United States Court of Appeals for the Six Circuit · 2019-07-03
author: unavailable · not independently reviewed
Case and law context
Interpretation-only case: no authored CASE context or instance blocks recorded in this snapshot.
Instances and excluded annotation blocks
| Case | Element | Holding and scope | Pattern | Exact source quotations |
|---|
Court interpretations recorded from this case
interpretation
Section 1962(d) makes it unlawful to conspire to associate with and participate in the conduct of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering.
United States v. Ledbetter — 929 F.3d 338 · United States Court of Appeals for the Six Circuit · 2019 (18usc1962: author: unavailable · not independently reviewed)
Section 1962(d) makes it unlawful to conspire to associate with and participate in the conduct of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering.Source:
docroot/ir/caselaw/f3d_929.jsonl#/f3d/929/0338-01; Unicode character offsets [24368:24514] (end exclusive); SHA-256 fe5d89352e19f2942a215b3899a8cfd7e15bb25c2b27d60d16ea5febdeb15a77.Note tension in older or lower-court civil opinions (e.g. Goldfine) that sometimes recite a requirement that each defendant agreed to commit two predicates; Salinas controls in criminal and modern civil cases, though civil § 1962(d) still requires a viable underlying § 1962(a)-(c) violation and an overt act that is itself a RICO predicate under Beck v. Prupis (529 U.S. 494 (2000)).