Qualifying mental adjudication or commitment

Coverage and quality

0 annotation blocks; 0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases with counted merits instances; 0 excluded blocks.

Frozen DB: 165 case–law contexts. Source tree: 300 CASE files. This snapshot does not imply full current repository coverage.

Legal review status: unavailable to this view.

Counting rules and source integrity

Counted instances require applied citation role, merits scope, and a reached holding. Procedural, not-reached, comparator, and other context remains visible but is excluded from counts.

Source hash and exact-offset checks verify quotation integrity only; they do not establish legal correctness, model confidence, exhaustive coverage, or approval. Zero means no counted annotation in this snapshot.

Database snapshot SHA-256: b8882353247abdd6e20d4e22922c166d68ccb8e2da50e13e0162a35c316318f8. 3301 source quotations verified across this snapshot.

OR · 18usc922:status.g4

Exact element source

(4) who has been adjudicated as a mental defective or who has been committed to a mental institution;

Source: docroot/ir/usc/title18.jsonl#title18_sec922; Unicode character offsets [16465:16566] (end exclusive); SHA-256 69d6082896652ca704d8da56c0a01daa1d10b51846206764bf1140610c756b65.

All variants

No variants recorded in this snapshot.

How courts decided this element

Annotation blocks, including explicitly excluded context
Case	Element	Holding and scope	Variant	Exact source quotations

Court interpretations