Municipal policy or custom as moving force (Monell v. Department of Social Services)

AND · 42usc1983:policy

Satisfied by (1) an express municipal policy, (2) a widespread practice/custom so permanent and well settled as to have the force of law, (3) an act of an official with final policymaking authority (Pembaur; Praprotnik), or (4) deliberate indifference in failure to train/supervise (`policy.failure-to-train`).

Exact element source

custom, or usage,
Source: docroot/ir/usc/title42.jsonl#title42_sec1983; Unicode character offsets [115:132] (end exclusive); SHA-256 88fe01322b9d94860a669ec452f558146e2745845070bc43583671ce12acb2bb.

All variants

Recorded DB variant labels, including zero-count variants
VariantDescriptionMerits instance blocksDistinct casesExample cases (up to 3 per group)
final-policymaker/police-chief-decision-ratified-by-city-manager1
Satisfied 1; not satisfied 0; excluded context 0
1/f-supp/772/0583-01 — United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida · 1991 — satisfied
policy-or-custom/entity-named-only-as-source-of-authority1
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 1; excluded context 0
1/f2d/628/1104-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980 — not
Unspecified variantNo variant assigned in the database.0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 8
0No counted merits examples

Excluded context examples: /f-supp/567/1159-01 — United States District Court for the District of Delaware · 1983 — applied/merits; /f3d/189/0808-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999 — applied/merits; /f3d/475/0645-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007 — applied/merits

How courts decided this element

Annotation blocks, including explicitly excluded context
CaseElementHolding and scopeVariantExact source quotations
/f-supp/567/1159-01 — United States District Court for the District of Delaware · 1983Municipal policy or custom as moving force (Monell v. Department of Social Services)not_reached
Excluded from merits counts
applied / merits

Unspecified variantNo source quotation recorded for this block.
/f-supp/772/0583-01 — United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida · 1991Municipal policy or custom as moving force (Monell v. Department of Social Services)satisfied
Counted merits instance
applied / merits

basis: triable; party: City of Miami and official-capacity defendants; subject: party=City of Miami and official-capacity defendants

Single personnel decisions by the chief, ratified by the city manager, suffice; final ruling reserved for trial.
final-policymaker/police-chief-decision-ratified-by-city-manager
Police Chief Dickson elected instead to impose a six month extension of Kamenesh’s probationary period as captain and to eliminate forty hours of Plaintiff’s earned overtime.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f_supp_772.jsonl#/f-supp/772/0583-01; Unicode character offsets [3230:3404] (end exclusive); SHA-256 61ce8424e918ef86a19d77a8269d686f5594190217c2ebcc63814df5bb34edd6.

Evidence kind: fact; polarity: supports; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

Dickson accepted Oboz’s recommendations to transfer Kamenesh out of SIS and to instigate an Internal Security investigation into Kamenesh’s associations with Anatasia and his alleged insubordination to Oboz.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f_supp_772.jsonl#/f-supp/772/0583-01; Unicode character offsets [2396:2603] (end exclusive); SHA-256 61ce8424e918ef86a19d77a8269d686f5594190217c2ebcc63814df5bb34edd6.

Evidence kind: fact; polarity: supports; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

the decisions of the two police chiefs involved and the direct and indirect ratification of those decisions by two different city managers concerning the incidents complained of constitute acts by “final policymakers”
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f_supp_772.jsonl#/f-supp/772/0583-01; Unicode character offsets [23447:23664] (end exclusive); SHA-256 61ce8424e918ef86a19d77a8269d686f5594190217c2ebcc63814df5bb34edd6.

Evidence kind: held; polarity: not recorded; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

/f2d/628/1104-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980Municipal policy or custom as moving force (Monell v. Department of Social Services)not
Counted merits instance
applied / merits

basis: pleaded; party: Polk County (entity); subject: party=Polk County (entity)

Deficient as pleaded but leave to amend ordered on remand, so the failure is provisional.
policy-or-custom/entity-named-only-as-source-of-authority
. The portion of the complaint which names Polk County reads as follows: “Polk County is enjoined [sic-perhaps “joined” is meant] in this action because it is the political basis, and the source that authorized it’s [sic] political sub-divisions and it’s [sic] quasi-contractants to act in the manner prescribed in this complaint . . .
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f2d_628.jsonl#/f2d/628/1104-01; Unicode character offsets [15735:16070] (end exclusive); SHA-256 d2c865685b00f7d491a6a0a10e31df9c82bf1a5e46d7bc2a6fe79468154f11bf.

Evidence kind: fact; polarity: supports; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

Even though we interpret the allegations expansively, we are unable to say that the complaint alleges the necessary county involvement in the claimed unconstitutional conduct by virtue of the execution of county policy or custom.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f2d_628.jsonl#/f2d/628/1104-01; Unicode character offsets [12870:13099] (end exclusive); SHA-256 d2c865685b00f7d491a6a0a10e31df9c82bf1a5e46d7bc2a6fe79468154f11bf.

Evidence kind: held; polarity: not recorded; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

/f3d/189/0808-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999Municipal policy or custom as moving force (Monell v. Department of Social Services)not_reached
Excluded from merits counts
applied / merits

Unspecified variantNo source quotation recorded for this block.
/f3d/475/0645-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007Municipal policy or custom as moving force (Monell v. Department of Social Services)not_reached
Excluded from merits counts
applied / merits

Unspecified variantNo source quotation recorded for this block.
/f3d/813/0938-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015Municipal policy or custom as moving force (Monell v. Department of Social Services)not_reached
Excluded from merits counts
applied / merits

Sheriff did not appeal in his official capacity.
Unspecified variantNo source quotation recorded for this block.
/f4th/141/417 — Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2025Municipal policy or custom as moving force (Monell v. Department of Social Services)not_reached
Excluded from merits counts
applied / merits

Unspecified variantNo source quotation recorded for this block.
/us/502/0021-01 — Supreme Court of the United States · 1991Municipal policy or custom as moving force (Monell v. Department of Social Services)not_reached
Excluded from merits counts
applied / merits

Stated only as a contrast: personal-capacity plaintiffs need not show an entity policy or custom; official-capacity plaintiffs must.
Unspecified variantNo source quotation recorded for this block.
/us/503/0001-01 — Supreme Court of the United States · 1992Municipal policy or custom as moving force (Monell v. Department of Social Services)not_reached
Excluded from merits counts
applied / merits

Unspecified variantNo source quotation recorded for this block.
/us/526/0040-01 — Supreme Court of the United States · 1999Municipal policy or custom as moving force (Monell v. Department of Social Services)not_reached
Excluded from merits counts
applied / merits

party: School District of Philadelphia, self-insurer and municipal corporation (own certiorari petition denied); subject: party=School District of Philadelphia, self-insurer and municipal corporation (own certiorari petition denied)

School District of Philadelphia (self-insurer, municipal corporation) was a defendant, but its state-actor status and any Monell question were never decided.
Unspecified variantNo source quotation recorded for this block.

Court interpretations

interpretation

Instead, to establish municipal liability, a plaintiff must show that a local government's "policy or custom" led to the plaintiff's injury. Monell , 436 U.

/f3d/935/0804-01

Instead, to establish municipal liability, a plaintiff must show that a local government's "policy or custom" led to the plaintiff's injury. Monell , 436 U.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f3d_935.jsonl#/f3d/935/0804-01; Unicode character offsets [9027:9183] (end exclusive); SHA-256 c8c8a082e238f939ada99fe6c822fed1224a701feedd83954fbc385779bf849a.

Satisfied by (1) an express municipal policy, (2) a widespread practice/custom so permanent and well settled as to have the force of law, (3) an act of an official with final policymaking authority (Pembaur; Praprotnik), or (4) deliberate indifference in failure to train/supervise (`policy.failure-to-train`).

interpretation

The city is not vicariously liable under §1983 for the constitutional torts of its agents: It is only liable when it can be fairly said that the city itself is the wrongdoer.

/us/503/0115-01 — Supreme Court of the United States · 1992

The city is not vicariously liable under §1983 for the constitutional torts of its agents: It is only liable when it can be fairly said that the city itself is the wrongdoer.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/us_503.jsonl#/us/503/0115-01; Unicode character offsets [8208:8382] (end exclusive); SHA-256 cdcb0d53dc7d297333c59be23c4699c1e9264a24434e59748ddb5fbaeb69f046.

Satisfied by (1) an express municipal policy, (2) a widespread practice/custom so permanent and well settled as to have the force of law, (3) an act of an official with final policymaking authority (Pembaur; Praprotnik), or (4) deliberate indifference in failure to train/supervise (`policy.failure-to-train`).

interpretation

Consequently, we vacate the district court’s derivative judgment in favor of defendants on Codrington’s claims under Monell v.

/f4th/142/884

Consequently, we vacate the district court’s derivative judgment in favor of defendants on Codrington’s claims under Monell v.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f4th_142.jsonl#/f4th/142/884; Unicode character offsets [2309:2435] (end exclusive); SHA-256 997b387c2c89f1d2c34461257739053b3dcd8941cb6ef00e0ce9f261c8d7c09a.

Satisfied by (1) an express municipal policy, (2) a widespread practice/custom so permanent and well settled as to have the force of law, (3) an act of an official with final policymaking authority (Pembaur; Praprotnik), or (4) deliberate indifference in failure to train/supervise (`policy.failure-to-train`).

not-required

Respondeat superior / vicarious liability is rejected; municipality is not liable solely because it employs a tortfeasor (Monell, 436 U.S. at 691)

No source quotation recorded.