Lambert v. Tesla, Inc. — 923 F.3d 1246 (2019) · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019-05-17

42usc1981: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)

Original case on neochart.com

Case and law context

42 U.S.C. § 1981

Role: background; posture: civil; employee's Section 1981 suit alleging racial harassment, discrimination and retaliation; order compelling arbitration under the employment contract's arbitration clause affirmed (9th Cir.); the only question decided is whether Section 1981 claims are arbitrable; result: not-decided; claim:

Uncertainty

other: result is not-decided because no Section 1981 claim or element was adjudicated; the plaintiff lost the appeal (arbitration compelled)

Element remedies: other: the law file declares no element for forum / arbitrability; remedies is only the nearest hook

Misfit

None recorded

B · Case × element grid

Top-level elements follow claim order in panels of up to six elements. Case rows repeat across panels. Every recorded block retains its holding and basis; multiple blocks are not merged into a case-level verdict. ✓ satisfied · ✗ not satisfied · ○ not reached · · not addressed. Muted blocks are not counted. Sub-element evidence remains on case and element pages.

Elements 1–6 of 15

42 U.S.C. § 1981
CasePersons protected by equal contractual rightsPlaintiff has rights in an existing or proposed contractFormation performance termination or contractual benefitsJudicial intentional-race-discrimination requirementJudicial but-for causation of contractual injuryNongovernmental impairment
Lambert v. Tesla, Inc. — 923 F.3d 1246 (2019) · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019 (42usc1981: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md))· not addressed· not addressed· not addressed· not addressed· not addressed· not addressed

Elements 7–12 of 15

42 U.S.C. § 1981
CaseJudicial section 1983 remedial route for state-law impairmentOpposition to racial impairment of contract rightsJudicial defendant-knowledge requirement for retaliationJudicial material-adversity requirement for retaliationJudicial causation requirement for retaliatory injuryContract and retaliation scope with noncontract clauses identified
Lambert v. Tesla, Inc. — 923 F.3d 1246 (2019) · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019 (42usc1981: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md))· not addressed· not addressed· not addressed· not addressed· not addressed· not addressed

Elements 13–15 of 15

42 U.S.C. § 1981
CaseJudicial hostile-environment threshold and attributionClaim-specific limitations and accrualCompensatory equitable punitive and fee remedies
Lambert v. Tesla, Inc. — 923 F.3d 1246 (2019) · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019 (42usc1981: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md))· not addressed· not addressed
○ not reached · basis not recordedNot counted: background/procedural

Instances and excluded annotation blocks

Annotation blocks, including explicitly excluded context
CaseElementHolding and scopePatternExact source quotations
Lambert v. Tesla, Inc. — 923 F.3d 1246 (2019) · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019 — not reached (42usc1981: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md))Compensatory equitable punitive and fee remediesnot_reached
Excluded from merits counts
background / procedural

A forum ruling, not a ruling on any remedy or element: Section 1981 claims may be sent to arbitration under an employment arbitration clause. Chief Judge Thomas concurs because bound by Luce, Forward, which he considers wrongly decided.
compulsory-arbitration-of-section-1981-claims-under-section-118-of-the-1991-act
Because the unambiguous language of § 118 applies to § 1981, and the statutory purpose of § 1981 does not evince a preclusion of arbitrability, Gilmer and Luce, Forward compel our conclusion: § 1981 claims can be subjected to compulsory arbitration.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f3d_923.jsonl#/f3d/923/1246-01; Unicode character offsets [12664:12913] (end exclusive); SHA-256 0e9ed12b5e019c1e959cd916eb21cfcb8a2ba7a19a36e0fd00336c858e6a2118.

Evidence kind: rule; polarity: not recorded; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

We therefore conclude that the district court correctly determined that § 1981 claims can be subjected to compulsory arbitration.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f3d_923.jsonl#/f3d/923/1246-01; Unicode character offsets [13994:14123] (end exclusive); SHA-256 0e9ed12b5e019c1e959cd916eb21cfcb8a2ba7a19a36e0fd00336c858e6a2118.

Evidence kind: held; polarity: not recorded; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

Court interpretations recorded from this case