A · Element outline
Labels preserve the recorded AND / OR / EXCEPTION / DEFENSE structure.
Claim structure
Expression key: & = AND; | = OR; ! = exclusion / negation. Parentheses preserve grouping.
29usc623:disparate-treatment
covered-employer & protected-age & employment-action & age-causation & !f-exceptions & !public-safety & !executive-retirementSection 623(a)(1) employer claim. The statutory exceptions are conditional defenses, not employer burdens to disprove discrimination in every case. The claimant retains ultimate persuasion; coverage and §626 prerequisites are separate from the merits.
29usc623:disparate-impact
covered-employer & protected-age & neutral-practice & age-disparity & !f-exceptionsSection 623(a)(2) disparate impact: isolate a neutral employment practice causing a significant age disparity, subject to the route-conditioned f-exceptions and the circuit-specific applicant-coverage constraint below. Intent and Gross treatment causation are not additional impact elements.
29usc623:retaliation
(covered-employer | covered-agency | covered-union) & protected-activity & retaliatory-adversity & retaliation-causationSection 623(d) is distinct from age discrimination. The protected conduct is opposition or participation; age bias is not the required retaliatory motive. For employer defendants the claimant must be an employee or applicant; agency defendants cover any individual, and union defendants cover members or applicants for membership, as subsection (d) specifies. The (f)(1)-(2) exceptions do not extend to subsection (d).
29usc623:agency-discrimination
covered-agency & agency-practice & protected-age & age-causation & !f-exceptionsSection 623(b) referral/classification discrimination; §630(c) defines covered employment agencies.
29usc623:union-discrimination
covered-union & union-practice & protected-age & age-causation & !f-exceptionsSection 623(c) membership, referral, or causing employer discrimination; §630(d)-(e) define labor-organization coverage.
29usc623:age-advertising
covered-advertiser & age-advertisement & !f-exceptionsSection 623(e) is a distinct prohibition on age-based notices/advertisements; do not confuse it with retaliation or administrative filing requirements.
29usc623:wage-reduction
covered-employer & compliance-wage-reduction & !f-exceptionsSection 623(a)(3) independently prohibits reducing an employee wage rate to comply with the ADEA.
29usc623:pension-accrual
covered-plan-actor & protected-age & pension-plan & pension-age-reduction & !pension-safeguardsSection 623(i)(1) separately prohibits age-based cessation or reduction of defined-benefit accrual or defined-contribution allocations. Its own subsection (i) qualifications govern; f-exceptions is not a blanket defense to this route. The catalogue models the (i)(1) core and identifies (i)(2)-(10) qualifications, not a complete actuarial test for hybrid-plan conversions.
Constraints
Apply the outside-applicant construction only when controlling precedent adopts it.
Kleber (Seventh Circuit en banc) and Villarreal (Eleventh Circuit en banc) construe (a)(2) to exclude outside applicants. Elsewhere determine controlling law before excluding a claimant; this is not a nationwide statutory exception. The preserved impact-applicant-limit ID is a judicial coverage element and is intentionally absent as an unconditional negative in the claim formula.
Apply the good-cause qualification only when the defendant acts as employer and the challenged employment action is discharge or discipline.
This conditional qualification belongs to the employer disparate-treatment route for discharge/discipline; it is not an unconditional negative conjunct in that route. Do not apply it to hiring or other non-disciplinary terms, agency referral/classification, union membership/referral, or the other claim routes. If an agency or union acts as an employer, assess its employer conduct under the employer route rather than importing this qualification into its separate agency or union route. The quoted f(3) words are unchanged; the catalogue does not replace ultimate age causation with acceptance of any asserted reason.
Match each statutory exception to the challenged act and theory under (a), (b), (c), or (e).
The f-exceptions gate is satisfied only if one applicable branch is proved. BFOQ requires a necessary age qualification; foreign-law requires an actual foreign-workplace legal conflict; seniority/benefits require all f(2) conditions. RFOA is available only for a legally cognizable disparate-impact theory using a non-age factor, never intentional age discrimination or an age-limited advertisement. Thus rfoa cannot defeat the intentional agency/union/treatment claims merely because the actor offers a business reason. No exception here applies to (d) retaliation or automatically overrides (i).
Law modes, protocols and effects
law
Law kind: substantive
protocol · mcdonnell-douglas
Proves: age-causation
prima-facie: plaintiff bears production; raises a rebuttable presumption of discrimination
employer-reason: defendant bears production; presumption drops out
pretext: plaintiff bears persuasion; merges with the ultimate causation question
Judicial proof protocol: Westmoreland applies McDonnell Douglas to circumstantial ADEA claims in the Fourth Circuit; plaintiff retains ultimate persuasion. The prima-facie facts vary by challenged action. This is not a statutory pleading checklist or a shift of the Gross persuasion burden.
Statute text with element anchors
Overlapping highlights link to the first element; the anchor key links every associated element. All offsets refer to unchanged source text.
§623. Prohibition of age discrimination
(a) Employer practices It shall be unlawful for an employer-
(1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual or otherwise discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's age;
(2) to limit, segregate, or classify his employees in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee, because of such individual's age; or
(3) to reduce the wage rate of any employee in order to comply with this chapter.
(b) Employment agency practices It shall be unlawful for an employment agency to fail or refuse to refer for employment, or otherwise to discriminate against, any individual because of such individual's age, or to classify or refer for employment any individual on the basis of such individual's age.
(c) Labor organization practices It shall be unlawful for a labor organization-
(1) to exclude or to expel from its membership, or otherwise to discriminate against, any individual because of his age;
(2) to limit, segregate, or classify its membership, or to classify or fail or refuse to refer for employment any individual, in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities, or would limit such employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee or as an applicant for employment, because of such individual's age;
(3) to cause or attempt to cause an employer to discriminate against an individual in violation of this section.
(d) Opposition to unlawful practices; participation in investigations, proceedings, or litigation It shall be unlawful for an employer to discriminate against any of his employees or applicants for employment, for an employment agency to discriminate against any individual, or for a labor organization to discriminate against any member thereof or applicant for membership, because such individual, member or applicant for membership has opposed any practice made unlawful by this section, or because such individual, member or applicant for membership has made a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or litigation under this chapter.
(e) Printing or publication of notice or advertisement indicating preference, limitation, etc. It shall be unlawful for an employer, labor organization, or employment agency to print or publish, or cause to be printed or published, any notice or advertisement relating to employment by such an employer or membership in or any classification or referral for employment by such a labor organization, or relating to any classification or referral for employment by such an employment agency, indicating any preference, limitation, specification, or discrimination, based on age.
(f) Lawful practices; age an occupational qualification; other reasonable factors; laws of foreign workplace; seniority system; employee benefit plans; discharge or discipline for good cause It shall not be unlawful for an employer, employment agency, or labor organization-
(1) to take any action otherwise prohibited under subsections (a), (b), (c), or (e) of this section where age is a bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary to the normal operation of the particular business, or where the differentiation is based on reasonable factors other than age, or where such practices involve an employee in a workplace in a foreign country, and compliance with such subsections would cause such employer, or a corporation controlled by such employer, to violate the laws of the country in which such workplace is located;
(2) to take any action otherwise prohibited under subsection (a), (b), (c), or (e) of this section-
(A) to observe the terms of a bona fide seniority system that is not intended to evade the purposes of this chapter, except that no such seniority system shall require or permit the involuntary retirement of any individual specified by section 631(a) of this title because of the age of such individual; or
(B) to observe the terms of a bona fide employee benefit plan-
(i) where, for each benefit or benefit package, the actual amount of payment made or cost incurred on behalf of an older worker is no less than that made or incurred on behalf of a younger worker, as permissible under section 1625.10, title 29, Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect on June 22, 1989); or
(ii) that is a voluntary early retirement incentive plan consistent with the relevant purpose or purposes of this chapter. Notwithstanding clause (i) or (ii) of subparagraph (B), no such employee benefit plan or voluntary early retirement incentive plan shall excuse the failure to hire any individual, and no such employee benefit plan shall require or permit the involuntary retirement of any individual specified by section 631(a) of this title, because of the age of such individual. An employer, employment agency, or labor organization acting under subparagraph (A), or under clause (i) or (ii) of subparagraph (B), shall have the burden of proving that such actions are lawful in any civil enforcement proceeding brought under this chapter; or
(3) to discharge or otherwise discipline an individual for good cause.
(g) Repealed. Pub. L. 101–239, title VI, §6202(b)(3)(C)(i), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2233
(h) Practices of foreign corporations controlled by American employers; foreign employers not controlled by American employers; factors determining control
(1) If an employer controls a corporation whose place of incorporation is in a foreign country, any practice by such corporation prohibited under this section shall be presumed to be such practice by such employer.
(2) The prohibitions of this section shall not apply where the employer is a foreign person not controlled by an American employer.
(3) For the purpose of this subsection the determination of whether an employer controls a corporation shall be based upon the-
(A) interrelation of operations,
(B) common management,
(C) centralized control of labor relations, and
(D) common ownership or financial control, of the employer and the corporation.
(i) Employee pension benefit plans; cessation or reduction of benefit accrual or of allocation to employee account; distribution of benefits after attainment of normal retirement age; compliance; highly compensated employees
(1) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, it shall be unlawful for an employer, an employment agency, a labor organization, or any combination thereof to establish or maintain an employee pension benefit plan which requires or permits-
(A) in the case of a defined benefit plan, the cessation of an employee's benefit accrual, or the reduction of the rate of an employee's benefit accrual, because of age, or
(B) in the case of a defined contribution plan, the cessation of allocations to an employee's account, or the reduction of the rate at which amounts are allocated to an employee's account, because of age.
(2) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit an employer, employment agency, or labor organization from observing any provision of an employee pension benefit plan to the extent that such provision imposes (without regard to age) a limitation on the amount of benefits that the plan provides or a limitation on the number of years of service or years of participation which are taken into account for purposes of determining benefit accrual under the plan.
(3) In the case of any employee who, as of the end of any plan year under a defined benefit plan, has attained normal retirement age under such plan-
(A) if distribution of benefits under such plan with respect to such employee has commenced as of the end of such plan year, then any requirement of this subsection for continued accrual of benefits under such plan with respect to such employee during such plan year shall be treated as satisfied to the extent of the actuarial equivalent of in-service distribution of benefits, and
(B) if distribution of benefits under such plan with respect to such employee has not commenced as of the end of such year in accordance with section 1056(a)(3) of this title and section 401(a)(14)(C) of title 26, and the payment of benefits under such plan with respect to such employee is not suspended during such plan year pursuant to section 1053(a)(3)(B) of this title or section 411(a)(3)(B) of title 26, then any requirement of this subsection for continued accrual of benefits under such plan with respect to such employee during such plan year shall be treated as satisfied to the extent of any adjustment in the benefit payable under the plan during such plan year attributable to the delay in the distribution of benefits after the attainment of normal retirement age. The provisions of this paragraph shall apply in accordance with regulations of the Secretary of the Treasury. Such regulations shall provide for the application of the preceding provisions of this paragraph to all employee pension benefit plans subject to this subsection and may provide for the application of such provisions, in the case of any such employee, with respect to any period of time within a plan year.
(4) Compliance with the requirements of this subsection with respect to an employee pension benefit plan shall constitute compliance with the requirements of this section relating to benefit accrual under such plan.
(5) Paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect to any employee who is a highly compensated employee (within the meaning of section 414(q) of title 26) to the extent provided in regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury for purposes of precluding discrimination in favor of highly compensated employees within the meaning of subchapter D of chapter 1 of title 26.
(6) A plan shall not be treated as failing to meet the requirements of paragraph (1) solely because the subsidized portion of any early retirement benefit is disregarded in determining benefit accruals or it is a plan permitted by subsection (m)..1
(7) Any regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to clause (v) of section 411(b)(1)(H) of title 26 and subparagraphs (C) and (D) 2 of section 411(b)(2) of title 26 shall apply with respect to the requirements of this subsection in the same manner and to the same extent as such regulations apply with respect to the requirements of such sections 411(b)(1)(H) and 411(b)(2).
(8) A plan shall not be treated as failing to meet the requirements of this section solely because such plan provides a normal retirement age described in section 1002(24)(B) of this title and section 411(a)(8)(B) of title 26.
(9) For purposes of this subsection-
(A) The terms "employee pension benefit plan", "defined benefit plan", "defined contribution plan", and "normal retirement age" have the meanings provided such terms in section 1002 of this title.
(B) The term "compensation" has the meaning provided by section 414(s) of title 26.
(10) Special rules relating to age.-
(A) Comparison to similarly situated younger individual.-
(i) In general.-A plan shall not be treated as failing to meet the requirements of paragraph (1) if a participant's accrued benefit, as determined as of any date under the terms of the plan, would be equal to or greater than that of any similarly situated, younger individual who is or could be a participant.
(ii) Similarly situated.-For purposes of this subparagraph, a participant is similarly situated to any other individual if such participant is identical to such other individual in every respect (including period of service, compensation, position, date of hire, work history, and any other respect) except for age.
(iii) Disregard of subsidized early retirement benefits.-In determining the accrued benefit as of any date for purposes of this clause, the subsidized portion of any early retirement benefit or retirement-type subsidy shall be disregarded.
(iv) Accrued benefit.-For purposes of this subparagraph, the accrued benefit may, under the terms of the plan, be expressed as an annuity payable at normal retirement age, the balance of a hypothetical account, or the current value of the accumulated percentage of the employee's final average compensation.
(B) Applicable defined benefit plans.-
(i) Interest credits.-
(I) In general.-An applicable defined benefit plan shall be treated as failing to meet the requirements of paragraph (1) unless the terms of the plan provide that any interest credit (or an equivalent amount) for any plan year shall be at a rate which is not greater than a market rate of return. A plan shall not be treated as failing to meet the requirements of this subclause merely because the plan provides for a reasonable minimum guaranteed rate of return or for a rate of return that is equal to the greater of a fixed or variable rate of return. (II) Preservation of capital.-An interest credit (or an equivalent amount) of less than zero shall in no event result in the account balance or similar amount being less than the aggregate amount of contributions credited to the account. (III) Market rate of return.-The Secretary of the Treasury may provide by regulation for rules governing the calculation of a market rate of return for purposes of subclause (I) and for permissible methods of crediting interest to the account (including fixed or variable interest rates) resulting in effective rates of return meeting the requirements of subclause (I). In the case of a governmental plan (as defined in the first sentence of section 414(d) of title 26), a rate of return or a method of crediting interest established pursuant to any provision of Federal, State, or local law (including any administrative rule or policy adopted in accordance with any such law) shall be treated as a market rate of return for purposes of subclause (I) and a permissible method of crediting interest for purposes of meeting the requirements of subclause (I), except that this sentence shall only apply to a rate of return or method of crediting interest if such rate or method does not violate any other requirement of this chapter.
(ii) Special rule for plan conversions.-If, after June 29, 2005, an applicable plan amendment is adopted, the plan shall be treated as failing to meet the requirements of paragraph (1)(H) unless the requirements of clause (iii) are met with respect to each individual who was a participant in the plan immediately before the adoption of the amendment.
(iii) Rate of benefit accrual.-Subject to clause (iv), the requirements of this clause are met with respect to any participant if the accrued benefit of the participant under the terms of the plan as in effect after the amendment is not less than the sum of-
(I) the participant's accrued benefit for years of service before the effective date of the amendment, determined under the terms of the plan as in effect before the amendment, plus (II) the participant's accrued benefit for years of service after the effective date of the amendment, determined under the terms of the plan as in effect after the amendment.
(iv) Special rules for early retirement subsidies.-For purposes of clause (iii)(I), the plan shall credit the accumulation account or similar amount 3 with the amount of any early retirement benefit or retirement-type subsidy for the plan year in which the participant retires if, as of such time, the participant has met the age, years of service, and other requirements under the plan for entitlement to such benefit or subsidy.
(v) Applicable plan amendment.-For purposes of this subparagraph-
(I) In general.-The term "applicable plan amendment" means an amendment to a defined benefit plan which has the effect of converting the plan to an applicable defined benefit plan. (II) Special rule for coordinated benefits.-If the benefits of 2 or more defined benefit plans established or maintained by an employer are coordinated in such a manner as to have the effect of the adoption of an amendment described in subclause (I), the sponsor of the defined benefit plan or plans providing for such coordination shall be treated as having adopted such a plan amendment as of the date such coordination begins. (III) Multiple amendments.-The Secretary of the Treasury shall issue regulations to prevent the avoidance of the purposes of this subparagraph through the use of 2 or more plan amendments rather than a single amendment. (IV) Applicable defined benefit plan.-For purposes of this subparagraph, the term "applicable defined benefit plan" has the meaning given such term by section 1053(f)(3) of this title.
(vi) Termination requirements.-An applicable defined benefit plan shall not be treated as meeting the requirements of clause (i) unless the plan provides that, upon the termination of the plan-
(I) if the interest credit rate (or an equivalent amount) under the plan is a variable rate, the rate of interest used to determine accrued benefits under the plan shall be equal to the average of the rates of interest used under the plan during the 5-year period ending on the termination date, and (II) the interest rate and mortality table used to determine the amount of any benefit under the plan payable in the form of an annuity payable at normal retirement age shall be the rate and table specified under the plan for such purpose as of the termination date, except that if such interest rate is a variable rate, the interest rate shall be determined under the rules of subclause (I).
(C) Certain offsets permitted.-A plan shall not be treated as failing to meet the requirements of paragraph (1) solely because the plan provides offsets against benefits under the plan to the extent such offsets are allowable in applying the requirements of section 401(a) of title 26.
(D) Permitted disparities in plan contributions or benefits.-A plan shall not be treated as failing to meet the requirements of paragraph (1) solely because the plan provides a disparity in contributions or benefits with respect to which the requirements of section 401(l) of title 26 are met.
(E) Indexing permitted.-
(i) In general.-A plan shall not be treated as failing to meet the requirements of paragraph (1) solely because the plan provides for indexing of accrued benefits under the plan.
(ii) Protection against loss.-Except in the case of any benefit provided in the form of a variable annuity, clause (i) shall not apply with respect to any indexing which results in an accrued benefit less than the accrued benefit determined without regard to such indexing.
(iii) Indexing.-For purposes of this subparagraph, the term "indexing" means, in connection with an accrued benefit, the periodic adjustment of the accrued benefit by means of the application of a recognized investment index or methodology.
(F) Early retirement benefit or retirement-type subsidy.-For purposes of this paragraph, the terms "early retirement benefit" and "retirement-type subsidy" have the meaning given such terms in section 1054(g)(2)(A) of this title.2
(G) Benefit accrued to date.-For purposes of this paragraph, any reference to the accrued benefit shall be a reference to such benefit accrued to date.
(j) Employment as firefighter or law enforcement officer It shall not be unlawful for an employer which is a State, a political subdivision of a State, an agency or instrumentality of a State or a political subdivision of a State, or an interstate agency to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual because of such individual's age if such action is taken-
(1) with respect to the employment of an individual as a firefighter or as a law enforcement officer, the employer has complied with section 3(d)(2) of the Age Discrimination in Employment Amendments of 1996 2 if the individual was discharged after the date described in such section, and the individual has attained-
(A) the age of hiring or retirement, respectively, in effect under applicable State or local law on March 3, 1983; or (B)(i) if the individual was not hired, the age of hiring in effect on the date of such failure or refusal to hire under applicable State or local law enacted after September 30, 1996; or
(ii) if applicable State or local law was enacted after September 30, 1996, and the individual was discharged, the higher of-
(I) the age of retirement in effect on the date of such discharge under such law; and (II) age 55; and
(2) pursuant to a bona fide hiring or retirement plan that is not a subterfuge to evade the purposes of this chapter.
(k) Seniority system or employee benefit plan; compliance A seniority system or employee benefit plan shall comply with this chapter regardless of the date of adoption of such system or plan.
(l) Lawful practices; minimum age as condition of eligibility for retirement benefits; deductions from severance pay; reduction of long-term disability benefits Notwithstanding clause (i) or (ii) of subsection (f)(2)(B)- (1)(A) It shall not be a violation of subsection (a), (b), (c), or (e) solely because-
(i) an employee pension benefit plan (as defined in section 1002(2) of this title) provides for the attainment of a minimum age as a condition of eligibility for normal or early retirement benefits; or
(ii) a defined benefit plan (as defined in section 1002(35) of this title) provides for-
(I) payments that constitute the subsidized portion of an early retirement benefit; or (II) social security supplements for plan participants that commence before the age and terminate at the age (specified by the plan) when participants are eligible to receive reduced or unreduced old-age insurance benefits under title II of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 401 et seq.), and that do not exceed such old-age insurance benefits.
(B) A voluntary early retirement incentive plan that-
(i) is maintained by-
(I) a local educational agency (as defined in section 7801 of title 20), or (II) an education association which principally represents employees of 1 or more agencies described in subclause (I) and which is described in section 501(c)(5) or (6) of title 26 and exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of title 26, and
(ii) makes payments or supplements described in subclauses (I) and (II) of subparagraph (A)(ii) in coordination with a defined benefit plan (as so defined) maintained by an eligible employer described in section 457(e)(1)(A) of title 26 or by an education association described in clause (i)(II), shall be treated solely for purposes of subparagraph (A)(ii) as if it were a part of the defined benefit plan with respect to such payments or supplements. Payments or supplements under such a voluntary early retirement incentive plan shall not constitute severance pay for purposes of paragraph (2). (2)(A) It shall not be a violation of subsection (a), (b), (c), or (e) solely because following a contingent event unrelated to age-
(i) the value of any retiree health benefits received by an individual eligible for an immediate pension;
(ii) the value of any additional pension benefits that are made available solely as a result of the contingent event unrelated to age and following which the individual is eligible for not less than an immediate and unreduced pension; or
(iii) the values described in both clauses (i) and (ii); are deducted from severance pay made available as a result of the contingent event unrelated to age.
(B) For an individual who receives immediate pension benefits that are actuarially reduced under subparagraph (A)(i), the amount of the deduction available pursuant to subparagraph (A)(i) shall be reduced by the same percentage as the reduction in the pension benefits.
(C) For purposes of this paragraph, severance pay shall include that portion of supplemental unemployment compensation benefits (as described in section 501(c)(17) of title 26) that-
(i) constitutes additional benefits of up to 52 weeks;
(ii) has the primary purpose and effect of continuing benefits until an individual becomes eligible for an immediate and unreduced pension; and
(iii) is discontinued once the individual becomes eligible for an immediate and unreduced pension.
(D) For purposes of this paragraph and solely in order to make the deduction authorized under this paragraph, the term "retiree health benefits" means benefits provided pursuant to a group health plan covering retirees, for which (determined as of the contingent event unrelated to age)-
(i) the package of benefits provided by the employer for the retirees who are below age 65 is at least comparable to benefits provided under title XVIII of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.);
(ii) the package of benefits provided by the employer for the retirees who are age 65 and above is at least comparable to that offered under a plan that provides a benefit package with one-fourth the value of benefits provided under title XVIII of such Act; or
(iii) the package of benefits provided by the employer is as described in clauses (i) and (ii). (E)(i) If the obligation of the employer to provide retiree health benefits is of limited duration, the value for each individual shall be calculated at a rate of $3,000 per year for benefit years before age 65, and $750 per year for benefit years beginning at age 65 and above.
(ii) If the obligation of the employer to provide retiree health benefits is of unlimited duration, the value for each individual shall be calculated at a rate of $48,000 for individuals below age 65, and $24,000 for individuals age 65 and above.
(iii) The values described in clauses (i) and (ii) shall be calculated based on the age of the individual as of the date of the contingent event unrelated to age. The values are effective on October 16, 1990, and shall be adjusted on an annual basis, with respect to a contingent event that occurs subsequent to the first year after October 16, 1990, based on the medical component of the Consumer Price Index for all-urban consumers published by the Department of Labor.
(iv) If an individual is required to pay a premium for retiree health benefits, the value calculated pursuant to this subparagraph shall be reduced by whatever percentage of the overall premium the individual is required to pay.
(F) If an employer that has implemented a deduction pursuant to subparagraph (A) fails to fulfill the obligation described in subparagraph (E), any aggrieved individual may bring an action for specific performance of the obligation described in subparagraph (E). The relief shall be in addition to any other remedies provided under Federal or State law.
(3) It shall not be a violation of subsection (a), (b), (c), or (e) solely because an employer provides a bona fide employee benefit plan or plans under which long-term disability benefits received by an individual are reduced by any pension benefits (other than those attributable to employee contributions)-
(A) paid to the individual that the individual voluntarily elects to receive; or
(B) for which an individual who has attained the later of age 62 or normal retirement age is eligible.
(m) Voluntary retirement incentive plans Notwithstanding subsection (f)(2)(B), it shall not be a violation of subsection (a), (b), (c), or (e) solely because a plan of an institution of higher education (as defined in section 1001 of title 20) offers employees who are serving under a contract of unlimited tenure (or similar arrangement providing for unlimited tenure) supplemental benefits upon voluntary retirement that are reduced or eliminated on the basis of age, if-
(1) such institution does not implement with respect to such employees any age-based reduction or cessation of benefits that are not such supplemental benefits, except as permitted by other provisions of this chapter;
(2) such supplemental benefits are in addition to any retirement or severance benefits which have been offered generally to employees serving under a contract of unlimited tenure (or similar arrangement providing for unlimited tenure), independent of any early retirement or exit-incentive plan, within the preceding 365 days; and
(3) any employee who attains the minimum age and satisfies all non-age-based conditions for receiving a benefit under the plan has an opportunity lasting not less than 180 days to elect to retire and to receive the maximum benefit that could then be elected by a younger but otherwise similarly situated employee, and the plan does not require retirement to occur sooner than 180 days after such election. ( Pub. L. 90–202, §4, Dec. 15, 1967, 81 Stat. 603 ; Pub. L. 95–256, §2(a), Apr. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 189 ; Pub. L. 97–248, title I, §116(a), Sept. 3, 1982, 96 Stat. 353 ; Pub. L. 98–369, div. B, title III, §2301(b), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 1063 ; Pub. L. 98–459, title VIII, §802(b), Oct. 9, 1984, 98 Stat. 1792 ; Pub. L. 99–272, title IX, §9201(b)(1), (3), Apr. 7, 1986, 100 Stat. 171 ; Pub. L. 99–509, title IX, §9201, Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1973 ; Pub. L. 99–514, §2, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2095 ; Pub. L. 99–592, §§2(a), (b), 3(a), Oct. 31, 1986, 100 Stat. 3342 ; Pub. L. 101–239, title VI, §6202(b)(3)(C)(i), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2233 ; Pub. L. 101–433, title I, §103, Oct. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 978 ; Pub. L. 101–521, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 2287 ; Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101(a) [title I, §119[1(b)]], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009 , 3009-23; Pub. L. 105–244, title IX, §941(a), (b), Oct. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1834 , 1835; Pub. L. 109–280, title VII, §701(c), title XI, §1104(a)(2), Aug. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 988 , 1058; Pub. L. 110–458, title I, §123(a), Dec. 23, 2008, 122 Stat. 5114 ; Pub. L. 114–95, title IX, §9215(e), Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 2166 .)All element anchor links
- Displayed scope and specialized exclusions — offsets [0:39]
- Employer coverage and exclusions — offsets [63:100]
- Hiring discharge or employment terms — offsets [101:326]
- Charge filing waiver and remedies — offsets [101:326]
- Age sixty-five executive or high-policymaker compulsory retirement — offsets [134:161]
- Judicial but-for standard for age-based treatment — offsets [293:326]
- Age forty or older — offsets [293:326]
- Judicial impact requirement of significant causal disparity — offsets [327:564]
- Judicial outside-applicant coverage limit where circuit precedent controls — offsets [327:564]
- Judicial impact requirement to identify a particular practice — offsets [327:564]
- Wage reduction to comply — offsets [565:646]
- Agency referral discrimination — offsets [647:947]
- Covered employment agency — offsets [679:724]
- Covered labor organization — offsets [981:1027]
- Membership classification referral or causing discrimination — offsets [1028:1148]
- Membership classification referral or causing discrimination — offsets [1149:1538]
- Membership classification referral or causing discrimination — offsets [1539:1651]
- Opposition or participation — offsets [1750:2342]
- Retaliatory causal connection — offsets [1750:2342]
- Judicial material-adversity standard for retaliation — offsets [1750:2342]
- Employer agency or union advertiser — offsets [2438:2536]
- Age-based notice or advertisement — offsets [2438:2919]
- Route-conditioned statutory f(1) and f(2) alternatives — offsets [3195:3294]
- Narrow bona fide occupational qualification — offsets [3295:3418]
- Reasonable factors other than age — offsets [3423:3494]
- Foreign workplace conflict with local law — offsets [3499:3757]
- Conditional bona fide seniority system or benefit plan — offsets [3758:3857]
- Conditional bona fide seniority system or benefit plan — offsets [3858:4164]
- Conditional bona fide seniority system or benefit plan — offsets [4165:4227]
- Conditional bona fide seniority system or benefit plan — offsets [4228:4536]
- Conditional bona fide seniority system or benefit plan — offsets [4537:5287]
- Good cause for employer discharge or discipline — offsets [5288:5358]
- Establish or maintain an employee pension benefit plan — offsets [6489:6735]
- Employer agency union or combination maintaining a pension plan — offsets [6567:6650]
- Age-based accrual or allocation cessation or reduction — offsets [6736:6908]
- Age-based accrual or allocation cessation or reduction — offsets [6909:7113]
- Subsection i pension qualifications and compliance — offsets [9316:9531]
- Conditional state firefighter and law-enforcement hiring or retirement — offsets [19308:19677]
- Conditional state firefighter and law-enforcement hiring or retirement — offsets [19678:19995]
- Conditional state firefighter and law-enforcement hiring or retirement — offsets [19996:20301]
- Conditional state firefighter and law-enforcement hiring or retirement — offsets [20302:20427]
- Conditional state firefighter and law-enforcement hiring or retirement — offsets [20428:20530]
- Conditional state firefighter and law-enforcement hiring or retirement — offsets [20531:20648]
Element outline
- AND Employer coverage and exclusions
Employer status is statutory, not established merely by quoting §623. Individual liability, sovereign immunity and employment status need jurisdiction-specific analysis; coverage does not itself waive state sovereign immunity.
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
No routes recorded for this element.
- AND Age forty or older
The age floor comes from §631, not §623. A comparator or replacement may itself be over forty; substantially younger is the relevant inference, not membership outside the protected class.
6 merits instance blocks; 6 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) _whole
accepted; 6 observed casesThe element is decided as a whole: the reasoning turns on no narrower doctrinal sub-question that distinguishes it from any other application of this element. 6
Satisfied 6; not satisfied 0; excluded context 06 Jardin v. CoxCom, LLC — 320 F. Supp. 3d 373 (2018) · United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island · 2018 — satisfied · conceded (29usc623: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: 53-year-old facilities technician; class membership conceded for the motionKitchen v. BASF — 343 F. Supp. 3d 681 (2018) · United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas · 2018 — satisfied · conceded (29usc623: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: employee over 55 at discharge; age not disputedWilliams v. Temple Univ. Hosp., Inc. — 345 F. Supp. 3d 590 (2018) · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania · 2018 — satisfied · conceded (29usc623: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: 61-year-old, oldest employee in the department; age element unchallenged - AND Hiring discharge or employment terms
10 merits instance blocks; 10 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) discharge
provisional; 9 observed casesTermination or reduction in force. 9
Satisfied 7; not satisfied 2; excluded context 09 Jardin v. CoxCom, LLC — 320 F. Supp. 3d 373 (2018) · United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island · 2018 — satisfied · conceded (29usc623: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: termination for a policy violation after 19 years of service; discharge concededShoap v. City of Crossville — 321 F. Supp. 3d 839 (2018) · United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee · 2018 — not · no-evidence (29usc623: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: interim police chief resigned when a rival was considered for the permanent post; constructive discharge claimed on hiring delays and friction with a councilmanKitchen v. BASF — 343 F. Supp. 3d 681 (2018) · United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas · 2018 — satisfied · conceded (29usc623: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: termination after a positive alcohol test under a final warning and return-to-work agreementhiring-or-promotion
provisional; 0 observed casesRefusal to hire or promote. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 00 Never used: no annotation uses in this snapshot terms-and-conditions
provisional; provisional (1 case)Compensation, terms, conditions or privileges; hostile environment requires the separate judicial severity/pervasiveness inquiry. 1
Satisfied 1; not satisfied 0; excluded context 01 Rivera-Rivera v. Medina & Medina, Inc. — 898 F.3d 77 (2018) · United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018 — satisfied · triable (29usc623: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: daily-age-taunts-by-owners-and-general-manager-as-hostile-work-environment - AND Judicial but-for standard for age-based treatment
Gross, 557 U.S. 167 (2009), governs §623(a)(1). A motivating-factor showing alone does not shift persuasion to the employer. Direct and circumstantial proof are available; McDonnell Douglas is a proof framework, not the statute or an inflexible universal pleading checklist.
11 merits instance blocks; 11 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) age-correlated-factor
provisional; provisional (1 case)Whether a decision based on a factor correlated with age is a decision because of age (Hazen Paper). 1
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 1; excluded context 01 Bryan v. Gov't of the V.I. — 916 F.3d 242 (2019) · United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019 — not · law (29usc623: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: extra-pension-contribution-imposed-on-employees-with-thirty-years-credited-servicepretext-inference
provisional; 8 observed casesWhether age was the but-for cause, inferred circumstantially from the weakness of the employer's reason, age-related remarks, replacement or comparison evidence. 8
Satisfied 4; not satisfied 4; excluded context 08 Jardin v. CoxCom, LLC — 320 F. Supp. 3d 373 (2018) · United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island · 2018 — not · no-evidence (29usc623: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: supervisor's two "weird old man" remarks five months before a discharge for admitted misconduct decided by HR; no nexusWilliams v. Temple Univ. Hosp., Inc. — 345 F. Supp. 3d 590 (2018) · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania · 2018 — satisfied · triable (29usc623: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: discretionary progressive discipline for cell-phone use, informal warnings available, plus a termination note referring to the employee being close to retirementRogers v. Medline Indus., Inc. — 361 F. Supp. 3d 616 (2019) · United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi · 2019 — satisfied · triable (29usc623: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: corrective action plan planned before any documented customer complaint, non-mandatory incentive quota, earlier lower quota results tolerated; one remote age remark held not probativeprima-facie-case
provisional; 2 observed casesWhether the plaintiff made the prima facie showing that raises an inference of age discrimination. 2
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 2; excluded context 02 Kitchen v. BASF — 343 F. Supp. 3d 681 (2018) · United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas · 2018 — not · no-evidence (29usc623: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: no evidence of replacement or of differently treated comparators, only the plaintiff's subjective belief; decisionmaker himself in his 50sMcDaniel v. Progress Rail Locomotive — 343 F. Supp. 3d 753 (2018) · United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois · 2018 — not · no-evidence (29usc623: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: no specific similarly situated younger comparator named; discharge by a separate safety committee for an admitted lifting violation - EXCEPTION Route-conditioned statutory f(1) and f(2) alternatives
Conditional gate for (a), (b), (c), (e), including agency, union and advertising routes. This is a disjunction of applicable defenses, not an assumption that every actor has every defense. Benefit coordination under (l)-(n) requires separate specialist analysis as disclosed in catalogue-scope.
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) foreign-conflict
provisional; 0 observed casesApply foreign-law only where compliance would violate the specified foreign workplace law. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 00 Never used: no annotation uses in this snapshot other-factor
provisional; 0 observed casesApply rfoa only to a legally cognizable impact theory; unavailable for intentional treatment or using age itself as the limit. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 00 Never used: no annotation uses in this snapshot qualification
provisional; 0 observed casesApply bfoq only to the necessary occupational age qualification. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 00 Never used: no annotation uses in this snapshot seniority-benefit
provisional; 0 observed casesApply benefit-plan only to observing a qualifying system/plan and subject to its hiring/retirement limits and defendant burden. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 00 Never used: no annotation uses in this snapshot - EXCEPTION Conditional state firefighter and law-enforcement hiring or retirement
Limited to the enumerated governmental employers, occupations, and hiring/discharge acts. It is not a general public-sector or public-safety BFOQ and does not excuse unrelated employment terms or retaliation.
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
No routes recorded for this element.
- EXCEPTION Age sixty-five executive or high-policymaker compulsory retirement
Cross-section statutory exception only to qualifying compulsory retirement; no exemption from all discrimination protections for anyone called an executive. The §623 text anchor is the discharge hook, not a fabricated §631 quotation.
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
No routes recorded for this element.
- AND Judicial impact requirement to identify a particular practice
Isolate the practice responsible for the disparity; workforce-wide age imbalance alone is insufficient. O’Brien held a benefits-liquidation rule applied to hundreds of employees actionable even though adopted once.
2 merits instance blocks; 2 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) Unclassified route
provisional; provisional (1 case)no definition yet 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 10 Used only in non-merits blocks (1).
Excluded context examples:Eggers v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. — 899 F.3d 629 (2018) · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018 — not reached · basis not recorded (29usc623: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · not counted
Pattern: not recorded_whole
accepted; 3 observed casesThe element is decided as a whole: the reasoning turns on no narrower doctrinal sub-question that distinguishes it from any other application of this element. 2
Satisfied 1; not satisfied 1; excluded context 12 Rogers v. Medline Indus., Inc. — 361 F. Supp. 3d 616 (2019) · United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi · 2019 — not · waived (29usc623: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: disparate-impact theory pleaded but expressly disclaimed in the summary-judgment responseO'Brien v. Caterpillar Inc. — 900 F.3d 923 (2018) · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018 — satisfied · law (29usc623: author: Astra4 · QA: PASS (QA2, neov2/qa/wave2-cases-QA2-crosscheck.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Excluded context examples:
Pattern: benefit-liquidation/retirement-eligibility-conditionTeufel v. Northern Trust Co. — 887 F.3d 799 (2018) · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018 — not reached · basis not recorded (29usc623: author: Astra4 · not independently reviewed) · background/merits · not counted
Pattern: pension/section-623-i-compliancespecific-practice-identification
provisional; provisional (1 case)Whether the plaintiff identified the specific employment practice said to cause the disparity (Smith v. City of Jackson, Meacham). 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 10 Used only in non-merits blocks (1).
Excluded context examples:Rogers v. Medline Indus., Inc. — 361 F. Supp. 3d 616 (2019) · United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi · 2019 — not · no-evidence (29usc623: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/alternative · not counted
Pattern: no employment policy identified at all; only a list of terminated older salespersons - AND Judicial impact requirement of significant causal disparity
Statistical comparison must fit the affected labor pool and challenged practice. O’Brien recognizes older-subgroup comparisons within the over-forty class; do not present that circuit treatment as a universal rule.
2 merits instance blocks; 2 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) _whole
accepted; 2 observed casesThe element is decided as a whole: the reasoning turns on no narrower doctrinal sub-question that distinguishes it from any other application of this element. 2
Satisfied 1; not satisfied 1; excluded context 02 Eggers v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. — 899 F.3d 629 (2018) · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018 — not · no-evidence (29usc623: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: no-statistical-evidence-of-impact-from-bank-refusal-to-sponsor-conviction-waiversO'Brien v. Caterpillar Inc. — 900 F.3d 923 (2018) · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018 — satisfied · law (29usc623: author: Astra4 · QA: PASS (QA2, neov2/qa/wave2-cases-QA2-crosscheck.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: statistical-impact/retirement-eligible-subgroup - AND Covered employment agency
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
No routes recorded for this element.
- AND Covered labor organization
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
No routes recorded for this element.
- AND Opposition or participation
2 merits instance blocks; 2 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) opposition
provisional; provisional (1 case)Opposing an ADEA-unlawful practice; judicial good-faith/reasonableness limits apply. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 10 Used only in non-merits blocks (1).
Excluded context examples:Shoap v. City of Crossville — 321 F. Supp. 3d 839 (2018) · United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee · 2018 — not reached · basis not recorded (29usc623: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · not counted
Pattern: no written or informal complaint of age discrimination, only general objection to a councilman; court "doubtful" but does not decideparticipation
provisional; 2 observed casesCharge, testimony, assistance or participation in ADEA investigation, proceeding or litigation. 2
Satisfied 2; not satisfied 0; excluded context 02 Spratt v. Bellwood Public Library — 380 F. Supp. 3d 783 (2019) · United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois · 2019 — satisfied · pleaded (29usc623: author: Astra4 · not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: eeoc-age-discrimination-chargeRivera-Rivera v. Medina & Medina, Inc. — 898 F.3d 77 (2018) · United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018 — satisfied · conceded (29usc623: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: filing-eeoc-and-adu-charges - AND Judicial material-adversity standard for retaliation
Davis-Garett applies Burlington Northern: harm need not change employment terms, but trivial slights do not suffice. Evaluate context and employer knowledge of protected conduct.
4 merits instance blocks; 4 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) _whole
accepted; 4 observed casesThe element is decided as a whole: the reasoning turns on no narrower doctrinal sub-question that distinguishes it from any other application of this element. 4
Satisfied 3; not satisfied 1; excluded context 04 Shoap v. City of Crossville — 321 F. Supp. 3d 839 (2018) · United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee · 2018 — not · no-evidence (29usc623: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: voluntary resignation, no discipline, no constructive discharge; retaliation claim fails for want of any adverse actionSpratt v. Bellwood Public Library — 380 F. Supp. 3d 783 (2019) · United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois · 2019 — satisfied · pleaded (29usc623: author: Astra4 · not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: retaliation/leave-and-termination-after-chargeRivera-Rivera v. Medina & Medina, Inc. — 898 F.3d 77 (2018) · United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018 — satisfied · triable (29usc623: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: daily-threats-of-termination-after-charge-then-resignation - AND Retaliatory causal connection
Require causal connection between protected conduct known to defendant and material adversity; ultimate retaliation liability requires the applicable but-for standard, not merely chronological sequence. Davis-Garett addresses the adversity standard, not an independent holding relaxing ultimate causation.
3 merits instance blocks; 3 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) _whole
accepted; 3 observed casesThe element is decided as a whole: the reasoning turns on no narrower doctrinal sub-question that distinguishes it from any other application of this element. 3
Satisfied 2; not satisfied 1; excluded context 03 McDaniel v. Progress Rail Locomotive — 343 F. Supp. 3d 753 (2018) · United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois · 2018 — not · no-evidence (29usc623: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: overtime complaint (assumed protected) followed the same month by a cell-phone write-up, later sweeping duty and discharge by a committee not shown to know of the complaintSpratt v. Bellwood Public Library — 380 F. Supp. 3d 783 (2019) · United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois · 2019 — satisfied · pleaded (29usc623: author: Astra4 · not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: causation/charge-followed-by-continuing-patternRivera-Rivera v. Medina & Medina, Inc. — 898 F.3d 77 (2018) · United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018 — satisfied · triable (29usc623: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: termination-threats-expressly-tied-to-the-charges - AND Agency referral discrimination
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
No routes recorded for this element.
- OR Membership classification referral or causing discrimination
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) inducement
provisional; 0 observed cases§623(c)(3) causing or attempting employer discrimination. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 00 Never used: no annotation uses in this snapshot membership
provisional; 0 observed casesExclusion, expulsion or discrimination under §623(c)(1). 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 00 Never used: no annotation uses in this snapshot referral
provisional; 0 observed cases§623(c)(2) classification or referral affecting employment opportunity. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 00 Never used: no annotation uses in this snapshot - AND Employer agency or union advertiser
Apply the relevant §630 covered-entity definition; employer-only numerical coverage is not imposed on every kind of entity.
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
No routes recorded for this element.
- AND Age-based notice or advertisement
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
No routes recorded for this element.
- AND Wage reduction to comply
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
No routes recorded for this element.
- AND Employer agency union or combination maintaining a pension plan
Section 623(i)(1) identifies these pension-plan actors independently of advertising. Apply the relevant §630 entity definitions; no notice, advertisement or publication is required.
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
No routes recorded for this element.
- AND Establish or maintain an employee pension benefit plan
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
No routes recorded for this element.
- OR Age-based accrual or allocation cessation or reduction
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) defined-benefit
provisional; 0 observed casesCessation of accrual or reduction of accrual rate because of age under (i)(1)(A). 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 00 Never used: no annotation uses in this snapshot defined-contribution
provisional; 0 observed casesCessation of account allocations or reduction of allocation rate because of age under (i)(1)(B). 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 00 Never used: no annotation uses in this snapshot - EXCEPTION Subsection i pension qualifications and compliance
These are conditional statutory qualifications, not an actuarial compliance finding. Teufel's pinned sentence supports (i)(4) compliance, not a freestanding f(2) defense. An (i)(1) assessment must examine all relevant (i)(2)-(10) conditions; this core formula does not independently model every hybrid-conversion violation.
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) age-neutral-cap
provisional; 0 observed cases(i)(2) permits benefit or service/participation limits imposed without regard to age. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 00 Never used: no annotation uses in this snapshot compensated-employee
provisional; 0 observed cases(i)(5) applies only to the regulatory extent necessary to prevent discrimination favoring highly compensated employees. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 00 Never used: no annotation uses in this snapshot distribution-adjustment
provisional; 0 observed cases(i)(3) credits the prescribed actuarial equivalent of in-service distribution or the specified delayed-distribution adjustment, subject to Treasury regulations. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 00 Never used: no annotation uses in this snapshot hybrid-and-offset
provisional; 0 observed cases(i)(10)(B)-(G) impose special hybrid-plan interest, capital, conversion and termination conditions and specified offset/disparity and preservation rules; a plan cannot invoke these as unconditional permission to reduce accrual because of age. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 00 Never used: no annotation uses in this snapshot subsidies-and-normal-age
provisional; 0 observed cases(i)(6)-(8) govern disregarded early-retirement subsidies, permitted (m) plans, incorporated Treasury regulations and the specified normal-retirement-age rule. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 00 Never used: no annotation uses in this snapshot younger-comparison
provisional; 0 observed cases(i)(10)(A) permits comparison with an otherwise identical younger participant, using the prescribed accrued-benefit measures and subsidy disregard. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 00 Never used: no annotation uses in this snapshot - EXCEPTION Conditional bona fide seniority system or benefit plan
Statutory alternatives: (A) a bona fide seniority system without an evasion purpose; (B)(i) the prescribed equal-benefit/cost condition or (B)(ii) a voluntary early-retirement incentive consistent with the Act. The defendant bears proof. Both seniority and benefits forbid age-based involuntary retirement as stated; the additional failure-to-hire prohibition applies to (B), not automatically to every seniority system. Pension accrual compliance belongs in pension-safeguards, not an unconditional f(2) exemption.
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
No routes recorded for this element.
- EXCEPTION Narrow bona fide occupational qualification
Section 623(f)(1) statutory defense; employer must justify age qualification, not rely on stereotypes or ordinary preference. Detailed safety/BFOQ evidentiary variants are outside this core catalogue.
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
No routes recorded for this element.
- AND Displayed scope and specialized exclusions
Models core (a)-(f) practices, (i)(1) pension accrual with conditional (i) safeguards, (j) public-safety and §631(c) executive retirement. Full (l)-(n) benefit-coordination and tenured-faculty incentive rules, detailed (i)(10) actuarial/conversion claims, and federal-sector §633a litigation remain outside these core formulas. Foreign-employer/control coverage under (h), §630 citizenship/employee definitions and enforcement prerequisites must also be checked; none is displaced by these merits formulas.
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
No routes recorded for this element.
- AND Charge filing waiver and remedies
Enforcement is not another merits element. Wrolstad applied a 300-day deferral-state deadline to unequivocal notice of a threat to sue. Federal §633a procedures and Babb causation are separate; see NOTES scope map.
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) _whole
accepted; provisional (1 case)The element is decided as a whole: the reasoning turns on no narrower doctrinal sub-question that distinguishes it from any other application of this element. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 10 Used only in non-merits blocks (1).
Excluded context examples:Davis v. District of Columbia — 925 F.3d 1240 (2019) · United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit · 2019 — not · waived (29usc623: author: Astra4 · not independently reviewed) · background/procedural · not counted
Pattern: appeal/age-claims-abandonedcharge-timeliness
provisional; provisional (1 case)Whether the administrative charge was timely, including when the claim accrued. 0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 10 Used only in non-merits blocks (1).
Excluded context examples:Wrolstad v. CUNA Mutual Insurance Society — 911 F.3d 450 (2018) · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018 — not · law (29usc623: author: Astra4 · QA: PASS (QA2, neov2/qa/wave2-cases-QA2-crosscheck.md)) · applied/procedural · not counted
Pattern: charge-accrual/unequivocal-waiver-enforcement-notice - EXCEPTION Foreign workplace conflict with local law
§623(f)(1); also inspect §623(h) control and foreign-employer rules and §630(f) citizenship coverage. Mere foreign business convenience is not statutory conflict.
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
No routes recorded for this element.
- EXCEPTION Good cause for employer discharge or discipline
Catalogue scope: employer discharge or disciplinary action under the disparate-treatment route only, subject to good-cause-scope. Not a general business-justification defense to hiring, non-disciplinary employment terms, agency referral/classification, union membership/referral, advertising, impact, retaliation or pension claims. A proffered reason can be rebutted as pretext; the claimant retains the ultimate Gross persuasion burden.
0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases
No routes recorded for this element.
- AND Judicial outside-applicant coverage limit where circuit precedent controls
Kleber en banc (7th Cir. 2019) excludes outside applicants from §623(a)(2), consistent with the Eleventh Circuit; §623(a)(1) treatment claims for applicants remain available. This jurisdiction-sensitive boundary is part of neutral-practice coverage, not a bar to all ADEA hiring claims.
1 merits instance blocks; 1 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) _whole
accepted; provisional (1 case)The element is decided as a whole: the reasoning turns on no narrower doctrinal sub-question that distinguishes it from any other application of this element. 1
Satisfied 1; not satisfied 0; excluded context 01 Kleber v. CareFusion Corp. — 914 F.3d 480 (2019) · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, en banc · 2019 — satisfied · law (29usc623: author: Astra4 · historical QA: PASS (QA2, neov2/qa/wave2-cases-QA2-crosscheck.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: applicant/outside-employee-impact-coverage - DEFENSE Reasonable factors other than age
The employer bears production and persuasion on this affirmative defense (Meacham, 554 U.S. 84). Reasonableness differs from Title VII business necessity and does not demand the least discriminatory alternative. RFOA is not permission for intentional age discrimination.
3 merits instance blocks; 3 distinct cases
Curated routes and observed case patterns Route Definition Merits instance blocks Distinct merits cases Examples (up to 3 cases per count group) _whole
accepted; 3 observed casesThe element is decided as a whole: the reasoning turns on no narrower doctrinal sub-question that distinguishes it from any other application of this element. 3
Satisfied 3; not satisfied 0; excluded context 03 O'Brien v. Caterpillar Inc. — 900 F.3d 923 (2018) · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018 — satisfied · law (29usc623: author: Astra4 · QA: PASS (QA2, neov2/qa/wave2-cases-QA2-crosscheck.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: financial-purpose/eliminate-unemployment-plan-with-union-supportDayton v. Oakton Cmty. Coll. — 907 F.3d 460 (2018) · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018 — satisfied · law (29usc623: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: blanket-refusal-to-employ-pension-annuitants-to-avoid-statutory-return-to-work-penaltyBryan v. Gov't of the V.I. — 916 F.3d 242 (2019) · United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019 — satisfied · law (29usc623: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: payroll-reduction-and-pension-solvency-targeting-long-tenured-employees