Mens rea: "knowingly or intentionally" (including knowledge that the substance is a controlled substance)

AND · 21usc841:knowledge

Under McFadden v. United States (576 U.S. 186 (2015)), the government must prove the defendant knew he was dealing with "a controlled substance" (either by knowing the substance is listed on the federal schedules, or by knowing the physical identity/chemical makeup of the substance even if unaware it is scheduled).

Exact element source

it shall be unlawful for any person knowingly or intentionally-
Source: docroot/ir/usc/title21.jsonl#title21_sec841; Unicode character offsets [83:146] (end exclusive); SHA-256 ebaba73bf6e21a591f44bf851f24a052a5687813c505030cd9483e17753e9420.

All variants

Recorded DB variant labels, including zero-count variants
VariantDescriptionMerits instance blocksDistinct casesExample cases (up to 3 per group)
admitted/defendant-admits-knowing-possession1
Satisfied 1; not satisfied 0; excluded context 0
1/f2d/779/1098-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986 — satisfied
circumstantial/loader-of-sealed-boxes-coordinated-with-delivery1
Satisfied 1; not satisfied 0; excluded context 0
1/f2d/701/1349-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983 — satisfied
circumstantial/owner-of-stash-premises-who-loaded-and-drove1
Satisfied 1; not satisfied 0; excluded context 0
1/f2d/701/1349-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983 — satisfied
Unspecified variantNo variant assigned in the database.0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 10
0No counted merits examples

Excluded context examples: /f-supp-2d/427/0894-01 — United States District Court for the District of Minnesota · 2006 — background/merits; /f-supp-3d/225/0274-01 — United States District Court for the District of New Jersey · 2016 — applied/merits; /f3d/20/0229-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994 — applied/merits

How courts decided this element

Annotation blocks, including explicitly excluded context
CaseElementHolding and scopeVariantExact source quotations
/f-supp-2d/427/0894-01 — United States District Court for the District of Minnesota · 2006Mens rea: "knowingly or intentionally" (including knowledge that the substance is a controlled substance)not_reached
Excluded from merits counts
background / merits

claim: (a)(1),(b)(1)(A)

Unspecified variantNo source quotation recorded for this block.
/f-supp-3d/225/0274-01 — United States District Court for the District of New Jersey · 2016Mens rea: "knowingly or intentionally" (including knowledge that the substance is a controlled substance)not_reached
Excluded from merits counts
applied / merits

claim: (a)(1),(b)(1)(A)

Unspecified variantNo source quotation recorded for this block.
/f2d/701/1349-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983Mens rea: "knowingly or intentionally" (including knowledge that the substance is a controlled substance)satisfied
Counted merits instance
applied / merits

basis: proved; claim: (a)(1); party: Vera; subject: party=Vera

No evidence he looked inside the boxes or of what was said; knowledge of contents inferred from presence at the final deal preparations, driving the buyer-supplied delivery van to the stash, 20 minutes in the shed, loading the boxes, and their leaking/torn condition. Distinguished from mere-presence and unwitting-courier cases (Littrell, Aguiar, Craig, Pruett).
circumstantial/loader-of-sealed-boxes-coordinated-with-delivery
Fiano saw appellant Vera together with Hassan, Adamo and Romero in the back room.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f2d_701.jsonl#/f2d/701/1349-01; Unicode character offsets [3660:3741] (end exclusive); SHA-256 06c4eb390b9d5107032af6ab238d0a354dab17499cbb12fe72ac63a7ff8ec7ed.

Evidence kind: fact; polarity: supports; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

Vera then drove the van, which had been provided for the delivery of the drugs, to Posada’s house.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f2d_701.jsonl#/f2d/701/1349-01; Unicode character offsets [19702:19800] (end exclusive); SHA-256 06c4eb390b9d5107032af6ab238d0a354dab17499cbb12fe72ac63a7ff8ec7ed.

Evidence kind: fact; polarity: supports; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

Approximately 20 minutes later, Vera and Posada emerged from the shed carrying a box measuring approximately three feet in width and one and a half feet in height which they loaded into the van.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f2d_701.jsonl#/f2d/701/1349-01; Unicode character offsets [4919:5113] (end exclusive); SHA-256 06c4eb390b9d5107032af6ab238d0a354dab17499cbb12fe72ac63a7ff8ec7ed.

Evidence kind: fact; polarity: supports; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

In addition, a white powdery substance was seeping out of one of the large boxes found in the van and some of the boxes in the van were “torn and broken.”
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f2d_701.jsonl#/f2d/701/1349-01; Unicode character offsets [22305:22459] (end exclusive); SHA-256 06c4eb390b9d5107032af6ab238d0a354dab17499cbb12fe72ac63a7ff8ec7ed.

Evidence kind: fact; polarity: supports; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

Rather, knowledge may be proved through inferences based upon surrounding circumstances.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f2d_701.jsonl#/f2d/701/1349-01; Unicode character offsets [18953:19041] (end exclusive); SHA-256 06c4eb390b9d5107032af6ab238d0a354dab17499cbb12fe72ac63a7ff8ec7ed.

Evidence kind: rule; polarity: not recorded; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

Close association with a co-conspirator or mere presence at the scene of the crime is insufficient evidence of knowing participation in a conspiracy.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f2d_701.jsonl#/f2d/701/1349-01; Unicode character offsets [16257:16406] (end exclusive); SHA-256 06c4eb390b9d5107032af6ab238d0a354dab17499cbb12fe72ac63a7ff8ec7ed.

Evidence kind: rule; polarity: not recorded; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

A reasonable jury could have concluded beyond a reasonable doubt that the evidence established that Vera knowingly participated in the conspiracy and knowingly possessed and distributed the quaaludes.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f2d_701.jsonl#/f2d/701/1349-01; Unicode character offsets [22637:22837] (end exclusive); SHA-256 06c4eb390b9d5107032af6ab238d0a354dab17499cbb12fe72ac63a7ff8ec7ed.

Evidence kind: held; polarity: not recorded; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

/f2d/701/1349-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983Mens rea: "knowingly or intentionally" (including knowledge that the substance is a controlled substance)satisfied
Counted merits instance
applied / merits

basis: proved; claim: (a)(1); party: Posada; subject: party=Posada

circumstantial/owner-of-stash-premises-who-loaded-and-drove
Moreover, Posada owned the shed in which the boxes were stored.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f2d_701.jsonl#/f2d/701/1349-01; Unicode character offsets [23429:23492] (end exclusive); SHA-256 06c4eb390b9d5107032af6ab238d0a354dab17499cbb12fe72ac63a7ff8ec7ed.

Evidence kind: fact; polarity: supports; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

After the boxes were loaded into the van, Posada drove the van by himself to the shopping center where Hassan was waiting and left the van with Hassan.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f2d_701.jsonl#/f2d/701/1349-01; Unicode character offsets [23493:23644] (end exclusive); SHA-256 06c4eb390b9d5107032af6ab238d0a354dab17499cbb12fe72ac63a7ff8ec7ed.

Evidence kind: fact; polarity: supports; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

Although there is no direct evidence of Posada’s knowledge, sufficient circumstantial evidence of his knowledge exists.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f2d_701.jsonl#/f2d/701/1349-01; Unicode character offsets [23163:23282] (end exclusive); SHA-256 06c4eb390b9d5107032af6ab238d0a354dab17499cbb12fe72ac63a7ff8ec7ed.

Evidence kind: rule; polarity: not recorded; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

Posada’s ownership of the shed where the boxes containing the quaaludes were located and his exercise of dominion and control over the boxes while driving the van to the shopping center clearly supports an inference that he knowingly possessed the boxes containing quaaludes.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f2d_701.jsonl#/f2d/701/1349-01; Unicode character offsets [23645:23920] (end exclusive); SHA-256 06c4eb390b9d5107032af6ab238d0a354dab17499cbb12fe72ac63a7ff8ec7ed.

Evidence kind: held; polarity: not recorded; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

/f2d/779/1098-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986Mens rea: "knowingly or intentionally" (including knowledge that the substance is a controlled substance)satisfied
Counted merits instance
applied / merits

basis: conceded; claim: (a)(1); party: Prieto-Tejas; subject: party=Prieto-Tejas

admitted/defendant-admits-knowing-possession
A conviction for possession of a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) requires proof of knowing possession with intent to distribute (or manufacture or dispense) the substance.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f2d_779.jsonl#/f2d/779/1098-01; Unicode character offsets [5220:5418] (end exclusive); SHA-256 3f39a24d0e7fd74f68caa830c5b43b98bd09511d85522b3dfc3c1703468bc7f2.

Evidence kind: rule; polarity: not recorded; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

Prieto-Tejas admitted knowing possession of all the cocaine found in his car, but claimed that it was for his personal consumption and that the evidence failed to establish his intent to distribute.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f2d_779.jsonl#/f2d/779/1098-01; Unicode character offsets [5653:5851] (end exclusive); SHA-256 3f39a24d0e7fd74f68caa830c5b43b98bd09511d85522b3dfc3c1703468bc7f2.

Evidence kind: held; polarity: not recorded; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

/f3d/20/0229-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994Mens rea: "knowingly or intentionally" (including knowledge that the substance is a controlled substance)not_reached
Excluded from merits counts
applied / merits

claim: (a)(1),(b)(1)(D)

Unspecified variantNo source quotation recorded for this block.
/f3d/235/0565-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000Mens rea: "knowingly or intentionally" (including knowledge that the substance is a controlled substance)not_reached
Excluded from merits counts
applied / merits

claim: (a)(1),(b)(1)(A),(b)(1)(B)

Unspecified variantNo source quotation recorded for this block.
/f3d/57/0516-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995Mens rea: "knowingly or intentionally" (including knowledge that the substance is a controlled substance)not_reached
Excluded from merits counts
applied / merits

claim: (a)(1)

Not contested on appeal.
Unspecified variantNo source quotation recorded for this block.
/f3d/767/0453-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014Mens rea: "knowingly or intentionally" (including knowledge that the substance is a controlled substance)not_reached
Excluded from merits counts
comparator / merits

claim: (a)(1)

Unspecified variantNo source quotation recorded for this block.
/f4th/142/259 — Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025Mens rea: "knowingly or intentionally" (including knowledge that the substance is a controlled substance)not_reached
Excluded from merits counts
comparator / merits

claim: (a)(1),(b)(1)(C)

Unspecified variantNo source quotation recorded for this block.
/us/500/0453-01 — Supreme Court of the United States · 1991Mens rea: "knowingly or intentionally" (including knowledge that the substance is a controlled substance)not_reached
Excluded from merits counts
applied / merits

claim: (a),(b)(1)(B)(v)

Unspecified variantNo source quotation recorded for this block.
/us/569/0184-01 — Supreme Court of the United States · 2013Mens rea: "knowingly or intentionally" (including knowledge that the substance is a controlled substance)not_reached
Excluded from merits counts
comparator / merits

claim: (a)(1),(b)(1)(D),(b)(4)

Unspecified variantNo source quotation recorded for this block.
/us/571/0204-01 — Supreme Court of the United States · 2014Mens rea: "knowingly or intentionally" (including knowledge that the substance is a controlled substance)not_reached
Excluded from merits counts
applied / merits

claim: (a)(1),(b)(1)(C)

Unspecified variantNo source quotation recorded for this block.

Court interpretations

interpretation

A conviction for possession of a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) requires proof of knowing possession with intent to distribute (or manufacture or dispense) the substance.

/f2d/779/1098-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986

A conviction for possession of a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) requires proof of knowing possession with intent to distribute (or manufacture or dispense) the substance.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f2d_779.jsonl#/f2d/779/1098-01; Unicode character offsets [5220:5418] (end exclusive); SHA-256 3f39a24d0e7fd74f68caa830c5b43b98bd09511d85522b3dfc3c1703468bc7f2.

Under McFadden v. United States (576 U.S. 186 (2015)), the government must prove the defendant knew he was dealing with "a controlled substance" (either by knowing the substance is listed on the federal schedules, or by knowing the physical identity/chemical makeup of the substance even if unaware it is scheduled).

interpretation

Rather, knowledge may be proved through inferences based upon surrounding circumstances.

/f2d/701/1349-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983

Rather, knowledge may be proved through inferences based upon surrounding circumstances.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f2d_701.jsonl#/f2d/701/1349-01; Unicode character offsets [18953:19041] (end exclusive); SHA-256 06c4eb390b9d5107032af6ab238d0a354dab17499cbb12fe72ac63a7ff8ec7ed.

Under McFadden v. United States (576 U.S. 186 (2015)), the government must prove the defendant knew he was dealing with "a controlled substance" (either by knowing the substance is listed on the federal schedules, or by knowing the physical identity/chemical makeup of the substance even if unaware it is scheduled).

interpretation

Close association with a co-conspirator or mere presence at the scene of the crime is insufficient evidence of knowing participation in a conspiracy.

/f2d/701/1349-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983

Close association with a co-conspirator or mere presence at the scene of the crime is insufficient evidence of knowing participation in a conspiracy.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f2d_701.jsonl#/f2d/701/1349-01; Unicode character offsets [16257:16406] (end exclusive); SHA-256 06c4eb390b9d5107032af6ab238d0a354dab17499cbb12fe72ac63a7ff8ec7ed.

Under McFadden v. United States (576 U.S. 186 (2015)), the government must prove the defendant knew he was dealing with "a controlled substance" (either by knowing the substance is listed on the federal schedules, or by knowing the physical identity/chemical makeup of the substance even if unaware it is scheduled).

not-required

Direct evidence of knowledge; circumstantial evidence (or deliberate ignorance / willful blindness where defendant took deliberate actions to avoid confirming a high probability of contraband) suffices (Vera; McFadden v. United States, 576 U.S. 186 (2015))

No source quotation recorded.