Wang v. Gen. Motors, LLC — 371 F. Supp. 3d 407 (2019) · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan · 2019

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan · 2019-03-05

42usc1981: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)

Original case on neochart.com

Case and law context

42 U.S.C. § 1981

Role: applied; posture: civil; Section 1981 race and ethnicity claim by a U.S. citizen employed in Shanghai by a GM affiliate (mandatory retirement at 60; denied transfer to the United States); GM's Rule 12(b)(6) motion granted as to the Section 1981 count (E.D. Mich.); result: claimant-lost; claim:

Uncertainty

Element protected-person: basis: a legal construction of the statute's territorial reach (following Ofori-Tenkorang) applied to the complaint's allegations; [pleaded] would also be defensible

Misfit

None recorded

B · Case × element grid

Top-level elements follow claim order in panels of up to six elements. Case rows repeat across panels. Every recorded block retains its holding and basis; multiple blocks are not merged into a case-level verdict. ✓ satisfied · ✗ not satisfied · ○ not reached · · not addressed. Muted blocks are not counted. Sub-element evidence remains on case and element pages.

Elements 1–6 of 15

42 U.S.C. § 1981
CasePersons protected by equal contractual rightsPlaintiff has rights in an existing or proposed contractFormation performance termination or contractual benefitsJudicial intentional-race-discrimination requirementJudicial but-for causation of contractual injuryNongovernmental impairment
Wang v. Gen. Motors, LLC — 371 F. Supp. 3d 407 (2019) · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan · 2019 (42usc1981: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md))· not addressed· not addressed· not addressed· not addressed· not addressed

Elements 7–12 of 15

42 U.S.C. § 1981
CaseJudicial section 1983 remedial route for state-law impairmentOpposition to racial impairment of contract rightsJudicial defendant-knowledge requirement for retaliationJudicial material-adversity requirement for retaliationJudicial causation requirement for retaliatory injuryContract and retaliation scope with noncontract clauses identified
Wang v. Gen. Motors, LLC — 371 F. Supp. 3d 407 (2019) · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan · 2019 (42usc1981: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md))· not addressed· not addressed· not addressed· not addressed· not addressed· not addressed

Elements 13–15 of 15

42 U.S.C. § 1981
CaseJudicial hostile-environment threshold and attributionClaim-specific limitations and accrualCompensatory equitable punitive and fee remedies
Wang v. Gen. Motors, LLC — 371 F. Supp. 3d 407 (2019) · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan · 2019 (42usc1981: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md))· not addressed· not addressed· not addressed

Instances and excluded annotation blocks

Annotation blocks, including explicitly excluded context
CaseElementHolding and scopePatternExact source quotations
Wang v. Gen. Motors, LLC — 371 F. Supp. 3d 407 (2019) · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan · 2019 — not · law (42usc1981: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md))Persons protected by equal contractual rightsnot
Counted merits instance
applied / merits

basis: law

us-citizen-working-in-china-for-affiliate-of-us-employer
The Second Circuit held: " Section 1981's territorial limitation is defined by the location of the subject of the discrimination, not by the location of the decisionmaker."
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f_supp_3d_371.jsonl#/f-supp-3d/371/0407-01; Unicode character offsets [20784:20956] (end exclusive); SHA-256 44719372de0b1641b6668dbf7d0281dfbd460fd3701d1f76f33e6b2df949adf1.

Evidence kind: rule; polarity: not recorded; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 1 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

On or about July 1, 2009, GM transferred Plaintiff to a new job assignment at GMCIC as Senior Manager for Automotive Performance, Test and Validation in the Engineering Laboratories Department.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f_supp_3d_371.jsonl#/f-supp-3d/371/0407-01; Unicode character offsets [4611:4804] (end exclusive); SHA-256 44719372de0b1641b6668dbf7d0281dfbd460fd3701d1f76f33e6b2df949adf1.

Evidence kind: fact; polarity: cuts-against; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

He became a naturalized United States citizen in 1999, and currently maintains only U.S. citizenship.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f_supp_3d_371.jsonl#/f-supp-3d/371/0407-01; Unicode character offsets [4409:4510] (end exclusive); SHA-256 44719372de0b1641b6668dbf7d0281dfbd460fd3701d1f76f33e6b2df949adf1.

Evidence kind: fact; polarity: supports; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

In his Complaint, Plaintiff alleges that he requested to "be transferred back to the United States if he was not allowed to continue to work in China" and "made several other contacts with GM in an effort to obtain a position back in the United States, but he was denied a transfer."
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f_supp_3d_371.jsonl#/f-supp-3d/371/0407-01; Unicode character offsets [16257:16540] (end exclusive); SHA-256 44719372de0b1641b6668dbf7d0281dfbd460fd3701d1f76f33e6b2df949adf1.

Evidence kind: fact; polarity: supports; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

The only discriminatory conduct Plaintiff has alleged in his Complaint and briefs (see Pl.'s Resp. Br. at 6, ECF No. 14 at Pg ID 137) occurred while he was outside the jurisdiction of the United States.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f_supp_3d_371.jsonl#/f-supp-3d/371/0407-01; Unicode character offsets [21968:22170] (end exclusive); SHA-256 44719372de0b1641b6668dbf7d0281dfbd460fd3701d1f76f33e6b2df949adf1.

Evidence kind: fact; polarity: cuts-against; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

The Court concludes that § 1981 does not extend to such conduct and is therefore granting GM's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's § 1981 claim (Count III).
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f_supp_3d_371.jsonl#/f-supp-3d/371/0407-01; Unicode character offsets [22171:22321] (end exclusive); SHA-256 44719372de0b1641b6668dbf7d0281dfbd460fd3701d1f76f33e6b2df949adf1.

Evidence kind: held; polarity: not recorded; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

Court interpretations recorded from this case