A · Element outline
Labels preserve the recorded AND / OR / EXCEPTION / DEFENSE structure.
Claim structure
Expression key: & = AND; | = OR; ! = exclusion / negation. Parentheses preserve grouping.
18usc924:924(c)-use-or-carry
predicate & firearm & (use | carry) & during-relationSection 924(c)(1)(A) requires a qualifying predicate, knowing firearm conduct and the during-and-in-relation-to nexus. Use and carry are alternative conduct modes. Penalty facts are not cumulative prerequisites to the five-year base offense.
18usc924:924(c)-possession
predicate & firearm & possession & furtheranceIndependent possession mode uses in-furtherance-of, not merely during-and-in-relation-to. A gun near drugs is not enough by itself; evidence must link possession to advancement of the predicate.
18usc924:924(c)-armor-use-or-carry
predicate & armor-ammunition & armor-use-carry & during-relationSection 924(c)(5) separately addresses armor-piercing ammunition; do not treat ordinary ammunition alone as a firearm under (c)(1). The statutory fifteen-year and death-result consequences are separate from base liability. Research emphasis is (c)(1)-(4).
18usc924:924(c)-armor-possession
predicate & armor-ammunition & armor-possession & furtheranceSection 924(c)(5) possession likewise requires the furtherance nexus. No independent corpus opinion interpreting this ammunition branch is claimed.
18usc924:924(c)-aiding-use-or-carry
predicate & firearm & (use | carry) & during-relation & accompliceSection 2 attribution route: the use/carry conduct and nexus are proved for the armed principal; accomplice addresses this defendant's active participation and advance knowledge under Rosemond. The formula does not require personal firearm handling by the accomplice. It does not silently extend Rosemond to every possession, Pinkerton, or armor-ammunition theory.
Constraints
Facts increasing a mandatory minimum require the constitutionally prescribed element proof
Alleyne, 570 U.S. 99, 103, 111-12 (2013), supplies a judicial constitutional rule, subject to a valid admission or jury waiver. These are elements of the aggravated offense, though not universal requirements of the five-year base offense. This constraint does not decide the distinct prior-conviction exception or every weapon-type mens rea issue.
Apply the governing higher minimum instead of cumulating lower tiers for the same firearm violation
The statutory proviso changes the applicable punishment, not base liability. Its presence is therefore modeled at the penalty node instead of negating the offense claims.
Law modes, protocols and effects
law
Law kind: substantive
element-effect
18usc924:higher-minimum: limits-remedy — Replaces the lower mandatory minimum; does not bar conviction or waive consecutive punishment merely because another count has a higher minimum.
Statute text with element anchors
Overlapping highlights link to the first element; the anchor key links every associated element. All offsets refer to unchanged source text.
§924. Penalties (a)(1) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, subsection (b), (c), (f), or (p) of this section, or in section 929, whoever-
(A) knowingly makes any false statement or representation with respect to the information required by this chapter to be kept in the records of a person licensed under this chapter or in applying for any license or exemption or relief from disability under the provisions of this chapter;
(B) knowingly violates subsection (a)(4), (f), (k), or (q) of section 922;
(C) knowingly imports or brings into the United States or any possession thereof any firearm or ammunition in violation of section 922(l); or
(D) willfully violates any other provision of this chapter, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
(2) Whoever knowingly violates subsection (a)(6), (h), (i), (j), or (o) of section 922 shall be fined as provided in this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.
(3) Any licensed dealer, licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, or licensed collector who knowingly-
(A) makes any false statement or representation with respect to the information required by the provisions of this chapter to be kept in the records of a person licensed under this chapter, or
(B) violates subsection (m) of section 922, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
(4) Whoever violates section 922(q) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the term of imprisonment imposed under this paragraph shall not run concurrently with any other term of imprisonment imposed under any other provision of law. Except for the authorization of a term of imprisonment of not more than 5 years made in this paragraph, for the purpose of any other law a violation of section 922(q) shall be deemed to be a misdemeanor.
(5) Whoever knowingly violates subsection (s) or (t) of section 922 shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for not more than 1 year, or both. (6)(A)(i) A juvenile who violates section 922(x) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both, except that a juvenile described in clause (ii) shall be sentenced to probation on appropriate conditions and shall not be incarcerated unless the juvenile fails to comply with a condition of probation.
(ii) A juvenile is described in this clause if-
(I) the offense of which the juvenile is charged is possession of a handgun or ammunition in violation of section 922(x)(2); and (II) the juvenile has not been convicted in any court of an offense (including an offense under section 922(x) or a similar State law, but not including any other offense consisting of conduct that if engaged in by an adult would not constitute an offense) or adjudicated as a juvenile delinquent for conduct that if engaged in by an adult would constitute an offense.
(B) A person other than a juvenile who knowingly violates section 922(x)-
(i) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both; and
(ii) if the person sold, delivered, or otherwise transferred a handgun or ammunition to a juvenile knowing or having reasonable cause to know that the juvenile intended to carry or otherwise possess or discharge or otherwise use the handgun or ammunition in the commission of a crime of violence, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.
(7) Whoever knowingly violates section 931 shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 3 years, or both.
(8) Whoever knowingly violates subsection (d) or (g) of section 922 shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for not more than 15 years, or both.
(b) Whoever, with intent to commit therewith an offense punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, or with knowledge or reasonable cause to believe that an offense punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year is to be committed therewith, ships, transports, or receives a firearm or any ammunition in interstate or foreign commerce shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both. (c)(1)(A) Except to the extent that a greater minimum sentence is otherwise provided by this subsection or by any other provision of law, any person who, during and in relation to any crime of violence or drug trafficking crime (including a crime of violence or drug trafficking crime that provides for an enhanced punishment if committed by the use of a deadly or dangerous weapon or device) for which the person may be prosecuted in a court of the United States, uses or carries a firearm, or who, in furtherance of any such crime, possesses a firearm, shall, in addition to the punishment provided for such crime of violence or drug trafficking crime-
(i) be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not less than 5 years;
(ii) if the firearm is brandished, be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not less than 7 years; and
(iii) if the firearm is discharged, be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not less than 10 years.
(B) If the firearm possessed by a person convicted of a violation of this subsection-
(i) is a short-barreled rifle, short-barreled shotgun, or semiautomatic assault weapon, the person shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not less than 10 years; or
(ii) is a machinegun or a destructive device, or is equipped with a firearm silencer or firearm muffler, the person shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not less than 30 years.
(C) In the case of a violation of this subsection that occurs after a prior conviction under this subsection has become final, the person shall-
(i) be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not less than 25 years; and
(ii) if the firearm involved is a machinegun or a destructive device, or is equipped with a firearm silencer or firearm muffler, be sentenced to imprisonment for life.
(D) Notwithstanding any other provision of law-
(i) a court shall not place on probation any person convicted of a violation of this subsection; and
(ii) no term of imprisonment imposed on a person under this subsection shall run concurrently with any other term of imprisonment imposed on the person, including any term of imprisonment imposed for the crime of violence or drug trafficking crime during which the firearm was used, carried, or possessed.
(2) For purposes of this subsection, the term "drug trafficking crime" means any felony punishable under the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. 951 et seq.), or chapter 705 of title 46.
(3) For purposes of this subsection the term "crime of violence" means an offense that is a felony and-
(A) has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another, or
(B) that by its nature, involves a substantial risk that physical force against the person or property of another may be used in the course of committing the offense.
(4) For purposes of this subsection, the term "brandish" means, with respect to a firearm, to display all or part of the firearm, or otherwise make the presence of the firearm known to another person, in order to intimidate that person, regardless of whether the firearm is directly visible to that person.
(5) Except to the extent that a greater minimum sentence is otherwise provided under this subsection, or by any other provision of law, any person who, during and in relation to any crime of violence or drug trafficking crime (including a crime of violence or drug trafficking crime that provides for an enhanced punishment if committed by the use of a deadly or dangerous weapon or device) for which the person may be prosecuted in a court of the United States, uses or carries armor piercing ammunition, or who, in furtherance of any such crime, possesses armor piercing ammunition, shall, in addition to the punishment provided for such crime of violence or drug trafficking crime or conviction under this section-
(A) be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not less than 15 years; and
(B) if death results from the use of such ammunition-
(i) if the killing is murder (as defined in section 1111), be punished by death or sentenced to a term of imprisonment for any term of years or for life; and
(ii) if the killing is manslaughter (as defined in section 1112), be punished as provided in section 1112. (d)(1) Any firearm or ammunition involved in or used in any knowing violation of subsection (a)(4), (a)(6), (f), (g), (h), (i), (j), or (k) of section 922, or knowing importation or bringing into the United States or any possession thereof any firearm or ammunition in violation of section 922(l), or knowing violation of section 924, 932, or 933, or willful violation of any other provision of this chapter or any rule or regulation promulgated thereunder, or any violation of any other criminal law of the United States, or any firearm or ammunition intended to be used in any offense referred to in paragraph (3) of this subsection, where such intent is demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence, shall be subject to seizure and forfeiture, and all provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 relating to the seizure, forfeiture, and disposition of firearms, as defined in section 5845(a) of that Code, shall, so far as applicable, extend to seizures and forfeitures under the provisions of this chapter: Provided, That upon acquittal of the owner or possessor, or dismissal of the charges against him other than upon motion of the Government prior to trial, or lapse of or court termination of the restraining order to which he is subject, the seized or relinquished firearms or ammunition shall be returned forthwith to the owner or possessor or to a person delegated by the owner or possessor unless the return of the firearms or ammunition would place the owner or possessor or his delegate in violation of law. Any action or proceeding for the forfeiture of firearms or ammunition shall be commenced within one hundred and twenty days of such seizure. (2)(A) In any action or proceeding for the return of firearms or ammunition seized under the provisions of this chapter, the court shall allow the prevailing party, other than the United States, a reasonable attorney's fee, and the United States shall be liable therefor.
(B) In any other action or proceeding under the provisions of this chapter, the court, when it finds that such action was without foundation, or was initiated vexatiously, frivolously, or in bad faith, shall allow the prevailing party, other than the United States, a reasonable attorney's fee, and the United States shall be liable therefor.
(C) Only those firearms or quantities of ammunition particularly named and individually identified as involved in or used in any violation of the provisions of this chapter or any rule or regulation issued thereunder, or any other criminal law of the United States or as intended to be used in any offense referred to in paragraph (3) of this subsection, where such intent is demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence, shall be subject to seizure, forfeiture, and disposition.
(D) The United States shall be liable for attorneys' fees under this paragraph only to the extent provided in advance by appropriation Acts.
(3) The offenses referred to in paragraphs (1) and (2)(C) of this subsection are-
(A) any crime of violence, as that term is defined in section 924(c)(3) of this title;
(B) any offense punishable under the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) or the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. 951 et seq.);
(C) any offense described in section 922(a)(1), 922(a)(3), 922(a)(5), or 922(b)(3) of this title, where the firearm or ammunition intended to be used in any such offense is involved in a pattern of activities which includes a violation of any offense described in section 922(a)(1), 922(a)(3), 922(a)(5), or 922(b)(3) of this title;
(D) any offense described in section 922(d) of this title where the firearm or ammunition is intended to be used in such offense by the transferor of such firearm or ammunition;
(E) any offense described in section 922(i), 922(j), 922(l), 922(n), or 924(b) of this title;
(F) any offense which may be prosecuted in a court of the United States which involves the exportation of firearms or ammunition; and
(G) any offense under section 932 or 933. (e)(1) In the case of a person who violates section 922(g) of this title and has three previous convictions by any court referred to in section 922(g)(1) of this title for a violent felony or a serious drug offense, or both, committed on occasions different from one another, such person shall be fined under this title and imprisoned not less than fifteen years, and, notwithstanding any other provision of law, the court shall not suspend the sentence of, or grant a probationary sentence to, such person with respect to the conviction under section 922(g).
(2) As used in this subsection-
(A) the term "serious drug offense" means-
(i) an offense under the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. 951 et seq.), or chapter 705 of title 46 for which a maximum term of imprisonment of ten years or more is prescribed by law; or
(ii) an offense under State law, involving manufacturing, distributing, or possessing with intent to manufacture or distribute, a controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802)), for which a maximum term of imprisonment of ten years or more is prescribed by law;
(B) the term "violent felony" means any crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, or any act of juvenile delinquency involving the use or carrying of a firearm, knife, or destructive device that would be punishable by imprisonment for such term if committed by an adult, that-
(i) has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another; or
(ii) is burglary, arson, or extortion, involves use of explosives, or otherwise involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another; and
(C) the term "conviction" includes a finding that a person has committed an act of juvenile delinquency involving a violent felony.
(f) In the case of a person who knowingly violates section 922(p), such person shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.
(g) Whoever, with the intent to engage in conduct which-
(1) constitutes an offense listed in section 1961(1),
(2) is punishable under the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. 951 et seq.), or chapter 705 of title 46,
(3) violates any State law relating to any controlled substance (as defined in section 102(6) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802(6))), or
(4) constitutes a crime of violence (as defined in subsection (c)(3)), travels from any State or foreign country into any other State and acquires, transfers, or attempts to acquire or transfer, a firearm in such other State in furtherance of such purpose, shall be imprisoned not more than 10 years, fined in accordance with this title, or both.
(h) Whoever knowingly receives or transfers a firearm or ammunition, or attempts or conspires to do so, knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that such firearm or ammunition will be used to commit a felony, a Federal crime of terrorism, or a drug trafficking crime (as such terms are defined in section 932(a)), or a crime under the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.), the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (50 U.S.C. 4801 et seq.), the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), or the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act (21 U.S.C. 1901 et seq.), shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for not more than 15 years, or both. (i)(1) A person who knowingly violates section 922(u) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.
(2) Nothing contained in this subsection shall be construed as indicating an intent on the part of Congress to occupy the field in which provisions of this subsection operate to the exclusion of State laws on the same subject matter, nor shall any provision of this subsection be construed as invalidating any provision of State law unless such provision is inconsistent with any of the purposes of this subsection.
(j) A person who, in the course of a violation of subsection (c), causes the death of a person through the use of a firearm, shall-
(1) if the killing is a murder (as defined in section 1111), be punished by death or by imprisonment for any term of years or for life; and
(2) if the killing is manslaughter (as defined in section 1112), be punished as provided in that section. (k)(1) A person who smuggles or knowingly brings into the United States a firearm or ammunition, or attempts or conspires to do so, with intent to engage in or to promote conduct that-
(A) is punishable under the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. 951 et seq.), or chapter 705 of title 46; or
(B) constitutes a felony, a Federal crime of terrorism, or a drug trafficking crime (as such terms are defined in section 932(a)), shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for not more than 15 years, or both.
(2) A person who smuggles or knowingly takes out of the United States a firearm or ammunition, or attempts or conspires to do so, with intent to engage in or to promote conduct that-
(A) would be punishable under the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. 951 et seq.), or chapter 705 of title 46, if the conduct had occurred within the United States; or
(B) would constitute a felony or a Federal crime of terrorism (as such terms are defined in section 932(a)) for which the person may be prosecuted in a court of the United States, if the conduct had occurred within the United States, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for not more than 15 years, or both.
(l) A person who steals any firearm which is moving as, or is a part of, or which has moved in, interstate or foreign commerce shall be imprisoned for not more than 10 years, fined under this title, or both.
(m) A person who steals any firearm from a licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, licensed dealer, or licensed collector shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.
(n) A person who, with the intent to engage in conduct that constitutes a violation of section 922(a)(1)(A), travels from any State or foreign country into any other State and acquires, or attempts to acquire, a firearm in such other State in furtherance of such purpose shall be imprisoned for not more than 10 years.
(o) A person who conspires to commit an offense under subsection (c) shall be imprisoned for not more than 20 years, fined under this title, or both; and if the firearm is a machinegun or destructive device, or is equipped with a firearm silencer or muffler, shall be imprisoned for any term of years or life.
(p) Penalties Relating To Secure Gun Storage or Safety Device.-
(1) In general.-
(A) Suspension or revocation of license; civil penalties.-With respect to each violation of section 922(z)(1) by a licensed manufacturer, licensed importer, or licensed dealer, the Secretary may, after notice and opportunity for hearing-
(i) suspend for not more than 6 months, or revoke, the license issued to the licensee under this chapter that was used to conduct the firearms transfer; or
(ii) subject the licensee to a civil penalty in an amount equal to not more than $2,500.
(B) Review.-An action of the Secretary under this paragraph may be reviewed only as provided under section 923(f).
(2) Administrative remedies.-The suspension or revocation of a license or the imposition of a civil penalty under paragraph (1) shall not preclude any administrative remedy that is otherwise available to the Secretary. (Added Pub. L. 90–351, title IV, §902, June 19, 1968, 82 Stat. 233 ; amended Pub. L. 90–618, title I, §102, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1223 ; Pub. L. 91–644, title II, §13, Jan. 2, 1971, 84 Stat. 1889 ; Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §§223(a), 1005(a), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2028 , 2138; Pub. L. 99–308, §104(a), May 19, 1986, 100 Stat. 456 ; Pub. L. 99–514, §2, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2095 ; Pub. L. 99–570, title I, §1402, Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3207–39 ; Pub. L. 100–649, §2(b), (f)(2)(B), (D), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3817 , 3818; Pub. L. 100–690, title VI, §§6211, 6212, 6451, 6460, 6462, title VII, §§7056, 7060(a), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4359 , 4360, 4371, 4373, 4374, 4402, 4403; Pub. L. 101–647, title XI, §1101, title XVII, §1702(b)(3), title XXII, §§2203(d), 2204(c), title XXXV, §§3526–3529, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4829 , 4845, 4857, 4924; Pub. L. 103–159, title I, §102(c), title III, §302(d), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1541 , 1545; Pub. L. 103–322, title VI, §60013, title XI, §§110102(c), 110103(c), 110105(2), 110201(b), 110401(e), 110503, 110504(a), 110507, 110510, 110515(a), 110517, 110518(a), title XXXIII, §§330002(h), 330003(f)(2), 330011(i), (j), 330016(1)(H), (K), (L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1973 , 1998-2000, 2011, 2015, 2016, 2018-2020, 2140, 2141, 2145, 2147; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §603(m)(1), (n)–(p)(1), (q)–(s), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3505 ; Pub. L. 105–386, §1(a), Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3469 ; Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title IV, §4002(d)(1)(E), div. C, title I, §11009(e)(3), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1809 , 1821; Pub. L. 108–174, §1(2), (3), Dec. 9, 2003, 117 Stat. 2481 ; Pub. L. 109–92, §§5(c)(2), 6(b), Oct. 26, 2005, 119 Stat. 2100 , 2102; Pub. L. 109–304, §17(d)(3), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1707 ; Pub. L. 115–391, title IV, §403(a), Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5221 ; Pub. L. 117–159, div. A, title II, §12004(c)–(f), June 25, 2022, 136 Stat. 1329 , 1330.) Amendment of Section Pub. L. 100–649, §2(f)(2)(B), (D), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3818 , as amended by Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXV, §3526(b), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4924 ; Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(h) [title VI, §649], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–480 , 2681-528; Pub. L. 108–174, §1, Dec. 9, 2003, 117 Stat. 2481 ; Pub. L. 113–57, §1, Dec. 9, 2013, 127 Stat. 656 , provided that, effective on Mar. 8, 2031, subsection (a)(1) of this section is amended by striking "this subsection, subsection (b), (c), or (f) of this section, or in section 929" and inserting "this chapter", subsection (f) of this section is repealed, and subsections (g) through (o) of this section are redesignated as subsections (f) through (n), respectively, of this section.All element anchor links
- Greater minimum for the same firearm conduct displaces the lower minimum — offsets [4178:4304]
- During and in relation to the predicate — offsets [4322:4395]
- Qualifying federal predicate offense — offsets [4561:4631]
- Section 2 aiding and abetting route — offsets [4633:4658]
- Knowingly possess and convey the firearm — offsets [4633:4658]
- Firearm object — offsets [4633:4658]
- Active employment of a firearm — offsets [4633:4658]
- Knowing actual or constructive possession — offsets [4660:4721]
- Possession advances the specific predicate — offsets [4668:4721]
- Sentencing consequences after offense proof — offsets [4723:4822]
- Five-year minimum absent applicable higher minimum — offsets [4823:4891]
- Seven-year brandishing minimum — offsets [4892:4995]
- Ten-year discharge minimum — offsets [4996:5097]
- Special firearm types — offsets [5184:5357]
- Special firearm types — offsets [5358:5545]
- Later offense after final prior section 924(c) conviction — offsets [5546:5690]
- Later offense after final prior section 924(c) conviction — offsets [5691:5764]
- Later offense after final prior section 924(c) conviction — offsets [5765:5932]
- Mandatory consecutive imprisonment; no probation — offsets [5981:6077]
- Mandatory consecutive imprisonment; no probation — offsets [6082:6387]
- Enumerated federal drug felony — offsets [6388:6648]
- Felony with the required force element — offsets [6649:6752]
- Felony with the required force element — offsets [6753:6880]
- Seven-year brandishing minimum — offsets [7048:7354]
- Greater minimum for the same firearm conduct displaces the lower minimum — offsets [7359:7489]
- Armor-piercing ammunition object — offsets [7818:7859]
- Use or carry the armor-piercing ammunition — offsets [7818:7859]
- Possess the armor-piercing ammunition — offsets [7861:7938]
- Armor-piercing ammunition consequences — offsets [8073:8146]
- Fifteen-year minimum before additional death consequences — offsets [8073:8146]
- Armor-piercing ammunition consequences — offsets [8147:8200]
- Resulting death constituting murder — offsets [8201:8358]
- Resulting death constituting manslaughter — offsets [8359:8465]
Element outline
- OR Qualifying federal predicate offense
Government must establish commission of a qualifying crime; legal qualification is distinct from proving the crime facts. The alternatives are the drug-felony definition in (c)(2) and the surviving elements clause in (c)(3)(A). The invalid residual clause is not an alternative.
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
No routes recorded for this element.
- AND Enumerated federal drug felony
1 merits instance blocks; 1 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) Unclassified route
provisional; 2 observed casesno definition yet 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 20 Used only in non-merits blocks (2).
Excluded context examples:Bailey v. United States — 516 U.S. 137 (1995) · Supreme Court of the United States · 1995 — not reached · basis not recorded (18usc924: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · not counted
Pattern: not recordedRosemond v. United States — 572 U.S. 65 (2014) · Supreme Court of the United States · 2014 — not reached · basis not recorded (18usc924: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · rule-announced/merits · not counted
Pattern: not recordedfelony-under-csa
provisional; 3 observed casesWhether the predicate is a felony punishable under the Controlled Substances Act. 1
Satisfied 1; not satisfied 0; excluded context 21 United States v. Alverio-Meléndez — 640 F.3d 412 (2011) · United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011 — satisfied · proved (18usc924: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · counted
Excluded context examples:
Pattern: csa/felonyUnited States v. Ocampo — 890 F.2d 1363 (1989) · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989 — satisfied · proved (18usc924: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · applied/lower-court · not counted
Pattern: csa/felonyUnited States v. Holland — 116 F.3d 1353 (1997) · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997 — satisfied · proved (18usc924: author: Fable · historical QA: PASS (QA2, neov2/qa/wave2-cases-QA2.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · applied/lower-court · not counted
Pattern: csa/felonyfelony-under-import-export-act
provisional; 0 observed casesFelony punishable under the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 00 Never used: no annotation uses in this snapshot felony-under-maritime-drug-law
provisional; 0 observed casesFelony punishable under title 46 chapter 705. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 00 Never used: no annotation uses in this snapshot state-felony-federal-misdemeanor
provisional; provisional (1 case)Whether conduct that is a state felony but only a federal misdemeanor qualifies (Lopez v. Gonzales). 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 20 Used only in non-merits blocks (2).
Excluded context examples:Lopez v. Gonzales — 549 U.S. 47 (2006) · Supreme Court of the United States · 2006 — satisfied · law (18usc924: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · comparator/dissent · not counted
Pattern: csa/state-felony-but-federal-misdemeanor-possessionLopez v. Gonzales — 549 U.S. 47 (2006) · Supreme Court of the United States · 2006 — not · law (18usc924: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · comparator/merits · not counted
Pattern: csa/state-felony-but-federal-misdemeanor-possession - AND Felony with the required force element
Delligatti, 604 U.S. 423 (2025), reaffirms the categorical method and holds that deliberate injury or death can involve force even by omission of a legal duty. Taylor does not exclude every attempt offense; compare attempted murder. Davis invalidates (c)(3)(B). Taylor, 596 U.S. 845 (2022), requires the categorical elements inquiry and holds attempted Hobbs Act robbery does not qualify; actual violent facts cannot repair a missing statutory force element. These rulings do not erase the separate drug-trafficking alternative. Official opinions and local-IR availability are recorded in NOTES.
5 merits instance blocks; 5 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) _comparator
accepted; provisional (1 case)The element is used as a yardstick for another statute or question, not applied to this case's own conduct. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 10 Used only in non-merits blocks (1).
Excluded context examples:Davis v. Beeler — 966 F. Supp. 483 (1997) · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky · 1997 — not reached · basis not recorded (18usc924: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · comparator/merits · not counted
Pattern: borrowed-definition/felon-in-possession-for-early-release-eligibility_whole
accepted; provisional (1 case)The element is decided as a whole: the reasoning turns on no narrower doctrinal sub-question that distinguishes it from any other application of this element. 1
Satisfied 1; not satisfied 0; excluded context 01 United States v. Phipps — 319 F.3d 177 (2003) · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003 — satisfied · conceded (18usc924: author: Fable · historical QA: FIX (QA2, neov2/qa/wave2-cases-QA2.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: asserted-without-analysis/kidnaping-and-carjackingelements-clause
provisional; 4 observed casesWhether the predicate offence categorically has as an element the use, attempted use or threatened use of physical force (§ 924(c)(3)(A)). 4
Satisfied 2; not satisfied 2; excluded context 04 United States v. Brazier — 933 F.3d 796 (2019) · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019 — not · law (18usc924: author: Flash3 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: federal kidnapping and holding for ransom can be committed by inveigling or decoying and by confinement without threat of forceUnited States v. Begay — 934 F.3d 1033 (2019) · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019 — not · law (18usc924: author: Flash3 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: federal second-degree murder can rest on depraved-heart (extreme) recklessnessUnited States v. Butler — 141 F.4th 1136 (2025) · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025 — satisfied · law (18usc924: author: Flash3 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: forcible assault on a federal officer under § 111(b) requires intent, not recklessness; bound by circuit precedent after Borden
- AND Enumerated federal drug felony
- AND Firearm object
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) Unclassified route
provisional; 4 observed casesno definition yet 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 40 Used only in non-merits blocks (4).
Excluded context examples:United States v. Ocampo — 890 F.2d 1363 (1989) · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989 — not reached · basis not recorded (18usc924: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · not counted
Pattern: not recordedUnited States v. Holland — 116 F.3d 1353 (1997) · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997 — not reached · basis not recorded (18usc924: author: Fable · historical QA: PASS (QA2, neov2/qa/wave2-cases-QA2.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · not counted
Pattern: not recordedUnited States v. Phipps — 319 F.3d 177 (2003) · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003 — not reached · basis not recorded (18usc924: author: Fable · historical QA: FIX (QA2, neov2/qa/wave2-cases-QA2.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · not counted
Pattern: not recorded - AND Active employment of a firearm
Bailey predates the 1998 possession amendment. Its active-employment rule still defines use; it does not immunize possession in furtherance. Watson decides use only and expressly leaves the possession theory open.
5 merits instance blocks; 4 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) Unclassified route
provisional; provisional (1 case)no definition yet 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 10 Used only in non-merits blocks (1).
Excluded context examples:Rosemond v. United States — 572 U.S. 65 (2014) · Supreme Court of the United States · 2014 — not reached · basis not recorded (18usc924: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · rule-announced/merits · not counted
Pattern: not recorded_procedural
accepted; provisional (1 case)The element is only the occasion for a procedural ruling. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 10 Used only in non-merits blocks (1).
Excluded context examples:United States v. Phipps — 319 F.3d 177 (2003) · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003 — not reached · basis not recorded (18usc924: author: Fable · historical QA: FIX (QA2, neov2/qa/wave2-cases-QA2.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · applied/procedural · not counted
Pattern: unit-of-prosecution/single-use-single-gun-two-predicatesactive-employment
provisional; 5 observed casesWhether the firearm was actively employed (brandished, displayed, fired, bartered), as opposed to merely possessed, stored or accessible (Bailey). 5
Satisfied 2; not satisfied 3; excluded context 24 United States v. Ocampo — 890 F.2d 1363 (1989) · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989 — satisfied · proved (18usc924: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: possession-as-facilitation/loaded-gun-within-reach-in-drug-vehicleUnited States v. Holland — 116 F.3d 1353 (1997) · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997 — not · no-evidence (18usc924: author: Fable · historical QA: PASS (QA2, neov2/qa/wave2-cases-QA2.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: accessibility-without-active-employment/gun-under-seat-of-drug-vehicleUnited States v. Phipps — 319 F.3d 177 (2003) · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003 — satisfied · conceded (18usc924: author: Fable · historical QA: FIX (QA2, neov2/qa/wave2-cases-QA2.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · counted
Excluded context examples:
Pattern: active/weaponBailey v. United States — 516 U.S. 137 (1995) · Supreme Court of the United States · 1995 — not reached · basis not recorded (18usc924: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · rule-announced/merits · not counted
Pattern: active/weaponDean v. United States — 556 U.S. 568 (2009) · Supreme Court of the United States · 2009 — not reached · basis not recorded (18usc924: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · applied/lower-court · not counted
Pattern: active/weapon - AND Knowingly possess and convey the firearm
3 merits instance blocks; 2 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) on-person
provisional; provisional (1 case)Whether the firearm was borne on the person. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 10 Used only in non-merits blocks (1).
Excluded context examples:Bailey v. United States — 516 U.S. 137 (1995) · Supreme Court of the United States · 1995 — not reached · basis not recorded (18usc924: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · rule-announced/merits · not counted
Pattern: conveyancevehicle
provisional; 3 observed casesWhether conveying a firearm in a vehicle is "carrying" (Muscarello). 3
Satisfied 3; not satisfied 0; excluded context 22 United States v. Ocampo — 890 F.2d 1363 (1989) · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989 — satisfied · proved (18usc924: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: conveyanceMuscarello v. United States — 524 U.S. 125 (1998) · Supreme Court of the United States · 1998 — satisfied · law (18usc924: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: conveyanceMuscarello v. United States — 524 U.S. 125 (1998) · Supreme Court of the United States · 1998 — satisfied · law (18usc924: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · counted
Excluded context examples:
Pattern: conveyanceUnited States v. Holland — 116 F.3d 1353 (1997) · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997 — satisfied · proved (18usc924: author: Fable · historical QA: PASS (QA2, neov2/qa/wave2-cases-QA2.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · applied/procedural · not counted
Pattern: conveyanceMuscarello v. United States — 524 U.S. 125 (1998) · Supreme Court of the United States · 1998 — not · law (18usc924: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · applied/dissent · not counted
Pattern: conveyance - AND During and in relation to the predicate
Both temporal coincidence and a facilitating relationship are required for use/carry. Smith explains at least facilitation or potential facilitation; coincidence alone is insufficient. Apply the corresponding nexus to ammunition under (c)(5).
2 merits instance blocks; 2 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) Unclassified route
provisional; 3 observed casesno definition yet 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 30 Used only in non-merits blocks (3).
Excluded context examples:Bailey v. United States — 516 U.S. 137 (1995) · Supreme Court of the United States · 1995 — not reached · basis not recorded (18usc924: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · not counted
Pattern: not recordedMuscarello v. United States — 524 U.S. 125 (1998) · Supreme Court of the United States · 1998 — not reached · basis not recorded (18usc924: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · rule-announced/merits · not counted
Pattern: not recordedDean v. United States — 556 U.S. 568 (2009) · Supreme Court of the United States · 2009 — not reached · basis not recorded (18usc924: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · rule-announced/merits · not counted
Pattern: not recorded_procedural
accepted; provisional (1 case)The element is only the occasion for a procedural ruling. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 10 Used only in non-merits blocks (1).
Excluded context examples:United States v. Holland — 116 F.3d 1353 (1997) · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997 — satisfied · proved (18usc924: author: Fable · historical QA: PASS (QA2, neov2/qa/wave2-cases-QA2.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · applied/procedural · not counted
Pattern: jury-finding-common-to-both-prongs/gun-in-vehicle-with-drugs-cash-pagersmeans-of-violent-crime
provisional; 2 observed casesWhether the firearm was the instrument by which the crime of violence was carried out. 1
Satisfied 1; not satisfied 0; excluded context 11 United States v. JT Myore — 142 F.4th 606 (2025) · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025 — satisfied · proved (18usc924: author: Flash3 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Excluded context examples:
Pattern: guns displayed to make the driver surrender the car, i.e. before the carjacking's taking was complete (contrast shots fired after driving away, Long Pumpkin)United States v. Phipps — 319 F.3d 177 (2003) · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003 — satisfied · proved (18usc924: author: Fable · historical QA: FIX (QA2, neov2/qa/wave2-cases-QA2.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · applied/lower-court · not counted
Pattern: weapon-compels-victim/gunpoint-abduction-and-vehicle-takingprotection-of-drugs-or-proceeds
provisional; provisional (1 case)Whether a firearm kept to protect drugs, proceeds or the dealer has the required nexus to the drug offence. 1
Satisfied 1; not satisfied 0; excluded context 01 United States v. Ocampo — 890 F.2d 1363 (1989) · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989 — satisfied · proved (18usc924: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: protection/drugs-or-proceeds - AND Knowing actual or constructive possession
Possession can be actual or constructive under applicable circuit law; a defendant must knowingly exercise the requisite control, rather than merely happen to be near a gun. The furtherance element is additional, not a substitute for possession.
1 merits instance blocks; 1 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) _procedural
accepted; provisional (1 case)The element is only the occasion for a procedural ruling. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 10 Used only in non-merits blocks (1).
Excluded context examples:United States v. Alverio-Meléndez — 640 F.3d 412 (2011) · United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011 — not reached · basis not recorded (18usc924: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · rule-announced/procedural · not counted
Pattern: instruction-error/use-or-carry-charged-instead-of-possessionproximity-inference
provisional; provisional (1 case)Whether possession is inferred from the gun's proximity to the defendant plus linking items. 1
Satisfied 1; not satisfied 0; excluded context 01 United States v. Alverio-Meléndez — 640 F.3d 412 (2011) · United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011 — satisfied · proved (18usc924: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: proximity-plus-matching-ammunition/gun-in-door-pocket-beside-passenger - AND Possession advances the specific predicate
(formerly `variant evidence/context`) Fifth Circuit nonexclusive factors: activity type, accessibility, weapon type, stolen status, legality of possession, loaded condition, proximity to drugs/profits, time and circumstances. These are evidentiary considerations, not mandatory independent elements. Ceballos-Torres affirmed on the combination of accessible loaded weapon, illegal possession, drugs and money. Neither mere presence nor a general assertion that drug dealers use guns suffices.
2 merits instance blocks; 2 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) _procedural
accepted; provisional (1 case)The element is only the occasion for a procedural ruling. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 10 Used only in non-merits blocks (1).
Excluded context examples:United States v. Alverio-Meléndez — 640 F.3d 412 (2011) · United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011 — not reached · basis not recorded (18usc924: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · rule-announced/procedural · not counted
Pattern: instruction-error/use-carry-nexus-charged-on-possession-countprotection-of-drugs-or-proceeds
provisional; 2 observed casesWhether a firearm kept to protect drugs, proceeds or the dealer advances the drug offence. 2
Satisfied 2; not satisfied 0; excluded context 02 United States v. Ceballos-Torres — 218 F.3d 409 (2000) · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000 — satisfied · proved (18usc924: author: Flash3 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: loaded Glock lying on the bed of the apartment where 570 g of cocaine and drug-tainted cash were hidden; possessor an illegal alienUnited States v. Alverio-Meléndez — 640 F.3d 412 (2011) · United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011 — satisfied · proved (18usc924: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: protection/drugs-or-proceeds - AND Armor-piercing ammunition object
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
No routes recorded for this element.
- AND Use or carry the armor-piercing ammunition
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
No routes recorded for this element.
- AND Possess the armor-piercing ammunition
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
No routes recorded for this element.
- AND Section 2 aiding and abetting route
Rosemond requires intent to facilitate the entire armed crime. Advance knowledge means time to choose to withdraw; knowledge first acquired when withdrawal is unrealistic does not automatically suffice. This is not a general rule that association with an armed offender establishes liability.
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) Unclassified route
provisional; 2 observed casesno definition yet 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 20 Used only in non-merits blocks (2).
Excluded context examples:United States v. Ocampo — 890 F.2d 1363 (1989) · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989 — not reached · basis not recorded (18usc924: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · not counted
Pattern: not recordedRosemond v. United States — 572 U.S. 65 (2014) · Supreme Court of the United States · 2014 — not reached · basis not recorded (18usc924: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · rule-announced/dissent · not counted
Pattern: not recordedadvance-knowledge
provisional; 2 observed casesWhether the accomplice knew beforehand that a confederate would carry a gun, in time to withdraw (Rosemond). 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 20 Used only in non-merits blocks (2).
Excluded context examples:United States v. Alverio-Meléndez — 640 F.3d 412 (2011) · United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011 — not reached · basis not recorded (18usc924: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · rule-announced/merits · not counted
Pattern: practical-certainty/driver-of-armed-drug-sourceRosemond v. United States — 572 U.S. 65 (2014) · Supreme Court of the United States · 2014 — not reached · basis not recorded (18usc924: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · rule-announced/merits · not counted
Pattern: intent/advance-knowledge-of-confederate-gunaffirmative-act
provisional; provisional (1 case)Whether the accomplice's act facilitating any part of the offence suffices. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 10 Used only in non-merits blocks (1).
Excluded context examples:Rosemond v. United States — 572 U.S. 65 (2014) · Supreme Court of the United States · 2014 — not reached · basis not recorded (18usc924: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · rule-announced/merits · not counted
Pattern: participation-in-predicate-only - EXCEPTION Greater minimum for the same firearm conduct displaces the lower minimum
Abbott, 562 U.S. 8 (2010), construes the (c)(1)(A) proviso. The second text anchor preserves the separate (c)(5) proviso; no independent holding on that ammunition branch is attributed to Abbott.
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
No routes recorded for this element.
- OR Sentencing consequences after offense proof
These nodes describe consequences; none is a universal extra conjunct in the base claims. The greater-minimum proviso and offense date matter. Mandatory-minimum aggravating facts and weapon type have their own allocation-of-proof doctrine; this catalogue does not replace a sentencing/jury-instruction analysis.
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
No routes recorded for this element.
- OR Armor-piercing ammunition consequences
Section (c)(5)(B) links resulting death to murder as defined in section 1111 or manslaughter as defined in section 1112, with the respective penalties. Causation and homicide definitions are additional conditions for that consequence; section 924(j) is outside this catalogue.
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
No routes recorded for this element.
- AND Fifteen-year minimum before additional death consequences
Applies without a death finding, subject to the greater-minimum proviso. Murder and manslaughter are alternative additional consequence branches when death results.
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
No routes recorded for this element.
- AND Resulting death constituting manslaughter
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
No routes recorded for this element.
- AND Resulting death constituting murder
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
No routes recorded for this element.
- AND Fifteen-year minimum before additional death consequences
- AND Five-year minimum absent applicable higher minimum
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
No routes recorded for this element.
- AND Seven-year brandishing minimum
1 merits instance blocks; 1 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) Unclassified route
provisional; provisional (1 case)no definition yet 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 10 Used only in non-merits blocks (1).
Excluded context examples:Dean v. United States — 556 U.S. 568 (2009) · Supreme Court of the United States · 2009 — not reached · basis not recorded (18usc924: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · rule-announced/merits · not counted
Pattern: not recorded_whole
accepted; provisional (1 case)The element is decided as a whole: the reasoning turns on no narrower doctrinal sub-question that distinguishes it from any other application of this element. 1
Satisfied 1; not satisfied 0; excluded context 01 United States v. JT Myore — 142 F.4th 606 (2025) · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025 — satisfied · proved (18usc924: author: Flash3 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: two men approach a blocked-in car with guns out demanding it; victim's account inconsistent until refreshed with his police statement - AND Mandatory consecutive imprisonment; no probation
Barrett (January 14, 2026) bars two convictions under (c)(1)(A)(i) and (j) for the same act. Section (c) consecutive sentencing must not be exported to a section (j) conviction, which has its own penalty scheme.
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
No routes recorded for this element.
- AND Ten-year discharge minimum
Dean construes discharge mens rea; Alleyne separately controls jury proof of the discharge fact. Dean's pre-Alleyne procedural assumptions do not displace that later constitutional rule.
1 merits instance blocks; 1 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) accidental-discharge
provisional; provisional (1 case)Whether the discharge enhancement requires intent to fire (Dean). 1
Satisfied 1; not satisfied 0; excluded context 11 Dean v. United States — 556 U.S. 568 (2009) · Supreme Court of the United States · 2009 — satisfied · law (18usc924: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · counted
Excluded context examples:
Pattern: discharge/accidental-during-robberyDean v. United States — 556 U.S. 568 (2009) · Supreme Court of the United States · 2009 — not · law (18usc924: author: Fable · not independently reviewed) · applied/dissent · not counted
Pattern: discharge/accidental-during-robbery - AND Later offense after final prior section 924(c) conviction
The current final-prior-conviction text prevents treating another count in the same initial prosecution as a qualifying final prior. Historical pre-First-Step-Act decisions require offense/sentencing-date analysis.
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
No routes recorded for this element.
- OR Special firearm types
Section (c)(1)(B)(i) separately provides a ten-year minimum for short-barreled rifles/shotguns. The source also retains semiautomatic assault weapon wording tied to the 1994 amendment termination note; do not activate that historical category without an effective-date analysis.
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
No routes recorded for this element.
- OR Armor-piercing ammunition consequences