United States v. Solis — 915 F.3d 1172 (2019) · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019-02-13

21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)

Original case on neochart.com

Case and law context

21 U.S.C. § 841

Role: applied; posture: criminal; jury convictions for conspiracy (§ 846) and possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine; on appeal defendant challenges sufficiency of the evidence of knowing (constructive) possession and the refusal of a "mere presence" instruction; drug convictions affirmed (separate misprision conviction reversed on Fifth Amendment grounds); result: claimant-won; claim: (a)(1) & (b)(1)(A)

Uncertainty

opinion: the last paragraph @15584..15675 is the opinion's own footnote appended by the IR; one span.

Misfit

None recorded

B · Case × element grid

Top-level elements follow claim order in panels of up to six elements. Case rows repeat across panels. Every recorded block retains its holding and basis; multiple blocks are not merged into a case-level verdict. ✓ satisfied · ✗ not satisfied · ○ not reached · · not addressed. Muted blocks are not counted. Sub-element evidence remains on case and element pages.

Elements 1–6 of 18

21 U.S.C. § 841
CaseMens rea: "knowingly or intentionally" (including knowledge that the substance is a controlled substance)Controlled substance (21 U.S.C. §§ 802(6), 812 Schedules I-V) or counterfeit substance (§ 841(a)(2))Authorization exception ("Except as authorized by this subchapter") for registered practitioners/handlersPossession (actual, constructive, sole, or joint dominion and control)Specific intent to manufacture, distribute, or dispense the possessed controlled substancePartial penalty-tier drug type and quantity table (selected § 841(b)(1)(A)-(D) hook)
United States v. Solis — 915 F.3d 1172 (2019) · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019 (21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md))· not addressed· not addressed
✓ satisfied · provedNot counted: applied/lower-court
· not addressed

Elements 7–12 of 18

21 U.S.C. § 841
CaseDeath or serious bodily injury results from the use of such substance (§ 841(b)(1)(A)-(C) 20-year mandatory minimum)Recidivist enhancement for prior conviction for a serious drug felony or serious violent felony (§ 841(b)(1), 21 U.S.C. § 851)Prohibited act under § 841(a)(1): manufacture, distribute, or dispenseCross-statute route alias: see separate aiding-abetting (§ 2) and x-conspiracy-846 (§ 846) routesAiding and abetting route under 18 U.S.C. § 2 (cross-statute)Categorical / modified categorical comparison of state drug offense to 21 U.S.C. § 841 (INA / ACCA / Guidelines)
United States v. Solis — 915 F.3d 1172 (2019) · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019 (21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md))· not addressed· not addressed· not addressed· not addressed· not addressed· not addressed

Elements 13–18 of 18

21 U.S.C. § 841
CaseDrug conspiracy route under 21 U.S.C. § 846 (cross-statute)Fifth Amendment Due Process / Equal Protection challenge to carrier-medium weight sentencing (Chapman)Affirmative defense of entrapment (government inducement + lack of predisposition)Rule of lenity in construing ambiguous penalty provisions of § 841(b)Fifth Amendment void-for-vagueness challenge to "mixture or substance" or analogue provisionsContinuing-offense venue for § 841(a)(1) possession with intent to distribute / distribution (18 U.S.C. § 3237(a))
United States v. Solis — 915 F.3d 1172 (2019) · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019 (21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md))· not addressed· not addressed· not addressed· not addressed· not addressed· not addressed

Instances and excluded annotation blocks

Annotation blocks, including explicitly excluded context
CaseElementHolding and scopePatternExact source quotations
United States v. Solis — 915 F.3d 1172 (2019) · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019 — satisfied · proved (21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md))Specific intent to manufacture, distribute, or dispense the possessed controlled substancesatisfied
Excluded from merits counts
applied / lower-court

basis: proved; claim: (a)(1) & (b)(1)(A)

Jury finding only: on appeal Solis attacked knowing possession, not intent to distribute, and the court does not discuss it.
two-and-half-kilograms-methamphetamine-in-car-seats
Using the cordless drill and the Phillips bit, he disassembled the car seats and found $19,000 in rubber-banded cash and 2.5 kilograms of methamphetamine.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f3d_915.jsonl#/f3d/915/1172-01; Unicode character offsets [3022:3176] (end exclusive); SHA-256 6728c81148db0694782b8aad773a56b2cf5cfbdc284dbfb893aec52d848ffcf5.

Evidence kind: fact; polarity: supports; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

After the trooper found a cordless screwdriver with a single Phillips bit and a suitcase containing Ziploc bags, he examined the car seats and found them abnormally heavy.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f3d_915.jsonl#/f3d/915/1172-01; Unicode character offsets [2850:3021] (end exclusive); SHA-256 6728c81148db0694782b8aad773a56b2cf5cfbdc284dbfb893aec52d848ffcf5.

Evidence kind: fact; polarity: supports; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

United States v. Solis — 915 F.3d 1172 (2019) · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019 — satisfied · proved (21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md))Mens rea: "knowingly or intentionally" (including knowledge that the substance is a controlled substance)satisfied
Counted merits instance
applied / merits

basis: proved; claim: (a)(1) & (b)(1)(A)

Circumstantial evidence established knowledge of the contraband concealed in the vehicle.
knew-boyfriend-purchased-drugs-stashed-in-her-vehicle
After Pedraza, Solis, and the children arrived in Dallas, DEA agents intercepted a phone conversation in which Solis asked Pedraza if he had "fix[ed] everything there."
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f3d_915.jsonl#/f3d/915/1172-01; Unicode character offsets [2307:2475] (end exclusive); SHA-256 6728c81148db0694782b8aad773a56b2cf5cfbdc284dbfb893aec52d848ffcf5.

Evidence kind: fact; polarity: supports; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

He found another $1,796 in rubber-banded cash in Solis's purse.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f3d_915.jsonl#/f3d/915/1172-01; Unicode character offsets [3177:3240] (end exclusive); SHA-256 6728c81148db0694782b8aad773a56b2cf5cfbdc284dbfb893aec52d848ffcf5.

Evidence kind: fact; polarity: supports; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

Here, unlike in Ramos, the evidence supported a finding that Solis: knew that Pedraza had purchased methamphetamine in Dallas; allowed Pedraza to store the drugs in her vehicle; knew that the drugs were stashed in her children's car seats; and had access to those car seats.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f3d_915.jsonl#/f3d/915/1172-01; Unicode character offsets [6388:6662] (end exclusive); SHA-256 6728c81148db0694782b8aad773a56b2cf5cfbdc284dbfb893aec52d848ffcf5.

Evidence kind: held; polarity: not recorded; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

United States v. Solis — 915 F.3d 1172 (2019) · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019 — satisfied · proved (21usc841: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md))Possession (actual, constructive, sole, or joint dominion and control)satisfied
Counted merits instance
applied / merits

basis: proved; claim: (a)(1) & (b)(1)(A)

Sufficiency upheld: the drugs were in the children's car seats of defendant's own vehicle on the return leg of a drug-buying trip she joined; the court found the nexus (knowledge plus access/control) that mere joint occupancy lacks.
drugs-hidden-in-childrens-car-seats-in-defendants-vehicle
Using the cordless drill and the Phillips bit, he disassembled the car seats and found $19,000 in rubber-banded cash and 2.5 kilograms of methamphetamine.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f3d_915.jsonl#/f3d/915/1172-01; Unicode character offsets [3022:3176] (end exclusive); SHA-256 6728c81148db0694782b8aad773a56b2cf5cfbdc284dbfb893aec52d848ffcf5.

Evidence kind: fact; polarity: supports; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

Using one of Solis's vehicles, Pedraza drove Solis and two of her children to Dallas, Texas, on July 17, 2015, where he planned on purchasing ten kilograms of methamphetamine.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f3d_915.jsonl#/f3d/915/1172-01; Unicode character offsets [1837:2012] (end exclusive); SHA-256 6728c81148db0694782b8aad773a56b2cf5cfbdc284dbfb893aec52d848ffcf5.

Evidence kind: fact; polarity: supports; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

Solis consented to a search of the vehicle.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f3d_915.jsonl#/f3d/915/1172-01; Unicode character offsets [2806:2849] (end exclusive); SHA-256 6728c81148db0694782b8aad773a56b2cf5cfbdc284dbfb893aec52d848ffcf5.

Evidence kind: fact; polarity: supports; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

The government may prove knowing possession by showing constructive possession-that is, that Solis had both knowledge of and control over the contraband.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f3d_915.jsonl#/f3d/915/1172-01; Unicode character offsets [5675:5828] (end exclusive); SHA-256 6728c81148db0694782b8aad773a56b2cf5cfbdc284dbfb893aec52d848ffcf5.

Evidence kind: rule; polarity: not recorded; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

Mere presence or physical proximity alone cannot support such a finding. There must be "some nexus between a defendant and the contraband."
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f3d_915.jsonl#/f3d/915/1172-01; Unicode character offsets [5893:6032] (end exclusive); SHA-256 6728c81148db0694782b8aad773a56b2cf5cfbdc284dbfb893aec52d848ffcf5.

Evidence kind: rule; polarity: not recorded; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 1 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

Accordingly, a reasonable jury could find that Solis had knowledge of and control over the methamphetamine.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f3d_915.jsonl#/f3d/915/1172-01; Unicode character offsets [6663:6770] (end exclusive); SHA-256 6728c81148db0694782b8aad773a56b2cf5cfbdc284dbfb893aec52d848ffcf5.

Evidence kind: held; polarity: not recorded; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

Court interpretations recorded from this case