United States District Court for the Central District of California · 2019-03-27
author: unavailable · not independently reviewed
Case and law context
Interpretation-only case: no authored CASE context or instance blocks recorded in this snapshot.
Instances and excluded annotation blocks
| Case | Element | Holding and scope | Pattern | Exact source quotations |
|---|
Court interpretations recorded from this case
interpretation
Mailings made to further any of these activities would satisfy the "use of the mails" element.
United States v. Gross — 370 F. Supp. 3d 1139 · United States District Court for the Central District of California · 2019 (18usc1341: author: unavailable · not independently reviewed)
Mailings made to further any of these activities would satisfy the "use of the mails" element.Source:
docroot/ir/caselaw/f_supp_3d_370.jsonl#/f-supp-3d/370/1139-01; Unicode character offsets [20843:20937] (end exclusive); SHA-256 385b5345f2ce5f8876a0e40368f42d686f4f9abdcb52258fdd5b77eb6fd340db.Evaluate the mailing against the actual scope and completion of the scheme. Bridge, 553 U.S. 639, 647 (2008), states the substantive mail-fraud nexus while deciding a civil RICO case; its separate RICO injury requirements do not become mail-fraud elements. Lulling mailings can further an ongoing scheme, but Hagen rejected incidental letters after the charged scheme was complete; Gross found collection mailings within an ongoing kickback scheme at the indictment stage.