Section 1983 malicious prosecution claim (Fourth Amendment / procedural due process)

OR · 42usc1983:x-malicious-prosecution

Under Thompson v. Clark (596 U.S. 36 (2022)), a Fourth Amendment malicious-prosecution claim under § 1983 requires showing that the criminal prosecution ended without a conviction.

Exact element source

to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws
Source: docroot/ir/usc/title42.jsonl#title42_sec1983; Unicode character offsets [306:402] (end exclusive); SHA-256 88fe01322b9d94860a669ec452f558146e2745845070bc43583671ce12acb2bb.

Routes and case patterns

Curated routes and observed case patterns
RouteDefinitionMerits instance blocksDistinct merits casesExamples (up to 3 cases per count group)
Unclassified route
provisional; provisional (1 case)
no definition yet0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 1
0

Used only in non-merits blocks (1).

Excluded context examples:

Galloway v. County of Nassau — 141 F.4th 417 (2025) · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2025 — not reached · basis not recorded (42usc1983: author: Fable · historical QA: PASS (QA2, neov2/qa/cases-QA2.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed) · applied/procedural · not counted
Pattern: not recorded

_whole
accepted; provisional (1 case)
The element is decided as a whole: the reasoning turns on no narrower doctrinal sub-question that distinguishes it from any other application of this element.1
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 1; excluded context 0
1

Codrington v. Dolak — 142 F.4th 884 (2025) · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025 — not · no-evidence (42usc1983: author: Flash1 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md)) · applied/merits · counted
Pattern: undisputed, non-fabricated marijuana, grinder and firearm found in the car supplied probable cause even though the search had been held illegal

How courts decided this element

Annotation blocks, including explicitly excluded context
CaseElementHolding and scopePatternExact source quotations
Galloway v. County of Nassau — 141 F.4th 417 (2025) · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2025 — not reached (42usc1983: author: Fable · historical QA: PASS (QA2, neov2/qa/cases-QA2.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed)Section 1983 malicious prosecution claim (Fourth Amendment / procedural due process)not_reached
Excluded from merits counts
applied / procedural

count: malicious-prosecution claims (1983 vs. detectives; state-law vs. County); subject: count=malicious-prosecution claims (1983 vs. detectives; state-law vs. County)

Qualified immunity on the malicious-prosecution claim abandoned for want of briefing (dissent would reach it and grant immunity on arguable probable cause). County's appeal on state-law malicious prosecution dismissed: no municipal qualified immunity under New York law, so no pendent appellate jurisdiction.
Unspecified routeNo source quotation recorded for this block.
Codrington v. Dolak — 142 F.4th 884 (2025) · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025 — not · no-evidence (42usc1983: author: Flash1 · QA: FIX (Fable, neov2/cases/TRIAGE-Flash.md))Section 1983 malicious prosecution claim (Fourth Amendment / procedural due process)not
Counted merits instance
applied / merits

basis: no-evidence; party: Officers Dolak, Blissett and Kirk (Louisville Metro Police Department); count: malicious-prosecution claim; subject: party=Officers Dolak, Blissett and Kirk (Louisville Metro Police Department); count=malicious-prosecution claim

The claim fails on the lack-of-probable-cause element alone. The court also holds, joining other circuits, that the exclusionary rule and fruit-of-the-poisonous-tree doctrine do not apply in § 1983 cases, so illegally seized evidence may establish probable cause.
undisputed, non-fabricated marijuana, grinder and firearm found in the car supplied probable cause even though the search had been held illegal
And although Codrington admitted that the little baggie of marijuana came from his car, he testified that the bigger bag was not his.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f4th_142.jsonl#/f4th/142/884; Unicode character offsets [21246:21379] (end exclusive); SHA-256 997b387c2c89f1d2c34461257739053b3dcd8941cb6ef00e0ce9f261c8d7c09a.

Evidence kind: fact; polarity: cuts-against; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

Because the exclusionary rule does not forbid us from considering the indisputably non- fabricated evidence located in Codrington’s vehicle, we can rely upon the small amount of marijuana, marijuana grinder, and legal firearm seized from the vehicle to determine whether defendants had probable cause to arrest Codrington.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f4th_142.jsonl#/f4th/142/884; Unicode character offsets [28404:28726] (end exclusive); SHA-256 997b387c2c89f1d2c34461257739053b3dcd8941cb6ef00e0ce9f261c8d7c09a.

Evidence kind: fact; polarity: cuts-against; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

The Jefferson County Circuit Court agreed and granted the motion to suppress before ultimately dismissing the charges against him.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f4th_142.jsonl#/f4th/142/884; Unicode character offsets [6811:6941] (end exclusive); SHA-256 997b387c2c89f1d2c34461257739053b3dcd8941cb6ef00e0ce9f261c8d7c09a.

Evidence kind: fact; polarity: supports; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

Unlike the fabrication-of-evidence claim, which requires the act of using falsified evidence, malicious prosecution concerns prosecution without probable cause.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f4th_142.jsonl#/f4th/142/884; Unicode character offsets [25397:25557] (end exclusive); SHA-256 997b387c2c89f1d2c34461257739053b3dcd8941cb6ef00e0ce9f261c8d7c09a.

Evidence kind: rule; polarity: not recorded; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

Putting aside the questions of fact regarding the allegedly fabricated evidence, the undisputed facts established probable cause for the officers to arrest and charge Codrington with possession of marijuana and possession of drug paraphernalia while possessing a firearm.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f4th_142.jsonl#/f4th/142/884; Unicode character offsets [26132:26403] (end exclusive); SHA-256 997b387c2c89f1d2c34461257739053b3dcd8941cb6ef00e0ce9f261c8d7c09a.

Evidence kind: held; polarity: not recorded; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

Court interpretations

interpretation

a police officer violates a plaintiff’s right to a fair 30 trial when he “creates false information likely to influence a jury’s 31 decision and forwards that information to prosecutors.”

Galloway v. County of Nassau — 141 F.4th 417 (2025) · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2025 (42usc1983: author: Fable · historical QA: PASS (QA2, neov2/qa/cases-QA2.md) · changed after review; current content not independently reviewed)

a police officer violates a plaintiff’s right to a fair 30 trial when he “creates false information likely to influence a jury’s 31 decision and forwards that information to prosecutors.”
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f4th_141.jsonl#/f4th/141/417; Unicode character offsets [23687:23874] (end exclusive); SHA-256 ffd06c7c495fbf996a4a6d1e4a3336db8e40aa112435c30b895506a5be4e900f.

Under Thompson v. Clark (596 U.S. 36 (2022)), a Fourth Amendment malicious-prosecution claim under § 1983 requires showing that the criminal prosecution ended without a conviction.