·
Case and law context
Interpretation-only case: no CASE context or instance blocks recorded in this snapshot.
Instances and excluded annotation blocks
| Case | Element | Holding and scope | Variant | Exact source quotations |
|---|
Court interpretations recorded from this case
interpretation
Apart from the narrowed universe of justifications, Turner and its progeny govern Pesci's case.
Apart from the narrowed universe of justifications, Turner and its progeny govern Pesci's case.Source:
docroot/ir/caselaw/f3d_935.jsonl#/f3d/935/1159-01; Unicode character offsets [15083:15178] (end exclusive); SHA-256 5e7ada89811b9486d6394a114ef8545ff5043a13bf962e80aafb7b55f07e916b.Pesci v. Budz (11th Cir. 2019) is an actual First Amendment merits ruling, rejecting a civil detainee’s newsletter challenge under a modified Turner test. This is a scoped civil-detention speech example, not a universal test for retaliatory arrest or public-employee speech. The unrelated Olivier/Heck passage is removed.
interpretation
we hold that the 2010 ban on Duck Soup does not violate the First Amendment.
we hold that the 2010 ban on Duck Soup does not violate the First Amendment.Source:
docroot/ir/caselaw/f3d_935.jsonl#/f3d/935/1159-01; Unicode character offsets [34023:34099] (end exclusive); SHA-256 5e7ada89811b9486d6394a114ef8545ff5043a13bf962e80aafb7b55f07e916b.Pesci v. Budz (11th Cir. 2019) is an actual First Amendment merits ruling, rejecting a civil detainee’s newsletter challenge under a modified Turner test. This is a scoped civil-detention speech example, not a universal test for retaliatory arrest or public-employee speech. The unrelated Olivier/Heck passage is removed.