Hiring discharge or employment terms

AND · 29usc623:employment-action

Exact element source

(1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual or otherwise discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's age;
Source: docroot/ir/usc/title29.jsonl#title29_sec623; Unicode character offsets [101:326] (end exclusive); SHA-256 d7414b39849853d6a6068539da731f835b09d9f238c028f95f2d0dd04fb6f667.

All variants

Recorded DB variant labels, including zero-count variants
VariantDescriptionMerits instance blocksDistinct casesExample cases (up to 3 per group)
dischargeTermination or reduction in force.0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 0		0No annotation uses in this snapshot
discharge/employer-terminated-worker1
Satisfied 1; not satisfied 0; excluded context 0		1/f3d/924/0718-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019 — satisfied
hiringRefusal to hire or promote.0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 0		0No annotation uses in this snapshot
termsCompensation, terms, conditions or privileges; hostile environment requires the separate judicial severity/pervasiveness inquiry.0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 0		0No annotation uses in this snapshot

How courts decided this element

Annotation blocks, including explicitly excluded context
CaseElementHolding and scopeVariantExact source quotations
/f3d/924/0718-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019Hiring discharge or employment termssatisfied
Counted merits instance
applied / merits

basis: proved

Jury verdict and appellate review of an ADEA discharge claim.		discharge/employer-terminated-worker
After TWC Administration, LLC, d/b/a Time Warner Cable ("TWC"), fired Glenda Westmoreland, she filed this action
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f3d_924.jsonl#/f3d/924/0718-01; Unicode character offsets [35:147] (end exclusive); SHA-256 c3db8421f8bbdeed51d7a4a2861e257d49fa1027dc6214fb9bd49f864ac871a3.

Evidence kind: fact; polarity: supports; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

Because TWC cannot overcome that hurdle, we affirm.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f3d_924.jsonl#/f3d/924/0718-01; Unicode character offsets [690:741] (end exclusive); SHA-256 c3db8421f8bbdeed51d7a4a2861e257d49fa1027dc6214fb9bd49f864ac871a3.

Evidence kind: held; polarity: not recorded; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

Court interpretations