AND · 29usc623:protected-activity
Exact element source
It shall be unlawful for an employer to discriminate against any of his employees or applicants for employment, for an employment agency to discriminate against any individual, or for a labor organization to discriminate against any member thereof or applicant for membership, because such individual, member or applicant for membership has opposed any practice made unlawful by this section, or because such individual, member or applicant for membership has made a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or litigation under this chapter.Source:
docroot/ir/usc/title29.jsonl#title29_sec623; Unicode character offsets [1750:2342] (end exclusive); SHA-256 d7414b39849853d6a6068539da731f835b09d9f238c028f95f2d0dd04fb6f667.All variants
| Variant | Description | Merits instance blocks | Distinct cases | Example cases (up to 3 per group) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| opposition | Opposing an ADEA-unlawful practice; judicial good-faith/reasonableness limits apply. | 0 Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 0 | 0 | No annotation uses in this snapshot |
| participation | Charge, testimony, assistance or participation in ADEA investigation, proceeding or litigation. | 0 Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 0 | 0 | No annotation uses in this snapshot |
| participation/eeoc-age-discrimination-charge | 1 Satisfied 1; not satisfied 0; excluded context 0 | 1 | /f-supp-3d/380/0783-01 — United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois · 2019 — satisfied |
How courts decided this element
| Case | Element | Holding and scope | Variant | Exact source quotations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| /f-supp-3d/380/0783-01 — United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois · 2019 | Opposition or participation | satisfied Counted merits instance applied / merits basis: pleaded The pleaded retaliation allegation survived the motion to dismiss posture. | participation/eeoc-age-discrimination-charge | Spratt alleges that Bellwood retaliated against her for filing an EEOC complaintSource: docroot/ir/caselaw/f_supp_3d_380.jsonl#/f-supp-3d/380/0783-01; Unicode character offsets [6455:6535] (end exclusive); SHA-256 ae65194fc22e806d299e7b218c92596a3be1c881f1451e66c47790b7cf1aad24.Spratt's Amended Complaint sufficiently alleges each element of a retaliation claim under the ADEA.Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f_supp_3d_380.jsonl#/f-supp-3d/380/0783-01; Unicode character offsets [7368:7467] (end exclusive); SHA-256 ae65194fc22e806d299e7b218c92596a3be1c881f1451e66c47790b7cf1aad24. |