United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019-08-21
author: unavailable · not independently reviewed
Case and law context
Interpretation-only case: no authored CASE context or instance blocks recorded in this snapshot.
Instances and excluded annotation blocks
| Case | Element | Holding and scope | Pattern | Exact source quotations |
|---|
Court interpretations recorded from this case
interpretation
Apart from the narrowed universe of justifications, Turner and its progeny govern Pesci's case.
Pesci v. Budz — 935 F.3d 1159 · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019 (42usc1983: author: unavailable · not independently reviewed)
Apart from the narrowed universe of justifications, Turner and its progeny govern Pesci's case.Source:
docroot/ir/caselaw/f3d_935.jsonl#/f3d/935/1159-01; Unicode character offsets [15083:15178] (end exclusive); SHA-256 5e7ada89811b9486d6394a114ef8545ff5043a13bf962e80aafb7b55f07e916b.Pesci v. Budz (11th Cir. 2019) is an actual First Amendment merits ruling, rejecting a civil detainee’s newsletter challenge under a modified Turner test. This is a scoped civil-detention speech example, not a universal test for retaliatory arrest or public-employee speech. The unrelated Olivier/Heck passage is removed.
interpretation
we hold that the 2010 ban on Duck Soup does not violate the First Amendment.
Pesci v. Budz — 935 F.3d 1159 · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019 (42usc1983: author: unavailable · not independently reviewed)
we hold that the 2010 ban on Duck Soup does not violate the First Amendment.Source:
docroot/ir/caselaw/f3d_935.jsonl#/f3d/935/1159-01; Unicode character offsets [34023:34099] (end exclusive); SHA-256 5e7ada89811b9486d6394a114ef8545ff5043a13bf962e80aafb7b55f07e916b.Pesci v. Budz (11th Cir. 2019) is an actual First Amendment merits ruling, rejecting a civil detainee’s newsletter challenge under a modified Turner test. This is a scoped civil-detention speech example, not a universal test for retaliatory arrest or public-employee speech. The unrelated Olivier/Heck passage is removed.