training-program statutory route or exception

AND · 42usc2000e-2:training-program

This block records the subsection-specific route or exception; it is not a universal conjunct of every Title VII claim.

Exact element source

any employer, labor organization, or joint labor-management committee controlling apprenticeship
Source: docroot/ir/usc/title42.jsonl#title42_sec2000e-2; Unicode character offsets [2004:2100] (end exclusive); SHA-256 7b026a9ac957c5491602d868578271db8730b4c98650f1a4007b2e7430194c8b.

Routes and case patterns

Curated routes and observed case patterns
RouteDefinitionMerits instance blocksDistinct merits casesExamples (up to 3 cases per count group)
Unclassified route
provisional; provisional (1 case)
no definition yet0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 1
0

Used only in non-merits blocks (1).

Excluded context examples:

Sacchi v. Ihc Health Servs., Inc. — 918 F.3d 1155 (2019) · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019 — not reached · basis not recorded (42usc2000e-2: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/procedural · not counted
Pattern: not recorded

How courts decided this element

Annotation blocks, including explicitly excluded context
CaseElementHolding and scopePatternExact source quotations
Sacchi v. Ihc Health Servs., Inc. — 918 F.3d 1155 (2019) · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019 — not reached (42usc2000e-2: author: Flash2 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md))training-program statutory route or exceptionnot_reached
Excluded from merits counts
applied / procedural

claim: (a), (d)

Footnote: the panel itself asked for supplemental briefing on whether 2000e-2(d) (training programs) covers this internship, then declined to reach the theory because it was never raised in the district court.
Unspecified route
We therefore agree with the Hospital that the principles motivating the application of plain error in similar circumstances counsel that we should not exercise our discretion to reach this issue.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f3d_918.jsonl#/f3d/918/1155-01; Unicode character offsets [15288:15483] (end exclusive); SHA-256 07fc3d350d4e048520c297e487140d60fc390217113f71eb61fd2be9d3c62390.

Evidence kind: held; polarity: not recorded; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

Court interpretations