United States District Court for the District of Minnesota · 2006-04-06
Case and law context
Role: background; posture: criminal; pretrial; district judge adopts magistrate's report denying co-defendant Keezer's motions to dismiss the indictment, suppress search-warrant evidence, quash arrest and suppress electronic surveillance; result: not-decided; claim: (a)(1),(b)(1)(A)
Instances and excluded annotation blocks
| Case | Element | Holding and scope | Variant | Exact source quotations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| /f-supp-2d/427/0894-01 — United States District Court for the District of Minnesota · 2006 | Cross-statute route alias: see separate aiding-abetting (§ 2) and x-conspiracy-846 (§ 846) routes | not_reached Excluded from merits counts background / merits claim: (a)(1),(b)(1)(A) Counts are framed under 18 U.S.C. § 2 and § 846 but accomplice/conspiracy liability is not analysed. | Unspecified variant | No source quotation recorded for this block. |
| /f-supp-2d/427/0894-01 — United States District Court for the District of Minnesota · 2006 | Specific intent to manufacture, distribute, or dispense the possessed controlled substance | not_reached Excluded from merits counts background / merits claim: (a)(1),(b)(1)(A) | Unspecified variant | No source quotation recorded for this block. |
| /f-supp-2d/427/0894-01 — United States District Court for the District of Minnesota · 2006 | Mens rea: "knowingly or intentionally" (including knowledge that the substance is a controlled substance) | not_reached Excluded from merits counts background / merits claim: (a)(1),(b)(1)(A) | Unspecified variant | No source quotation recorded for this block. |
| /f-supp-2d/427/0894-01 — United States District Court for the District of Minnesota · 2006 | Possession (actual, constructive, sole, or joint dominion and control) | not_reached Excluded from merits counts background / merits claim: (a)(1),(b)(1)(A) Charged as aiding and abetting possession with intent to distribute crack (two dates); the opinion only reviews probable cause for two residential search warrants. Warrant affidavits recite a controlled buy of half a gram from a third person at the shared residence and an informant seeing packaged crack there; none of this is assessed against the offence elements. | Unspecified variant | No source quotation recorded for this block. |
| /f-supp-2d/427/0894-01 — United States District Court for the District of Minnesota · 2006 | Partial penalty-tier drug type and quantity table (selected § 841(b)(1)(A)-(D) hook) | not_reached Excluded from merits counts background / merits claim: (a)(1),(b)(1)(A) (b)(1)(A) is charged; quantity is never discussed (affidavit mentions about one ounce of crack recovered in the January search). | Unspecified variant | No source quotation recorded for this block. |
| /f-supp-2d/427/0894-01 — United States District Court for the District of Minnesota · 2006 | Controlled substance (21 U.S.C. §§ 802(6), 812 Schedules I-V) or counterfeit substance (§ 841(a)(2)) | not_reached Excluded from merits counts background / merits claim: (a)(1),(b)(1)(A) | Unspecified variant | No source quotation recorded for this block. |