Coverage and quality 0 annotation blocks; 0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases with counted merits instances; 0 excluded blocks.
Snapshot af6842b5 built from commit e3efe9e6 on 2026-11-10: 298 of 298 case files in the repository.
0 case–law pairs: 0 independently reviewed at the current content; 0 not currently independently reviewed. Reviewed does not mean PASS.
Small annotation samples do not establish prevalence, confidence or legal correctness.
Current authored case-instance annotations; superseded/rejected records and machine proposals are omitted (302 stored blocks).
Counting rules and source integrity Counted instances require applied citation role, merits scope, and a reached holding. Procedural, not-reached, comparator, and other context remains visible but is excluded from counts.
Source checks verify quotation integrity only. Review badges identify their reports and freshness; a historical verdict is not approval of changed content.
Source commit: e3efe9e6a405f9a8d816ce67b3c7821d75e4c87b; built: 2026-11-10T20:10:54.760173+00:00. Database snapshot SHA-256: af6842b5b0e134d1b7b341363699a8853b47a22de70515f84038f10a0b59d0da. 5032 source quotations verified across this snapshot. United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019-04-10
author: unavailable · not independently reviewed
Original case on neochart.com
Case and law context Interpretation-only case: no authored CASE context or instance blocks recorded in this snapshot.
Instances and excluded annotation blocks Annotation blocks, including explicitly excluded context Case Element Holding and scope Pattern Exact source quotations
Court interpretations recorded from this case interpretation "The Supreme Court requires plaintiffs to establish both but for cause and proximate cause in order to show injury 'by reason of' a RICO violation.
WASTE MANAGEMENT OF LOUISIANA v. River Birch, Inc. — 920 F.3d 958 · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019 (18usc1962: author: unavailable · not independently reviewed)
"The Supreme Court requires plaintiffs to establish both but for cause and proximate cause in order to show injury 'by reason of' a RICO violation. Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f3d_920.jsonl#/f3d/920/0958-01; Unicode character offsets [11394:11541] (end exclusive); SHA-256 43e4170249e2a24056cca48e31088f46875c9dc4419d09a210a34c125ef9232e. Under Holmes v. SIPC (503 U.S. 258 (1992)), Anza, and Hemi Group, proximate cause requires "some direct relation between the injury asserted and the injurious conduct alleged".