·
Case and law context
Interpretation-only case: no CASE context or instance blocks recorded in this snapshot.
Instances and excluded annotation blocks
| Case | Element | Holding and scope | Variant | Exact source quotations |
|---|
Court interpretations recorded from this case
interpretation
Mailings made to further any of these activities would satisfy the "use of the mails" element.
Mailings made to further any of these activities would satisfy the "use of the mails" element.Source:
docroot/ir/caselaw/f_supp_3d_370.jsonl#/f-supp-3d/370/1139-01; Unicode character offsets [20843:20937] (end exclusive); SHA-256 385b5345f2ce5f8876a0e40368f42d686f4f9abdcb52258fdd5b77eb6fd340db.Evaluate the mailing against the actual scope and completion of the scheme. Bridge, 553 U.S. 639, 647 (2008), states the substantive mail-fraud nexus while deciding a civil RICO case; its separate RICO injury requirements do not become mail-fraud elements. Lulling mailings can further an ongoing scheme, but Hagen rejected incidental letters after the charged scheme was complete; Gross found collection mailings within an ongoing kickback scheme at the indictment stage.