Midwest Grinding Co. v. Spitz

976 F.2d 1016 (1992) United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 1992-09-16

civil; plaintiff appeals partial Rule 12(b)(6)/9(b) dismissal and later summary judgment for defendants on the (c) and (d) counts; defendants cross-appeal (result: claimant-lost)

Facts

  1. 11 Conspiracy to violate § 1962(a), (b), or (c) (§ 1962(d)) not no-evidence
    A few loose ends: First, the § 1962(d) RICO conspiracy claim is also premised on the existence of a pattern of racketeering; therefore, we need not further address that issue or Grunfeld’s dismissal from the suit as a co-conspirator.