A · Element outline
Labels preserve the recorded AND / OR / EXCEPTION / DEFENSE structure.
Claim structure
Expression key: & = AND; | = OR; ! = exclusion / negation. Parentheses preserve grouping.
21usc841:(a)(1)-prohibited-act
knowledge & (act.distribute | act.manufacture | act.dispense) & substance & !unauthorizedScoped to § 841(a)(1) manufacture/distribute/dispense routes. The separate possession-with-intent route is below; § 841(a)(2) counterfeit substance and § 841(c)–(h) offenses are intentionally unmodeled.
21usc841:(a)(1)-possession-with-intent
knowledge & possession & intent-to-distribute & substance & !unauthorizedPossession with intent to manufacture, distribute, or dispense a controlled substance under § 841(a)(1).
21usc841:(b)-aggravated-selected
((a)(1)-prohibited-act | (a)(1)-possession-with-intent) & (quantity | death-results | prior-conviction) & !quantity.marijuana-small-amount-no-remunerationSelected § 841(b)(1)(A)-(C) tiers only. Quantity is a partial drug-specific threshold table; remaining § 841(b) tiers and § 841(c)–(h) offenses are intentionally unmodeled. Applicable sentence-increasing facts must be submitted to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt, apart from prior-conviction treatment.
Constraints
Penalty enhancements in § 841(b) that increase the statutory maximum or mandatory minimum operate as elements of an aggravated offense, with the base § 841(a)(1) violation serving as a lesser included offense.
Law modes, protocols and effects
law
Law kind: substantive
Statute text with element anchors
Overlapping highlights link to the first element; the anchor key links every associated element. All offsets refer to unchanged source text.
§841. Prohibited acts A
(a) Unlawful acts Except as authorized by this subchapter, it shall be unlawful for any person knowingly or intentionally-
(1) to manufacture, distribute, or dispense, or possess with intent to manufacture, distribute, or dispense, a controlled substance; or
(2) to create, distribute, or dispense, or possess with intent to distribute or dispense, a counterfeit substance.
(b) Penalties Except as otherwise provided in section 849, 859, 860, or 861 of this title, any person who violates subsection (a) of this section shall be sentenced as follows: (1)(A) In the case of a violation of subsection (a) of this section involving-
(i) 1 kilogram or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of heroin;
(ii) 5 kilograms or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of-
(I) coca leaves, except coca leaves and extracts of coca leaves from which cocaine, ecgonine, and derivatives of ecgonine or their salts have been removed; (II) cocaine, its salts, optical and geometric isomers, and salts of isomers; (III) ecgonine, its derivatives, their salts, isomers, and salts of isomers; or (IV) any compound, mixture, or preparation which contains any quantity of any of the substances referred to in subclauses (I) through (III);
(iii) 280 grams or more of a mixture or substance described in clause (ii) which contains cocaine base;
(iv) 100 grams or more of phencyclidine (PCP) or 1 kilogram or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of phencyclidine (PCP);
(v) 10 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD);
(vi) 400 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of N-phenyl-N- [ 1- ( 2-phenylethyl ) -4-piperidinyl ] propanamide or 100 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of any analogue of N-phenyl-N-[1-(2-phenylethyl)-4-piperidinyl] propanamide or a fentanyl-related substance;
(vii) 1000 kilograms or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of marihuana, or 1,000 or more marihuana plants regardless of weight; or
(viii) 50 grams or more of methamphetamine, its salts, isomers, and salts of its isomers or 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine, its salts, isomers, or salts of its isomers; such person shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment which may not be less than 10 years or more than life and if death or serious bodily injury results from the use of such substance shall be not less than 20 years or more than life, a fine not to exceed the greater of that authorized in accordance with the provisions of title 18 or $10,000,000 if the defendant is an individual or $50,000,000 if the defendant is other than an individual, or both. If any person commits such a violation after a prior conviction for a serious drug felony or serious violent felony has become final, such person shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not less than 15 years and not more than life imprisonment and if death or serious bodily injury results from the use of such substance shall be sentenced to life imprisonment, a fine not to exceed the greater of twice that authorized in accordance with the provisions of title 18 or $20,000,000 if the defendant is an individual or $75,000,000 if the defendant is other than an individual, or both. If any person commits a violation of this subparagraph or of section 849, 859, 860, or 861 of this title after 2 or more prior convictions for a serious drug felony or serious violent felony have become final, such person shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not less than 25 years and fined in accordance with the preceding sentence. Notwithstanding section 3583 of title 18, any sentence under this subparagraph shall, in the absence of such a prior conviction, impose a term of supervised release of at least 5 years in addition to such term of imprisonment and shall, if there was such a prior conviction, impose a term of supervised release of at least 10 years in addition to such term of imprisonment. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the court shall not place on probation or suspend the sentence of any person sentenced under this subparagraph. No person sentenced under this subparagraph shall be eligible for parole during the term of imprisonment imposed therein.
(B) In the case of a violation of subsection (a) of this section involving-
(i) 100 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of heroin;
(ii) 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of-
(I) coca leaves, except coca leaves and extracts of coca leaves from which cocaine, ecgonine, and derivatives of ecgonine or their salts have been removed; (II) cocaine, its salts, optical and geometric isomers, and salts of isomers; (III) ecgonine, its derivatives, their salts, isomers, and salts of isomers; or (IV) any compound, mixture, or preparation which contains any quantity of any of the substances referred to in subclauses (I) through (III);
(iii) 28 grams or more of a mixture or substance described in clause (ii) which contains cocaine base;
(iv) 10 grams or more of phencyclidine (PCP) or 100 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of phencyclidine (PCP);
(v) 1 gram or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD);
(vi) 40 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of N-phenyl-N- [ 1- ( 2-phenylethyl ) -4-piperidinyl ] propanamide or 10 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of any analogue of N-phenyl-N-[1-(2-phenylethyl)-4-piperidinyl] propanamide or a fentanyl-related substance;
(vii) 100 kilograms or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of marihuana, or 100 or more marihuana plants regardless of weight; or
(viii) 5 grams or more of methamphetamine, its salts, isomers, and salts of its isomers or 50 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine, its salts, isomers, or salts of its isomers; such person shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment which may not be less than 5 years and not more than 40 years and if death or serious bodily injury results from the use of such substance shall be not less than 20 years or more than life, a fine not to exceed the greater of that authorized in accordance with the provisions of title 18 or $5,000,000 if the defendant is an individual or $25,000,000 if the defendant is other than an individual, or both. If any person commits such a violation after a prior conviction for a serious drug felony or serious violent felony has become final, such person shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment which may not be less than 10 years and not more than life imprisonment and if death or serious bodily injury results from the use of such substance shall be sentenced to life imprisonment, a fine not to exceed the greater of twice that authorized in accordance with the provisions of title 18 or $8,000,000 if the defendant is an individual or $50,000,000 if the defendant is other than an individual, or both. Notwithstanding section 3583 of title 18, any sentence imposed under this subparagraph shall, in the absence of such a prior conviction, include a term of supervised release of at least 4 years in addition to such term of imprisonment and shall, if there was such a prior conviction, include a term of supervised release of at least 8 years in addition to such term of imprisonment. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the court shall not place on probation or suspend the sentence of any person sentenced under this subparagraph. No person sentenced under this subparagraph shall be eligible for parole during the term of imprisonment imposed therein.
(C) In the case of a controlled substance in schedule I or II, gamma hydroxybutyric acid (including when scheduled as an approved drug product for purposes of section 3(a)(1)(B) of the Hillory J. Farias and Samantha Reid Date-Rape Drug Prohibition Act of 2000), or 1 gram of flunitrazepam, except as provided in subparagraphs (A), (B), and (D), such person shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not more than 20 years and if death or serious bodily injury results from the use of such substance shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not less than twenty years or more than life, a fine not to exceed the greater of that authorized in accordance with the provisions of title 18 or $1,000,000 if the defendant is an individual or $5,000,000 if the defendant is other than an individual, or both. If any person commits such a violation after a prior conviction for a felony drug offense has become final, such person shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not more than 30 years and if death or serious bodily injury results from the use of such substance shall be sentenced to life imprisonment, a fine not to exceed the greater of twice that authorized in accordance with the provisions of title 18 or $2,000,000 if the defendant is an individual or $10,000,000 if the defendant is other than an individual, or both. Notwithstanding section 3583 of title 18, any sentence imposing a term of imprisonment under this paragraph shall, in the absence of such a prior conviction, impose a term of supervised release of at least 3 years in addition to such term of imprisonment and shall, if there was such a prior conviction, impose a term of supervised release of at least 6 years in addition to such term of imprisonment. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the court shall not place on probation or suspend the sentence of any person sentenced under the provisions of this subparagraph which provide for a mandatory term of imprisonment if death or serious bodily injury results, nor shall a person so sentenced be eligible for parole during the term of such a sentence.
(D) In the case of less than 50 kilograms of marihuana, except in the case of 50 or more marihuana plants regardless of weight, 10 kilograms of hashish, or one kilogram of hashish oil, such person shall, except as provided in paragraphs (4) and (5) of this subsection, be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not more than 5 years, a fine not to exceed the greater of that authorized in accordance with the provisions of title 18 or $250,000 if the defendant is an individual or $1,000,000 if the defendant is other than an individual, or both. If any person commits such a violation after a prior conviction for a felony drug offense has become final, such person shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not more than 10 years, a fine not to exceed the greater of twice that authorized in accordance with the provisions of title 18 or $500,000 if the defendant is an individual or $2,000,000 if the defendant is other than an individual, or both. Notwithstanding section 3583 of title 18, any sentence imposing a term of imprisonment under this paragraph shall, in the absence of such a prior conviction, impose a term of supervised release of at least 2 years in addition to such term of imprisonment and shall, if there was such a prior conviction, impose a term of supervised release of at least 4 years in addition to such term of imprisonment. (E)(i) Except as provided in subparagraphs (C) and (D), in the case of any controlled substance in schedule III, such person shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not more than 10 years and if death or serious bodily injury results from the use of such substance shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not more than 15 years, a fine not to exceed the greater of that authorized in accordance with the provisions of title 18 or $500,000 if the defendant is an individual or $2,500,000 if the defendant is other than an individual, or both.
(ii) If any person commits such a violation after a prior conviction for a felony drug offense has become final, such person shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not more than 20 years and if death or serious bodily injury results from the use of such substance shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not more than 30 years, a fine not to exceed the greater of twice that authorized in accordance with the provisions of title 18 or $1,000,000 if the defendant is an individual or $5,000,000 if the defendant is other than an individual, or both.
(iii) Any sentence imposing a term of imprisonment under this subparagraph shall, in the absence of such a prior conviction, impose a term of supervised release of at least 2 years in addition to such term of imprisonment and shall, if there was such a prior conviction, impose a term of supervised release of at least 4 years in addition to such term of imprisonment.
(2) In the case of a controlled substance in schedule IV, such person shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not more than 5 years, a fine not to exceed the greater of that authorized in accordance with the provisions of title 18 or $250,000 if the defendant is an individual or $1,000,000 if the defendant is other than an individual, or both. If any person commits such a violation after a prior conviction for a felony drug offense has become final, such person shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not more than 10 years, a fine not to exceed the greater of twice that authorized in accordance with the provisions of title 18 or $500,000 if the defendant is an individual or $2,000,000 if the defendant is other than an individual, or both. Any sentence imposing a term of imprisonment under this paragraph shall, in the absence of such a prior conviction, impose a term of supervised release of at least one year in addition to such term of imprisonment and shall, if there was such a prior conviction, impose a term of supervised release of at least 2 years in addition to such term of imprisonment.
(3) In the case of a controlled substance in schedule V, such person shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not more than one year, a fine not to exceed the greater of that authorized in accordance with the provisions of title 18 or $100,000 if the defendant is an individual or $250,000 if the defendant is other than an individual, or both. If any person commits such a violation after a prior conviction for a felony drug offense has become final, such person shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not more than 4 years, a fine not to exceed the greater of twice that authorized in accordance with the provisions of title 18 or $200,000 if the defendant is an individual or $500,000 if the defendant is other than an individual, or both. Any sentence imposing a term of imprisonment under this paragraph may, if there was a prior conviction, impose a term of supervised release of not more than 1 year, in addition to such term of imprisonment.
(4) Notwithstanding paragraph (1)(D) of this subsection, any person who violates subsection (a) of this section by distributing a small amount of marihuana for no remuneration shall be treated as provided in section 844 of this title and section 3607 of title 18.
(5) Any person who violates subsection (a) of this section by cultivating or manufacturing a controlled substance on Federal property shall be imprisoned as provided in this subsection and shall be fined any amount not to exceed-
(A) the amount authorized in accordance with this section;
(B) the amount authorized in accordance with the provisions of title 18;
(C) $500,000 if the defendant is an individual; or
(D) $1,000,000 if the defendant is other than an individual; or both.
(6) Any person who violates subsection (a), or attempts to do so, and knowingly or intentionally uses a poison, chemical, or other hazardous substance on Federal land, and, by such use-
(A) creates a serious hazard to humans, wildlife, or domestic animals,
(B) degrades or harms the environment or natural resources, or
(C) pollutes an aquifer, spring, stream, river, or body of water, shall be fined in accordance with title 18 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
(7) Penalties for distribution.-
(A) In general.-Whoever, with intent to commit a crime of violence, as defined in section 16 of title 18 (including rape), against an individual, violates subsection (a) by distributing a controlled substance or controlled substance analogue to that individual without that individual's knowledge, shall be imprisoned not more than 20 years and fined in accordance with title 18.
(B) Definition.-For purposes of this paragraph, the term "without that individual's knowledge" means that the individual is unaware that a substance with the ability to alter that individual's ability to appraise conduct or to decline participation in or communicate unwillingness to participate in conduct is administered to the individual.
(c) Offenses involving listed chemicals Any person who knowingly or intentionally-
(1) possesses a listed chemical with intent to manufacture a controlled substance except as authorized by this subchapter;
(2) possesses or distributes a listed chemical knowing, or having reasonable cause to believe, that the listed chemical will be used to manufacture a controlled substance except as authorized by this subchapter; or
(3) with the intent of causing the evasion of the recordkeeping or reporting requirements of section 830 of this title, or the regulations issued under that section, receives or distributes a reportable amount of any listed chemical in units small enough so that the making of records or filing of reports under that section is not required; shall be fined in accordance with title 18 or imprisoned not more than 20 years in the case of a violation of paragraph (1) or (2) involving a list I chemical or not more than 10 years in the case of a violation of this subsection other than a violation of paragraph (1) or (2) involving a list I chemical, or both.
(d) Boobytraps on Federal property; penalties; "boobytrap" defined
(1) Any person who assembles, maintains, places, or causes to be placed a boobytrap on Federal property where a controlled substance is being manufactured, distributed, or dispensed shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment for not more than 10 years or fined under title 18, or both.
(2) If any person commits such a violation after 1 or more prior convictions for an offense punishable under this subsection, such person shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not more than 20 years or fined under title 18, or both.
(3) For the purposes of this subsection, the term "boobytrap" means any concealed or camouflaged device designed to cause bodily injury when triggered by any action of any unsuspecting person making contact with the device. Such term includes guns, ammunition, or explosive devices attached to trip wires or other triggering mechanisms, sharpened stakes, and lines or wires with hooks attached.
(e) Ten-year injunction as additional penalty In addition to any other applicable penalty, any person convicted of a felony violation of this section relating to the receipt, distribution, manufacture, exportation, or importation of a listed chemical may be enjoined from engaging in any transaction involving a listed chemical for not more than ten years.
(f) Wrongful distribution or possession of listed chemicals
(1) Whoever knowingly distributes a listed chemical in violation of this subchapter (other than in violation of a recordkeeping or reporting requirement of section 830 of this title) shall, except to the extent that paragraph (12), (13), or (14) of section 842(a) of this title applies, be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.
(2) Whoever possesses any listed chemical, with knowledge that the recordkeeping or reporting requirements of section 830 of this title have not been adhered to, if, after such knowledge is acquired, such person does not take immediate steps to remedy the violation shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
(g) Internet sales of date rape drugs
(1) Whoever knowingly uses the Internet to distribute a date rape drug to any person, knowing or with reasonable cause to believe that-
(A) the drug would be used in the commission of criminal sexual conduct; or
(B) the person is not an authorized purchaser; shall be fined under this subchapter or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
(2) As used in this subsection:
(A) The term "date rape drug" means-
(i) gamma hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) or any controlled substance analogue of GHB, including gamma butyrolactone (GBL) or 1,4–butanediol;
(ii) ketamine;
(iii) flunitrazepam; or
(iv) any substance which the Attorney General designates, pursuant to the rulemaking procedures prescribed by section 553 of title 5, to be used in committing rape or sexual assault. The Attorney General is authorized to remove any substance from the list of date rape drugs pursuant to the same rulemaking authority.
(B) The term "authorized purchaser" means any of the following persons, provided such person has acquired the controlled substance in accordance with this chapter:
(i) A person with a valid prescription that is issued for a legitimate medical purpose in the usual course of professional practice that is based upon a qualifying medical relationship by a practitioner registered by the Attorney General. A "qualifying medical relationship" means a medical relationship that exists when the practitioner has conducted at least 1 medical evaluation with the authorized purchaser in the physical presence of the practitioner, without regard to whether portions of the evaluation are conducted by other heath 1 professionals. The preceding sentence shall not be construed to imply that 1 medical evaluation demonstrates that a prescription has been issued for a legitimate medical purpose within the usual course of professional practice.
(ii) Any practitioner or other registrant who is otherwise authorized by their registration to dispense, procure, purchase, manufacture, transfer, distribute, import, or export the substance under this chapter.
(iii) A person or entity providing documentation that establishes the name, address, and business of the person or entity and which provides a legitimate purpose for using any "date rape drug" for which a prescription is not required.
(3) The Attorney General is authorized to promulgate regulations for record-keeping and reporting by persons handling 1,4–butanediol in order to implement and enforce the provisions of this section. Any record or report required by such regulations shall be considered a record or report required under this chapter.
(h) Offenses involving dispensing of controlled substances by means of the Internet
(1) In general It shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly or intentionally-
(A) deliver, distribute, or dispense a controlled substance by means of the Internet, except as authorized by this subchapter; or
(B) aid or abet (as such terms are used in section 2 of title 18) any activity described in subparagraph (A) that is not authorized by this subchapter.
(2) Examples Examples of activities that violate paragraph (1) include, but are not limited to, knowingly or intentionally-
(A) delivering, distributing, or dispensing a controlled substance by means of the Internet by an online pharmacy that is not validly registered with a modification authorizing such activity as required by section 823(g) of this title (unless exempt from such registration);
(B) writing a prescription for a controlled substance for the purpose of delivery, distribution, or dispensation by means of the Internet in violation of section 829(e) of this title;
(C) serving as an agent, intermediary, or other entity that causes the Internet to be used to bring together a buyer and seller to engage in the dispensing of a controlled substance in a manner not authorized by sections 2 823(g) or 829(e) of this title;
(D) offering to fill a prescription for a controlled substance based solely on a consumer's completion of an online medical questionnaire; and
(E) making a material false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation in a notification or declaration under subsection (d) or (e), respectively, of section 831 of this title.
(3) Inapplicability
(A) This subsection does not apply to-
(i) the delivery, distribution, or dispensation of controlled substances by nonpractitioners to the extent authorized by their registration under this subchapter;
(ii) the placement on the Internet of material that merely advocates the use of a controlled substance or includes pricing information without attempting to propose or facilitate an actual transaction involving a controlled substance; or
(iii) except as provided in subparagraph (B), any activity that is limited to-
(I) the provision of a telecommunications service, or of an Internet access service or Internet information location tool (as those terms are defined in section 231 of title 47); or (II) the transmission, storage, retrieval, hosting, formatting, or translation (or any combination thereof) of a communication, without selection or alteration of the content of the communication, except that deletion of a particular communication or material made by another person in a manner consistent with section 230(c) of title 47 shall not constitute such selection or alteration of the content of the communication.
(B) The exceptions under subclauses (I) and (II) of subparagraph (A)(iii) shall not apply to a person acting in concert with a person who violates paragraph (1).
(4) Knowing or intentional violation Any person who knowingly or intentionally violates this subsection shall be sentenced in accordance with subsection (b). ( Pub. L. 91–513, title II, §401, Oct. 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 1260 ; Pub. L. 95–633, title II, §201, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3774 ; Pub. L. 96–359, §8(c), Sept. 26, 1980, 94 Stat. 1194 ; Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §§224(a), 502, 503(b)(1), (2), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2030 , 2068, 2070; Pub. L. 99–570, title I, §§1002, 1003(a), 1004(a), 1005(a), 1103, title XV, §15005, Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3207–2 , 3207-5, 3207-6, 3207-11, 3207-192; Pub. L. 100–690, title VI, §§6055, 6254(h), 6452(a), 6470(g), (h), 6479, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4318 , 4367, 4371, 4378, 4381; Pub. L. 101–647, title X, §1002(e), title XII, §1202, title XXXV, §3599K, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4828 , 4830, 4932; Pub. L. 103–322, title IX, §90105(a), (c), title XVIII, §180201(b)(2)(A), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1987 , 1988, 2047; Pub. L. 104–237, title II, §206(a), title III, §302(a), Oct. 3, 1996, 110 Stat. 3103 , 3105; Pub. L. 104–305, §2(a), (b)(1), Oct. 13, 1996, 110 Stat. 3807 ; Pub. L. 105–277, div. E, §2(a), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–759 ; Pub. L. 106–172, §§3(b)(1), 5(b), 9, Feb. 18, 2000, 114 Stat. 9 , 10, 13; Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title III, §3005(a), title IV, §4002(d)(2)(A), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1805 , 1809; Pub. L. 109–177, title VII, §§711(f)(1)(B), 732, Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 262 , 270; Pub. L. 109–248, title II, §201, July 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 611 ; Pub. L. 110–425, §3(e), (f), Oct. 15, 2008, 122 Stat. 4828 , 4829; Pub. L. 111–220, §§2(a), 4(a), Aug. 3, 2010, 124 Stat. 2372 ; Pub. L. 115–391, title IV, §401(a)(2), Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5220 ; Pub. L. 117–215, title I, §103(b)(1)(G), Dec. 2, 2022, 136 Stat. 2263 ; Pub. L. 119–26, §6(a), July 16, 2025, 139 Stat. 417 .)All element anchor links
- Authorization exception ("Except as authorized by this subchapter") for registered practitioners/handlers — offsets [42:82]
- Mens rea: "knowingly or intentionally" (including knowledge that the substance is a controlled substance) — offsets [83:146]
- Affirmative defense of entrapment (government inducement + lack of predisposition) — offsets [83:146]
- Prohibited act under § 841(a)(1): manufacture, distribute, or dispense — offsets [151:190]
- Dispensing by a practitioner outside the usual course of professional practice (Ruan v. United States) — offsets [151:190]
- Distribution (delivery / actual, constructive, or attempted transfer of a controlled substance) — offsets [151:190]
- Manufacture (production, preparation, propagation, compounding, or processing of a controlled substance) — offsets [151:190]
- Categorical / modified categorical comparison of state drug offense to 21 U.S.C. § 841 (INA / ACCA / Guidelines) — offsets [151:282]
- Continuing-offense venue for § 841(a)(1) possession with intent to distribute / distribution (18 U.S.C. § 3237(a)) — offsets [151:282]
- Possession (actual, constructive, sole, or joint dominion and control) — offsets [192:254]
- Specific intent to manufacture, distribute, or dispense the possessed controlled substance — offsets [203:254]
- Controlled substance (21 U.S.C. §§ 802(6), 812 Schedules I-V) or counterfeit substance (§ 841(a)(2)) — offsets [256:282]
- Controlled substance (21 U.S.C. §§ 802(6), 812 Schedules I-V) or counterfeit substance (§ 841(a)(2)) — offsets [373:397]
- Cross-statute route alias: see separate aiding-abetting (§ 2) and x-conspiracy-846 (§ 846) routes — offsets [489:543]
- Aiding and abetting route under 18 U.S.C. § 2 (cross-statute) — offsets [489:543]
- Drug conspiracy route under 21 U.S.C. § 846 (cross-statute) — offsets [489:543]
- Rule of lenity in construing ambiguous penalty provisions of § 841(b) — offsets [489:574]
- Partial penalty-tier drug type and quantity table (selected § 841(b)(1)(A)-(D) hook) — offsets [658:744]
- Death or serious bodily injury results from the use of such substance (§ 841(b)(1)(A)-(C) 20-year mandatory minimum) — offsets [2494:2566]
- Recidivist enhancement for prior conviction for a serious drug felony or serious violent felony (§ 841(b)(1), 21 U.S.C. § 851) — offsets [2874:2967]
- Fifth Amendment Due Process / Equal Protection challenge to carrier-medium weight sentencing (Chapman) — offsets [5386:5494]
- Fifth Amendment void-for-vagueness challenge to "mixture or substance" or analogue provisions — offsets [5386:5494]
- Misdemeanor treatment for distributing a small amount of marijuana for no remuneration (§ 841(b)(4)) — offsets [14995:15254]
Element outline
- AND Mens rea: "knowingly or intentionally" (including knowledge that the substance is a controlled substance)
Under McFadden v. United States (576 U.S. 186 (2015)), the government must prove the defendant knew he was dealing with "a controlled substance" (either by knowing the substance is listed on the federal schedules, or by knowing the physical identity/chemical makeup of the substance even if unaware it is scheduled).
8 merits instance blocks; 7 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) Unclassified route
provisional; 14 observed casesno definition yet 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 140 Used only in non-merits blocks (14).
Excluded context examples:United States v. Person — 427 F. Supp. 2d 894 (2006) · United States District Court for the District of Minnesota · 2006 — not reached · basis not recorded (21usc841: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · background/merits · not counted
Pattern: not recordedUnited States v. Tiangco — 225 F. Supp. 3d 274 (2016) · United States District Court for the District of New Jersey · 2016 — not reached · basis not recorded (21usc841: author: Fable · historical QA: FIX (QA2, neov2/qa/cases-QA2.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · not counted
Pattern: not recordedUnited States v. Quintanar — 150 F.3d 902 (1998) · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998 — not reached · basis not recorded (21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · not counted
Pattern: not recordedadmission
provisional; provisional (1 case)Whether the defendant's own statement proves knowledge. 1
Satisfied 1; not satisfied 0; excluded context 01 United States v. Prieto-Tejas — 779 F.2d 1098 (1986) · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986 — satisfied · conceded (21usc841: author: Fable · QA: PASS (QA1, neov2/qa/cases-v1-QA1.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: admitted/defendant-admits-knowing-possessioncircumstantial
provisional; 6 observed casesWhether knowledge of the drugs is inferred from the defendant's role and conduct. 7
Satisfied 7; not satisfied 0; excluded context 06 United States v. Vera — 701 F.2d 1349 (1983) · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983 — satisfied · proved (21usc841: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: loader-of-sealed-boxes-coordinated-with-deliveryUnited States v. Vera — 701 F.2d 1349 (1983) · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983 — satisfied · proved (21usc841: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: owner-of-stash-premises-who-loaded-and-droveUnited States v. Griffin — 150 F.3d 778 (1998) · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998 — satisfied · proved (21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: nervousness-contradictory-statements-and-high-valueUnited States v. Lazcano-Villalobos — 175 F.3d 838 (1999) · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999 — satisfied · proved (21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: masking-odor-border-crossings-nervousness - AND Controlled substance (21 U.S.C. §§ 802(6), 812 Schedules I-V) or counterfeit substance (§ 841(a)(2))
Includes controlled substance analogues treated as Schedule I under 21 U.S.C. § 813 when intended for human consumption (McFadden v. United States, 576 U.S. 186 (2015)).
6 merits instance blocks; 5 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) Unclassified route
provisional; 8 observed casesno definition yet 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 80 Used only in non-merits blocks (8).
Excluded context examples:United States v. Person — 427 F. Supp. 2d 894 (2006) · United States District Court for the District of Minnesota · 2006 — not reached · basis not recorded (21usc841: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · background/merits · not counted
Pattern: not recordedUnited States v. Tiangco — 225 F. Supp. 3d 274 (2016) · United States District Court for the District of New Jersey · 2016 — not reached · basis not recorded (21usc841: author: Fable · historical QA: FIX (QA2, neov2/qa/cases-QA2.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · not counted
Pattern: not recordedUnited States v. Vera — 701 F.2d 1349 (1983) · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983 — not reached · basis not recorded (21usc841: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · not counted
Pattern: not recorded_whole
accepted; 4 observed casesThe element is decided as a whole: the reasoning turns on no narrower doctrinal sub-question that distinguishes it from any other application of this element. 5
Satisfied 5; not satisfied 0; excluded context 04 United States v. Griffin — 150 F.3d 778 (1998) · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998 — satisfied · conceded (21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: cocaine-identity-undisputedUnited States v. Jenkins — 175 F.3d 1208 (1999) · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999 — satisfied · conceded (21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: crack-cocaine-identity-undisputedUnited States v. Jenkins — 175 F.3d 1208 (1999) · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999 — satisfied · conceded (21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: marijuana-identity-undisputedUnited States v. Strayhorn — 250 F.3d 462 (2001) · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001 — satisfied · conceded (21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: marijuana-seized-and-admitted-by-pleaidentity-proof
provisional; 3 observed casesHow the identity of the substance is proved. 1
Satisfied 1; not satisfied 0; excluded context 21 United States v. Hishaw — 235 F.3d 565 (2000) · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000 — satisfied · conceded (21usc841: author: Fable · historical QA: PASS (QA2, neov2/qa/cases-QA2.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · counted
Excluded context examples:
Pattern: identity/lab-test-plus-defendant-admissionUnited States v. Seals — 915 F.3d 1203 (2019) · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019 — satisfied · proved (21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/lower-court · not counted
Pattern: lab-identified-heroin-and-fentanylUnited States v. Rashun Suncar — 142 F.4th 259 (2025) · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025 — satisfied · conceded (21usc841: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · background/merits · not counted
Pattern: identity/counterfeit-pills-containing-fentanylscheduling
provisional; provisional (1 case)Whether the substance is a scheduled controlled substance. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 10 Used only in non-merits blocks (1).
Excluded context examples:Moncrieffe v. Holder — 569 U.S. 184 (2013) · Supreme Court of the United States · 2013 — satisfied · conceded (21usc841: author: Fable · historical QA: PASS (QA1, neov2/qa/cases-QA1.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · comparator/merits · not counted
Pattern: schedule-i/marijuana - EXCEPTION Authorization exception ("Except as authorized by this subchapter") for registered practitioners/handlers
Under 21 U.S.C. § 885(a)(1), the government need not negative any statutory exemption or exception in the indictment or until the defendant satisfies the burden of going forward with evidence of registration/authorization; once produced by a registrant, Ruan (597 U.S. 450 (2022)) requires the government to prove knowing/intentional lack of authorization beyond a reasonable doubt.
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
No routes recorded for this element.
- AND Possession (actual, constructive, sole, or joint dominion and control)
Constructive possession requires power and intention to exercise dominion and control over the contraband (directly or through others); mere proximity, association, or unconsummated inspection prior to payment does not suffice.
15 merits instance blocks; 11 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) Unclassified route
provisional; 4 observed casesno definition yet 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 40 Used only in non-merits blocks (4).
Excluded context examples:United States v. Person — 427 F. Supp. 2d 894 (2006) · United States District Court for the District of Minnesota · 2006 — not reached · basis not recorded (21usc841: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · background/merits · not counted
Pattern: not recordedUnited States v. Vincent — 20 F.3d 229 (1994) · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994 — not reached · basis not recorded (21usc841: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · not counted
Pattern: not recordedUnited States v. Teran-Salas — 767 F.3d 453 (2014) · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014 — not reached · basis not recorded (21usc841: author: Fable · historical QA: PASS (QA2, neov2/qa/cases-QA2.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · comparator/merits · not counted
Pattern: not recordedactual
provisional; 4 observed casesWhether the defendant physically held or carried the drugs. 4
Satisfied 3; not satisfied 1; excluded context 04 United States v. Vera — 701 F.2d 1349 (1983) · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983 — satisfied · proved (21usc841: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: physically-loaded-boxes-of-drugsUnited States v. Prieto-Tejas — 779 F.2d 1098 (1986) · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986 — satisfied · conceded (21usc841: author: Fable · QA: PASS (QA1, neov2/qa/cases-v1-QA1.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: admitted-ownership-of-drugs-hidden-in-own-carUnited States v. Hishaw — 235 F.3d 565 (2000) · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000 — satisfied · conceded (21usc841: author: Fable · historical QA: PASS (QA2, neov2/qa/cases-QA2.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: drugs-concealed-on-personconstructive
provisional; 12 observed casesWhether the defendant had dominion and control over drugs not on his person, or over the place or person holding them. 11
Satisfied 9; not satisfied 2; excluded context 210 United States v. Vera — 701 F.2d 1349 (1983) · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983 — satisfied · proved (21usc841: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: dominion-over-premises-or-vehicle-holding-drugsUnited States v. Prieto-Tejas — 779 F.2d 1098 (1986) · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986 — satisfied · proved (21usc841: author: Fable · QA: PASS (QA1, neov2/qa/cases-v1-QA1.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: driver-with-dominion-over-vehicle-holding-drugsUnited States v. Griffin — 150 F.3d 778 (1998) · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998 — satisfied · proved (21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Excluded context examples:
Pattern: sole-occupant-of-own-vehicle-holding-cargo-boxUnited States v. Tiangco — 225 F. Supp. 3d 274 (2016) · United States District Court for the District of New Jersey · 2016 — satisfied · proved (21usc841: author: Fable · historical QA: FIX (QA2, neov2/qa/cases-QA2.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · applied/procedural · not counted
Pattern: package-in-transit-with-common-carrierUnited States v. Mazzulla — 932 F.3d 1091 (2019) · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019 — satisfied · proved (21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/lower-court · not counted
Pattern: residence-camper-and-vehicle-storage - AND Specific intent to manufacture, distribute, or dispense the possessed controlled substance
Routinely inferred from distribution-level quantity, purity, street value, packaging materials, scales, ledgers, firearms, or absence of personal-use paraphernalia.
9 merits instance blocks; 8 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) Unclassified route
provisional; 6 observed casesno definition yet 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 60 Used only in non-merits blocks (6).
Excluded context examples:United States v. Person — 427 F. Supp. 2d 894 (2006) · United States District Court for the District of Minnesota · 2006 — not reached · basis not recorded (21usc841: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · background/merits · not counted
Pattern: not recordedUnited States v. Vera — 701 F.2d 1349 (1983) · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983 — not reached · basis not recorded (21usc841: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · rule-announced/merits · not counted
Pattern: not recordedUnited States v. Quintanar — 150 F.3d 902 (1998) · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998 — not reached · basis not recorded (21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · not counted
Pattern: not recorded_comparator
accepted; provisional (1 case)The element is used as a yardstick for another statute or question, not applied to this case's own conduct. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 10 Used only in non-merits blocks (1).
Excluded context examples:Moncrieffe v. Holder — 569 U.S. 184 (2013) · Supreme Court of the United States · 2013 — satisfied · law (21usc841: author: Fable · historical QA: PASS (QA1, neov2/qa/cases-QA1.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · comparator/merits · not counted
Pattern: categorical-match/state-possession-with-intent-offenseinferred-from-quantity-and-circumstances
provisional; 10 observed casesWhether intent to distribute is inferred from quantity, purity, paraphernalia, cash, prior sales or testimony. 9
Satisfied 9; not satisfied 0; excluded context 28 United States v. Prieto-Tejas — 779 F.2d 1098 (1986) · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986 — satisfied · proved (21usc841: author: Fable · QA: PASS (QA1, neov2/qa/cases-v1-QA1.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: inferred/quantity-purity-scale-and-unaffordable-claimed-habitUnited States v. Griffin — 150 F.3d 778 (1998) · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998 — satisfied · proved (21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: ten-compressed-packages-scale-and-loaded-pistolUnited States v. Lazcano-Villalobos — 175 F.3d 838 (1999) · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999 — satisfied · proved (21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Excluded context examples:
Pattern: ten-bundles-92-percent-pure-cocaine-and-courier-fee-cashUnited States v. Tiangco — 225 F. Supp. 3d 274 (2016) · United States District Court for the District of New Jersey · 2016 — satisfied · proved (21usc841: author: Fable · historical QA: FIX (QA2, neov2/qa/cases-QA2.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · applied/hypothetical · not counted
Pattern: inferred/quantity-inconsistent-with-personal-use-plus-supplier-testimonyUnited States v. Solis — 915 F.3d 1172 (2019) · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019 — satisfied · proved (21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/lower-court · not counted
Pattern: two-and-half-kilograms-methamphetamine-in-car-seats - OR Partial penalty-tier drug type and quantity table (selected § 841(b)(1)(A)-(D) hook)
PARTIAL_THRESHOLD_TABLE: this entry anchors the § 841(b)(1) drug-specific threshold matrix without pretending that one heroin threshold quote enumerates every listed substance and tier. Under Chapman v. United States (500 U.S. 453 (1991)), "mixture or substance" includes the carrier medium in which the drug is marketed/consumed, but not unusable waste water or packaging containers that must be separated before use.
6 merits instance blocks; 5 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) Unclassified route
provisional; 4 observed casesno definition yet 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 40 Used only in non-merits blocks (4).
Excluded context examples:United States v. Person — 427 F. Supp. 2d 894 (2006) · United States District Court for the District of Minnesota · 2006 — not reached · basis not recorded (21usc841: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · background/merits · not counted
Pattern: not recordedUnited States v. Prieto-Tejas — 779 F.2d 1098 (1986) · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986 — not reached · basis not recorded (21usc841: author: Fable · QA: PASS (QA1, neov2/qa/cases-v1-QA1.md)) · applied/merits · not counted
Pattern: not recordedUnited States v. Rashun Suncar — 142 F.4th 259 (2025) · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025 — not reached · basis not recorded (21usc841: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · comparator/merits · not counted
Pattern: not recorded_whole
accepted; provisional (1 case)The element is decided as a whole: the reasoning turns on no narrower doctrinal sub-question that distinguishes it from any other application of this element. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 10 Used only in non-merits blocks (1).
Excluded context examples:United States v. Orozco — 700 F.3d 1176 (2012) · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012 — not reached · basis not recorded (21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · rule-announced/merits · not counted
Pattern: cocaine-base-55-grams-between-old-50g-and-new-280g-thresholdjury-finding-of-threshold
provisional; 4 observed casesWhether the penalty-triggering quantity was found by the jury beyond reasonable doubt, and the consequence when it was not (Apprendi, Alleyne). 5
Satisfied 2; not satisfied 3; excluded context 14 United States v. Tiangco — 225 F. Supp. 3d 274 (2016) · United States District Court for the District of New Jersey · 2016 — satisfied · proved (21usc841: author: Fable · historical QA: FIX (QA2, neov2/qa/cases-QA2.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: threshold-found-by-jury/special-interrogatoryUnited States v. Nordby — 225 F.3d 1053 (2000) · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000 — not · law (21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: judge-found-1000-plants-by-preponderance-jury-told-quantity-irrelevantUnited States v. Hishaw — 235 F.3d 565 (2000) · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000 — not · no-evidence (21usc841: author: Fable · historical QA: PASS (QA2, neov2/qa/cases-QA2.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: threshold-not-found-by-jury/lab-weight-below-charged-tierUnited States v. Hishaw — 235 F.3d 565 (2000) · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000 — satisfied · conceded (21usc841: author: Fable · historical QA: PASS (QA2, neov2/qa/cases-QA2.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · counted
Excluded context examples:
Pattern: lower-tier-supported/sentence-within-proved-quantity-maximumUnited States v. Tiangco — 225 F. Supp. 3d 274 (2016) · United States District Court for the District of New Jersey · 2016 — satisfied · proved (21usc841: author: Fable · historical QA: FIX (QA2, neov2/qa/cases-QA2.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · background/merits · not counted
Pattern: threshold-found-by-jury/special-interrogatorymixture-or-substance
provisional; 2 observed casesWhat is weighed as a "mixture or substance containing a detectable amount". 1
Satisfied 1; not satisfied 0; excluded context 11 Chapman v. United States — 500 U.S. 453 (1991) · Supreme Court of the United States · 1991 — satisfied · law (21usc841: author: Fable · historical QA: PASS (QA2, neov2/qa/cases-QA2.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · counted
Excluded context examples:
Pattern: carrier-medium-weight-includedUnited States v. Vincent — 20 F.3d 229 (1994) · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994 — satisfied · law (21usc841: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · comparator/merits · not counted
Pattern: usable-plant-parts-with-detectable-drug-included- EXCEPTION Misdemeanor treatment for distributing a small amount of marijuana for no remuneration (§ 841(b)(4))
Under Moncrieffe v. Holder (569 U.S. 184 (2013)), because § 841(b)(4) punishes social sharing of a small amount of marijuana for no remuneration as a misdemeanor under 21 U.S.C. § 844, a state marijuana distribution statute that reaches such conduct is not categorically an "aggravated felony" under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) _comparator
accepted; provisional (1 case)The element is used as a yardstick for another statute or question, not applied to this case's own conduct. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 10 Used only in non-merits blocks (1).
Excluded context examples:Moncrieffe v. Holder — 569 U.S. 184 (2013) · Supreme Court of the United States · 2013 — satisfied · law (21usc841: author: Fable · historical QA: PASS (QA1, neov2/qa/cases-QA1.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · comparator/merits · not counted
Pattern: felony-vs-misdemeanor-tier/state-conviction-does-not-negate-b4-social-sharing
- EXCEPTION Misdemeanor treatment for distributing a small amount of marijuana for no remuneration (§ 841(b)(4))
- OR Death or serious bodily injury results from the use of such substance (§ 841(b)(1)(A)-(C) 20-year mandatory minimum)
Under Burrage v. United States (571 U.S. 204 (2014)), "results from" requires actual ("but-for") causation (at least where the distributed drug was not an independently sufficient cause of death), rejecting "contributing cause" instructions.
3 merits instance blocks; 3 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) but-for-causation
provisional; 2 observed casesWhether the drug distributed was a but-for cause of death rather than a contributing factor (Burrage). 2
Satisfied 1; not satisfied 1; excluded context 02 United States v. Seals — 915 F.3d 1203 (2019) · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019 — satisfied · proved (21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: immediate-collapse-after-injecting-sold-mixtureBurrage v. United States — 571 U.S. 204 (2014) · Supreme Court of the United States · 2014 — not · no-evidence (21usc841: author: Fable · QA: PASS (QA1, neov2/qa/cases-v1-QA1.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: contributing-cause-in-mixed-drug-overdoseforeseeability
provisional; provisional (1 case)Whether the death must have been reasonably foreseeable to the distributor. 1
Satisfied 1; not satisfied 0; excluded context 01 United States v. Soler — 275 F.3d 146 (2002) · United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002 — satisfied · law (21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: buyer-snorted-heroin-believing-it-cocaine - OR Recidivist enhancement for prior conviction for a serious drug felony or serious violent felony (§ 841(b)(1), 21 U.S.C. § 851)
Governed by the notice and information procedures of 21 U.S.C. § 851 (and exempted from Apprendi's jury requirement under Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998)).
3 merits instance blocks; 3 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) Unclassified route
provisional; provisional (1 case)no definition yet 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 10 Used only in non-merits blocks (1).
Excluded context examples:United States v. Rashun Suncar — 142 F.4th 259 (2025) · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025 — not reached · basis not recorded (21usc841: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · comparator/merits · not counted
Pattern: not recorded_whole
accepted; 3 observed casesThe element is decided as a whole: the reasoning turns on no narrower doctrinal sub-question that distinguishes it from any other application of this element. 3
Satisfied 2; not satisfied 1; excluded context 03 United States v. Strayhorn — 250 F.3d 462 (2001) · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001 — satisfied · conceded (21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: single-prior-felony-drug-convictionUnited States v. Soler — 275 F.3d 146 (2002) · United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002 — satisfied · conceded (21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: final-prior-drug-felonyUnited States v. Graves — 925 F.3d 1036 (2019) · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019 — not · law (21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: overbroad-state-statute-disqualifies-enhancement - OR Prohibited act under § 841(a)(1): manufacture, distribute, or dispense
Branches into `act.manufacture`, `act.distribute`, and `act.dispense` (or the possession-with-intent alternative via `possession` + `intent-to-distribute`).
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
No routes recorded for this element.
- OR Distribution (delivery / actual, constructive, or attempted transfer of a controlled substance)
Because 21 U.S.C. § 802(8),(11) defines "distribute" as "deliver" and "deliver" as "actual, constructive, or attempted transfer", a completed § 841(a)(1) distribution includes an attempted transfer (United States v. Suncar, 142 F.4th 259 (3d Cir. 2025)).
5 merits instance blocks; 5 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) Unclassified route
provisional; 2 observed casesno definition yet 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 20 Used only in non-merits blocks (2).
Excluded context examples:United States v. Rashun Suncar — 142 F.4th 259 (2025) · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025 — not reached · basis not recorded (21usc841: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · comparator/merits · not counted
Pattern: not recordedChapman v. United States — 500 U.S. 453 (1991) · Supreme Court of the United States · 1991 — not reached · basis not recorded (21usc841: author: Fable · historical QA: PASS (QA2, neov2/qa/cases-QA2.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · not counted
Pattern: not recordeddelivery-or-transfer
provisional; 2 observed casesWhether the defendant delivered or transferred the drug, actually or constructively, without regard to sale. 1
Satisfied 1; not satisfied 0; excluded context 11 United States v. Vera — 701 F.2d 1349 (1983) · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983 — satisfied · proved (21usc841: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · counted
Excluded context examples:
Pattern: delivery/staged-wholesale-delivery-to-undercover-agentUnited States v. Tiangco — 225 F. Supp. 3d 274 (2016) · United States District Court for the District of New Jersey · 2016 — satisfied · proved (21usc841: author: Fable · historical QA: FIX (QA2, neov2/qa/cases-QA2.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · applied/procedural · not counted
Pattern: delivery/shipment-by-commercial-courier-intercepted-before-addresseesale
provisional; 6 observed casesWhether the defendant sold the drug. 4
Satisfied 4; not satisfied 0; excluded context 24 United States v. Vincent — 20 F.3d 229 (1994) · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994 — satisfied · proved (21usc841: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: controlled-buy-by-informantUnited States v. Soler — 275 F.3d 146 (2002) · United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002 — satisfied · proved (21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: hand-to-hand-sale-of-stamped-bags-at-apartment-landingUnited States v. Daniels — 930 F.3d 393 (2019) · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019 — satisfied · proved (21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Excluded context examples:
Pattern: hand-to-hand-sale-captured-on-videoUnited States v. Seals — 915 F.3d 1203 (2019) · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019 — satisfied · proved (21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/lower-court · not counted
Pattern: forty-dollars-heroin-and-fentanyl-sold-to-userUnited States v. Rashun Suncar — 142 F.4th 259 (2025) · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025 — satisfied · conceded (21usc841: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · background/merits · not counted
Pattern: controlled-buy-by-informant - OR Manufacture (production, preparation, propagation, compounding, or processing of a controlled substance)
Includes cultivation/harvesting (21 U.S.C. § 802(22)) and chemical synthesis or conversion.
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) _whole
accepted; provisional (1 case)The element is decided as a whole: the reasoning turns on no narrower doctrinal sub-question that distinguishes it from any other application of this element. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 10 Used only in non-merits blocks (1).
Excluded context examples:United States v. Nordby — 225 F.3d 1053 (2000) · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000 — satisfied · proved (21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/lower-court · not counted
Pattern: outdoor-marijuana-gardens-on-defendants-parcels - OR Dispensing by a practitioner outside the usual course of professional practice (Ruan v. United States)
Under United States v. Moore (423 U.S. 122 (1975)) and Ruan v. United States (597 U.S. 450 (2022)), a registered physician or practitioner violates § 841(a)(1) by prescribing/dispensing outside the usual course of professional practice, and once the defendant meets the burden of producing evidence of authorization, the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant knowingly or intentionally acted in an unauthorized manner.
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) Unclassified route
provisional; provisional (1 case)no definition yet 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 10 Used only in non-merits blocks (1).
Excluded context examples:United States v. Teran-Salas — 767 F.3d 453 (2014) · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014 — not reached · basis not recorded (21usc841: author: Fable · historical QA: PASS (QA2, neov2/qa/cases-QA2.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · comparator/merits · not counted
Pattern: not recorded
- OR Distribution (delivery / actual, constructive, or attempted transfer of a controlled substance)
- OR Cross-statute route alias: see separate aiding-abetting (§ 2) and x-conspiracy-846 (§ 846) routes
Alias retained for existing CASE vocabulary only; it is not a § 841 element. Do not conflate separate § 2 aiding-and-abetting and § 846 conspiracy routes.
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) Unclassified route
provisional; 2 observed casesno definition yet 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 20 Used only in non-merits blocks (2).
Excluded context examples:United States v. Person — 427 F. Supp. 2d 894 (2006) · United States District Court for the District of Minnesota · 2006 — not reached · basis not recorded (21usc841: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · background/merits · not counted
Pattern: not recordedUnited States v. Tiangco — 225 F. Supp. 3d 274 (2016) · United States District Court for the District of New Jersey · 2016 — not reached · basis not recorded (21usc841: author: Fable · historical QA: FIX (QA2, neov2/qa/cases-QA2.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · not counted
Pattern: not recorded_whole
accepted; 2 observed casesThe element is decided as a whole: the reasoning turns on no narrower doctrinal sub-question that distinguishes it from any other application of this element. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 20 Used only in non-merits blocks (2).
Excluded context examples:United States v. Vera — 701 F.2d 1349 (1983) · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983 — satisfied · proved (21usc841: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · background/merits · not counted
Pattern: conspiracy-846/acts-furthering-delivery-as-proof-of-knowing-participationUnited States v. Prieto-Tejas — 779 F.2d 1098 (1986) · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986 — satisfied · proved (21usc841: author: Fable · QA: PASS (QA1, neov2/qa/cases-v1-QA1.md)) · background/merits · not counted
Pattern: conspiracy-846/tacit-agreement-inferred-from-joint-transport - OR Aiding and abetting route under 18 U.S.C. § 2 (cross-statute)
Cross-statute route only; § 2 supplies the aiding theory and § 841 supplies the substantive offense.
1 merits instance blocks; 1 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) _whole
accepted; provisional (1 case)The element is decided as a whole: the reasoning turns on no narrower doctrinal sub-question that distinguishes it from any other application of this element. 1
Satisfied 1; not satisfied 0; excluded context 01 United States v. Daniels — 930 F.3d 393 (2019) · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019 — satisfied · proved (21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: packaging-supplies-and-lookout-in-motel-room - OR Categorical / modified categorical comparison of state drug offense to 21 U.S.C. § 841 (INA / ACCA / Guidelines)
Frequently litigated when § 841 serves as the generic federal comparator in immigration (Moncrieffe), Armed Career Criminal Act, or Sentencing Guidelines (U.S.S.G. §§ 2L1.2, 4B1.2) cases.
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) _whole
accepted; 3 observed casesThe element is decided as a whole: the reasoning turns on no narrower doctrinal sub-question that distinguishes it from any other application of this element. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 40 Used only in non-merits blocks (4).
Excluded context examples:United States v. Teran-Salas — 767 F.3d 453 (2014) · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014 — satisfied · law (21usc841: author: Fable · historical QA: PASS (QA2, neov2/qa/cases-QA2.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · comparator/merits · not counted
Pattern: state-predicate-matches-federal-offence/overbreadth-only-theoretical-no-realistic-probabilityGuillen v. U.S. Attorney Gen. — 910 F.3d 1174 (2018) · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018 — satisfied · law (21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · comparator/merits · not counted
Pattern: divisible-state-drug-schedule-matches-federalUnited States v. Rashun Suncar — 142 F.4th 259 (2025) · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025 — satisfied · law (21usc841: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · comparator/merits · not counted
Pattern: state-predicate-matches-federal-offence/no-implied-offer-to-sellUnited States v. Rashun Suncar — 142 F.4th 259 (2025) · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025 — satisfied · law (21usc841: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · comparator/merits · not counted
Pattern: state-predicate-matches-federal-offence/attempted-transfer-is-completed-delivery - OR Drug conspiracy route under 21 U.S.C. § 846 (cross-statute)
Cross-statute route only; § 846 is distinct from aiding under § 2 and from substantive § 841(a)(1).
2 merits instance blocks; 2 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) _whole
accepted; 2 observed casesThe element is decided as a whole: the reasoning turns on no narrower doctrinal sub-question that distinguishes it from any other application of this element. 2
Satisfied 2; not satisfied 0; excluded context 02 United States v. Soler — 275 F.3d 146 (2002) · United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002 — satisfied · proved (21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: two-sellers-same-apartment-same-stamped-inventory-pooled-cashUnited States v. Daniels — 930 F.3d 393 (2019) · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019 — satisfied · proved (21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: helper-who-unloads-drugs-wraps-cash-and-sells-fronted-crack - DEFENSE Fifth Amendment Due Process / Equal Protection challenge to carrier-medium weight sentencing (Chapman)
Rejected in Chapman v. United States (500 U.S. 453 (1991)): Congress had a rational basis for tying penalty tiers to street weight of the mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of the drug.
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) _whole
accepted; provisional (1 case)The element is decided as a whole: the reasoning turns on no narrower doctrinal sub-question that distinguishes it from any other application of this element. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 10 Used only in non-merits blocks (1).
Excluded context examples:Chapman v. United States — 500 U.S. 453 (1991) · Supreme Court of the United States · 1991 — not · law (21usc841: author: Fable · historical QA: PASS (QA2, neov2/qa/cases-QA2.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · applied/procedural · not counted
Pattern: rational-basis/street-weight-penalty-scheme - DEFENSE Affirmative defense of entrapment (government inducement + lack of predisposition)
Requires showing government inducement of the crime plus absence of predisposition on the part of the defendant to engage in the criminal conduct (Mathews v. United States, 485 U.S. 58 (1988)).
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) Unclassified route
provisional; provisional (1 case)no definition yet 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 10 Used only in non-merits blocks (1).
Excluded context examples:United States v. Vincent — 20 F.3d 229 (1994) · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994 — not reached · basis not recorded (21usc841: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · applied/procedural · not counted
Pattern: not recorded - DEFENSE Rule of lenity in construing ambiguous penalty provisions of § 841(b)
Invoked when statutory text of § 841(b) is grievously ambiguous (declined in Chapman where "mixture or substance" was held unambiguous; reinforced in Burrage where "results from" was given its ordinary but-for meaning).
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) _whole
accepted; provisional (1 case)The element is decided as a whole: the reasoning turns on no narrower doctrinal sub-question that distinguishes it from any other application of this element. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 10 Used only in non-merits blocks (1).
Excluded context examples:Chapman v. United States — 500 U.S. 453 (1991) · Supreme Court of the United States · 1991 — not · law (21usc841: author: Fable · historical QA: PASS (QA2, neov2/qa/cases-QA2.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · applied/procedural · not counted
Pattern: no-grievous-ambiguity/plain-text-and-structure - DEFENSE Fifth Amendment void-for-vagueness challenge to "mixture or substance" or analogue provisions
Evaluated as applied to the facts of the case because § 841 implicates no First Amendment freedoms.
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) _whole
accepted; provisional (1 case)The element is decided as a whole: the reasoning turns on no narrower doctrinal sub-question that distinguishes it from any other application of this element. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 10 Used only in non-merits blocks (1).
Excluded context examples:Chapman v. United States — 500 U.S. 453 (1991) · Supreme Court of the United States · 1991 — not · law (21usc841: author: Fable · historical QA: PASS (QA2, neov2/qa/cases-QA2.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · applied/procedural · not counted
Pattern: as-applied/sentencing-term-not-vague - AND Continuing-offense venue for § 841(a)(1) possession with intent to distribute / distribution (18 U.S.C. § 3237(a))
Under 18 U.S.C. § 3237(a), possession with intent to distribute and distribution across multiple districts are continuing offenses prosecutable in any district in which the offense was begun, continued, or completed.
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) _whole
accepted; provisional (1 case)The element is decided as a whole: the reasoning turns on no narrower doctrinal sub-question that distinguishes it from any other application of this element. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 10 Used only in non-merits blocks (1).
Excluded context examples:United States v. Tiangco — 225 F. Supp. 3d 274 (2016) · United States District Court for the District of New Jersey · 2016 — satisfied · law (21usc841: author: Fable · historical QA: FIX (QA2, neov2/qa/cases-QA2.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · applied/procedural · not counted
Pattern: continuing-offense/drugs-shipped-by-courier-into-forum-district