Affirmative defense of entrapment (government inducement + lack of predisposition)

DEFENSE · 21usc841:x-entrapment

Requires showing government inducement of the crime plus absence of predisposition on the part of the defendant to engage in the criminal conduct (Mathews v. United States, 485 U.S. 58 (1988)).

Exact element source

it shall be unlawful for any person knowingly or intentionally-
Source: docroot/ir/usc/title21.jsonl#title21_sec841; Unicode character offsets [83:146] (end exclusive); SHA-256 ebaba73bf6e21a591f44bf851f24a052a5687813c505030cd9483e17753e9420.

All variants

Recorded DB variant labels, including zero-count variants
VariantDescriptionMerits instance blocksDistinct casesExample cases (up to 3 per group)
Unspecified variantNo variant assigned in the database.0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 1
0No counted merits examples

Excluded context examples: /f3d/20/0229-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994 — applied/procedural

How courts decided this element

Annotation blocks, including explicitly excluded context
CaseElementHolding and scopeVariantExact source quotations
/f3d/20/0229-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994Affirmative defense of entrapment (government inducement + lack of predisposition)not_reached
Excluded from merits counts
applied / procedural

claim: (a)(1),(b)(1)(D)

Raised for the first time on appeal (informant sent into the home to buy); court declined to consider it.
Unspecified variantNo source quotation recorded for this block.

Court interpretations

interpretation

In order to establish the knowing or intentional distribution of a controlled substance, the government needed only.to show that defendant knowingly or intentionally delivered a controlled substance.

/f3d/20/0229-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

In order to establish the knowing or intentional distribution of a controlled substance, the government needed only.to show that defendant knowingly or intentionally delivered a controlled substance.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f3d_20.jsonl#/f3d/20/0229-01; Unicode character offsets [5072:5271] (end exclusive); SHA-256 1b8c4fb6d1b27c83cc97582c53236d4fe132b40a4a1a11e5f6552d400bb8d267.

Requires showing government inducement of the crime plus absence of predisposition on the part of the defendant to engage in the criminal conduct (Mathews v. United States, 485 U.S. 58 (1988)).