Qualifying federal predicate offense

Coverage and quality

0 annotation blocks; 0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases with counted merits instances; 0 excluded blocks.

Snapshot af6842b5 built from commit e3efe9e6 on 2026-11-10: 298 of 298 case files in the repository.

0 case–law pairs: 0 independently reviewed at the current content; 0 not currently independently reviewed. Reviewed does not mean PASS.

Small annotation samples do not establish prevalence, confidence or legal correctness.

Current authored case-instance annotations; superseded/rejected records and machine proposals are omitted (302 stored blocks).

Counting rules and source integrity

Counted instances require applied citation role, merits scope, and a reached holding. Procedural, not-reached, comparator, and other context remains visible but is excluded from counts.

Source checks verify quotation integrity only. Review badges identify their reports and freshness; a historical verdict is not approval of changed content.

Source commit: e3efe9e6a405f9a8d816ce67b3c7821d75e4c87b; built: 2026-11-10T20:10:54.760173+00:00. Database snapshot SHA-256: af6842b5b0e134d1b7b341363699a8853b47a22de70515f84038f10a0b59d0da. 5032 source quotations verified across this snapshot.

OR · 18usc924:predicate

Government must establish commission of a qualifying crime; legal qualification is distinct from proving the crime facts. The alternatives are the drug-felony definition in (c)(2) and the surviving elements clause in (c)(3)(A). The invalid residual clause is not an alternative.

Exact element source

for which the person may be prosecuted in a court of the United States

Source: docroot/ir/usc/title18.jsonl#title18_sec924; Unicode character offsets [4561:4631] (end exclusive); SHA-256 899fad466e76614e7f7b0bb794089010ef0af034312bcd194c76394228dbfdc4.

Routes and case patterns

No routes recorded for this element.

How courts decided this element

Annotation blocks, including explicitly excluded context
Case	Element	Holding and scope	Pattern	Exact source quotations

Court interpretations