Restraint of trade or commerce among the several States or with foreign nations

AND · 15usc1:commerce

Under Summit Health, Ltd. v. Pinhas (500 U.S. 322 (1991)) and McLain v. Real Estate Board of New Orleans (444 U.S. 232 (1980)), satisfied if the restraint is either "in" interstate commerce or concerns general business activities that have a "not insubstantial effect" on interstate commerce (and for foreign commerce, subject to the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act, 15 U.S.C. § 6a).

Exact element source

among the several States, or with foreign nations
Source: docroot/ir/usc/title15.jsonl#title15_sec1; Unicode character offsets [169:218] (end exclusive); SHA-256 9c248965c2c712de1e3f3d52a17be4c90dfdcac5d3f9fea0b7220b164e2c2973.

All variants

Recorded DB variant labels, including zero-count variants
VariantDescriptionMerits instance blocksDistinct casesExample cases (up to 3 per group)
Unspecified variantNo variant assigned in the database.0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 12
0No counted merits examples

Excluded context examples: /f-supp-2d/385/0740-01 — United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois · 2005 — rule-announced/merits; /f-supp-3d/351/0698-01 — United States District Court for the Southern District of New York · 2018 — applied/merits; /f-supp/864/1175-01 — United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida · 1994 — applied/merits

How courts decided this element

Annotation blocks, including explicitly excluded context
CaseElementHolding and scopeVariantExact source quotations
/f-supp-2d/385/0740-01 — United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois · 2005Restraint of trade or commerce among the several States or with foreign nationsnot_reached
Excluded from merits counts
rule-announced / merits

Unspecified variantNo source quotation recorded for this block.
/f-supp-3d/351/0698-01 — United States District Court for the Southern District of New York · 2018Restraint of trade or commerce among the several States or with foreign nationsnot_reached
Excluded from merits counts
applied / merits

Unspecified variantNo source quotation recorded for this block.
/f-supp/864/1175-01 — United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida · 1994Restraint of trade or commerce among the several States or with foreign nationsnot_reached
Excluded from merits counts
applied / merits

Unspecified variantNo source quotation recorded for this block.
/f2d/361/0874-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966Restraint of trade or commerce among the several States or with foreign nationsnot_reached
Excluded from merits counts
applied / merits

Unspecified variantNo source quotation recorded for this block.
/f2d/589/0451-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979Restraint of trade or commerce among the several States or with foreign nationsnot_reached
Excluded from merits counts
applied / merits

Unspecified variantNo source quotation recorded for this block.
/f2d/845/1367-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988Restraint of trade or commerce among the several States or with foreign nationsnot_reached
Excluded from merits counts
applied / merits

Unspecified variantNo source quotation recorded for this block.
/f3d/117/1137-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997Restraint of trade or commerce among the several States or with foreign nationsnot_reached
Excluded from merits counts
rule-announced / merits

Unspecified variantNo source quotation recorded for this block.
/f3d/496/0403-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007Restraint of trade or commerce among the several States or with foreign nationsnot_reached
Excluded from merits counts
applied / merits

Unspecified variantNo source quotation recorded for this block.
/us/547/0001-01 — Supreme Court of the United States · 2006Restraint of trade or commerce among the several States or with foreign nationsnot_reached
Excluded from merits counts
applied / merits

Unspecified variantNo source quotation recorded for this block.
/us/550/0544-01 — Supreme Court of the United States · 2007Restraint of trade or commerce among the several States or with foreign nationsnot_reached
Excluded from merits counts
applied / merits

Unspecified variantNo source quotation recorded for this block.
/us/551/0877-01 — Supreme Court of the United States · 2007Restraint of trade or commerce among the several States or with foreign nationsnot_reached
Excluded from merits counts
rule-announced / merits

Unspecified variantNo source quotation recorded for this block.
/us/560/0183-01 — Supreme Court of the United States · 2010Restraint of trade or commerce among the several States or with foreign nationsnot_reached
Excluded from merits counts
applied / merits

Unspecified variantNo source quotation recorded for this block.

Court interpretations

interpretation

A tying arrangement constitutes an unreasonable restraint of trade if “the seller has ‘appreciable economic power’ in the tying product market and if the arrangement affects a substantial volume of commerce in the tied market.”

/f3d/117/1137-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997

A tying arrangement constitutes an unreasonable restraint of trade if “the seller has ‘appreciable economic power’ in the tying product market and if the arrangement affects a substantial volume of commerce in the tied market.”
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f3d_117.jsonl#/f3d/117/1137-01; Unicode character offsets [5624:5851] (end exclusive); SHA-256 a36344b321af95e0282badf90b0d6556447e8cb9d2f401ed27f3a27a49607f8d.

Under Summit Health, Ltd. v. Pinhas (500 U.S. 322 (1991)) and McLain v. Real Estate Board of New Orleans (444 U.S. 232 (1980)), satisfied if the restraint is either "in" interstate commerce or concerns general business activities that have a "not insubstantial effect" on interstate commerce (and for foreign commerce, subject to the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act, 15 U.S.C. § 6a).