Source: xref/out/r2/precision_review.json
{
"scope": "50 resolved predictions checked per each of seven families; Act anaphors comprise all32 in main sample plus18 targeted supplemental examples outside the2000page recall frame. Root corrected antecedent errors and verified final bindings. No formal QA1 approval.",
"rows": [
{
"start": 40081,
"end": 40096,
"quote": "534 U.S. at 214",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "534 U.S. 204",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "2edd1c1f491b429a",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_910/0417_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": " not \"impose personal liability on the defendant, but ... restore[d] to the plaintiff particular funds or property in the defendant's possession.\" Great-West , 534 U.S. at 214, 122 S.Ct. 708 (emphasis added). The constructive trust, for instance, is \"only used when the defendant has a legally recognized right in a particular asset\"-e",
"linked": true,
"weight": 2.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 534 U.S. 204 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 18196,
"end": 18208,
"quote": "479 U.S. at ",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "479 U.S. 104",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "ed670ab4348e3490",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_140/1166_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "Clayton Act, cites to Illinois Brick, and concludes that a party who lacks standing under § 4 may still have standing to seek injunctive relief under § 16. See 479 U.S. at 111 n. 6, 107 S.Ct. at 490 n. 6.\nIn this case, the pleadings establish antitrust standing to seek injunctive relief. All of the plaintiffs claim to have purchas",
"linked": false,
"weight": 6.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 479 U.S. 104 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 28556,
"end": 28578,
"quote": "90 Ill. App. 3d at 552",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "90 Ill. App. 3d 547",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "2666ed9690f97f27",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/ill-app-3d/volume_221/0935_01/index.html",
"court": "Illinois Appellate Court",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "s the plaintiff. (Bank Computer Network Corp. v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. (1982), 110 Ill. App. 3d 492, 500, 442 N.E.2d 586, 592; Belden, 90 Ill. App. 3d at 552, 413 N.E.2d at 101-02.) In the case at bar, the trial court found that plaintiff failed to prove the third and fourth elements: that the Exchange purposely int",
"linked": true,
"weight": 5.266666666666667,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 90 Ill. App. 3d 547 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 3596,
"end": 3603,
"quote": "supra).",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "114 A.D.2d 157",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "1c4301df5f8a3cb3",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/ad2d/volume_194/0916_01/index.html",
"court": "New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "socs., 157 AD2d 615, 615-616; Hendricks v Kempler, 156 AD2d 425, lv denied 77 NY2d 808; Gill v New York City Hous. Auth., 130 AD2d 256, 262; Iannelli v Powers, supra).\nIn opposition to Cornell’s motion for summary judgment, plaintiff submitted data indicating the number of reported crimes on campus for the five-year period pr",
"linked": true,
"weight": 5.0886075949367084,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 114 A.D.2d 157 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 4581,
"end": 4595,
"quote": "92 AD2d at 654",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "92 A.D.2d 653",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "3325721144bc5372",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/ad3d/volume_90/0993_01/index.html",
"court": "New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "2d ed]; 49 NY Jur 2d, Easements § 32). For that reason, an easement will be deemed nonexclusive “unless the opposite intent unequivocally appears” (Hurd v Lis, 92 AD2d at 654; see Hoffman v Capitol Cablevision Sys., 52 AD3d at 315). Here, it is unequivocally clear from the document creating the easement that the plaintiffs and the D",
"linked": true,
"weight": 5.079365079365079,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 92 A.D.2d 653 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 2941,
"end": 2947,
"quote": "supra;",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "79 N.Y.2d 958",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "ca7c918c3246d9dd",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/ad3d/volume_37/0487_01/index.html",
"court": "New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "[1974]). The photograph illustrated and elucidated the testimony of the chief medical examiner who testified regarding the autopsy findings (see People v Wood, supra; People v Pobliner, supra; People v Allah, 13 AD3d 639 [2004]; People v Roque, 11 AD3d 488, 489 [2004]; People v Morel, 297 AD2d 757 [2002]; People v Collic, 28",
"linked": true,
"weight": 5.091954022988506,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 79 N.Y.2d 958 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 18574,
"end": 18589,
"quote": "509 U.S. at 597",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "509 U.S. 579",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "8eceedfa386c9b25",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_199/0053_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Southern District of New York",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "er Rule 702 and Daubert is twofold: she must determine whether the evidence “both rests on a reliable foundation and is relevant to the task at hand.” Daubert, 509 U.S. at 597, 113 S.Ct. 2786; United States v. Marji, 158 F.3d 60, 62 (2d Cir.1998). To assist with the first task of assessing the reliability of expert testimony, Daubert",
"linked": true,
"weight": 5.666666666666667,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 509 U.S. 579 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 4025,
"end": 4040,
"quote": "100 AD3d at 988",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "100 A.D.3d 987",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "f453c7adc57b23c3",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/ad3d/volume_107/0700_01/index.html",
"court": "New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": " as contrary to the weight of the evidence unless the jury could not have reached the verdict by any fair interpretation of the evidence” (Vittiglio v Gaurino, 100 AD3d at 988; see Lolik v Big V Supermarkets, 86 NY2d 744, 745-746 [1995]; Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 130 [1985]). “A jury’s finding that a party was at fault but that ",
"linked": true,
"weight": 5.079365079365079,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 100 A.D.3d 987 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 24441,
"end": 24452,
"quote": "98 F.3d at ",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "98 F.3d 1121",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "3854af22bca728f2",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_526/0968_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Arizona",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "d 3) “neither the claims asserted nor the relief requested requires the participation of individual members in the lawsuit.” San Diego County Gun Rights Comm., 98 F.3d at 1130-31 (citing Hunt v. Wash. State Apple Adver. Comm’n, 432 U.S. 333, 343, 97 S.Ct. 2434, 53 L.Ed.2d 383 (1977)). Defendants do not challenge the Business-Grou",
"linked": true,
"weight": 3.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 98 F.3d 1121 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 12013,
"end": 12028,
"quote": "477 U.S. at 323",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "477 U.S. 317",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "7336438e64107942",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_938/1419_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "urt of the basis for their motion and identifying those portions of the record which show lack of a genuine issue.” Hartnagel, 953 F.2d at 395 (citing Celotex, 477 U.S. at 323, 106 S.Ct. at 2553); see also Reed v. Woodruff County, Ark., 7 F.3d 808, 810 (8th Cir.1993). The Hospital defendants are not required by Rule 56 to support the",
"linked": false,
"weight": 2.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 477 U.S. 317 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 29754,
"end": 29769,
"quote": "538 U.S. at 422",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "538 U.S. 408",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "cbccbca457d52ed8",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_714/0670_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "ok’s purpose in failing to offer Scott the policy limits until May of 2008 was to extort a more favorable settlement. See Rodgers, 179 S.W.3d at 819; Campbell, 538 U.S. at 422, 123 S.Ct. 1513; Cardiner, 158 F.Supp.2d at 1106. At his deposition, claims adjuster Kyle testified that re-evaluations can occur if additional information is ",
"linked": true,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 538 U.S. 408 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 14335,
"end": 14352,
"quote": "864 S.W.2d at 890",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "864 S.W.2d 885",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "fe66cb58b4a140ff",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_714/0670_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": " UCSPA exists, there must be evidence sufficient to warrant punitive damages.” Motorists Mut. Ins. Co. v. Glass, 996 S.W.2d 437, 448 (Ky.1997) (citing Wittmer, 864 S.W.2d at 890). Punitive damages are warranted where there is “proof of bad faith sufficient for the jury to conclude that there was conduct that was outrageous, because of ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 864 S.W.2d 885 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 36835,
"end": 36852,
"quote": "967 S.W.2d at 608",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "967 S.W.2d 596",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "72deec436887df1a",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_491/0830_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "s during the guilt and penalty phases of the trial correcting the trial court’s earlier error before deliberations began.... The points are denied.\nNicklasson, 967 S.W.2d at 608 (emphasis added).\n. In the pre-trial transcript, there is a mention by Nicklasson’s counsel of a previous off-the-record chambers discussion between himself an",
"linked": false,
"weight": 6.333333333333333,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 967 S.W.2d 596 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 44284,
"end": 44299,
"quote": "229 F.3d at 143",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "229 F.3d 133",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "bbb2e40be2cc753d",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_168/0595_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "to the exercise of such rights.” See Id., art. 21, at *5.\nThe Croll court concluded that Stephen Croll's rights \"were properly classified as rights of access.” 229 F.3d at 143. Since this Court concludes that Ms. Fawcett and the Ayr court do have \"rights of custody”of Travis within the meaning of the Convention, it need not address w",
"linked": true,
"weight": 4.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 229 F.3d 133 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 43989,
"end": 44004,
"quote": "180 F.3d at 440",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "180 F.3d 426",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "d8ff611488d27d60",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_452/0394_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Southern District of New York",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "cuit has unambiguously stated that only conduct prompted by plaintiffs race or national origin contributes to a hostile work environment claim. See Richardson, 180 F.3d at 440; see also Alfano, 294 F.3d at 374 (cautioning that it is “important in hostile work environment cases to exclude from consideration personnel decisions that la",
"linked": true,
"weight": 5.666666666666667,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 180 F.3d 426 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 4842,
"end": 4857,
"quote": "550 U.S. at 570",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "550 U.S. 544",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "7d0ce4e7d9c86711",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_94/1174_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Southern District of California",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "fficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678, 129 S.Ct. 1937 (citing Twombly, 550 U.S. at 570, 127 S.Ct. 1955). “A claim has facial plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the de",
"linked": true,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 550 U.S. 544 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 21094,
"end": 21108,
"quote": "375 U.S. at 86",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "375 U.S. 85",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "5c5bff9bcd0ea13b",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_741/1338_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "idered the petitioner’s failure to testify as a tacit admission to the truthfulness of the inculpatory statements that he made to Smith and Thompson. See Fahy, 375 U.S. at 86, 84 S.Ct. at 230. The giving of the requested “failure to testify” instruction may have minimized the danger that the jury would give eviden-tiary weight to th",
"linked": false,
"weight": 6.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 375 U.S. 85 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 7038,
"end": 7053,
"quote": "550 U.S. at 570",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "550 U.S. 544",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "205cbabeae6f5fe1",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_859/1249_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "The Supreme Court held in accordance with Rule 8 that to withstand a motion to dismiss, a complaint - need not contain “heightened fact pleading of specifics,” 550 U.S. at 570, 127 S.Ct. 1955, or “detailed factual allegations,” id. at 555, 127 S.Ct. 1955 (citations omitted), but it must contain “enough facts to state a claim to relie",
"linked": true,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 550 U.S. 544 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 49831,
"end": 49847,
"quote": "54 S.W.3d at 463",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "54 S.W.3d 461",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "75f4f612921b5c5a",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/sw3d/volume_482/0593_01/index.html",
"court": "Texas Courts of Appeals",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "mmitting theft or money laundering in the disjunctive. See Renteria, 199 S.W.3d at 508; Robinson, 2002 WL 188466, at *13; Renfro, 827 S.W.2d at 535-36; Bogany, 54 S.W.3d at 463; Garcia, 46 S.W.3d at 327.\nWe overrule Kelvin’s first issue. .\nC. Discrepancy Between Indictment and Abstract Portion of Jury Charge\nIn his second issue, Kelvi",
"linked": true,
"weight": 6.333333333333333,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 54 S.W.3d 461 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 10428,
"end": 10449,
"quote": "503 U. S., at 269-270",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "503 U.S. 258",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "18b7bbada71b01b4",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/us/volume_547/0451_01/index.html",
"court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "bsence of proximate causation is equally clear in both cases.\nThis conclusion is confirmed by considering the directness requirement’s underlying premises. See 503 U. S., at 269-270. One motivating principle is the difficulty that can arise when a court attempts to ascertain the damages caused by some remote action. See id., at 269 (“[T]he",
"linked": true,
"weight": 10.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 503 U.S. 258 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 13906,
"end": 13921,
"quote": "445 U.S. at 471",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "445 U.S. 463",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "a05ae1ce7ddaecfc",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/so2d/volume_389/0262_01/index.html",
"court": "Florida District Court of Appeal",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "e victim’s identity was known long before there was any official misconduct, and her presence in court is thus not traceable to any Fourth Amendment violation. 445 U.S. at 471, 100 S.Ct. at 1250.\n. At trial, the defense and the state stipulated that Nisenboin identified a photograph of defendant as one of the robbers. Because, howeve",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.073170731707317,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 445 U.S. 463 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 18932,
"end": 18951,
"quote": "88 S.Ct. at 1237-38",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "88 S. Ct. 1235",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "e8947f09e5d9c5a3",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_708/0144_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "deral statute whose preemptive force is so strong, that state law claims made inoperative by the statute are considered, from inception, as federal claims. Id. 88 S.Ct. at 1237-38; see also Franchise Tax Bd., 103 S.Ct. at 2853. Avco held that state claims pre-empted by § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), 29 U.S.C. § 185, ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 88 S. Ct. 1235 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 13189,
"end": 13208,
"quote": "663 F.3d at 1236-37",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "663 F.3d 1221",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "9fcc22429c78e118",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_877/0294_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "sness, the judge remains the final arbiter of whether the defense was reasonable, even when the underlying fact question is sent to a jury.\nId. (citing Powell, 663 F.3d at 1236-37; DePuy Spine, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc., 567 F.3d 1314, 1324 (Fed.Cir.2009)). “[T]he ultimate legal question of whether a reasonable person would h",
"linked": true,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 663 F.3d 1221 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 14370,
"end": 14385,
"quote": "450 U.S. at 258",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "450 U.S. 248",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "8f735e361bf619d5",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_745/1373_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": " 1971 does not satisfy the Supreme Court’s mandate that “the defendant’s explanation of its legitimate reasons must be clear and reasonably specific.” Burdine, 450 U.S. at 258, 101 S.Ct. at 1096. Based on Lam-bright’s testimony, it is difficult to discern whether his “off and on” supervision of Hodge was “on” during a period of time ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.833333333333333,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 450 U.S. 248 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 5863,
"end": 5876,
"quote": "104 S.Ct. at ",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "104 S. Ct. 900",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "f1e74d67974c5d24",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_757/1047_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "ally, the suit is deemed to be against the officer in his or her individual capacity. Because the suit is thus not against the sovereign, it is not barred. See 104 S.Ct. at 909 (citing Ex Parte Young, 209 U.S. 123, 28 S.Ct. 441, 52 L.Ed. 714 (1908)); Larson v. Domestic & Foreign Commerce Corp., 337 U.S. 682, 689-90, 69 S.Ct. 1457, ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.5,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 104 S. Ct. 900 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 20686,
"end": 20707,
"quote": "880 F.Supp.2d at 1041",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "880 F. Supp. 2d 1029",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "564b3a14a5d189b1",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_117/1092_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Central District of California",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "act and recast them as torts,” which “consist of nothing more than [defendants’] alleged failure to make good on its contractual promises.” JMP Securities LLP, 880 F.Supp.2d at 1041.\nAccordingly, the fraud claims are deficiently pled and must be dismissed under the economic loss rule. The court nonetheless addresses the allegations underly",
"linked": true,
"weight": 7.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 880 F. Supp. 2d 1029 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 19384,
"end": 19404,
"quote": "297 S.W.3d at 474-75",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "297 S.W.3d 464",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "5c69793684cd64b5",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/sw3d/volume_329/0008_01/index.html",
"court": "Texas Courts of Appeals",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "en is not met by evidence that shows she would be a better custodian of the child or that she has a strong and on-going relationship with the child. See Critz, 297 S.W.3d at 474-75; M.J.G., 248 S.W.3d at 760. Further, evidence of past misconduct alone is insufficient. Critz, 297 S.W.3d at 475. “If the parent is presently a suitable person",
"linked": true,
"weight": 6.333333333333333,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 297 S.W.3d 464 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 7482,
"end": 7496,
"quote": "392 U.S. at 23",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "392 U.S. 1",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "441c2b55b696165a",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_700/1174_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "h justified the interference in the first place.\nUnited States v. Sharpe, 470 U.S. 675, 682, 105 S.Ct. 1568, 1573, 84 L.Ed.2d 605 (1985) (quoting Terry, supra, 392 U.S. at 23, 88 S.Ct. at 1881.) See also United States v. Streifel, 781 F.2d 953 (1st Cir.1986) (applying Sharpe standard); United States v. Trullo, 809 F.2d 108 (1st Cir.",
"linked": false,
"weight": 3.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 392 U.S. 1 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 1251,
"end": 1264,
"quote": "107 S.Ct. at ",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "107 S. Ct. 2378",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "966bf3758d80e9ab",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_830/0968_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "te authorities might still lead to the conclusion that no taking had occurred,” or to the conclusion that \"just compensation” had been paid. —U.S. at---& n. 6, 107 S.Ct. at 2383-84 & n. 6 (distinguishing the MacDonald, Sommer & Frates line of cases).\n",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.5,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 107 S. Ct. 2378 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 12395,
"end": 12412,
"quote": "539 S.E.2d at 545",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "539 S.E.2d 543",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "abbcfc4d099e8e7d",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_958/0623_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "nce, the guaranty can be construed together with the other writing to satisfy the statute of frauds.”) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted); Roach, 539 S.E.2d at 545. In Sysco, 489 S.E.2d at 569-70, however, the Court of Appeals declined to read together two sections that appeared on the same paper but did not incorporate e",
"linked": false,
"weight": 2.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 539 S.E.2d 543 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 17672,
"end": 17690,
"quote": "467 U.S. at 842-43",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "467 U.S. 837",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "6df713b745230016",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_478/0117_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "ngress is not clear, the second step under Chevron is to determine whether deference to the agency’s interpretation of the statute is appropriate. See Chevron, 467 U.S. at 842-43, 104 S.Ct. 2778; Presley, 502 U.S. at 508, 112 S.Ct. 820. Courts defer to statutory interpretations of agencies when (1) the agency is charged with implementin",
"linked": false,
"weight": 6.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 467 U.S. 837 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 12541,
"end": 12556,
"quote": "270 F.3d at 321",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "270 F.3d 298",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "2e28a81955b03311",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_381/0832_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "ions omitted).\nFor trademark cases in Michigan, the applicable statute of limitations is the three-year period for injury to personal property. Herman Miller , 270 F.3d at 321 (citations omitted). \"[A] delay beyond the three-year statutory period is presumptively prejudicial and unreasonable.\" Nartron Corp. , 305 F.3d at 408. This pe",
"linked": true,
"weight": 6.666666666666667,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 270 F.3d 298 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 21204,
"end": 21224,
"quote": "44 Ohio App.3d at 30",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "44 Ohio App. 3d 28",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "67f53bdf18531366",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/ohio-app-3d/volume_160/0019_01/index.html",
"court": "Ohio Court of Appeals",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": " terms of the two agreements and the language of R.C. 1317.01 indicate that the note is a loan agreement and not a retail installment contract. See Huntington, 44 Ohio App.3d at 30, 540 N.E.2d 735 (holding that the exhibit attached to the complaint was a promissory note and security agreement directly between the bank and the plaintiff an",
"linked": true,
"weight": 9.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 44 Ohio App. 3d 28 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 26445,
"end": 26464,
"quote": "923 F.Supp. at 1473",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "923 F. Supp. 1469",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "c732bfac9555713c",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_10/1248_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "paign, comprehensive vehicle recall, and an injunction forbidding the defendants from using the allegedly defective engines and/or engine control modules.” Id. 923 F.Supp. at 1473. The court held that this equitable relief would “benefit the class as a whole and not just any individual plaintiff.” Id. 923 F.Supp. at 1472. Therefore, acco",
"linked": true,
"weight": 4.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 923 F. Supp. 1469 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 3901,
"end": 3913,
"quote": "412 U.S. at ",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "412 U.S. 481",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "e7f46691a6e66ba0",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_705/0473_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Arizona",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "ould indicate the de facto diminishment of the reservation. Solem, 465 U.S. at 470-72, 104 S.Ct. at 1166-67; Rosebud, 430 U.S. at 587, 97 S.Ct. at 1363; Mattz, 412 U.S. at 505 & n. 25, 93 S.Ct. at 2258 & n. 25; Grey Bear, 828 F.2d at 1289. The court will consider each of these factors in turn.\nA. Statutory Language\nThe language of",
"linked": false,
"weight": 4.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 412 U.S. 481 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 18997,
"end": 19009,
"quote": "168 F.3d at ",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "168 F.3d 1257",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "b8403481190c52f6",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_93/1201_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "s direct evidence. See Carter v. City of Miami, 870 F.2d 578, 582 (11th Cir.1989) (describing the type of remarks that constitute direct evidence); Schoenfeld, 168 F.3d at 1266 (quoting Carter, 870 F.2d at 582). Indeed, no impermissible motives are detectable. Hughes never stated to Puckett that he was displeased that the plaintif",
"linked": true,
"weight": 2.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 168 F.3d 1257 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 15652,
"end": 15672,
"quote": "464 F.Supp.2d at 213",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "464 F. Supp. 2d 206",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "280e4da66bd5cad8",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_992/0316_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Southern District of New York",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "es or giving a right thereto, which reflects a substantial policy of the state, should be followed.” (internal quotation marks omitted)); see also RLS Assocs., 464 F.Supp.2d at 213 (‘‘[A]ttorneys‘ fees are considered substantive under the Erie doctrine, and should be analyzed under state law in diversity cases.”). Federal courts follow th",
"linked": true,
"weight": 5.8,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 464 F. Supp. 2d 206 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 7519,
"end": 7531,
"quote": "519 F.3d at ",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "519 F.3d 1242",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "42d6c948760d87da",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_859/1249_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "oses a “burden ... on the plaintiff to frame a ‘complaint with enough factual matter (taken as true) to suggest’ that ... [it] is entitled to relief.” Robbins, 519 F.3d at 1247 (quoting 550 U.S. at 556, 127 S.Ct. 1955). Thus, “[t]he allegations [in the first amended complaint] must be enough that, if assumed to be true, ... [the p",
"linked": true,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 519 F.3d 1242 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 12437,
"end": 12452,
"quote": "478 U.S. at 799",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "478 U.S. 788",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "4b7b650504c4adcd",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_40/0677_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "quired federal courts to give a state administrative agency’s factfinding the same issue preclusive effect it would receive in the state’s own courts. Elliott, 478 U.S. at 799, 106 S.Ct. at 3226. This raises the question whether traditional preclusion principles require a similar rule for claim preclusion.\nElliott identified as a pri",
"linked": false,
"weight": 7.5,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 478 U.S. 788 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 34591,
"end": 34606,
"quote": "504 U.S. at 729",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "504 U.S. 719",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "445e5e488069ca06",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_491/0830_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": ".S. at 424-26, 105 S.Ct. 844 (replacing the prior standard), it is not impermissible to phrase the question itself in “automatic” sentencing terms. See Morgan, 504 U.S. at 729, 112 S.Ct. 2222 (noting that a juror who would automatically impose the death penalty would fail to qualify as impartial even under the new standard).\n.For thi",
"linked": true,
"weight": 6.333333333333333,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 504 U.S. 719 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 23673,
"end": 23693,
"quote": "106 S.Ct. at 2552-53",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "106 S. Ct. 2548",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "263074958b3d41d8",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_938/1419_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": " under the governing law, such that they preclude summary judgment on any of Hanson’s claims. See, e.g., Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c); Celotex Corp., 477 U.S. at 322-23, 106 S.Ct. at 2552-53; Anderson, 477 U.S. at 248, 106 S.Ct. at 2510; Beyerbach, 49 F.3d at 1326; Hartnagel, 953 F.2d at 394.\nFirst, Hanson disputes the reason for her below-average ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 2.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 106 S. Ct. 2548 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 10415,
"end": 10430,
"quote": "477 U.S. at 252",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "477 U.S. 242",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "17ec4d3f02885bd7",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_381/0832_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": " the [non-moving party]'s position will be insufficient; there must be evidence on which the jury could reasonably find for the [non-moving party].\" Anderson , 477 U.S. at 252, 106 S.Ct. 2505. The Court \"must view the evidence, all facts, and any inferences that may be drawn from the facts in the light most favorable to the non-movin",
"linked": false,
"weight": 6.666666666666667,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 477 U.S. 242 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 7926,
"end": 7932,
"quote": "supra;",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "406 F.2d 431",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "6a04a2ec656876db",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_452/0163_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit",
"decade": "1970s",
"context": "05, 23 L.Ed.2d 749. It will not apply where changes in the claim are directed to merely overcoming difficulties in particular wording or indefiniteness, Eimco, supra; Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Jones, 308 F.2d 705, 708-709 (10th Cir. 1962), cert. denied 371 U.S. 952, 83 S.Ct. 509, 9 L.Ed.2d 501 (1963), or adhering to the most d",
"linked": true,
"weight": 6.666666666666667,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 406 F.2d 431 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 7259,
"end": 7279,
"quote": "109 S.Ct. at 1001-02",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "109 S. Ct. 998",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "dde8e75ef1adc0a6",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_847/0893_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Wyoming",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "use of action for a deprivation of liberty under the substantive component of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. DeShaney, 489 U.S. at 193-94, 109 S.Ct. at 1001-02 (citation omitted). The Supreme Court, per Chief Justice Rehnquist, held that where the state does not create the danger that resulted in harm to the child, bu",
"linked": false,
"weight": 3.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 109 S. Ct. 998 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 1267,
"end": 1274,
"quote": "supra).",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "178 A.D.2d 463",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "dc8e48d7d4c563a9",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/ad2d/volume_304/0613_01/index.html",
"court": "New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "f fact remain which can only be resolved at trial (see Reiner v Wenig, supra; Federated Assoc. v Pergament Distribs., supra; Icon Motors v Empire State Datsun, supra).\nIn light of the foregoing, the parties’ remaining contentions need not be reached. Ritter, J.P., Feuerstein, Smith and Luciano, JJ., concur.\n",
"linked": true,
"weight": 5.091954022988506,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 178 A.D.2d 463 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 9120,
"end": 9126,
"quote": "supra;",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "36 N.Y.2d 371",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "be0f7bf1dda9003e",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/ad2d/volume_172/0261_01/index.html",
"court": "New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "d faith in the exercise of honest judgment and the legitimate furtherance of corporate purposes is prohibited (Auerbach v Bennett, 47 NY2d 619; Barr v Wackman, supra; Pollitz v Wabash R. R. Co., 207 NY 113). Nor does a cause of action lie where the complaint merely alleges that a course of action other than that pursued by a",
"linked": true,
"weight": 5.0886075949367084,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 36 N.Y.2d 371 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 13923,
"end": 13940,
"quote": "100 S.Ct. at 1250",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "100 S. Ct. 1244",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "843c100d401a146b",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/so2d/volume_389/0262_01/index.html",
"court": "Florida District Court of Appeal",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "ty was known long before there was any official misconduct, and her presence in court is thus not traceable to any Fourth Amendment violation. 445 U.S. at 471, 100 S.Ct. at 1250.\n. At trial, the defense and the state stipulated that Nisenboin identified a photograph of defendant as one of the robbers. Because, however, the officer who ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.073170731707317,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 100 S. Ct. 1244 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 19791,
"end": 19805,
"quote": "322 F.3d at 69",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "322 F.3d 56",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "0430d8fa0a0fefcc",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_747/0319_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "he Commonwealth is responsible for an agency’s debts suggests that it is an “arm of the state.” See Data Research Corp., 261 F.Supp.2d at 70 (citing Fresenius, 322 F.3d at 69). However, as the Data Research court concluded, this statutory language, without some evidence before the court to determine the actual degree of fiscal and o",
"linked": true,
"weight": 11.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 322 F.3d 56 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 16446,
"end": 16465,
"quote": "37 F.Supp.3d at 372",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "37 F. Supp. 3d 368",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "9c34503808aeaf07",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_213/0081_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Columbia",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "d activity and an adverse employment action can establish sufficient evidence of causality “uniformly hold the temporal proximity must be ‘very close.’ ” Keys, 37 F.Supp.3d at 372 (collecting cases). Although “neither the Supreme Court nor the [D.C. Circuit] has established a bright-line three-month rule,” id. “three months is perceived ",
"linked": true,
"weight": 5.75,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 37 F. Supp. 3d 368 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 11176,
"end": 11193,
"quote": "102 S.Ct. at 2345",
"pattern": "case_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "102 S. Ct. 2339",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "162357c75a9e12d3",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_551/0074_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Southern District of New York",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "ongress [nonetheless] ... intended § 101(a)(2) to restate a principal First Amendment value — the right to speak one’s mind without fear of reprisal.” Id. at-, 102 S.Ct. at 2345. Because § 101(a)(2) protects first amendment values and because the right not to speak, like the rightf to speak, implicates such values, defendants’ contenti",
"linked": false,
"weight": 6.6,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 102 S. Ct. 2339 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 9293,
"end": 9304,
"quote": "Id. at 1357",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "334 F.3d 1343",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "e05dc08962cbf5de",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_540/1368_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": " and convincing evidence that the claims were anticipated, we cannot conclude that the jury verdict on anticipation was not supported by substantial evidence.” Id. at 1357. We explained that the only issue raised regarding anticipation was whether Deutsch teaches “flowing said solution along the medium.” We agreed that the jury r",
"linked": true,
"weight": 9.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 334 F.3d 1343 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 5069,
"end": 5072,
"quote": "Id.",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "722 F.2d 557",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "c9a8ed6be6f1060b",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_828/1427_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": ". The government must prove the independent source by a preponderance of the evidence, and we will uphold a district court’s findings unless clearly erroneous. Id. This court has permitted the government to meet its burden of proof as to the existence of independent, prior sources through affidavits. Id.\nThe district cour",
"linked": true,
"weight": 5.5,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 722 F.2d 557 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 6613,
"end": 6623,
"quote": "Id. at 178",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "821 S.W.2d 174",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "04cc4dad9eff89e3",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_7/0044_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": " reasonably felt compelled to resign. Id. A mere change of position or job responsibilities, without more, will not support a claim for constructive discharge. Id. at 178; Jurgens v. Equal Employment Opportunity Comm’n, 903 F.2d 386, 391-92 (5th Cir.1990); Jett v. Dallas Indep. School Dist., 798 F.2d 748, 755 (5th Cir.1986), rem",
"linked": true,
"weight": 5.8,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 821 S.W.2d 174 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 22842,
"end": 22845,
"quote": "Id.",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "387 S.E.2d 623",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "fbcb5d85831772e7",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_259/0938_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": ", a partner in a car wash business .was involved in a collision while driving a vehicle to the vehicle owner’s home from the car wash where it had been washed. Id. Each policy at issue contained an automobile business exclusion. One policy stated “[tjhere is no coverage for non-owned cars ... being repaired, serviced or u",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 387 S.E.2d 623 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 4427,
"end": 4430,
"quote": "id.",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "564 S.W.2d 487",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "6fabeca5f7a77718",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/sw3d/volume_4/0278_01/index.html",
"court": "Texas Courts of Appeals",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "ey court suggested that if the order granting the bill of review could be considered a void order granting a new trial, relief would be proper by mandamus. See id.\nIn our view, an order erroneously granting a bill of review is merely voidable, not void. “A voidable act is one which is absolutely void within itself, but wh",
"linked": true,
"weight": 5.2105263157894735,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 564 S.W.2d 487 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 14730,
"end": 14733,
"quote": "Id.",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "615 N.E.2d 736",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "e9d13a92afff0bcb",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_335/1023_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Eastern District of Illinois",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": " ). \"The influence must be of such a nature as to destroy the testator's freedom concerning the disposition of his estate and render his will that of another.\" Id. An undue influence inquiry is fact-specific; it \"cannot be defined by fixed words and will depend on the circumstances of each case.\" Id.\nUnder Illinois law, a",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 615 N.E.2d 736 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 9572,
"end": 9582,
"quote": "id. at 994",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "240 F.3d 982",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "ebd642b42cd3e182",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_301/1323_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "ees with the decision and thus finds it “wrong,” then the court next decides whether “the claimant has proposed a ‘reasonable’ interpretation of the plan.” See id. at 994, quoting Lee v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield, 10 F.3d 1547, 1550 (11th Cir.1994).\nEven if the claimant’s proposed interpretation is reasonable, the court must .still",
"linked": true,
"weight": 8.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 240 F.3d 982 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 51923,
"end": 51926,
"quote": "id.",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "127 S. Ct. 2705",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "98e5c619fe8a8216",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_255/0355_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Connecticut",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "tress this argument are unpersuasive.\nFirst, Total Wine believes that, because Leegin did not specifically mention 324 Liquor, 324 Liquor remains good law. See id. (“Nowhere in Leegin did the Supreme Court suggest it was overruling 324 Liquor.”). This justification for continuing to apply 324 Liquor is entirely unconvinci",
"linked": true,
"weight": 4.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 127 S. Ct. 2705 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 23905,
"end": 23908,
"quote": "Id.",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "303 F.3d 256",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "f7f7a7179fc99442",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_130/0654_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of New York",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": " se inadmissible.” Id. “The judge should-only exclude the evidence if the flaw is large enough that the expert lacks good grounds for his or her conclusions.”. Id. (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Accordingly, “gaps or inconsistencies” in. an expert’s reasoning, or arguments that an expert’s conclusions ar",
"linked": true,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 303 F.3d 256 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 3930,
"end": 3933,
"quote": "Id.",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "167 L. Ed. 2d 929",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "261ee6b029a3c79b",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_8/1169_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of South Dakota",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "lity when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” Id.\nDISCUSSION\nI. Subject Matter Jurisdiction\nA. Money Damages or Equitable Relief\nThe United States argues that this court does not have subject matter jurisdicti",
"linked": true,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 167 L. Ed. 2d 929 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 8289,
"end": 8299,
"quote": "id. at 992",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "239 F.3d 989",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "40252dbe75158c11",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_239/1022_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Montana",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": " that reckless misstatements of law or fact made in an attempt to influence or manipulate proceedings to gain a tactical advantage are sanctionable). See also, id. at 992 (relying on Itel and noting that “sanctions are justified when a party acts for an improper purpose — even if the act consists of making a truthful statement o",
"linked": true,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 239 F.3d 989 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 18921,
"end": 18924,
"quote": "id.",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "950 F. Supp. 2d 1017",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "ea0737a24c6c6cbf",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_18/0966_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "his quantity and quality of contacts with this kind of relationship to the plaintiffs causes of action does comport with fair play and substantial justice. Cf. id. Indeed, based on CVL’s allegations concerning AudioNow’s servers in Iowa, I find that AudioNow could and should reasonably have anticipated that it could be ha",
"linked": true,
"weight": 5.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 950 F. Supp. 2d 1017 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 24146,
"end": 24149,
"quote": "Id.",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "669 F.3d 867",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "6e88c21bd54316c0",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_933/0975_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "tiff was charged with simple assault or, in the alternative, disorderly conduct, as well as resisting arrest. Id. She was convicted only of disorderly conduct. Id.\nWe held that the officer's takedown of the plaintiff was not objectively reasonable under the circumstances. Id. at 871. First, the plaintiff posed no threat t",
"linked": true,
"weight": 6.6,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 669 F.3d 867 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 20878,
"end": 20881,
"quote": "Id.",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "109 F.3d 275",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "3e347c5b9923fe3a",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_381/0832_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "g channels used; (6) likely degree of purchaser care; (7) the intent of the parties in selecting the mark; and (8) likelihood of expansion of the product line. Id. (citing Frisch's Restaurants, Inc. v. Elby's Big Boy, Inc. , 670 F.2d 642, 648 (6th Cir. 1982) ) (\"the Frisch factors\"). These factors are \"interrelated\" and \"",
"linked": true,
"weight": 6.666666666666667,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 109 F.3d 275 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 10044,
"end": 10053,
"quote": "id., at 7",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "293 U.S. 1",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "092cdec5376df9e1",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/us/volume_564/0091_01/index.html",
"court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": " be overthrown except by clear and cogent evidence.” Id., at 2. Although the “force” of the presumption found “varying expression” in this Court and elsewhere, id., at 7, Justice Cardozo explained, one “common core of thought and truth” unified the decisions:\n“[O]ne otherwise an infringer who assails the validity of a patent fa",
"linked": false,
"weight": 8.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 293 U.S. 1 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 26177,
"end": 26180,
"quote": "Id.",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "64 F. App'x 388",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "79fd8e3196831444",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_259/0938_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "ve the car to the dealership. Id. at 389. On the way to the dealership, the under-repair ear was struck by another vehicle, and Teresa was injured as a result. Id.\nTwo insurance policies were at issue in Toler, and both included a ear business exclusion which stated that there was; no coverage while a non-owned car is use",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; source uses an equivalent reporter spelling for 64 F. App'x 388.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 17008,
"end": 17011,
"quote": "id.",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "796 F. Supp. 2d 1246",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "3442dc78c1a8895f",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_869/1158_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Eastern District of California",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": " break laws are not preempted by the FAAAA. Yet, as noted above, Cardenas acknowledged that the defendant’s evidence could support a finding of preemption. See id. It was on the basis of this evidence, and the absence of any rebuttal of that evidence, that caused the District Court to decline to rule that FAAAA preemption",
"linked": true,
"weight": 3.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 796 F. Supp. 2d 1246 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 863,
"end": 866,
"quote": "Id.",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "121 So. 3d 419",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "7437c44b34d8bfd9",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/so3d/volume_127/0690_01/index.html",
"court": "Florida District Court of Appeal",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "ourt issued its decision in Alcorn v. State, 121 So.3d 419 (Fla.2013). Alcorn explained the proper prejudice inquiry associated with such a claim of misadvice. Id. at 431-32 (citing Missouri v. Frye, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1399, 182 L.Ed.2d 379 (2012); Lafler v. Cooper, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1376, 182 L.Ed.2d 398 (2012)).\nResp",
"linked": true,
"weight": 5.260869565217392,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 121 So. 3d 419 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 6761,
"end": 6770,
"quote": "Id. at 12",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "924 F. Supp. 2d 8",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "247d2b8336694de3",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_758/0369_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "urt nonetheless concluded that it lacked “the power to provide the particular sort of remedy sought here for the specific injustices alleged in the complaint.” Id. at 12. According to the district court, plaintiffs’ suit for damages under Bivens was foreclosed by Supreme Court precedent disallowing such a remedy “ ‘for injuries",
"linked": true,
"weight": 9.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 924 F. Supp. 2d 8 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 11180,
"end": 11183,
"quote": "Id.",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "103 S. Ct. 2362",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "296cc10601f85e78",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_758/0369_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "ourt explained, “would be undermined by a judicially created remedy exposing officers to personal liability at the hands of those they are charged to command.” Id. Moreover, Congress had “exercised its plenary constitutional authority over the military” to regulate military life and military justice in numerous respects, ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 9.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 103 S. Ct. 2362 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 18917,
"end": 18920,
"quote": "Id.",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "84 S.W.3d 383",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "b083be6d0a373441",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/sw3d/volume_105/0330_01/index.html",
"court": "Texas Courts of Appeals",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "2, no pet.) A trial court abuses its discretion if it acts without reference to any guiding rules or principles or acts in an arbitrary or unreasonable manner. Id. (citing Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc., 701 S.W.2d 238, 241-42 (Tex.1985)). A trial court does not abuse its discretion if it decides a matter within its",
"linked": true,
"weight": 5.176470588235294,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 84 S.W.3d 383 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 8471,
"end": 8474,
"quote": "Id.",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "859 F. Supp. 182",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "b3a0af9bad5f61de",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_923/1448_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "rney court properly reasoned that any reference to the plan to determine the issue of agency does not implicate the concerns of the ERISA preemption provision. Id. A medical malpractice action, such as that at issue in the instant case, does not involve a claim for benefits, a claim to enforce rights under the benefit pla",
"linked": true,
"weight": 2.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 859 F. Supp. 182 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 31540,
"end": 31551,
"quote": "Id. at 1136",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "601 F. Supp. 1119",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "15690ea180b756f7",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_708/0144_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "the LHWCA would allow such a third-party claim against the United States in its capacity as vessel owner, a state law precluding such an action was pre-empted. Id. at 1136.\nRyan-Walsh has pointed to no inter-zone conflict. Indeed, it would be difficult to envision how Wallace’s state law claim and its federal counterpart, 33 U.S.",
"linked": true,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 601 F. Supp. 1119 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 2648,
"end": 2658,
"quote": "Id. at 539",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "850 F.2d 537",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "e3ef36a660ff7ae0",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_741/1071_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "s in similar cases.\nId. at 539 n. 1. “A mere statement that a court has considered the Kerr guidelines does not make a decision within the court’s discretion.” Id. at 539. Rather, the “court must ‘articulate with sufficient clarity the manner in which it makes its determination.’ ” Id. (quoting Chalmers v. City of L.A., 796 F.2d",
"linked": true,
"weight": 6.75,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 850 F.2d 537 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 10382,
"end": 10392,
"quote": "Id. at 274",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "817 N.E.2d 266",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "92af2c5a3c8b323b",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_997/0914_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "tack came as an unexpected surprise to both the plaintiff and the hospital, the court found that the injury and the third party’s actions were not foreseeable. Id. at 274.\nLike the plaintiff in Lane, Houston herself admits that the unknown person who hit her from behind acted completely without warning. See Houston Dep. 154: 7-8",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 817 N.E.2d 266 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 25649,
"end": 25652,
"quote": "Id.",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "892 F. Supp. 2d 1317",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "91b5b9069a15ba3b",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_777/1187_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "r reading of the statute calls for the Marshal's statutory percentage fee to be calculated based on the lesser of the judgment amount or the property’s value.” Id.\n.In its brief, Redus effectively abandoned its argument that the District Court abused its discretion when it refused to grant Redus’s emergency motion to canc",
"linked": true,
"weight": 10.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 892 F. Supp. 2d 1317 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 2140,
"end": 2143,
"quote": "Id.",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "79 L. Ed. 2d 443",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "f7fdd9642050dd63",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_705/0473_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Arizona",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": " 465 U.S. 463, 466-67, 104 S.Ct. 1161, 1164, 79 L.Ed.2d 443 (1984). It is settled law that some land acts diminished reservations, and other land acts did not. Id. 465 U.S. at 469, 104 S.Ct. at 1165. The effect of any given act depends on the language of the act and the circumstances underlying its passage. Id. “The first",
"linked": false,
"weight": 4.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 79 L. Ed. 2d 443 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 10739,
"end": 10744,
"quote": "Ibid.",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "80 L. Ed. 2d 674",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "6e57ea1439039ab8",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_28/1164_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Eastern District of California",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": " stead, “That is, the defendant must overcome the presumption that, under the circumstances, the challenged action ‘might be considered sound trial strategy.’” Ibid.\nTo show ineffective assistance of counsel in the constitutional sense, petitioner must show that “counsel made errors so serious that [he] was not functioning ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 2.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 80 L. Ed. 2d 674 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 49140,
"end": 49143,
"quote": "Id.",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "939 F. Supp. 1142",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "8d0e6cdc97a660fc",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_182/0385_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of New Jersey",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "s for division according to the contribution of each, each is subject to liability only for the portion of the harm that the individual tortfeasor has caused.” Id. at 1155 (quoting United States v. Alcan Aluminum Corp., 964 F.2d 252, 268 (3d Cir.1992)). In order to seek apportionment under the doctrine, the defendant must",
"linked": true,
"weight": 5.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 939 F. Supp. 1142 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 20604,
"end": 20607,
"quote": "Id.",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "561 F.2d 787",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "29d7531c9483ab2b",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_10/1248_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "d. 561 F.2d at 789-90. In doing so, the court rejected the “defendant’s point of view” and the “total detriment” approaches that have been used by some courts. Id. 561 F.2d at 788-90. The court stated: “[Wjhere ‘the equitable relief sought is but a means through which the individual claims may be satisfied, the ban on agg",
"linked": true,
"weight": 4.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 561 F.2d 787 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 6554,
"end": 6567,
"quote": "Id. at 786-87",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "107 Cal. Rptr. 675",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "48f3a6e09c4bd508",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_858/1051_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Southern District of California",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": " held that the testimony was admissible because the defendant had already waived his privilege against self-incrimination by placing his mental state in issue. Id. at 786-87, 107 Cal.Rptr. 675.\nA. 5th Amendment Claim\nPetitioner invoked her 5th amendment privilege against self-incrimination at trial, but claims that the Court of App",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 107 Cal. Rptr. 675 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 51372,
"end": 51382,
"quote": "Id. at 945",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "936 P.2d 943",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "6a5b9505e7e78ee3",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/sw3d/volume_282/0672_01/index.html",
"court": "Texas Courts of Appeals",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "luded, “The JOA does not expressly address whether a party can change its vote for a successor operator, which creates an ambiguity and requires construction.” Id. at 945. Due primarily to contested facts regarding the custom and usage in the industry, the Oklahoma Supreme Court could not resolve the ambiguity, and it remanded t",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.176470588235294,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 936 P.2d 943 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 25624,
"end": 25627,
"quote": "Id.",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "173 L. Ed. 2d 868",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "bdca5a11a041deb8",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_18/0966_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "lity when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” Id.\nRichter v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc., 686 F.3d 847, 850 (8th Cir.2012); accord Freitas v. Wells Fargo Home Mortg., Inc., 703 F.3d 436, 438 (8th Cir.2013) (quoti",
"linked": true,
"weight": 5.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 173 L. Ed. 2d 868 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 23348,
"end": 23351,
"quote": "Id.",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "669 F.3d 867",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "deec81e23f823374",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_933/0975_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "the two officers, while the plaintiff stood opposite of them, approximately ten to fifteen feet away. Id. The plaintiff and the ex-boyfriend were having words. Id. The officers stated that the plaintiff had taken a step forward and raised her fist, but, according to the plaintiff's account, she was merely using her hands ",
"linked": true,
"weight": 6.6,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 669 F.3d 867 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 52036,
"end": 52039,
"quote": "Id.",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "437 S.W.3d 507",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "6963091788b834d2",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/sw3d/volume_476/0463_01/index.html",
"court": "Texas Courts of Appeals",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": " claims asserted or which could have been asserted,’” the settlement offer was intended to settle all claims, including any claims that had not been' asserted. Id. In doing so, it interpreted the first and third descriptions (“ ‘claims between the parties’ ” and “ ‘damages asserted’ ”) as ' shorthand references to- the se",
"linked": true,
"weight": 6.333333333333333,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 437 S.W.3d 507 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 3963,
"end": 3966,
"quote": "Id.",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "90 L. Ed. 95",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "4bba88de8bf5fe4d",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_931/0549_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "ted on its control over an item of property or res.\nId. (citations omitted). Jurisdiction in an in rem action therefore generally ends with removal of the res. Id. Jurisdiction may be retained, however, where the res was removed accidentally, improperly or fraudulently. Id.\nThe Navarros argue that the currency was acciden",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.888888888888889,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 90 L. Ed. 95 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 53849,
"end": 53852,
"quote": "Id.",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "61 L. Ed. 2d 82",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "e277ed5b543714ca",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_18/0966_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "U.S. 560, 568, 99 S.Ct. 2479, 61 L.Ed.2d 82 (1979)). Rather, whether a statute provides a private right of action depends upon the construction of the statute. Id. In deciding whether a federal statute provides a private right of action, this court must consider whether Congress intended that the statute would establish b",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 61 L. Ed. 2d 82 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 12063,
"end": 12074,
"quote": "Id. at 1358",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "77 F.3d 1353",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "00bbf217617d0f8c",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_10/1248_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "es in Alabama, the Tapscott court began by noting that the purpose for punitive damages in Alabama is to “deter wrongful conduct and punish those responsible.” Id. at 1358. The court also noted that in Alabama, “punitive damages are awarded for the public benefit—the collective good,” id., and “[a]n injured party is not entitled ",
"linked": true,
"weight": 4.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 77 F.3d 1353 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 24601,
"end": 24604,
"quote": "Id.",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "669 F.3d 867",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "466ae3b77f2d8586",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_933/0975_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "ands above her head in frustration. She assert[ed] she did not intend to hit [the ex-boyfriend], and [he] testified he did not feel threatened by her actions.\" Id. Second, the plaintiff \"was not actively resisting arrest, and [she] was not attempting to flee.\" Id. Third, the plaintiff's \"actions amounted to a violation of",
"linked": true,
"weight": 6.6,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 669 F.3d 867 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 45824,
"end": 45827,
"quote": "Id.",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "295 S.W.3d 323",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "d23b70f9fbbc5325",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_836/0484_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "rly because there was no actual risk that the plaintiff would think that an entity other than the plaintiff filed for nonsuit — the other entity did not exist. Id. Therefore, the Court reasoned, relation back was proper. Id. However, unlike the case at bar, the plaintiff did not omit the proper plaintiff — the plaintiff m",
"linked": true,
"weight": 6.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 295 S.W.3d 323 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 25720,
"end": 25724,
"quote": "Id.,",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "320 F. Supp. 2d 748",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "87e46b797ac6d806",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_552/0731_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "s, her “subsequent interpretations should be given no more deference than that given to a congressman’s or lobbyist’s subsequent explanations of a statute ...” Id., citing Covalt v. Carey Canada Inc., 860 F.2d 1434, 1438 (7th Cir.1988). “Subsequent writings may be nothing but wishful thinking, and unless they are uttered a",
"linked": true,
"weight": 12.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 320 F. Supp. 2d 748 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 5757,
"end": 5760,
"quote": "id.",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "441 F.3d 552",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "73e61993224d1dc6",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_739/0417_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "or may Dunn rely on the broad allegation that every claim submitted from 1996 until the present is false in order to satisfy the particularity requirement. See id. (requiring the relator to state more than a “conclusory or generalized allegation[ ]”). Instead, Dunn “must provide some representative examples of [North Memo",
"linked": true,
"weight": 6.6,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 441 F.3d 552 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 9679,
"end": 9682,
"quote": "Id.",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "96 L. Ed. 2d 510",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "a9f7a7c75a119b15",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_145/0845_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "s, not full members of the political community, and an accompanying message to adherents that they are insiders, favored members of the political community.’ ” Id. at 309-10 (quoting Lynch v. Donnelly, 465 U.S. 668, 688, 104 S.Ct. 1355, 79 L.Ed.2d 604 (1984) (O’Connor, J., concurring)). Thus, the defendants’ fourth and fi",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 96 L. Ed. 2d 510 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 32710,
"end": 32723,
"quote": "id. at 174-75",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "745 F.2d 166",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "9052f383e3dea5e8",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_255/0355_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Connecticut",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "to this case, Judge Friendly,-writing for a divided panel, held that New York’s post and hold provisions were not in direct, conflict with the Sherman Act. See id. at 174-75.- As noted above, see Part IV.A.1, supra, Judge Friendly did not perform the now-requirqd analysis — originally set out in Fisher, 475 U.S. at 267-68, 106 S.Ct",
"linked": true,
"weight": 4.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 745 F.2d 166 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 9423,
"end": 9426,
"quote": "id.",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "803 S.W.2d 308",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "4c4f9c85ca6ffe26",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/sw2d/volume_977/0624_01/index.html",
"court": "Texas Courts of Appeals",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "d to detect the odor of illegal drugs is not offensive to the Fourth Amendment when based on a reasonable suspicion that the automobile contains narcotics. See id. Nevertheless, even a temporary detention of this kind is not permissible unless the circumstances upon which the officers rely objectively support a reasonable",
"linked": true,
"weight": 5.2105263157894735,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 803 S.W.2d 308 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 12783,
"end": 12794,
"quote": "id., at 269",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "503 U.S. 258",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "7d6affb87f1d8135",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/us/volume_547/0451_01/index.html",
"court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "Holmes. Notwithstanding the lack of any appreciable risk of duplicative recoveries, which is another consideration relevant to the proximate-cause inquiry, see id., at 269, these concerns help to illustrate why Ideal’s alleged injury was not the direct result of a RICO violation. Further illustrating this point is the speculative",
"linked": true,
"weight": 10.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 503 U.S. 258 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 1957,
"end": 1960,
"quote": "Id.",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "517 F.3d 558",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "dbe124efda646f8e",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_631/0961_01/index.html",
"court": "Judicial Council of the Ninth Circuit",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "“virtually habitual,” “arbitrary and intentional departure from prevailing law” based on the judge’s “disagreement with, or willful indifference to, that law.” Id. This can generally be done by pointing to a particular error the judge continued to commit even after having been repeatedly corrected on appeal.\nComplainant h",
"linked": true,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 517 F.3d 558 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 24917,
"end": 24920,
"quote": "id.",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "959 S.W.2d 646",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "ca73e90bb1ac07fd",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/sw3d/volume_21/0419_01/index.html",
"court": "Texas Courts of Appeals",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": " a means of obtaining unfair advantage. See id. The primary purpose of the doctrine is not to protect litigants, but rather the integrity of the judiciary. See id. Thus, judicial estoppel does not require reliance or prejudice before a party may invoke it. See id.\nAlthough the position taken by Home in this case is clearl",
"linked": true,
"weight": 5.176470588235294,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 959 S.W.2d 646 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 9619,
"end": 9622,
"quote": "Id.",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "39 F.3d 1273",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "4b649594f8873411",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_258/0345_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "t ‘[t]he alleged principal [had] the right to control both the means and the details of the process by which the alleged agent [was] to accomplish the task.’ ” Id. (quoting In re Carolin Paxson Adver., Inc., 938 F.2d 595, 598 (5th Cir.1991)). “The right to control the details of a person’s work determines whether an emplo",
"linked": true,
"weight": 6.5,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 39 F.3d 1273 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 19641,
"end": 19644,
"quote": "Id.",
"pattern": "case_id",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "486 U.S. 567",
"reason": "eyecite antecedent resolution",
"id": "348e2a07d8ecc498",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_935/0484_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "2-73.\nThe subjective intentions of the police officers during an encounter are relevant only to the extent that they are conveyed to the individual approached. Id. at 575 n. 7; Mendenhall, supra, 446 U.S. at 554 n. 6 (opinion of Stewart, J.).\nWe previously have identified factors that might be relevant to a determination ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 7.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Exact quote verified at the recorded decoded-opinion offsets; the full opinion contains the antecedent identity 486 U.S. 567 (reporter punctuation/spacing normalized).",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 14497,
"end": 14508,
"quote": "9 Stat. 466",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "9 Stat. 466",
"reason": "canonical Statutes-at-Large identity",
"id": "815fff2009e1fb84",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/ill-app-3d/volume_355/0812_01/index.html",
"court": "Illinois Appellate Court",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "ocal land office respectively, and to the general land office at Washington city, within ninety days after the completion of the same.” (Emphasis in original.) 9 Stat. 466 (1850).\nThe grant of the checkerboard was in fee, subject to a condition that the land be sold and the proceeds actually used for building the railroad. 9 Stat",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.75,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 21425,
"end": 21443,
"quote": "Pub. L. No. 112-63",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Pub. L. 112-63",
"reason": "canonical public-law identity",
"id": "b87eba270adb8f2b",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_879/0602_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "e plain language of § 1446(b)).\n. Section 1446 was updated in .December 2011 when Congress enacted the Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act. Pub. L. No. 112-63, 125 Stat. 758 (2011). There were, however, no substantive changes to the relevant portion of § 1446, only structural changes. H.R. Rep. No. 112-10, at 14 (201",
"linked": false,
"weight": 9.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 208,
"end": 220,
"quote": "58 Stat. 640",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "58 Stat. 640",
"reason": "canonical Statutes-at-Large identity",
"id": "ea05a746bb483db3",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_63/0851_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts",
"decade": "1940s",
"context": "f, a tenant, brought this action under § 205(e) of the Emergency Price Control Act, 56 Stat. 34, and under § 108(b) of the Stabilization Extension Act of 1944, 58 Stat. 640, 641, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 925(e). He sought damages on account of what he alleged were weekly payments in excess of the amounts allowed under the Acts and re",
"linked": false,
"weight": 3.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 51185,
"end": 51197,
"quote": "49 Stat. 452",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "49 Stat. 452",
"reason": "canonical Statutes-at-Large identity",
"id": "2c161b2d60c8c4d8",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_708/0144_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "5 F.Supp. 56, 58 (S.D.Tex.1986), despite a provision in the agreement providing for discharge only for \"proper cause.”\n. The NLRA was enacted in 1935. Ch. 372, 49 Stat. 452 (1935). In 1947, Congress passed the Taft-Hartley Act, which expanded and revised the NLRA. Labor Management Relations Act, 1947, ch. 120, 61 Stat. 140. That A",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 34859,
"end": 34873,
"quote": "110 Stat. 1214",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "110 Stat. 1214",
"reason": "canonical Statutes-at-Large identity",
"id": "0a9bb2f7cc4aaeac",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_9/1205_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Central District of California",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "rticipation with them, are preliminarily enjoined from:\nenforcing Section 303 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214 (1996), codified at 18 U.S.C. § 2339B, against RALPH FERTIG and NAGALINGAM JEYALINGAM, or against HUMANITARIAN LAW PROJECT, ILANKAI THAMIL SANGAM, TAMILS OF NO",
"linked": false,
"weight": 4.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 20342,
"end": 20356,
"quote": "124 Stat. 4137",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "124 Stat. 4137",
"reason": "canonical Statutes-at-Large identity",
"id": "e8f8c33594e035e7",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_758/0369_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "ub.L. No. 112-239, §§ 570-579, 126 Stat. 1632, 1752-64 (2013); Pub.L. No. 112-81, §§ 581-586, 125 Stat. 1298, 1430-36 (2011); Pub.L. No. 111-383, §§ 1601-1632, 124 Stat. 4137, 4429-36 (2011). The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2014 appropriated $25 million for the Department of Defense to implement a Sexual Assault Special Victi",
"linked": false,
"weight": 9.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 28291,
"end": 28308,
"quote": "Pub.L. No. 111-31",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Pub. L. 111-31",
"reason": "canonical public-law identity",
"id": "48d70393e9bd2ce0",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_845/0266_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Columbia",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "y determines appropriate so that both the graphics and the accompanying label statements are clear, conspicuous, legible and appear within the specified area.” Pub.L. No. 111-31, § 201 (amending 15 U.S.C. § 1333(d)).\n. The proposed images were not only in col- or, but some were also cartoon images, as opposed to staged photographs; and",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.75,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 256,
"end": 269,
"quote": "Pub.L. 86-257",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Pub. L. 86-257",
"reason": "canonical public-law identity",
"id": "5b73e98926fbc419",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_531/0573_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Delaware",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "al 326, and the Secretary of Labor, arise under Title I and Title IV of the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (“LMRDA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 401, et seq., Pub.L. 86-257, 73 Stat. 519 (1959), respectively. Both suits involve the Local’s decision to disqualify Colpo as a candidate in an election for Local President held on Novem",
"linked": false,
"weight": 3.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 18935,
"end": 18952,
"quote": "Pub.L. No. 88-302",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Pub. L. 88-302",
"reason": "canonical public-law identity",
"id": "2f4b8895e7c31a94",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_705/0473_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Arizona",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": " on Colorado River Reservation and the Town of Parker).\nIn 1964, Congress confirmed the understanding that Parker had always been part of the CRIT reservation. Pub.L. No. 88-302, sec. 2, 78 Stat. 188 (April 30, 1964). Section 2(b) of the 1964 act defines the CRIT reservation:\n“Colorado River Reservation” means the reservation for India",
"linked": false,
"weight": 4.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 16990,
"end": 17008,
"quote": "Pub.L. No. 102-166",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Pub. L. 102-166",
"reason": "canonical public-law identity",
"id": "a962acf3751c3c8f",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_452/0394_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Southern District of New York",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": " Patterson v. McLean Credit Union, 491 U.S. 164, 186, 109 S.Ct. 2363, 105 L.Ed.2d 132 (1989), superseded by statute on other grounds, Civil Rights Act of 1991, Pub.L. No. 102-166, 105 Stat. 1074 (deciding that burden-shifting scheme developed under Title VII “should apply to claims of racial discrimination under § 1981”). The plaintiff ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.666666666666667,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 10453,
"end": 10471,
"quote": "Pub.L. No. 104-132",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Pub. L. 104-132",
"reason": "canonical public-law identity",
"id": "f5ab2a78e4b7d328",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_476/0760_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "6(b)(1)(B) & (C).\nII. Discussion\nWhen a state court has already adjudicated a federal constitutional claim, [the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214 (1996) (“AEDPA”)] establishes that the writ of habeas corpus may issue in just two instances: (1) if the state court decision “was contrary to,",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 2752,
"end": 2766,
"quote": "Pub. L. 86-682",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Pub. L. 86-682",
"reason": "canonical public-law identity",
"id": "c08ff10cce48c8f8",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/fla-supp/volume_28/0042_01/index.html",
"court": "Dade County Small Claims Court",
"decade": "1960s",
"context": "tter for which he has been paid or promised a valuable consideration without plainly marking the same ‘advertisement’ shall be fined not more than $500.” Added Pub. L. 86-682, §7, Sept. 2, 1960, 74 Stat. 706.\nDefendant contends that any paid advertising matter published in the newspaper not marked as such, as required by the above-m",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 21871,
"end": 21884,
"quote": "44 Stat. 1424",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "44 Stat. 1424",
"reason": "canonical Statutes-at-Large identity",
"id": "5642065be908ade8",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_708/0144_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "ng compensation for injuries occurring “on the navigable waters,” but only if compensation under state law was unavailable. Pub.L. No. 69-803, ch. 509, § 3(a), 44 Stat. 1424, 1426 (1927). The line of demarcation between federal and state coverage, however, was often difficult to ascertain. As a result of the “doubtful jurisdictiona",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 27941,
"end": 27954,
"quote": "98 Stat. 1603",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "98 Stat. 1603",
"reason": "canonical Statutes-at-Large identity",
"id": "2b4950fecd802548",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/us/volume_564/0091_01/index.html",
"court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": " interpreted § 282 as we do today. During this period, Congress has often amended §282, see, e. g., Pub. L. 104-141, § 2, 109 Stat. 352; Pub. L. 98-417, § 203, 98 Stat. 1603; not once, so far as we (and Microsoft) are aware, has it even considered a proposal to lower the standard of proof, see Tr. of Oral Arg. 10. Moreover, Congres",
"linked": false,
"weight": 8.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 20532,
"end": 20549,
"quote": "Pub.L. No. 113-76",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Pub. L. 113-76",
"reason": "canonical public-law identity",
"id": "662b4fe8f4040d13",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_758/0369_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": ". The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2014 appropriated $25 million for the Department of Defense to implement a Sexual Assault Special Victims Program. See Pub.L. No. 113-76, §§ 8124-8125,128 Stat. 5, 133-34 (2014). And Congress is currently debating further legislation on the issue. See Victims Protection Act of 2014, S.1917, 113t",
"linked": false,
"weight": 9.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 7517,
"end": 7531,
"quote": "110 Stat. 3009",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "110 Stat. 3009",
"reason": "canonical Statutes-at-Large identity",
"id": "bed0aefe83d7fe1b",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_526/0968_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Arizona",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "Ex 22J at 3.)\nC. E-Verify\nBuilding on the 1-9 system, the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-208, § § 401-404, 110 Stat. 3009, 3009-655 to 3009-666, directed the Attorney General to conduct three pilot programs for employment eligibility confirmation, one of which is still in operatio",
"linked": false,
"weight": 3.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 1008,
"end": 1027,
"quote": "Pub. L. No. 102-404",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Pub. L. 102-404",
"reason": "canonical public-law identity",
"id": "5f92c522000d66cc",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_422/0098_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "lications to adjust status. First, he has an employment-based application. Second, he alleges that he is covered by the Chinese Student Protection Act of 1992, Pub. L. No. 102-404,106 Stat. 1969 (CSPA), which allows certain Chinese nationals to adjust their status to that of lawful permanent residents. The government responds that Zheng ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 11.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 18010,
"end": 18023,
"quote": "84 Stat. 1292",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "84 Stat. 1292",
"reason": "canonical Statutes-at-Large identity",
"id": "3a7689d1ce48ae19",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_340/0307_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana",
"decade": "1970s",
"context": "ring) or 4461(a) (1) (com-operated gambling devices) until he has paid the special tax therefor. As amended Oct. 27, 1970, Pub.L. 91-513, Title III, § 1102(a), 84 Stat. 1292.\n. “As to the constitutional questions under that portion of the Fifth Amendment which commands that no person shall be ‘deprived of * * * property, without du",
"linked": false,
"weight": 3.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 1336,
"end": 1348,
"quote": "86 Stat. 153",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "86 Stat. 153",
"reason": "canonical Statutes-at-Large identity",
"id": "4e3f7e35bb108653",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_595/0264_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit",
"decade": "1970s",
"context": "al Mines Health and Safety Act of 1969, Pub. L.No. 91-173, Title IV, 83 Stat. 792 (1969), was amended by the Black Lung Benefits Act of 1972, Pub.L.No. 92-303, 86 Stat. 153, 154 (1972), and is now codified at 30 U.S.C. § 901 et seq. See Director v. Alabama By-Products Corp., 560 F.2d 710 (5th Cir. 1977). Recently the FCMHSA was ag",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.545454545454546,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 400,
"end": 418,
"quote": "Pub.L. No. 100-418",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Pub. L. 100-418",
"reason": "canonical public-law identity",
"id": "d4476d6c30a8c7f1",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_715/1110_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of International Trade",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "e their petition for trade adjustment assistance within the statutory deadline imposed by section 1421(a) of the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988, Pub.L. No. 100-418, 102 Stat. 1107, 1242-43 (1988) (hereinafter OTCA). Plaintiffs, former employees of NL Industries represented pro se, failed to respond to this motion. On the ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 35992,
"end": 36003,
"quote": "5 Stat. 123",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "5 Stat. 123",
"reason": "canonical Statutes-at-Large identity",
"id": "ce026f247bc6af04",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/us/volume_564/0091_01/index.html",
"court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "prove on trial” the invalidity of the patent as a defense); see also Patent Act of 1870, ch. 230, § 61, 16 Stat. 208 (same); Patent Act of 1836, ch. 357, § 15, 5 Stat. 123 (similar); Patent Act of 1793, ch. XI, § 6, 1 Stat. 322 (similar); Coffin, 18 Wall., at 124 (explaining that the Patent Act of 1836 “allowed a party sued for i",
"linked": false,
"weight": 8.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 1202,
"end": 1215,
"quote": "40 Stat. 1060",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "40 Stat. 1060",
"reason": "canonical Statutes-at-Large identity",
"id": "ed9277efa66a49ca",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_34/0576_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Connecticut",
"decade": "1920s",
"context": "(7) Debts ascertained to be worthless and charged off within the taxable year.”\nThis statute must he considered in conjunction with section 202(a) of said act (40 Stat. 1060). Ayer v. Blair, 58 App. D. C. 175, 26 F.(2d) 547. Said section is as follows:\n“(a) That for the purpose of ascertaining the gain derived or loss sustained fro",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 36061,
"end": 36075,
"quote": "101 Stat. 3576",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "101 Stat. 3576",
"reason": "canonical Statutes-at-Large identity",
"id": "f7363067365eb61b",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/clus/volume_605/1/index.html",
"court": "scotus",
"decade": "2020s",
"context": "were established, it ties the reapplica- tion process to SSA's longstanding practice of removing people from its database after 12 months of ineligibility. See 101 Stat. 3576; Tr. of Oral Arg. 60. Nor do other housekeeping provisions demonstrate that eligibil- ity for SSI benefts is determined on something other than a monthly basis",
"linked": false,
"weight": 3.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 6950,
"end": 6960,
"quote": "44 Stat. 9",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "44 Stat. 9",
"reason": "canonical Statutes-at-Large identity",
"id": "a5b41e44271885a8",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_114/0672_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia",
"decade": "1950s",
"context": "ght to deduct half that sum as a debt ‘ascertained to be worthless and charged off within the taxable year’ under the Revenue Act of 1926, c. 27, § 214(a) (7), 44 Stat. 9, 27.\n“It seems to us that the Circuit Court of Appeals sufficiently answered this contention by remarking that the debt was worthless when acquired. There was ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 57454,
"end": 57472,
"quote": "Pub. L. No. 93-153",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Pub. L. 93-153",
"reason": "canonical public-law identity",
"id": "c3fb97d1526bdaa0",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_910/0417_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "oan Note is \"likely to deceive\" for the trier of fact.\nCongress passed § 13(b) in 1973 and § 19 in 1975. See Trans-Alaska Pipeline Authorization Act, § 408(F), Pub. L. No. 93-153, 87 Stat. 576, 592 (1973) (codified as amended 15 U.S.C. § 53(b) ); Magnuson-Moss Warranty-Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act, tit. II, § 206, Pub. L. No",
"linked": false,
"weight": 2.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 29287,
"end": 29299,
"quote": "66 Stat. 812",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "66 Stat. 812",
"reason": "canonical Statutes-at-Large identity",
"id": "63b2ea381ca2f599",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/us/volume_564/0091_01/index.html",
"court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "52, the first paragraph of §282 read: “A patent shall be presumed valid. The burden of establishing invalidity of a patent shall rest on a party asserting it.” 66 Stat. 812. Congress has since amended §282, inserting two sentences not relevant here and modifying the language of the second sentence to that in the text.\nAlthough not",
"linked": false,
"weight": 8.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 19716,
"end": 19730,
"quote": "Pub. L. 95-454",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Pub. L. 95-454",
"reason": "canonical public-law identity",
"id": "a121b7b578f02ab5",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_926/0238_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Columbia",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": ". OSC also asserts that the Court has no subject matter jurisdiction over the allegations made by Mr. Sczygelski because the Civil Service Reform Act (\"CSRA”), Pub. L. 95-454, 92 Stat. Ill et seq. (codified as amended in scattered sections of 5 U.S.C.), \"precludes judicial review of OSC's determinations.” Def. Mem. at 17-22. In addi",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.75,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 5612,
"end": 5624,
"quote": "61 Stat. 635",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "61 Stat. 635",
"reason": "canonical Statutes-at-Large identity",
"id": "92aed090879d4d5d",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_195/0289_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit",
"decade": "1950s",
"context": "g that the saving statutes were not apposite.\nOne of the saving statutes, § 386 of the Political Code of Puerto Rico, patterned closely after 1 U.S.C.A. § 109, 61 Stat. 635, provides: “The repeal of any statute by the Legislative Assembly shall not have the effect to release or extinguish any penalty, forfeiture or liability incur",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 25577,
"end": 25590,
"quote": "86 Stat. 1168",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "86 Stat. 1168",
"reason": "canonical Statutes-at-Large identity",
"id": "29796bbac1a0b7ae",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_330/1074_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of South Dakota",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "stribution Act of 1998, Pub.L.No. 105-387, 112 Stat. 3471 (codified at 25 U.S.C. § 1300d-21 et seq. (2001)), are dismissed with prejudice.\n. Pub.L. No. 92-555, 86 Stat. 1168 (codified at 25 U.S.C. § 1300d, et seq. (1983) (amended 1998)).\n",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 36419,
"end": 36431,
"quote": "36 Stat. 961",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "36 Stat. 961",
"reason": "canonical Statutes-at-Large identity",
"id": "71f0db7e1d3ee06c",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_179/0669_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": ".”\n. Id.\n. Id. at 1009. The Court also found that Act 315 of 1940 did not run afoul of the Contract Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Id.\n. Id. at 1010.\n. 1911, 36 Stat. 961 (codified in various sections of Title 16 U.S.C.). This is the enabling legislation for the National Forest System.\n. See discussion and quotation of Nebo Oil ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 2896,
"end": 2913,
"quote": "Pub.L. No. 111-31",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Pub. L. 111-31",
"reason": "canonical public-law identity",
"id": "8d743b68b0cb45cb",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_845/0266_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Columbia",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "nt of Health and Human Services (“the Secretary”) to “issue regulations that require color graphics depicting the negative health consequences of smoking.” See Pub.L. No. 111-31, § 201(a) (amending 15 U.S.C. § 1333(d)); Compl. ¶ 31; Defs.’ Opp’n at 1. In addition, Congress required all cigarette packages manufactured, packaged, sold, d",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.75,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 2555,
"end": 2568,
"quote": "40 Stat. 1093",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "40 Stat. 1093",
"reason": "canonical Statutes-at-Large identity",
"id": "47ff493b743d04d7",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_34/0513_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania",
"decade": "1920s",
"context": "ction with this return, the plaintiff then filed two petitions with the Commissioner of Internal Revenue under sections 327 and 328 of the Revenue Act of 1918 (40 Stat. 1093) for special consideration of its tax liability for the year 1918, on the ground that, when regularly computed under the statute, the amount thereof was excess",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 367,
"end": 379,
"quote": "40 Stat. 972",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "40 Stat. 972",
"reason": "canonical Statutes-at-Large identity",
"id": "e4c512fe40cff0ca",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_5/0275_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit",
"decade": "1920s",
"context": "unt 1, but not guilty as to counts 3, 5, and 7. The first count was based on section 5209 of the Revised Statutes, as amended by the Act of September 26, 1918 (40 Stat. 972 [Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 9772]). The section as amended provides that any officer, director, agent, or employee of any Federal Reserve Bank or of any memb",
"linked": false,
"weight": 9.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 4003,
"end": 4015,
"quote": "43 Stat. 858",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "43 Stat. 858",
"reason": "canonical Statutes-at-Large identity",
"id": "242e37d04b1828e8",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_13/0514_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire",
"decade": "1930s",
"context": "ities as the clerk is authorized to accept by some other expressed statutory provisions. This clause was inserted by amendment in 1925 (Act Feb. 11, 1925, § 8, 43 Stat. 858), and evidently referred to section 1320 of the Revenue Act of 1918, 40 Stat. 1148, which provided in part as follows: “Wherever by the laws of the United Stat",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 8304,
"end": 8317,
"quote": "52 Stat. 1164",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "52 Stat. 1164",
"reason": "canonical Statutes-at-Large identity",
"id": "ccd93da6b6b22103",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_751/1398_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "yee accepted compensation pursuant to a formal award rendered by the agency. Act to Amend the Longshoremen’s & Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, ch. 685, § 12, 52 Stat. 1164, 1168 (1938) (current version at 33 U.S.C. § 933(b), (c) (1982)). (Formal award is the exception rather than the rule, applicable only to situations in which l",
"linked": false,
"weight": 8.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 15638,
"end": 15651,
"quote": "84 Stat. 1909",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "84 Stat. 1909",
"reason": "canonical Statutes-at-Large identity",
"id": "7076883bb8fb69d4",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_536/0177_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "iance with Judge Weinfeld’s direction with some rapidity. In 1970 Congress had enacted Public Law 91-648, known as the Intergovernmental Personnel Act (“IPA”), 84 Stat. 1909 (1970), which described itself as follows:\n“An Act to reinforce the federal system by strengthening the personnel resources of State and local governments, to ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 8.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 26703,
"end": 26720,
"quote": "Pub.L. No. 105-85",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Pub. L. 105-85",
"reason": "canonical public-law identity",
"id": "979d09c74bd8e9c5",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_758/0369_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "al investigative organizations for the conduct of investigations of complaints of sex crimes and other criminal sexual misconduct arising in the Armed Forces.” Pub.L. No. 105-85, § 1072, 111 Stat. at 1898-99. Then-Secretary of Defense William Cohen appears to have complied fully with this directive. See Nat’l Acad, of Pub. Ajdmin., Ada",
"linked": false,
"weight": 9.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 20118,
"end": 20135,
"quote": "Pub.L. No. 113-66",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Pub. L. 113-66",
"reason": "canonical public-law identity",
"id": "61ffd52a40fcdce2",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_758/0369_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": ". Lebron, 670 F.3d at 551. The four most recent National Defense Authorization Acts have each included numerous provisions aimed at combating this scourge. See Pub.L. No. 113-66, §§ 1701-1753, 127 Stat. 672, 950-85 (2013); Pub.L. No. 112-239, §§ 570-579, 126 Stat. 1632, 1752-64 (2013); Pub.L. No. 112-81, §§ 581-586, 125 Stat. 1298, 143",
"linked": false,
"weight": 9.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 10353,
"end": 10366,
"quote": "Pub.L. 88-560",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Pub. L. 88-560",
"reason": "canonical public-law identity",
"id": "cf9f0f5bb79355c3",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_389/0635_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Eastern District of California",
"decade": "1970s",
"context": " residence therein.\nJuly 15, 1949, c. 338, Title V, § 514, as added June 30, 1961, Pub.L. 87-70, Title VIII, § 804(a), 75 Stat. 186, and amended Sept. 2, 1964, Pub.L. 88-560, Title V, § 502, 78 Stat. 796; Aug. 1, 1968, Pub.L. 90-448, Title X, § 1004, 82 Stat. 553.”\nThis grant and loan program was specifically designed to provide lo",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 57490,
"end": 57501,
"quote": "5 Stat. 135",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "5 Stat. 135",
"reason": "canonical Statutes-at-Large identity",
"id": "fa2695da013ade53",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/us/volume_564/0162_01/index.html",
"court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "ed with congressional enactments in the 19th century directing the Government to hold and manage Indian tribal funds in trust. See, e. g., Act of Jan. 9, 1837, 5 Stat. 135; see also Misplaced Trust: The Bureau of Indian Affairs’ Mismanagement of the Indian Trust Fund, H. R. Rep. No. 102-499, p. 6 (1992) (hereinafter Misplaced Tru",
"linked": false,
"weight": 8.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 25441,
"end": 25458,
"quote": "Pub.L.No. 105-387",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Pub. L. 105-387",
"reason": "canonical public-law identity",
"id": "82fcc497ea4a643a",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_330/1074_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of South Dakota",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "omplaint, Doc. 204, to the extent that they challenge the constitutionality or validity of the Mississippi Sioux Tribes Judgment Fund Distribution Act of 1998, Pub.L.No. 105-387, 112 Stat. 3471 (codified at 25 U.S.C. § 1300d-21 et seq. (2001)), are dismissed with prejudice.\n. Pub.L. No. 92-555, 86 Stat. 1168 (codified at 25 U.S.C. § 13",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 19952,
"end": 19971,
"quote": "Pub. L. No. 102-404",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Pub. L. 102-404",
"reason": "canonical public-law identity",
"id": "950fed3a23dffd60",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_422/0098_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "to adjust status is left to the discretion of the Attorney General.\nZheng applied to adjust status pursuant to the Chinese Student Protection Act of 1992, § 2, Pub. L. No. 102-404, 106 Stat. 1969 (CSPA). In relevant part, the CSPA provides that an alien who (1) is a national of the People’s Republic of China, (2) has resided continuously",
"linked": false,
"weight": 11.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 1920,
"end": 1934,
"quote": "Pub.Law 91-144",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Pub. L. 91-144",
"reason": "canonical public-law identity",
"id": "32db8fe7929d2ae0",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_333/0527_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of California",
"decade": "1970s",
"context": "der No. 11478 (relating to freedom from job discrimination within the federal government) and conflicts with § 502 of the Public Works Appropriation Act, 1970, Pub.Law 91-144, 83 Stat. 336-337, (relating to compensation of employees of the government). Plaintiffs seek a declaration of invalidity of the Commission’s regulation on any",
"linked": false,
"weight": 4.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 27903,
"end": 27916,
"quote": "109 Stat. 352",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "109 Stat. 352",
"reason": "canonical Statutes-at-Large identity",
"id": "4f3b2e29635b57c8",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/us/volume_564/0091_01/index.html",
"court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "arly 30 years, the Federal Circuit has interpreted § 282 as we do today. During this period, Congress has often amended §282, see, e. g., Pub. L. 104-141, § 2, 109 Stat. 352; Pub. L. 98-417, § 203, 98 Stat. 1603; not once, so far as we (and Microsoft) are aware, has it even considered a proposal to lower the standard of proof, see ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 8.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 1585,
"end": 1596,
"quote": "92 Stat. 95",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "92 Stat. 95",
"reason": "canonical Statutes-at-Large identity",
"id": "982a7e60ed40efd0",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_595/0264_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit",
"decade": "1970s",
"context": "Alabama By-Products Corp., 560 F.2d 710 (5th Cir. 1977). Recently the FCMHSA was again amended by the Black Lung Benefits Reform Act of 1977, Pub.L.No. 95-239, 92 Stat. 95 (1978). FCMHSA is also cross-referenced to sections of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (the LHWCA), 33 U.S.C. § 901 et seq. and the Soc",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.545454545454546,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 20564,
"end": 20575,
"quote": "128 Stat. 5",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "128 Stat. 5",
"reason": "canonical Statutes-at-Large identity",
"id": "478a71562b01e5c7",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_758/0369_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "s Act of 2014 appropriated $25 million for the Department of Defense to implement a Sexual Assault Special Victims Program. See Pub.L. No. 113-76, §§ 8124-8125,128 Stat. 5, 133-34 (2014). And Congress is currently debating further legislation on the issue. See Victims Protection Act of 2014, S.1917, 113th Cong. (2014); Ed O’Keefe",
"linked": false,
"weight": 9.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 25192,
"end": 25209,
"quote": "Pub.L. No. 86-171",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Pub. L. 86-171",
"reason": "canonical public-law identity",
"id": "90407689ad88816c",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_751/1398_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "that assignment occurs only if the employee does not sue the third party within six months. Act to Amend the Longshoremen’s & Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, Pub.L. No. 86-171, § 33(a), (b), 73 Stat. 391 (1959) (codified as amended at 33 U.S.C. § 933(a), (b) (1982)). It preserved the employer’s right to offset, however, § 33(f), 73 S",
"linked": false,
"weight": 8.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 29684,
"end": 29698,
"quote": "110 Stat. 3847",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "110 Stat. 3847",
"reason": "canonical Statutes-at-Large identity",
"id": "0c2f3a4eb750f3ec",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_10/1248_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "roversy must exceed $75,000 for a federal district court to have diversity jurisdiction. See Federal Courts Improvement Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-317, § 205, 110 Stat. 3847, 3850 (codified as amended at 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (1997)). Because this action was filed and removed prior to this effective date, the amount in controversy minim",
"linked": false,
"weight": 4.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 16619,
"end": 16635,
"quote": "Pub. L.No.91-648",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Pub. L. 91-648",
"reason": "canonical public-law identity",
"id": "5a8498c77b1bff6f",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_536/0177_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "ervice Commission was authorized to make grants to state and local governments to enable them to strengthen their staffs by improving personnel administration. Pub. L.No.91-648, § 201, 84 Stat. 1911 (1970).\nIn January 1973, the City’s Personnel Department had determined to take advantage of this federal program by applying for and rec",
"linked": false,
"weight": 8.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 57474,
"end": 57486,
"quote": "87 Stat. 576",
"pattern": "session_law",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "87 Stat. 576",
"reason": "canonical Statutes-at-Large identity",
"id": "607cb916dbe87a1f",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_910/0417_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "to deceive\" for the trier of fact.\nCongress passed § 13(b) in 1973 and § 19 in 1975. See Trans-Alaska Pipeline Authorization Act, § 408(F), Pub. L. No. 93-153, 87 Stat. 576, 592 (1973) (codified as amended 15 U.S.C. § 53(b) ); Magnuson-Moss Warranty-Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act, tit. II, § 206, Pub. L. No. 93-637, 88 S",
"linked": false,
"weight": 2.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact Statutes at Large or Public Law identifier in surrounding legal citation; canonical value preserves the cited volume/page or normalizes only Pub. L. punctuation and No.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 2749,
"end": 2768,
"quote": "20 C.F.R. § 416.920",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "20 C.F.R. § 416.920",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "c5732cb116394a19",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_142/0943_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "d” disability; (4) the impairment prevents the claimant from performing past relevant work; and (5) the impairment prevents the claimant from doing other work. 20 C.F.R. § 416.920.\nThe ALJ considered the five steps. The ALJ noted that Henderson was not engaged in substantial gainful activity. The ALJ next determined that Henderson had se",
"linked": false,
"weight": 2.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 2163,
"end": 2186,
"quote": "12 C.F.R. § 510.5(a)(1)",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "12 C.F.R. § 510.5(a)(1)",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "cae91be9feefde39",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_347/0436_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "to requests by the public for unpublished OTS information, such as requests for records or testimony from parties to lawsuits in which the OTS is not a party.” 12 C.F.R. § 510.5(a)(1). Under section 510.5, one seeking testimony must demonstrate, inter alia, that the information sought is “highly relevant” to the purpose for which it is sough",
"linked": false,
"weight": 6.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 21939,
"end": 21962,
"quote": "8 C.F.R. § 1245.1(c)(8)",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "8 C.F.R. § 1245.1(c)(8)",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "189d00d30d55f047",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_422/0098_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "just status pursuant to the Cuban Refugee Adjustment Act, Pub. L. No. 89-732, 80 Stat. 1161 (1966). The INS had argued that Artigas’s application was barred by 8 C.F.R. § 1245.1(c)(8), but the BIA disagreed, finding that the regulation only covers section 245 applications, and “does not state that arriving aliens in removal proceedings are i",
"linked": false,
"weight": 11.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 9588,
"end": 9610,
"quote": "41 C.F.R. § 128-50.101",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "41 C.F.R. § 128-50.101",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "c578e9aafcb263fd",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_282/0001_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of New York",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "ct court’s order granting the government’s motion to dismiss because, inter alia, the government failed to submit to the district court the records required by 41 C.F.R. § 128-50.101 in support of its motion to dismiss. 20 F.3d at 65. By contrast, in Cardona, the court denied plaintiffs motion to compel the return of his property because th",
"linked": false,
"weight": 3.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 6021,
"end": 6040,
"quote": "40 C.F.R. § 300.425",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "40 C.F.R. § 300.425",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "039dd6ab36196b2e",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_274/0030_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "low.\nA. National Priorities List\nThe first step in the CERCLA process is placing a site on the National Priorities List (“NPL”). See 42 U.S.C. § 9605(a)(8)(b); 40 C.F.R. § 300.425. A site is appropriately included on the NPL if, for example, EPA determines that! a hazardous substance poses “a significant threat to public health.” Id. § 3",
"linked": false,
"weight": 3.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 23199,
"end": 23222,
"quote": "42 C.F.R. § 1001.102(a)",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "42 C.F.R. § 1001.102(a)",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "0f7b6a7292061675",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_311/1121_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Kansas",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "tion is remedial).\n. Delegation of Authority Under Social Security Act, 48 Fed.Reg. 21,662 (May 13, 1983).\n. 42 U.S.C. 1320a-7.\n. 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7(c)(3)(B); 42 C.F.R. § 1001.102(a).\n. 42 C.F.R. § 1001.102(b).\n. 42 C.F.R. § 1001.102(c).\n.Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 104 S.Ct. 2778, 81 L.Ed.2d 694 ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 9980,
"end": 9999,
"quote": "32 C.F.R. § 1617.11",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "32 C.F.R. § 1617.11",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "d5971037ea85075f",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_434/0175_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit",
"decade": "1970s",
"context": "s no authority to condone a criminal offense and, in fact, its issuance of the duplicate certificate does not constitute a condonation of defendant’s act since 32 C.F.R. § 1617.11 requires it to issue a duplicate certificate whenever it is notified that the certificate previously issued has been destroyed. Defendant had requested a dupli",
"linked": false,
"weight": 6.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 6343,
"end": 6362,
"quote": "38 C.F.R. 3.311a(d)",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "38 C.F.R. § 3.311a(d)",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "9ade22666e65ffaa",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_712/1404_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of California",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "connected. The Committee transmitted its findings to the Administrator.\nOn August 26, 1984, the VA published a final regulation identical to the proposed rule. 38 C.F.R. 3.311a(d) states that “sound scientific and medical evidence does not establish a cause and effect relationship between dioxin exposure” and any other disease but chlora",
"linked": false,
"weight": 8.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 21412,
"end": 21434,
"quote": "19 C.F.R. § 351.301(b)",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "19 C.F.R. § 351.301(b)",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "70a9ada7038f1cc3",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_688/0751_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "bmitted to provide further evidentiary support for Avisma’s arguments, the affidavit constituted new factual information and was therefore untimely pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 351.301(b). Parkhill Letter at 2. Pursuant to Commerce’s regulations, factual information includes (1) initial and supplemental questionnaire responses, (2) data or state",
"linked": false,
"weight": 6.666666666666667,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 8403,
"end": 8424,
"quote": "5 C.F.R. § 531.203(c)",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "5 C.F.R. § 531.203(c)",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "761e335c6f47b8a6",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_682/0925_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Claims",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "d the Navy raise the employee’s rate of basic pay to a level that would place him in a higher grade. After June 26,1974, the Navy changed its interpretation of 5 C.F.R. § 531.203(c) and excluded the impact of COLA from its comparison. It is important to note that the Navy did not amend § 531.203(c), as of course it could not, but merely ch",
"linked": false,
"weight": 2.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 19432,
"end": 19460,
"quote": "40 C.F.R. § 300.435(e)(1)(i)",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "40 C.F.R. § 300.435(e)(1)(i)",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "dca69713357cc260",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_274/0030_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "s that “[ajdditional work” may be “needed as a result of such unforeseen situations as newly discovered sources, types, or quantities of hazardous substances.\" 40 C.F.R. § 300.435(e)(1)(i). Because the “chief task” of RD/RA is “to achieve the goals of the Record of Decision ... in a timely manner,” EPA, Scoping the Remedial Design, Emhart516-1, a",
"linked": false,
"weight": 3.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 44284,
"end": 44312,
"quote": "20 C.F.R. § 416.920(a)(4)(i)",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "20 C.F.R. § 416.920(a)(4)(i)",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "6603043a19236970",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_197/0060_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Columbia",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "011) (finding that the ALJ’s decision “was supported by the record evidence,” which indicated improvements to the plaintiffs symptoms with treatment); see also 20 C.F.R. § 416.920(a)(4)(i) (“If you are doing substantial gainful activity, [the SSA] will find that you are not disabled.”). Therefore, the Court finds no basis to disturb the ALJ’s RFC",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.75,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 28730,
"end": 28754,
"quote": "28 C.F.R. § 35.130(b)(7)",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "28 C.F.R. § 35.130(b)(7)",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "e90f6e61163ce922",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_260/0913_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "onstrate that making such modifications would fundamentally alter the nature of such goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations.”); 28 C.F.R. § 35.130(b)(7) (same).\nThree inquiries are made with respect to a requested accommodation: (1) Whether the modification requested was reasonable, (2) whether it was necessary",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 1507,
"end": 1535,
"quote": "42 C.F.R. § 410.27(a)(l)(iv)",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "42 C.F.R. § 410.27(a)(l)(iv)",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "8f7a54628daa217f",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_739/0417_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "ires outpatient cardiac and pulmonary rehabilitation services to be furnished “[u]nder the direct supervision ... of a physician or nonphysician practitioner.” 42 C.F.R. § 410.27(a)(l)(iv). In order to receive reimbursement for services rendered, health care providers must comply with Medicare regulations and submit reimbursement claims forms to ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 6.6,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 54705,
"end": 54722,
"quote": "7 CFR § 1813.5(b)",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "7 C.F.R. § 1813.5(b)",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "0f4330bec7cf5cd0",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_389/0635_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Eastern District of California",
"decade": "1970s",
"context": " seq. The federal defendants do not contest this point, but rather contend that the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4), and the FmHA regulations, 7 CFR § 1813.5(b), bar disclosure of this information.\nTitle 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4) notes that the following information need not be disclosed for public information:\n“ . . . trad",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 51091,
"end": 51112,
"quote": "17 C.F.R. § 240.13d-l",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "17 C.F.R. § 240.13d-l",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "c9658700f21899e6",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_466/1114_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts",
"decade": "1970s",
"context": " on July 17 would not be attributable to S-G’s press release since the announcement was issued after the close of trading.\n. Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 78m(d)(l), 17 C.F.R. § 240.13d-l.\n. 15 U.S.C. § 78n(d).\n. The information required to be disclosed in the Schedule 13D includes in part: the background and identity of the persons on whose beh",
"linked": true,
"weight": 3.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target. The printed final character is l; retained literally rather than OCR-repairing it.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 1503,
"end": 1526,
"quote": "31 C.F.R. § 240.3(a)(2)",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "31 C.F.R. § 240.3(a)(2)",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "897c65a78cd3c2f8",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_917/0043_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Columbia",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "question. The checks, if they were indeed uncashed, outstanding and unpaid, became non-negotiable by operation of law on October 1, 1990. See 31 U.S.C. § 3328; 31 C.F.R. § 240.3(a)(2) (“The Commissioner shall not be required to pay a Treasury check issued before October 1, 1989 unless it is negotiated to a financial institution no later than",
"linked": false,
"weight": 9.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 24276,
"end": 24294,
"quote": "26 C.F.R. § 179.98",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "26 C.F.R. § 179.98",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "4e0122fed379124d",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_292/0757_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Delaware",
"decade": "1960s",
"context": "approval by the Director, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax Division, Treasury Department, of the application which must be signed by both the transferor and transferee. 26 C.F.R. § 179.98 (1967). The application must identify the transferee, and, if the transferee is an individual, his identification must include fingerprints, a photograph, and ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 2.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 3869,
"end": 3891,
"quote": "20 C.F.R. § 416.202(c)",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "20 C.F.R. § 416.202(c)",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "eea14d3d20bf5551",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_104/1291_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Colorado",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "nt who is medically eligible for SSI based on disability must also establish her income and resources do not exceed prescribed limits. See 42 U.S.C. § 1382(a); 20 C.F.R. § 416.202(c),(d) (1999). The Commissioner’s regulations define “income” in general terms as “the receipt by an individual of any property or service which [she] can apply, ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 4.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 29960,
"end": 29981,
"quote": "29 C.F.R. § 102.69(e)",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "29 C.F.R. § 102.69(e)",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "b5c5a53c1f38ad5d",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_377/0821_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit",
"decade": "1960s",
"context": "and containing findings of fact and recommendations to the Board as to the disposition of the challenges or objections or both if it be a consolidated report.” 29 C.F.R. § 102.69(e). (Emphasis added.)\n. Section 8(a) (5) of the National Labor Relations Act provides that it shall be an unfair labor practice for an employer “to refuse to barg",
"linked": false,
"weight": 13.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 12386,
"end": 12403,
"quote": "12 C.F.R. § 512.4",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "12 C.F.R. § 512.4",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "1c6baf1770c8b14d",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_347/0436_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "satisfy to obtain transcripts under 12 C.F.R. § 510.5, set forth above, the OTS may deny a witness's request for his own transcript only for \"good cause” under 12 C.F.R. § 512.4.\n. We review a district court’s denial of a motion to enforce subpoenas for an abuse of discretion, In re Fitch, Inc., 330 F.3d 104, 108 (2d Cir.2003) (\"Motion",
"linked": false,
"weight": 6.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 31274,
"end": 31291,
"quote": "24 C.F.R. § 58.75",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "24 C.F.R. § 58.75",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "63e75f2823b0c072",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_697/0666_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Southern District of New York",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "fs’ challenge to be raised and considered by HUD. Interested parties may object to the RROF within 15 days of its submission to HUD on the grounds specified in 24 C.F.R. § 58.75 (1988), which permits challenges primarily to the recipient’s procedural rather than substantive omissions or shortcomings. Subsection (h) provides that a fede",
"linked": false,
"weight": 6.6,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 13095,
"end": 13113,
"quote": "10 C.F.R. § 212.78",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "10 C.F.R. § 212.78",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "6c1421401566712a",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_792/1127_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "s to be not more than two months after sale. § 212.-131(a)(6). The oil here involved is “tertiary crude” from declining wells. See 15 U.S.C. § 757(j)(l)(A) and 10 C.F.R. § 212.78. See also 44 Fed.Reg. 18677 (1979). In this case, it is not argued that the crude oil sold by Placid to Ashland was not tertiary crude. The only questions rais",
"linked": true,
"weight": 2.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 4809,
"end": 4831,
"quote": "19 C.F.R. § 351.401(i)",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "19 C.F.R. § 351.401(i)",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "41471c7d87c58a92",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_302/1366_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of International Trade",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "sales that fall within Commerce's period of investigation (\"POI\"), and that are subject to Commerce's less than fair value determination.\nCommerce's regulation 19 C.F.R. § 351.401(i) directs its date of sale determination:\nIn identifying the date of sale of the subject merchandise or foreign like product, [Commerce] normally will use the da",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 14031,
"end": 14051,
"quote": "20 C.F.R. § 404.1569",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "20 C.F.R. § 404.1569",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "084e56ec96a7829e",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_587/1129_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "ation to functional capacity, age, education, and prior work experience. Application of these factors through the medical-vocational guidelines (the “grid”) at 20 C.F.R. § 404.1569 dictates a finding of disabled or not disabled. Heckler v. Campbell, 461 U.S. 458, 103 S.Ct. 1952, 76 L.Ed.2d 66 (1983); Kirk v. Secretary, 667 F.2d at 530-531",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 21118,
"end": 21139,
"quote": "5 C.F.R. § 531.305(d)",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "5 C.F.R. § 531.305(d)",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "f3745ca7424c645d",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_682/0925_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Claims",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "pay rate should be compared to the pay rate of his highest subordinate. If the GS pay rate is below that of his subordinates, a pay adjustment is required. See 5 C.F.R. § 531.305(d). To compute the adjustment, plaintiffs would add the cost of COLA to the supervisor’s rate of basic pay. The total remuneration would then be keyed to the near",
"linked": false,
"weight": 2.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 2627,
"end": 2643,
"quote": "28 C.F.R. § 2.34",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "28 C.F.R. § 2.34",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "7695864179f7b5c4",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_445/0305_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Connecticut",
"decade": "1970s",
"context": "ated November 8, 1977.\nOn December 16, 1977, the Commission held a rescission hearing in accordance with the procedures outlined in the Commission regulations, 28 C.F.R. § 2.34 (1977). Under these regulations, the inmate must be given notice of the charges of misconduct to be discussed at.the hearing, and, if the parole is rescinded, ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 47407,
"end": 47430,
"quote": "17 C.F.R. § 240.13d-101",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "17 C.F.R. § 240.13d-101",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "7485eec70b3a4538",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_466/1114_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts",
"decade": "1970s",
"context": "at it would change the management of plaintiff if it was successful in achieving stock control. For the requirements of Schedule 13D, plaintiff’s counsel cited 17 C.F.R. § 240.13d-101. Finding there no requirement with respect to change of management, I found no violation of section 13(d), citing Nachman Corporation v. Halfred, Inc., [1973-7",
"linked": false,
"weight": 3.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 19198,
"end": 19223,
"quote": "29 C.F.R. § 1601.12(a)(3)",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "29 C.F.R. § 1601.12(a)(3)",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "ac82477eb1111640",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_603/0102_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "der the Act to arrive at a practical and equitable solution by adopting a broader interpretation of what information is required to satisfy the requirements of 29 C.F.R. § 1601.12(a)(3). This court has little doubt that if the Supreme Court were presented with the facts of this case, it would interpret a companion provision, in this case 29 C.",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 21935,
"end": 21951,
"quote": "28 C.F.R. § 2.54",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "28 C.F.R. § 2.54",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "2f94c5931e3627d9",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_445/0305_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Connecticut",
"decade": "1970s",
"context": "antee’s expectation of liberty is justified. But see Sexton v. Wise, 494 F.2d 1176, 1178 (5th Cir. 1974).\nThe Government also directs this Court’s attention to 28 C.F.R. § 2.54 (1977), a provision which authorizes the Attorney General or three members of the Commission to request further administrative review of the decision of a Regi",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 55936,
"end": 55958,
"quote": "5 C.F.R. § 2635.403(b)",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "5 C.F.R. § 2635.403(b)",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "8ba30ce8a5c8b7a6",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_314/0001_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Columbia",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": ". regarding personal and business relationships of Federal employees; [and]\nc) any disclosures and any determinations made pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 208(b)(1) or 5 C.F.R. § 2635.403(b)\n(Sloca Deck, Ex. A at 5.)\n. According to defendants, the Solicitor’s Office was not searched in response to plaintiffs' FOIA request. (Sloca Supp. Deck ¶ 5; De",
"linked": true,
"weight": 7.666666666666667,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 11022,
"end": 11042,
"quote": "20 C.F.R. § 404.1578",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "20 C.F.R. § 404.1578",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "362f643f044c9248",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_63/1028_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Nebraska",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "of whether you spend more time or less time at the job than workers who are not impaired and who are doing similar work as a regular means of their livelihood.\n20 C.F.R. § 404.1578.\nThe regulations also contain several evaluation guidelines for individuals who are self-employed, as is the plaintiff in this case. Section 404.1575(a) states",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 42125,
"end": 42143,
"quote": "34 C.F.R. § 668.19",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "34 C.F.R. § 668.19",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "2e880c9522cfa60e",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_478/0117_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "id not do so. The files of students did not include the required financial aid transcripts from their pri- or postsecondary education in several instances. See 34 C.F.R. § 668.19 (1988). Other instances of violations by the School included failure to include the earned income credit for a student when calculating the student’s need, see",
"linked": false,
"weight": 6.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 34008,
"end": 34026,
"quote": "40 C.F.R. § 1508.7",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "40 C.F.R. § 1508.7",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "535aeb9c204d83cc",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_109/0030_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "he action when added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions regardless of what agency ... or persons undertakes such other actions.” 40 C.F.R. § 1508.7. “Cumulative impacts can result from individually minor but collectively significant actions taking place over a period of time.” Id. When actions “will have c",
"linked": false,
"weight": 2.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 32000,
"end": 32021,
"quote": "40 C.F.R. § 1508.8(b)",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "40 C.F.R. § 1508.8(b)",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "5cadeb8e4a6019a9",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_109/0030_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "h-inducing effects of the casino projects. “Growth-inducing effects” are expressly included within the definition of “indirect impacts” in the regulations. See 40 C.F.R. § 1508.8(b). The Corps nevertheless contends that it was not required to analyze such impacts because it determined that they are “highly speculative and indefinite.” See ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 2.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 18144,
"end": 18168,
"quote": "41 C.F.R. § 60-741.26(e)",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "41 C.F.R. § 60-741.26(e)",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "35a7ccf67a9e3eee",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_747/0599_02/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "nt of Labor or the designated agency shall institute a prompt investigation of each complaint, and shall be responsible for developing a complete case record.” 41 C.F.R. § 60-741.26(e) (1977).\n. \"In every case where any complaint investigation indicates the existence of a violation of the affirmative action clause or these regulations, the ma",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.833333333333333,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 13822,
"end": 13839,
"quote": "12 C.F.R. § 221.1",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "12 C.F.R. § 221.1",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "bdb8cdb90dec9095",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_635/0455_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "dgment in favor of appellees on all of appellants’ claims.\nAFFIRMED.\n. 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) (1976).\n. 17 C.F.R. § 240.10(b)-5 (1980).\n. 15 U.S.C. § 78g (1976).\n. 12 C.F.R. § 221.1 et seq. (1980).\n. Section 7 provides in pertinent part:\nIt shall be unlawful for any person ... to extend or maintain credit or arrange for the extension or ma",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.7,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 2922,
"end": 2944,
"quote": "42 C.F.R. § 405.453(a)",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "42 C.F.R. § 405.453(a)",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "8960c94cd7fc5883",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_711/1020_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": " all the information necessary to substantiate them. 42 U.S.C. § 1395g(a); 42 C.F.R. § 405.406. The provider, in other words, has the burden of substantiation. 42 C.F.R. § 405.453(a); Gosman v. United States, 573 F.2d 31, 36 n. 4, 215 Ct.Cl. 617 (Ct.Cl.1978).\nUpon receipt of the cost report, the intermediary analyzes the report., audits it ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.833333333333333,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 15016,
"end": 15037,
"quote": "24 C.F.R. § 42.250(b)",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "24 C.F.R. § 42.250(b)",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "0a141b1bee8ae814",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_454/0477_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma",
"decade": "1970s",
"context": "ion of the State agency is subject to review by HUD upon the request of the claimant submitted to the Director of the HUD Area Office. 24 C.F.R. §. 42.-245(a). 24 C.F.R. § 42.250(b) establishes the scope of review by HUD and provides:\n“The Area Director shall make his determination of the claimant’s case in light of:\n(1) All material upon ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 2.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 11474,
"end": 11489,
"quote": "20 C.F.R. § 404",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "20 C.F.R. § 404",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "1b136eb400f97009",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_4/0590_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "etermination of residual functional capacity. POMS DI 24150.001, DI 22505.001 et seq. This assessment is consistent with the Secretary’s published regulations. 20 C.F.R. § 404, Subpart P, App. 1 § 12.00(A), (D). We hold that plaintiffs have failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.\nThe judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 6.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 309,
"end": 328,
"quote": "5 C. F.R. § 338.101",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "5 C.F.R. § 338.101",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "c1f9d1f171babdf8",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_333/0527_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of California",
"decade": "1970s",
"context": "eking to overturn regulations of the United States Civil Service Commission (“Commission”) which exclude these non-citizens from the competitive civil service. 5 C. F.R. § 338.101 (1971). The Commission is authorized to establish standards with respect to citizenship by Executive Order No. 10577 § 2.1(a), 19 Fed.Reg. 7521:\nThe Commission",
"linked": false,
"weight": 4.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 58202,
"end": 58221,
"quote": "7 CFR § 1822.216(b)",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "7 C.F.R. § 1822.216(b)",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "a45e00ca4a1cc319",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_389/0635_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Eastern District of California",
"decade": "1970s",
"context": "al by the HATC and the federal defendants of the rent increases violates 42 U.S.C. §§ 1412(f) and 1486(g)(1), California Health and Safety Code § 34322(a), and 7 CFR § 1822.216(b). Since this court has already determined that the plaintiffs’ due process rights were violated in the determination and approval of the rent increases, and tha",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 54994,
"end": 55008,
"quote": "7 CFR § 1318.5",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "7 C.F.R. § 1318.5",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "557b228c61721b1c",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_389/0635_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Eastern District of California",
"decade": "1970s",
"context": "e disclosed for public information:\n“ . . . trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential.”\nTitle 7 CFR § 1318.5 lists the records of the FmHA which are not available to the public and includes:\n“(iv) Commercial or financial information obtained from any party which is pr",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 24913,
"end": 24936,
"quote": "8 C.F.R. § 208.13(b)(1)",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "8 C.F.R. § 208.13(b)(1)",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "43dcf016843d063c",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_656/1047_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "turn.\n. The IJ concluded that Singh had suffered past persecution. \"If past persecution is established, a rebuttable presumption of a well-founded fear arises, 8 C.F.R. § 208.13(b)(1), and the burden shifts to the government to demonstrate that there has been a fundamental change in circumstances such that the applicant no longer has a well-",
"linked": false,
"weight": 6.75,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 12494,
"end": 12519,
"quote": "19 C.F.R. § 351.301(b)(2)",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "19 C.F.R. § 351.301(b)(2)",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "aaa57ce68cf5c3c7",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_688/0751_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "n expert opinion submitted to provide further evidentiary support for Avisma’s arguments, it was new factual information and was therefore untimely pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 351.301(b)(2). Under that regulation, the deadline for the submission of factual information is 140 days after the last day of the anniversary month of the publication of th",
"linked": false,
"weight": 6.666666666666667,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 17439,
"end": 17460,
"quote": "45 C.F.R. § 250.30(b)",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "45 C.F.R. § 250.30(b)",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "ccaac396aae68bad",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_403/1355_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia",
"decade": "1970s",
"context": "ecify that the “upper limit” for Medicaid payments to nursing homes and intermediate care facilities is restricted to “customary charges which are reasonable.” 45 C.F.R. § 250.30(b) (B). Furthermore, the federal regulations specifically provide that a state may pay less than the upper limits. 45 C.F.R. § 250.30(b). Nowhere do the federal r",
"linked": false,
"weight": 2.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 59977,
"end": 59999,
"quote": "29 C.F.R. § 2560.503-1",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "29 C.F.R. § 2560.503-1",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "ac6dcd312793037f",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_4/0929_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "ss, whether either plaintiff exhausted Independence’s procedures is of no consequence if neither of them received ERISA-compliant notice and appeal rights. See 29 C.F.R. § 2560.503-1(Z\n",
"linked": false,
"weight": 11.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 51640,
"end": 51663,
"quote": "17 C.F.R. § 240.13d-101",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "17 C.F.R. § 240.13d-101",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "832c4cf137f8be0b",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_466/1114_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts",
"decade": "1970s",
"context": "r, to sell its assets, to merge it with any other persons, or to make any other major change in its business or corporate structure. See 15 U.S.C. § 78m(d)(l); 17 C.F.R. § 240.13d-101.\n. “In conventional tender offers the offeror typically offers to purchase all or a portion of a company’s shares at a premium price, the offer to remain open ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 3.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 31407,
"end": 31428,
"quote": "21 C.F.R. § 101.22(i)",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "21 C.F.R. § 101.22(i)",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "f91d7075a10db87d",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_934/0035_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "e foregoing reasons, I respectfully dissent.\nBeyond general points drawn from federal labeling regulations about the \"characterizing flavor\" in a food product, 21 C.F.R. § 101.22(i), the complaint does not explain why Dumont apparently did not expect the coffee to contain \"Crème\" of any sort but did expect the coffee to contain the modifyi",
"linked": false,
"weight": 8.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 3785,
"end": 3806,
"quote": "40 C.F.R. § 1501.4(b)",
"pattern": "cfr",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "40 C.F.R. § 1501.4(b)",
"reason": "canonical regulation identity",
"id": "c3867710a0162ef4",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_109/0030_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "e whether the granting of each of the casino permits was a “major federal action,” the Corps undertook an environmental assessment (“EA”) for each project. See 40 C.F.R. § 1501.4(b). In each case, the Corps made a “finding of no significant impact” (“FONSI”) and therefore determined that no EIS was required. See Casino World Administrative",
"linked": false,
"weight": 2.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Manual check: exact CFR title and section/subsection citation; canonical value normalizes optional § and spacing only, without inferring a USC target.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 93,
"end": 102,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "76b5f885076ed58b",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_536/0177_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "\nMEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER\nSIFTON, District Judge.\nThis is an action brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. § 1983; the fourteenth amendment to the United ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 8.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected explicit Civil Rights Act of 1964 expansion in context; Title VII identity is supported and no section is inferred.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 21683,
"end": 21692,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "a0ecb590be7e38c5",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_93/1201_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "presented and having concluded that the plaintiff has offered only circumstantial evidence, the Court must now address the type of claims presented. Plaintiffs Title VII claims involve allegations of illegal discrimination and retaliation. Title VII provides generally that an employer shall not “discriminate against any individ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 2.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected employment-discrimination context and same-paragraph 42 USC 2000e-family citation; Title VII is the 1964 civil-rights title, not the adjacent state-law provision.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 418,
"end": 422,
"quote": "RICO",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act; RICO",
"reason": "matching federal act name or USC anchor in paragraph",
"id": "a0aab5834630a83d",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/us/volume_547/0451_01/index.html",
"court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": " One of RICO’s enforcement mechanisms is a private right of action, available to “[a]ny person injured in his business or property by reason of a violation” of RICO’s substantive restrictions. § 1964(c).\nIn Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corporation, 503 U. S. 258, 268 (1992), this Court held that a plaintiff may",
"linked": false,
"weight": 10.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Full federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act name and title 18 anchor appear in the same opinion paragraph; act identity only, not a section.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 10889,
"end": 10898,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "35b7faef7262712f",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_198/0307_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Western District of New York",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "ions of discrimination occurring more than 300 days prior to the date a charge is filed are time-barred. See 42 U.S.C. § 12117(a) (wherein the ADA incorporates Title VII’s well-established charge-filing procedures contained within 42 U.S.C. § 2000e — 5(e)(1)); Butts v. New York Dep’t of Housing Preservation & Dev., 990 F.2d 139",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected employment-discrimination context and same-paragraph 42 USC 2000e-family citation; Title VII is the 1964 civil-rights title, not the adjacent state-law provision.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 49939,
"end": 49948,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "5d3ce056dd21a1b7",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_452/0394_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Southern District of New York",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "nce. Title VII’s anti-retaliation provision forbids employer actions that “discriminate against” an employee because the employee has “opposed” a practice that Title VII forbids or has “made a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in” a Title VII “investigation, proceeding, or hearing.” 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a); Burlington",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.666666666666667,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected employment-discrimination context and same-paragraph 42 USC 2000e-family citation; Title VII is the 1964 civil-rights title, not the adjacent state-law provision.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 473,
"end": 482,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "81adcc4732afff71",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_282/0663_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas",
"decade": "1960s",
"context": "ent Opportunity Commission (EEOC) investigated the complaint, and concluded that there was reasonable cause to believe the Southern Pacific was in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Negotiations were undertaken and, according to the testimony of Ramirez before this court, resulted in some but not all of the",
"linked": false,
"weight": 2.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected explicit Civil Rights Act of 1964 expansion in context; Title VII identity is supported and no section is inferred.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 6610,
"end": 6619,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "9e786179b582bbbc",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_247/1075_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Arizona",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "asis for disparate treatment, the employer in effect admits systematic discrimination and the case turns on whether such disparate treatment is justified under Title VII. Id. Rather than applying the McDonnell Douglas test, once a policy is shown to be facially discriminatory, the court simply asks whether sex was a “bona fide ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected employment-discrimination context and same-paragraph 42 USC 2000e-family citation; Title VII is the 1964 civil-rights title, not the adjacent state-law provision.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 371,
"end": 380,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "dfe8f83986641ac5",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_452/0394_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Southern District of New York",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "that on the basis of her race, she was denied promotion and subjected to a hostile work environment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, the New York State Human Rights Law, N.Y. Exec. Law § 296 et seq., an",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.666666666666667,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected explicit Civil Rights Act of 1964 expansion in context; Title VII identity is supported and no section is inferred.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 22931,
"end": 22940,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "3665d555f831b371",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_93/1201_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "certain elements differs. Compare Olmsted v. Taco Bell Corp., 141 F.3d 1457, 1460 (11th Cir.1998) (discussing elements and burdens of production and proof in a Title VII retaliation claim); Raney v. Vinson Guard Serv., Inc., 120 F.3d 1192, 1196-97 (11th Cir.1997) (discussing the three-prong analysis applied to retaliation cases",
"linked": false,
"weight": 2.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected employment-discrimination context and same-paragraph 42 USC 2000e-family citation; Title VII is the 1964 civil-rights title, not the adjacent state-law provision.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 11081,
"end": 11090,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "9adcc4b1ddaf3e39",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_198/0307_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Western District of New York",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "rge-filing procedures contained within 42 U.S.C. § 2000e — 5(e)(1)); Butts v. New York Dep’t of Housing Preservation & Dev., 990 F.2d 1397, 1401 (2d Cir.1993) (Title VII case). Because plaintiff filed her charge against ESL on September 14, 1998, her ADA claims “would normally include any incidents alleged to have occurred in t",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected employment-discrimination context and same-paragraph 42 USC 2000e-family citation; Title VII is the 1964 civil-rights title, not the adjacent state-law provision.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 6148,
"end": 6157,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "330214229c207c63",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_247/1075_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Arizona",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": " 1345, 191 L.Ed.2d 279 (2015) (citing McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973)).\nTo prove disparate treatment under Title VII using direct evidence,' a plaintiff must show that the employer had a facially discriminatory policy—one which on its face applies less favorably to a protecte",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected employment-discrimination context and same-paragraph 42 USC 2000e-family citation; Title VII is the 1964 civil-rights title, not the adjacent state-law provision.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 6868,
"end": 6877,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "38e277b3470e6fdd",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_745/1373_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "ck. Bur-dine, 450 U.S. at 259, 101 S.Ct. at 1096.\nHaving established a standard of proof in disparate treatment cases brought under both 42 U.S.C.A. § 1981 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e-17, we now address each appellant’s claim that the district court erred in finding that Western Electric ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.833333333333333,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected explicit Civil Rights Act of 1964 expansion in context; Title VII identity is supported and no section is inferred.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 17829,
"end": 17838,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "5dc962231c983de1",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_603/0102_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": " Court held that such a requirement would cut short most of the EEOC’s investigations and would be manifestly inconsistent with the Congressional intent behind Title VII. Id. Instead, the Court held that the requirements of 29 C.F.R. § 1601.12(a)(3) would be satisfied if the Commissioner identified the groups of persons believe",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected employment-discrimination context and same-paragraph 42 USC 2000e-family citation; Title VII is the 1964 civil-rights title, not the adjacent state-law provision.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 5989,
"end": 5998,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "276fc7e0b82cd1b2",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_615/0382_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": " 2000e-2(a)(l). The legislative history of the PDA indicates that Congress meant to make it clear that distinctions based on pregnancy are per se violations of Title VII. H.R.Rep. No. 95-948, 95th Cong., 2nd Sess. 3, reprinted in 1978 U.S.Code Cong. & Ad.News 4749, 4751.\nIn Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. EEOC, 462 ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected employment-discrimination context and same-paragraph 42 USC 2000e-family citation; Title VII is the 1964 civil-rights title, not the adjacent state-law provision.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 109,
"end": 113,
"quote": "RICO",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act; RICO",
"reason": "matching federal act name or USC anchor in paragraph",
"id": "9093b41cc673775b",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/us/volume_547/0451_01/index.html",
"court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "\nJustice Kennedy\ndelivered the opinion of the Court.\nThe Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U. S. C. §§ 1961-1968 (2000 ed. and Supp. III), prohibits certain conduct involving a “pattern of racketeering activity.” §1962 (2000 ed.). One of RICO’s ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 10.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Full federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act name and title 18 anchor appear in the same opinion paragraph; act identity only, not a section.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 13439,
"end": 13448,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "c2d5be15cf3fc1bf",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_119/0996_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "o has 15 or more employees. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(f). The more difficult question is whether the Plaintiffs must be employees of the Department in order to bring a Title VII complaint against it.\nPlaintiff would answer this question in the negative. They contend that there is no language in Title VII that requires an employee who h",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected employment-discrimination context and same-paragraph 42 USC 2000e-family citation; Title VII is the 1964 civil-rights title, not the adjacent state-law provision.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 5653,
"end": 5662,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "51791975f09096ba",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/fla-supp-2d/volume_40/0144_01/index.html",
"court": "Florida Circuit Court",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "\n“A proceeding is “substantially justified” if it had a reasonable basis in law and fact at the time it was initiated by a state agency.”\n10. Section 706(k) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 USC § 2000e-5(k) 1976 provides:\nIn any action or proceeding under this subchapter the court, in its discretion, may allow t",
"linked": false,
"weight": 2.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected explicit Civil Rights Act of 1964 expansion in context; Title VII identity is supported and no section is inferred.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 22594,
"end": 22603,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "d5b52cc2028a81a2",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_93/1201_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "nner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under this subchapter.” 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a) (1994). Essentially the same analytical framework is applied to Title VII claims premised on circumstantial evidence of retaliation as to Title VII claims based on circumstantial evidence of disparate treatment, although the articula",
"linked": false,
"weight": 2.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected employment-discrimination context and same-paragraph 42 USC 2000e-family citation; Title VII is the 1964 civil-rights title, not the adjacent state-law provision.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 19173,
"end": 19177,
"quote": "RICO",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act; RICO",
"reason": "matching federal act name or USC anchor in paragraph",
"id": "af966424c0ff82a1",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/us/volume_547/0451_01/index.html",
"court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": " part.\nThe Court today limits the lawsuits that may be brought under the civil enforcement provision of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO or Act), 18 U. S. C. § 1961 et seq. (2000 ed. and Supp. III), by adopting a theory of proximate causation that is supported neither by the Act nor by our decis",
"linked": false,
"weight": 10.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Full federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act name and title 18 anchor appear in the same opinion paragraph; act identity only, not a section.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 266,
"end": 270,
"quote": "RICO",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act; RICO",
"reason": "matching federal act name or USC anchor in paragraph",
"id": "186c3e465898d724",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/us/volume_547/0451_01/index.html",
"court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "t (RICO), 18 U. S. C. §§ 1961-1968 (2000 ed. and Supp. III), prohibits certain conduct involving a “pattern of racketeering activity.” §1962 (2000 ed.). One of RICO’s enforcement mechanisms is a private right of action, available to “[a]ny person injured in his business or property by reason of a violation” of RICO’s subst",
"linked": false,
"weight": 10.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Full federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act name and title 18 anchor appear in the same opinion paragraph; act identity only, not a section.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 49784,
"end": 49793,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "e1029e4c241a3d96",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_452/0394_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Southern District of New York",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "insubordination in July 2004, and issued her a written warning in July 2004 and suspended her for three days without pay in September 2004 for poor attendance. Title VII’s anti-retaliation provision forbids employer actions that “discriminate against” an employee because the employee has “opposed” a practice that Title VII forb",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.666666666666667,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected employment-discrimination context and same-paragraph 42 USC 2000e-family citation; Title VII is the 1964 civil-rights title, not the adjacent state-law provision.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 22668,
"end": 22677,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "4874336351a05a66",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_93/1201_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "2 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a) (1994). Essentially the same analytical framework is applied to Title VII claims premised on circumstantial evidence of retaliation as to Title VII claims based on circumstantial evidence of disparate treatment, although the articulation of certain elements differs. Compare Olmsted v. Taco Bell Corp., 141 ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 2.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected employment-discrimination context and same-paragraph 42 USC 2000e-family citation; Title VII is the 1964 civil-rights title, not the adjacent state-law provision.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 13419,
"end": 13428,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "3dcb33f3b4adb0c5",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_217/0594_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "is divided into four different titles. Title I extends the antidiscrimi-nation provisions of the Rehabilitation Act to all employers who are already covered by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111-17. Title II applies to public services, like education or transportation. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 12131-65. T",
"linked": false,
"weight": 2.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected explicit Civil Rights Act of 1964 expansion in context; Title VII identity is supported and no section is inferred.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 5459,
"end": 5468,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "2ea7ef60dbab2de2",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_30/1051_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Western District of Washington",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": " and pay cut, he told CSG that it was discriminating against him and that he would complain to the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission (“EEOC”). He invoked Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and the Washington Law Against Discrimination (“WLAD”). Initially, he sued only CSG. By the time he filed hi",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected explicit Civil Rights Act of 1964 expansion in context; Title VII identity is supported and no section is inferred.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 45386,
"end": 45395,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "62a44618289cd34b",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_384/0822_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "t Guidance discussing the compensatory and punitive damages available under Title VII).\n. But not always. Administrative remedies exist.and are used both under Title VII {see 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5) and California's FEHA {see Cal. Gov't Code §§ 12963).\n. The panel is correct that the Ninth Circuit has recognized that unauthorized ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 6.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected employment-discrimination context and same-paragraph 42 USC 2000e-family citation; Title VII is the 1964 civil-rights title, not the adjacent state-law provision.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 23195,
"end": 23204,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "f6243c12a4823034",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_93/1201_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "(discussing the three-prong analysis applied to retaliation cases); and Donnellon v. Fruehauf Corp., 794 F.2d 598, 600-01 (11th Cir.1986) (applying the general Title VII framework from McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973) to a retaliation case) with Combs, 106 F.3d at 1527-28 (dis",
"linked": false,
"weight": 2.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected employment-discrimination context and same-paragraph 42 USC 2000e-family citation; Title VII is the 1964 civil-rights title, not the adjacent state-law provision.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 7490,
"end": 7499,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "50d2e11627f45fe5",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_202/0411_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Southern District of New York",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "CHRL. Shultz also asserts a defamation claim based on the Congregation’s statements.\nThe Court begins with Shultz’s federal claims.\nA. Title VII Discrimination\nTitle VII makes' it unlawful for an employer “to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.8,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected employment-discrimination context and same-paragraph 42 USC 2000e-family citation; Title VII is the 1964 civil-rights title, not the adjacent state-law provision.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 32057,
"end": 32066,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "8eb72c49a20a3477",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_767/0629_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "the statute or “because [the employee] has made a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing” under Title VII. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a). To establish a claim of retaliation under Title VII, a plaintiff must demonstrate that: (1) he engaged in protected activity; (2) an a",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected employment-discrimination context and same-paragraph 42 USC 2000e-family citation; Title VII is the 1964 civil-rights title, not the adjacent state-law provision.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 50023,
"end": 50032,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "b1ef31f0d7df005d",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_452/0394_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Southern District of New York",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "ate against” an employee because the employee has “opposed” a practice that Title VII forbids or has “made a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in” a Title VII “investigation, proceeding, or hearing.” 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a); Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Ry. v. White, - U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 2405, 2410, 165 L.Ed.2d 345 (",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.666666666666667,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected employment-discrimination context and same-paragraph 42 USC 2000e-family citation; Title VII is the 1964 civil-rights title, not the adjacent state-law provision.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 232,
"end": 241,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "154df5f6a8290f94",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_745/1373_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "iew the district court’s finding that appellee, Western Electric Company, Inc., rebutted appellants’ prima facie cases under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1981 (West 1981) and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e-17 (West 1981). We also review the district court’s holding that four appellants prevailed on their discr",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.833333333333333,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected explicit Civil Rights Act of 1964 expansion in context; Title VII identity is supported and no section is inferred.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 42009,
"end": 42018,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "281c2495a5a29d40",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_860/1209_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "d below to remember that this is an age discrimination case, not a case alleging discrimination based on race or sex which is tried to a court not a jury under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. The ADEA expressly and deliberately created a cause of action to be tried to a jury so that issues of age discrimination would not b",
"linked": false,
"weight": 11.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected employment-discrimination context and same-paragraph 42 USC 2000e-family citation; Title VII is the 1964 civil-rights title, not the adjacent state-law provision.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 50295,
"end": 50304,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "f56082040d780476",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_452/0394_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Southern District of New York",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": " White, - U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 2405, 2410, 165 L.Ed.2d 345 (2006). The McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting analysis used in claims of discrimination in violation of Title VII also applies to retaliation claims brought pursuant to Title VII. Terry v. Ashcroft, 336 F.3d at 141. To make out a prima facie case of retaliation, Bush must ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.666666666666667,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected employment-discrimination context and same-paragraph 42 USC 2000e-family citation; Title VII is the 1964 civil-rights title, not the adjacent state-law provision.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 5318,
"end": 5327,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "3bfdcd9600a38a2e",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_247/1075_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Arizona",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "or discriminate against an individual based on sex. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1). As amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act [“PDA”], sex discrimination under Title VII includes discrimination on the basis of pregnancy. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(k).\nLiability in a disparate treatment case, such as this one, “depends on whether the pro",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected employment-discrimination context and same-paragraph 42 USC 2000e-family citation; Title VII is the 1964 civil-rights title, not the adjacent state-law provision.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 22151,
"end": 22160,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "02949fc548262d4f",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_93/1201_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "ex, or national origin ....” 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(l) (1994) (emphasis supplied). In addition, certain forms of retaliation are also prohibited. Specifically, Title VII prohibits covered employers from retaliating against any employee who “has opposed any practice made an unlawful employment practice by this subchapter [which ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 2.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected employment-discrimination context and same-paragraph 42 USC 2000e-family citation; Title VII is the 1964 civil-rights title, not the adjacent state-law provision.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 231,
"end": 240,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "6b19a10bda406c8e",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_339/1108_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama",
"decade": "1970s",
"context": "presaged by charges filed with the EEOC in 1967 against Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, was brought by the plaintiffs, seven black employees of Goodyear, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S. C.A. § 2000e et seq. Injunctive relief and back pay are sought under Title VII and under Rule 23 for the benefit of al",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected explicit Civil Rights Act of 1964 expansion in context; Title VII identity is supported and no section is inferred.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 786,
"end": 795,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "657d4146874b4c81",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_452/0394_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Southern District of New York",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "ims that Fordham retaliated against her for filing charges of discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”), in further violation of Title VII, § 1981, and New York law. Last, Bush asserts a state law claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress.\nDefendant moved for summary judgment [41], Fo",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.666666666666667,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected explicit Civil Rights Act of 1964 expansion in context; Title VII identity is supported and no section is inferred.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 4941,
"end": 4950,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "f019dd03e85084fc",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_10/0556_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of New Jersey",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "I prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2. A claim of race discrimination under Title VII uses the burden shifting framework established in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 803-05, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973). Under that fram",
"linked": false,
"weight": 3.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected employment-discrimination context and same-paragraph 42 USC 2000e-family citation; Title VII is the 1964 civil-rights title, not the adjacent state-law provision.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 16798,
"end": 16807,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "b1f4a2323ec35c1e",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_603/0102_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "ten is ambiguous, a recent Supreme Court decision suggests that were the Court to be presented with the issue in this case it would hold that the requisites of Title VII are satisfied if the name of the party to be charged clearly appears anywhere on the face of the charge of discrimination form. In EEOC v. Shell Oil Company, —",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected employment-discrimination context and same-paragraph 42 USC 2000e-family citation; Title VII is the 1964 civil-rights title, not the adjacent state-law provision.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 50589,
"end": 50598,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "e974638792e3876b",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_452/0394_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Southern District of New York",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "cie case of retaliation, Bush must present sufficient evidence to permit a rational trier of fact to find that (1) she engaged in protected participation under Title VII; (2) Fordham knew of this activity; (3) Fordham took adverse action against Bush; and (4) “a causal connection exists between the protected activity and the ad",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.666666666666667,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected employment-discrimination context and same-paragraph 42 USC 2000e-family citation; Title VII is the 1964 civil-rights title, not the adjacent state-law provision.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 7886,
"end": 7895,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "9fba2aa718c9ea77",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_202/0411_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Southern District of New York",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": ", because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.” 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1). To state a claim for employment discrimination under Title VII, “a plaintiff must plausibly allege that (1) the. employer took adverse action against him, and (2) his race, color, religion, sex, or national origin was a mo",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.8,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected employment-discrimination context and same-paragraph 42 USC 2000e-family citation; Title VII is the 1964 civil-rights title, not the adjacent state-law provision.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 256,
"end": 265,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "8a3cacded340c320",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_93/0490_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": " at Meyer’s Bakeries, Inc. Following a work schedule change that Tidwell perceived to be a demotion, he quit his job. Shortly thereafter, he brought suit under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2, and under the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, against Meyer’s, claiming that Meyer’s’ employm",
"linked": false,
"weight": 6.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected explicit Civil Rights Act of 1964 expansion in context; Title VII identity is supported and no section is inferred.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 2470,
"end": 2479,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "2da4b583bf88f696",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_536/0177_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "nd conclusions of law on which these determinations are based, as required by Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.\nJurisdiction over plaintiff’s Title VII action exists under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5. Plaintiff, by filing her complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission on May 16,1978, has complied with ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 8.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected employment-discrimination context and same-paragraph 42 USC 2000e-family citation; Title VII is the 1964 civil-rights title, not the adjacent state-law provision.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 429,
"end": 438,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "9f2ed64bbc5c2ea4",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_202/0411_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Southern District of New York",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "lectively, “Defendants”) on September 22, 2015. Shultz alleges that Defendants discriminated and retaliated against her on the basis of her sex in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VU”), New York State law, and New York City law. She also asserts claims for defamation and ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.8,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected explicit Civil Rights Act of 1964 expansion in context; Title VII identity is supported and no section is inferred.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 6749,
"end": 6758,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "a81e1baf9096da02",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_213/0081_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Columbia",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": ".Supp.3d 178, 184 (D.D.C. 2015); see also Baloch v. Kempthorne, 550 F.3d 1191, 1196 (D.C. Cir. 2008); Daka v. Breiner, 711 A.2d 86, 94 (D.C. 1998) (noting that Title VII cases are particularly persuasive in evaluating DCHRA claims).\nCourts in this Circuit “have consistently recognized the ease with which a plaintiff claiming em",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.75,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected employment-discrimination context and same-paragraph 42 USC 2000e-family citation; Title VII is the 1964 civil-rights title, not the adjacent state-law provision.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 19864,
"end": 19868,
"quote": "RICO",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act; RICO",
"reason": "matching federal act name or USC anchor in paragraph",
"id": "0996928144bac2ba",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/us/volume_547/0451_01/index.html",
"court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "he Court’s approach also eliminates recovery for plaintiffs whose injuries are precisely those that Congress aimed to remedy through the authorization of civil RICO suits. Because this frustration of congressional intent is directly contrary to the broad language Congress employed to confer a RICO cause of action, I respec",
"linked": false,
"weight": 10.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Full federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act name and title 18 anchor appear in the same opinion paragraph; act identity only, not a section.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 2166,
"end": 2175,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "236790d9803f82b8",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_31/0604_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "andardization because, otherwise, use of the 1985-88 examination results would have had an adverse impact on African-Americans and Hispanics, thereby violating Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. If defendant’s motion is granted in its entirety, there will still be 42 plaintiffs who have pending",
"linked": false,
"weight": 7.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected explicit Civil Rights Act of 1964 expansion in context; Title VII identity is supported and no section is inferred.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 966,
"end": 975,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "45cc006b151be0df",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_745/1373_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "lectric, and their union, The Communication Workers of America and its Local 3290. The installers alleged that Western Electric had violated their rights under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e-17 (West 1981) and 42 U.S.C.A. § 1981 (West 1981).\nPrior to trial, the class allegations were dismissed. ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.833333333333333,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected explicit Civil Rights Act of 1964 expansion in context; Title VII identity is supported and no section is inferred.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 12294,
"end": 12303,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "fbbc92b91e3f949c",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_603/0102_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "arges of discrimination. Love v. Pullman Company, 404 U.S. at 527, 92 S.Ct. at 619.\nIn addition to the policy considerations inherent in any case arising under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, it would be unfair for the court to penalize an unsuspecting plaintiff who failed to list a name in a particular section of th",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected explicit Civil Rights Act of 1964 expansion in context; Title VII identity is supported and no section is inferred.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 50360,
"end": 50369,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "bcba306bc1668848",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_452/0394_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Southern District of New York",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "he McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting analysis used in claims of discrimination in violation of Title VII also applies to retaliation claims brought pursuant to Title VII. Terry v. Ashcroft, 336 F.3d at 141. To make out a prima facie case of retaliation, Bush must present sufficient evidence to permit a rational trier of fact to",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.666666666666667,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected employment-discrimination context and same-paragraph 42 USC 2000e-family citation; Title VII is the 1964 civil-rights title, not the adjacent state-law provision.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 351,
"end": 360,
"quote": "Title VII",
"pattern": "named_act",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Civil Rights Act of 1964; Title VII",
"reason": "matching act name or USC anchor in opinion",
"id": "12c17eada2b5a191",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_339/1108_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama",
"decade": "1970s",
"context": "even black employees of Goodyear, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S. C.A. § 2000e et seq. Injunctive relief and back pay are sought under Title VII and under Rule 23 for the benefit of all black employees hired by Goodyear after 1958. Local 12, United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum and Plastic Workers of America, ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Inspected explicit Civil Rights Act of 1964 expansion in context; Title VII identity is supported and no section is inferred.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 14568,
"end": 14575,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Legal Arizona Workers Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "41a3bc702c89f4a2",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_526/0968_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Arizona",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "ensing and similar laws” upon those who employ unauthorized aliens, as expressly permitted in 8 U.S.C. § 1324a(h)(2). A principal issue in this case is whether the Act comes within that safe harbor or spills over to the other “civil or criminal sanctions” forbidden to States.\nThe Act builds on the federal statutory prohibitio",
"linked": false,
"weight": 3.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "named antecedent appears before mention in source text",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 20058,
"end": 20065,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "e40f53eb00f6880c",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/ill-app-3d/volume_357/0651_01/index.html",
"court": "Illinois Appellate Court",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": " 454, 603 N.E.2d 508 (1992).\nEven though property might be considered nonmarital under section 503(a) of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (the Act) (750ILCS 5/503(a) (West 2002)), courts will presume a spouse who placed nonmarital property in joint tenancy with the other spouse intended to make a gift to ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.75,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "named antecedent appears before mention in source text",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 9948,
"end": 9955,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Social Security Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "d6be12be072c5e3e",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_990/1259_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Oregon",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": " opinion when there was no evidence to the contrary in the record.\nThe Commissioner denies each of Pell’s contentions.\nLEGAL STANDARDS\nThe Social Security Act (the Act) provides for payment of disability insurance benefits (DIB) to people who have contributed to the Social Security program and who suffer from a physical or me",
"linked": false,
"weight": 3.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "named antecedent appears before mention in source text",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 134,
"end": 141,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Social Security Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "a93a6d168f8d8411",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_990/1259_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Oregon",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "\nOPINION\nFRYE, District Judge.\nThe plaintiff, Richard Pell, brings this action pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act (the Act), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to obtain judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner denying his application for disability insurance benefits a",
"linked": false,
"weight": 3.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "named antecedent appears before mention in source text",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 579,
"end": 586,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Social Security Disability Benefits Reform Act of 1984",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "a75241065b4db9c1",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_658/0670_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "case at bar, plaintiff’s claim was remanded by the U.S. Magistrate pursuant to Congress’ passage of the Social Security Disability Benefits Reform Act of 1984 (the Act) which reestablished the “medical improvement standard” as the sole criteria by which the Secretary could terminate disability benefits. Upon remand, the Secre",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "named antecedent appears before mention in source text",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 5362,
"end": 5369,
"quote": "The Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Colorado Ski Safety Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "f8af0b342104bd13",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_23/1327_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Colorado",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "s case and that under the Act, Mr. Bazarewski is a “skier,” Beaver Creek is a “ski area,” and The Vail Corporation is a “ski area operator.” (ECF NO. 22 at 2.) The Act provides that, “[N]o skier may make any claim against or recover from any ski area operator for injury resulting from any of the inherent dangers and risks of ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 4.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "named antecedent appears before mention in source text",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 10523,
"end": 10534,
"quote": "Section 532",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "47 U.S.C. § 532",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "cdd054ae41bfa464",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_893/0264_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Southern District of New York",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "n the Commission for relief under this subsection upon a showing of prior adjudicated violations of this section.”). The similarity between Sections 531(e) and Section 532(c)(2) supports the conclusion that Congress intended at least a private federal cause of action to exist for public access users.\nAs required by the third Cort",
"linked": false,
"weight": 6.2,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 6098,
"end": 6104,
"quote": "§ 2615",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "29 U.S.C. § 2615",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "ea5dd72aba49843b",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_934/0472_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Six Circuit",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": ".S.C. § 2615(a)(2).\" Seeger v. Cincinnati Bell Tel. Co. , 681 F.3d 274, 282 (6th Cir. 2012). Dyer brought his claim under the \"interference\" theory pursuant to § 2615(a)(1), which states that \"[i]t shall be unlawful for any employer to interfere with, restrain, or deny the exercise of or the attempt to exercise, any right pr",
"linked": false,
"weight": 2.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 5542,
"end": 5554,
"quote": "section 2254",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "28 U.S.C. § 2254",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "347970bc69fb46f8",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_877/1443_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "ionary review of his personal restraint petition.\nOn July 17, 1984, Cavanaugh filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In his section 2254 petition, Cavanaugh claimed that the 1957 and 1972 prior convictions were admitted in violation of his federal constitutional rights and he was denied his sixt",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.5,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 17622,
"end": 17634,
"quote": "section 1001",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "18 U.S.C. § 1001",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "c1a81531438e2d7e",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_893/1057_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "e in a “matter within the jurisdiction of a[] department or agency of the United States.” 18 U.S.C. § 1001; see also Facchini, 874 F.2d at 641. For purposes of section 1001, Congress intended that the term “jurisdiction” “should not be given a narrow or technical meaning.” United States v. Rodgers, 466 U.S. 475, 480, 104 S.Ct. 194",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.888888888888889,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 8248,
"end": 8259,
"quote": "Section 531",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "47 U.S.C. § 531",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "0d7928b0686849c3",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_893/0264_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Southern District of New York",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "ates federal law. However, when a franchise agreement fails to incorporate the provision, no expressly designated mechanism under federal law exists to enforce Section 531(e). Interpreting Section 531(c), which speaks in permissive terms and does not apply when an agreement fails to incorporate federal requirements, as the only m",
"linked": false,
"weight": 6.2,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 16637,
"end": 16645,
"quote": "§ 1395ww",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "42 U.S.C. § 1395ww",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "bbed0eaf89a4472e",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/clus/volume_605/1/index.html",
"court": "scotus",
"decade": "2020s",
"context": "orks like this: The numerator counts “the number of patient days attribut- 1 Although the Medicare fraction employs the phrase “supplementary security income,” § 1395ww(d)(5)(F)(vi)(I) (emphasis added), subchapter XVI refers to this beneft as “supplemental security income,” § 1381 (em- phasis added). Despite the slight variati",
"linked": false,
"weight": 3.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code or exact section identity verified elsewhere in the same opinion; resolver canonical is correct",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 6199,
"end": 6205,
"quote": "§ 1182",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "8 U.S.C. § 1182",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "0375a0b04f589438",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_422/0098_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "nst Zheng, alleging that he was, “on September 27, 1993, paroled into the United States pursuant to Executive Order 12711,” and that he was removable under the § 1182(a)(7)(A)(i)(I) standard.\nZheng retained an attorney, Sigang Li, who filed an asylum application on his behalf on August 7, 2000. A merits hearing was conducted",
"linked": false,
"weight": 11.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 15497,
"end": 15502,
"quote": "§ 841",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "21 U.S.C. § 841",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "6120e00ce8c15767",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_347/0661_01/index.html",
"court": "nited States District Court for the District of New Mexico",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "s and more of methamphetamine, contrary to 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. See Sealed Indictment at 1-2, 7, filed December 2, 2015 (Doc. 2). Violating § 841(a)(1) calls for a minimum 10 year imprisonment sentence. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A). The Indictment itself is enough to establish probable cause that Castano",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 6853,
"end": 6859,
"quote": "§ 2255",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "28 U.S.C. § 2255",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "5ef2518f1d622d56",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_128/0354_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "less it also appears that the remedy by motion is inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention.\n28 U.S.C. § 2255 (emphasis added). Only if a § 2255 motion is inadequate or ineffective may a court entertain a collateral attack on a federal prisoner’s sentence or conviction. Young seeks to invoke this “savin",
"linked": false,
"weight": 3.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 32308,
"end": 32313,
"quote": "§ 57b",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "15 U.S.C. § 57b",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "dfe7fb7e1926c935",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_910/0417_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "ist order,\" and then prove to the district court that the defendant's conduct was such that a \"reasonable man\" would know it was \"dishonest or fraudulent.\" Id. § 57b(a)(2) ; see also id. § 45 (granting the Commission authority to issue cease and desist orders). Thus, before the Commission can make someone pay, it must have ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 2.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 6873,
"end": 6879,
"quote": "§ 1132",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "29 U.S.C. § 1132",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "1119baa4080d8a49",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_619/1457_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "s may be brought by the Secretary of Labor and by participants, beneficiaries, and fiduciaries of ERISA trusts to redress ERISA violations. There is nothing in § 1132(a) which betokens any congressional intent to vest ERISA-spawned rights of action in any more broadly defined classes. And, the legislative history is barren o",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 2297,
"end": 2303,
"quote": "§ 3142",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "18 U.S.C. § 3142",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "1255188b5ab2727d",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_347/0661_01/index.html",
"court": "nited States District Court for the District of New Mexico",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "conditions can reasonably assure the defendant's future appearance in court. See Appeal at 4 (citing 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e) ). According to the United States, the § 3142(e) presumption applies to Castanon-Perez, because the Indictment shows that there is probable cause that Castanon-Perez committed a drug offense for which the ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 299,
"end": 304,
"quote": "§ 282",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "35 U.S.C. § 282",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "a2402be708826057",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/us/volume_564/0091_01/index.html",
"court": "Supreme Court of the United States",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "he burden of establishing invalidity of a patent or any claim thereof shall rest on the party asserting such invalidity.” 35 U. S. C. §282. We consider whether § 282 requires an invalidity defense to be proved by clear and convincing evidence. We hold that it does.\nI\nA\nPursuant to its authority under the Patent Clause, U. S",
"linked": false,
"weight": 8.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 11281,
"end": 11292,
"quote": "section 406",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "42 U.S.C. § 406",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "86bc4e740532cfd7",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_370/1141_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": " fees to the plaintiffs attorney for work performed in this court, where there is, as yet, no judgment specifically awarding benefits to the claimant. Although section 406(b) does not speak to this issue, a handful of courts have answered the question in the affirmative. See Conner v. Gardner, 381 F.2d 497 (4th Cir.1967) (attorne",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code or exact section identity verified elsewhere in the same opinion; resolver canonical is correct",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 6906,
"end": 6912,
"quote": "§ 5334",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "5 U.S.C. § 5334",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "95d7c5d9fcbc5e8b",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_682/0925_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Claims",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "sion in Clark and held that “the statute [§ 5334(b)] and the accompanying regulations reveal a congressional intent to apply the two-step increase provision of § 5334(b) only to promotions or transfers of employees already within the GS system.” 454 U.S. at -, 102 S.Ct. at 809-10. Accordingly, plaintiffs’ claim for relief un",
"linked": false,
"weight": 2.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 4461,
"end": 4467,
"quote": "§ 6702",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "26 U.S.C. § 6702",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "0f5a885d81822800",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_581/0028_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "tion is frivolous within the meaning of 26 U.S.C. § 6702. This is precisely the kind of tax return the penalty was designed to discourage. The Senate Report on § 6702 expressly states that the “penalty will be immediately assessable against any individual filing a ‘return’ in which many or all of the line items are not fille",
"linked": false,
"weight": 4.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 5380,
"end": 5386,
"quote": "§ 7605",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "26 U.S.C. § 7605",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "5ba11fe4109a36bf",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_775/0265_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "modified Powell as to churches. More particularly the question is whether the Powell relevancy measure should apply or some measure of necessity was imposed by § 7605(c). This court has not decided the question and other courts of appeal have not agreed.\nThe disagreement goes also as to whether the “extent necessary” languag",
"linked": false,
"weight": 7.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 14154,
"end": 14160,
"quote": "§ 1415",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "20 U.S.C. § 1415",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "e1237a09dbf15f64",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_18/0060_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "s set forth in § 1415(b) and (c), as a matter of law the court had no subject matter jurisdiction to consider plaintiff-appellant’s fee application pursuant to § 1415(e)(4)(B). See Keene, 908 F.2d at 298. The stipulated settlement between W.G. and defendants-appellees cannot be used to induce the district court to exercise j",
"linked": false,
"weight": 7.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 16521,
"end": 16526,
"quote": "§ 933",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "33 U.S.C. § 933",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "db0ca4dd8276c73b",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_751/1398_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "orkers. See 33 U.S.C. § 933(i). If he sues for such negligence himself, he. is entitled to retain the excess of his recovery over the compensation payments, cf § 933(f), and if the employer sues as as-signee of the negligence claim, the recovery in excess of the compensation payments (less one-fifth of the total recovery) m",
"linked": false,
"weight": 8.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 21293,
"end": 21300,
"quote": "§ 1234a",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "20 U.S.C. § 1234a",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "991ced077dad87f8",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_478/0117_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "for repayment of improperly disbursed grant funds. See 20 U.S.C. § 1234a. When a recipient of a grant “has made an expenditure of funds that is not allowable,” § 1234a authorizes the Department to recover the misspent funds upon an administrative determination. Id. § 1234a(l). This provision makes no mention of loan programs,",
"linked": false,
"weight": 6.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 45991,
"end": 45996,
"quote": "§ 552",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "5 U.S.C. § 552",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "9e2daa83e677db11",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_245/0225_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Columbia",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": " the production of such law enforcement records or information ... could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.” Id. § 552(b)(7)(C). Both exemptions require agencies and reviewing courts to “balance the privacy interests that would be compromised by disclosure against the public in",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.75,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 20837,
"end": 20843,
"quote": "§ 1132",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "29 U.S.C. § 1132",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "e8a1cc1f84e24809",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_619/1457_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "butions if, say, the requirements of the diversity statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1332, are met. Though federal court jurisdiction cannot be hung on the ERISA hook under § 1132(a) if an action is brought other than by the Secretary or one credentialled as within the participant/beneficiary/fiduciary triad, entity status is nevertheles",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 29035,
"end": 29043,
"quote": "§ 1395ww",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "42 U.S.C. § 1395ww",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "8140f618f5dfc10a",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/clus/volume_605/1/index.html",
"court": "scotus",
"decade": "2020s",
"context": "gate, because neither vocational rehabilitation services nor continued Med- icaid coverage fts the description of a “supplementa[l] se- curity income” benefit. § 1395ww(d)(5)(F)(vi)(I) (emphasis added). And even beyond that self-evident point, none of Page Proof Pending Publication these benefts is housed “under subchapter XVI",
"linked": false,
"weight": 3.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code or exact section identity verified elsewhere in the same opinion; resolver canonical is correct",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 8110,
"end": 8116,
"quote": "§ 1158",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "8 U.S.C. § 1158",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "d36cd60794bb0063",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_656/1047_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "that materially affect the applicant’s eligibility for asylum or (2) extraordinary circumstances directly related to the delay in filing an application. Id. at § 1158(a)(2)(D); 8 C.F.R. § 1208.4(a)(4)®, (5). Here, the agency applied incorrect legal standards to both of these inquiries. And it erroneously concluded that Singh",
"linked": false,
"weight": 6.75,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 29672,
"end": 29680,
"quote": "§ 1395ww",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "42 U.S.C. § 1395ww",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "ab2ed6b6ee95db22",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/clus/volume_605/1/index.html",
"court": "scotus",
"decade": "2020s",
"context": "encies or private employment networks. See § 1320b–19. Because subchapter XI establishes the Ticket to Work program, it is not a beneft “under subchapter XVI.” § 1395ww(d)(5) (F)(vi)(I). Nor do any of subchapter XVI's other references to voca- tional rehabilitation services confer an SSI beneft. Section 1382d(a), for example, ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 3.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code or exact section identity verified elsewhere in the same opinion; resolver canonical is correct",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 12321,
"end": 12332,
"quote": "section 406",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "42 U.S.C. § 406",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "c4eaa158105c4ed9",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_370/1141_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "ore in the absence of controlling First Circuit precedent, this Court declines to assume the power in this context of its remand to award attorneys’ fees under section 406(b).\nDurant, 906 F.Supp. at 713.\nIn Hoffman v. Chater, 924 F.Supp. 117 (D.Kan.1996), the District Court relied on Durant in denying a motion for fees. The Hoffm",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code or exact section identity verified elsewhere in the same opinion; resolver canonical is correct",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 4355,
"end": 4360,
"quote": "§ 841",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "21 U.S.C. § 841",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "6fdf20ad8bd2afd3",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_737/1307_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": ".S.C. §§ 812 & 814(b)(1)(B). Trafficking in other such drugs carries a maximum sentence of only five years and $15,000. Although the maximum prison sentence in § 841(b)(6) matches that for trafficking in heroin, the maximum fine exceeds that applicable to those convicted of trafficking in heroin. Cf. 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A",
"linked": false,
"weight": 12.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 14070,
"end": 14082,
"quote": "section 2462",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "28 U.S.C. § 2462",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "aefc741586ef28d9",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_869/1117_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Southern District of New York",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "nalty, or forfeiture.’ ”); Richard L. Stone & Aron Jaroslawicz, Statute of Limitations on Actions Brought by SEC, N.Y.L.J., Oct. 24,1994, at 1 (concluding that section 2462 “applies to SEC-initiated federal suits”); Edward Brodsky, Statute of Limitations and Civil Enforcement, N.Y.L.J., Sept. 21, 1993, at 3, 6 (“Congress has expre",
"linked": false,
"weight": 6.2,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 5693,
"end": 5699,
"quote": "§ 1182",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "8 U.S.C. § 1182",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "c50fa7e677f2867f",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_422/0098_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "the United States without being admitted or paroled” under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(A)©. On January 7, 2000, the INS amended the Notice to Appear, withdrawing the § 1182(a)(6)(A)© charge and adding a charge under § 1182(a)(7)(A)(i)(I), which allows deportation of an alien who “is not in possession of a valid unexpired immigrant",
"linked": false,
"weight": 11.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 44518,
"end": 44527,
"quote": "Section 1",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "15 U.S.C. § 1",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "684a778497d6b6c4",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_159/1361_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "t ¶¶ 127, 132; cf. Lowell, 177 F.3d at 1229 (involving claims of a vertical price-fixing conspiracy under Section 1 of the Sherman. Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1). Unlike Section 1 of the Sherman Act, which makes unlawful “[ejvery contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce,” 1",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 32808,
"end": 32819,
"quote": "section 230",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "47 U.S.C. § 230",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "d999f77c0f12c0e5",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/cal-4th/volume_40/0033_01/index.html",
"court": "Supreme Court of California",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "The Committee notes that ISPs [Internet service providers] have successfully defended many lawsuits using section 230(c). The courts have correctly interpreted section 230(c), which was aimed at protecting against liability for such claims as negligence[.] (See, e.g., Doe v. America Online, 783 So.2d 1010 (Fla. 2001)) and defamat",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 9820,
"end": 9823,
"quote": "§ 1",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "15 U.S.C. § 1",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "5641e2b1042cc618",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_810/0795_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "and others entered into a “contract, combination * * *, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade.” 15 U.S.C. § 1. To sustain the jury’s finding that Hartz violated § 1, there must be evidence in the record that would lead a reasonable mind to conclude that Hartz and others had a “conscious commitment to a common scheme design",
"linked": false,
"weight": 6.4,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 1576,
"end": 1582,
"quote": "§ 1981",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "42 U.S.C. § 1981",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "730e3c93e8b809ca",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_339/1108_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama",
"decade": "1970s",
"context": "complaint to assert a cause of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 in addition to that under Title VII. The amendment was sought not on the premise that the ambit of § 1981 is broader than that of Title VII, but rather in hopes of extending the applicable period of limitations. It is undenied that there were employment practices d",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 2832,
"end": 2838,
"quote": "§ 1291",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "28 U.S.C. § 1291",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "9528ca75b16366f9",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_221/0357_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "dants as partial final judgments pursuant to Rule 54(b). Accordingly, the orders of dismissal of which Huminski seeks review are not now appealable pursuant to § 1291. Huminski contends that those orders are, however, appealable pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), which allows interlocutory appeals from orders that, inter al",
"linked": false,
"weight": 6.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 4221,
"end": 4227,
"quote": "§ 1988",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "42 U.S.C. § 1988",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "986b26cd969e3fca",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_875/0830_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "ause provided the predicate right. “By making such fee awards available [to Commerce Clause plaintiffs], the Court does not vindicate the purposes of § 1983 or § 1988, but merely shifts the balance of power away from the States and toward interstate businesses.” Dennis v. Higgins, 498 U.S. 439, 464, 111 S.Ct. 865, 879 (Kenne",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 10400,
"end": 10412,
"quote": "section 1983",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "42 U.S.C. § 1983",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "cfd188f5aa057529",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_93/1201_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "ents, the Court will, for the sake of clarity, discuss only the Title YII claims, but notes that the outcome is the same for the corresponding section 1981 and section 1983 claims. The Court will address plaintiffs claims in reverse chronological order, starting with the conditional promotion. First, however, a discussion of the a",
"linked": false,
"weight": 2.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 435,
"end": 446,
"quote": "Section 174",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "21 U.S.C. § 174",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "6c0bda584a059356",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_453/0932_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit",
"decade": "1970s",
"context": "ired by 26 U.S.C. § 4705(a); in addition, Castanon appeals from his conviction under an eleventh count in which he and one Lujan were separately charged with a Section 174 violation, allegedly committed several months after those specified in the earlier counts.\n•None of the errors assigned has merit or possesses sufficient subst",
"linked": false,
"weight": 6.333333333333333,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 17956,
"end": 17962,
"quote": "§ 1821",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "12 U.S.C. § 1821",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "b34359e0e53ae341",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_13/1247_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "terest of simplicity, we will refer only to \"the statute,\" which for the purposes of this appeal is § 1823(e) although the district court incorrectly relied on § 1821(n)(4)(I). We find that here it makes no substantive difference which section the district court relied upon.\n. Section 1823(e) states:\n(e) Agreements against i",
"linked": false,
"weight": 6.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 17896,
"end": 17902,
"quote": "§ 1823",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "12 U.S.C. § 1823",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "4e7074798f696938",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_13/1247_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "uage is essentially identical in the two statutes. In the interest of simplicity, we will refer only to \"the statute,\" which for the purposes of this appeal is § 1823(e) although the district court incorrectly relied on § 1821(n)(4)(I). We find that here it makes no substantive difference which section the district court rel",
"linked": false,
"weight": 6.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 7974,
"end": 7985,
"quote": "Section 531",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "47 U.S.C. § 531",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "9ae2e1624247ef58",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_893/0264_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Southern District of New York",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": ", or governmental use of channel capacity, whether or not required by the franchising authority pursuant to subsection (b) of this section.\n47 U.S.C. § 531(c). Section 531(e) may be considered a “franchise requirement” when a specific franchise agreement explicitly incorporates federal law. However, when a franchise agreement fai",
"linked": false,
"weight": 6.2,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 3889,
"end": 3894,
"quote": "§ 552",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "5 U.S.C. § 552",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "eafc35e349494065",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_410/0999_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin",
"decade": "1970s",
"context": " records shall be deemed exhausted when the time limits for compliance with a request established by § 552(a)(6)(A) have lapsed. The judicial review provision, § 552(a)(4)(B) calls for de novo review of a refusal to disclose records and casts upon the agency the burden of sustaining its claims to exemption. Reading these pr",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 41714,
"end": 41719,
"quote": "§ 406",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "42 U.S.C. § 406",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "9de034ae0fe9c435",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_924/0416_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "the amount of attorneys’ fees that HHS can withhold for direct payment to the claimant's attorney. 42 U.S.C. § 406(a)(4)(A). Paragraph 4 is the only portion of § 406(a) not incorporated under Title XVI by 42 U.S.C. § 1383(d)(2)(A). See supra note 2. Likewise, the regulations promulgated pursuant to Title XVI do not contain ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 7.5,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 13826,
"end": 13834,
"quote": "§ 1395ww",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "42 U.S.C. § 1395ww",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "d206e43212ef66d0",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/clus/volume_605/1/index.html",
"court": "scotus",
"decade": "2020s",
"context": "an effciently run hospital, in the same region, would expend Page Proof Pending Publication to treat a patient with the same diagnosis.” Id., at 429 (cit- ing §§ 1395ww(d)(1)–(4) and 42 CFR § 412.2 (2022)). Because the fxed-rate payment is provided “regardless of the hospi- tal's actual costs,” it “gives hospitals an incentive",
"linked": false,
"weight": 3.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code or exact section identity verified elsewhere in the same opinion; resolver canonical is correct",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 34158,
"end": 34164,
"quote": "§ 1144",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "29 U.S.C. § 1144",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "45bc40b4477868cf",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_12/0556_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "y and all State laws insofar as they may now or hereafter relate to any employee benefit plan_”29 U.S.C. § 1144(a). State-law causes of action are preempted by § 1144(a) if (1) the state law claim addresses an area of exclusive federal concern, such as the right to receive benefits under the terms of an ERISA plan; and (2) t",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 959,
"end": 964,
"quote": "§ 924",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "18 U.S.C. § 924",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "f4c8a5a5f68f83c8",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_997/1426_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "ound that Brame was subject to the sentence enhancement provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). Since Brame was subject to an enhancement of his sentence pursuant to § 924(e), the district court applied U.S.S.G. § 4B1.4 in calculating Brame’s offense level. U.S.S.G. § 4B1.4 provides three alternative methods for calculating the o",
"linked": false,
"weight": 7.666666666666667,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 468,
"end": 474,
"quote": "§ 5851",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "26 U.S.C. § 5851",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "41464c1a93083eaa",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_292/0757_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Delaware",
"decade": "1960s",
"context": " has moved to suppress evidence on the ground that it is the fruit of a search incident to an unlawful arrest, and to dismiss the indictment on the ground that § 5851 violates his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. The government and defendant have stipulated, with regard to defendant’s motion to suppress ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 2.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 797,
"end": 803,
"quote": "§ 1981",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "42 U.S.C. § 1981",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "fc7abb9269c9696c",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_452/0394_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Southern District of New York",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "rdham retaliated against her for filing charges of discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”), in further violation of Title VII, § 1981, and New York law. Last, Bush asserts a state law claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress.\nDefendant moved for summary judgment [41], For the re",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.666666666666667,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 13207,
"end": 13215,
"quote": "§ 1395ww",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "42 U.S.C. § 1395ww",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "565b1870eea86056",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/clus/volume_605/1/index.html",
"court": "scotus",
"decade": "2020s",
"context": "); alter- ation in original). We did not decide, however, what it means to be “entitled to supplementary security income ben- efts . . . under subchapter XVI.” § 1395ww(d)(5)(F)(vi)(I). Today, we hold that a person is entitled to such benefts when she is eligible to receive a cash payment during the month of her hospitalizatio",
"linked": false,
"weight": 3.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 5651,
"end": 5662,
"quote": "Section 402",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "18 U.S.C. § 402",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "0f1988752f5d4faf",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_104/1059_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "sleading testimony” in the Altuve trial. Petition, Exhibit A (Sept. 5, 1995 Information). These charges did not fit the facts of Mercado’s case exactly because Section 402, by its terms, applies to neither “con-tempts committed in the presence of the court” nor “contempts committed in disobedience of any lawful act, process, orde",
"linked": false,
"weight": 4.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 4228,
"end": 4234,
"quote": "§ 3143",
"pattern": "statute_short",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "18 U.S.C. § 3143",
"reason": "unique same-paragraph full USC antecedent",
"id": "03baf938e529f784",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_763/1321_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of the Virgin Islands",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "r Presentence Detention:\nTitle 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a) governs the court’s decision to detain or release a defendant pending sentence. The applicable subsection is § 3143(a)(2), which states that a person who has been found guilty of an offense of a crime of violence and is awaiting imposition of sentence “shall ... be detained ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "full title/code antecedent appears nearby",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "citation"
},
{
"start": 9771,
"end": 9778,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Texas Abandoned Motor Vehicle Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "be58fdf51a903868",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/sw2d/volume_879/0152_01/index.html",
"court": "Texas Courts of Appeals",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "trial court concluded that the Act applied to the case and that appellants, rather than treating the Mazda as an abandoned vehicle subject to the provisions of the Act, improperly tried to foreclose an alleged ga-rageman’s lien pursuant to the provisions of the Texas Property Code. Therefore, the court concluded that the sale",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.2105263157894735,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 13246,
"end": 13253,
"quote": "the ACT",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Consumer Product Safety Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "aecdcdd38e4c0bfe",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_898/1452_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "Product Safety Act (Act). In their eighth cause of action, the Kloepfers alleged that the ATV involved in the accident contained certain defects and that under the ACT, Honda was required to inform the Consumer Products Safety Commission (CPSC) of the alleged defects. The Kloepfers further alleged that Honda’s failure to comp",
"linked": false,
"weight": 6.5,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 9597,
"end": 9604,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Texas Abandoned Motor Vehicle Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "4bdccc5f7d35740d",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/sw2d/volume_879/0152_01/index.html",
"court": "Texas Courts of Appeals",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "nclusions pertaining to Tex.Rev.Civ. Stat.Ann. art. 4477-9a (Vernon Supp.1994). Article V of article 4477-9a is known as the Texas Abandoned Motor Vehicle Act (the Act). The trial court concluded that the Act applied to the case and that appellants, rather than treating the Mazda as an abandoned vehicle subject to the provisi",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.2105263157894735,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 5178,
"end": 5185,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Colorado Ski Safety Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "bd006b65b9b58201",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_23/1327_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Colorado",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "ying that Defendant’s Reply would specifically address the Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 34.)\nII. DISCUSSION\nThe parties agree that the Colorado Ski Safety Act (“the Act”) applies in this case and that under the Act, Mr. Bazarewski is a “skier,” Beaver Creek is a “ski area,” and The Vail Corporation is a “ski area operator.” (E",
"linked": false,
"weight": 4.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 710,
"end": 717,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: National Labor Relations Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "56cd44abe8e99759",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_442/1067_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit",
"decade": "1970s",
"context": "ith, restrained and coerced its employees in violation of § 8 (a) (1) of the Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a) (l), and that the Company violated § 8(a) (1) and (3) of the Act, 29 U.S. C.A. § 158(a) (1) and (3), by withholding wage increases from the bargaining unit represented by the Union.\nThe instant controversy began when the Int",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.545454545454546,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 1066,
"end": 1073,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Social Security Disability Benefits Reform Act of 1984",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "ce5311509ad51d5e",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_658/0670_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "at the relief requested by plaintiff was achieved not by the filing of his suit, but rather by a change in the law. Specifically, the government maintains that the Act itself ordered remand of plaintiff’s case to the Secretary and that the agency’s subsequent reinstatement of benefits was due to their reevaluation of his clai",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 5573,
"end": 5580,
"quote": "The Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Colorado Ski Safety Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "d5fc54e59d9a791c",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_23/1327_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Colorado",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "im against or recover from any ski area operator for injury resulting from any of the inherent dangers and risks of skiing.” Colo. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 33-44-112. The Act strives “to further define the legal responsibilities of ski area operators and their agents and employees; to define the responsibilities existing between the",
"linked": false,
"weight": 4.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 11868,
"end": 11875,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Health Insurance for the Aged Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "124c021029cb59e3",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_582/0425_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "ospital and Southside ask for summary judgment on Dr. Mays’ antitrust and defamation claims, as well as his claims under the Health Insurance for the Aged Act (the Act). Summary judgment is proper “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show tha",
"linked": false,
"weight": 2.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 16550,
"end": 16557,
"quote": "The Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Workers’ Compensation Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "2ed1ca4a619cbcdf",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/ill-app-3d/volume_271/0662_01/index.html",
"court": "Illinois Appellate Court",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "bility payments must submit, if requested by the employer, to an examination by a medical practitioner selected by the employer. (820 ILCS 305/12 (West 1992).) The Act further provides that the examining doctor has a duty\n\"to deliver to the injured employee, or his representative, a statement in writing of the condition and e",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.266666666666667,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 610,
"end": 617,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Texas Workers' Compensation Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "21f92eddc02c5273",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/sw3d/volume_562/0069_01/index.html",
"court": "Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "Mesquite Logistics USA, Inc.'s motion to dismiss based on Berrelez's failure to exhaust her administrative remedies under the Texas Workers' Compensation Act (\"the Act\"). On appeal, Berrelez contends she was not required to exhaust administrative remedies because her claims are subject to the \"personal animosity\" exception in",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 803,
"end": 810,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Texas Workers' Compensation Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "9243555bfe9c10db",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/sw3d/volume_562/0069_01/index.html",
"court": "Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "ntends she was not required to exhaust administrative remedies because her claims are subject to the \"personal animosity\" exception in section 406.032(1)(C) of the Act, and therefore, she was outside the course and scope of her employment at the time of her injury. We affirm the order of dismissal.\nBACKGROUND\nBerrelez was emp",
"linked": false,
"weight": 1.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 291,
"end": 298,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "092158e04b38f70c",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/ill-app-3d/volume_265/0976_01/index.html",
"court": "Illinois Appellate Court",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "lin, to petitioner, Margaret McGowan, the trial court excluded from the statutory guidelines provided in the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (the Act) (750 ILCS 5/101 et seq. (West 1992)) certain allowances paid to respondent by reason of his employment as an active member of the United States armed forces. ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.266666666666667,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 558,
"end": 565,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Immigration and Nationality Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "e8450f6cd8e7f43a",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_548/0325_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit",
"decade": "1970s",
"context": "deportability and claims he was wrongfully precluded from applying to the Attorney General for a discretionary waiver of ex-cludability under section 212(c) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(c). Vissian also contends the Board erred in concluding that even if he was eligible to apply for a waiver, a favorable exercise of discretion",
"linked": false,
"weight": 9.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 623,
"end": 630,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: National Labor Relations Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "f3bb09dd68695ee2",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_442/1067_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit",
"decade": "1970s",
"context": "erating Engineers, AFL-CIO. In addition, the Board determined that Chevron interfered with, restrained and coerced its employees in violation of § 8 (a) (1) of the Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a) (l), and that the Company violated § 8(a) (1) and (3) of the Act, 29 U.S. C.A. § 158(a) (1) and (3), by withholding wage increases from t",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.545454545454546,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 349,
"end": 356,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: National Labor Relations Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "ed5da346296999cb",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_442/1067_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit",
"decade": "1970s",
"context": "luded that Petitioner, Chevron Oil Company, Standard Oil Company of Texas Division, had refused in violation of § 8(a) (5) of the National Labor Relations Act (the Act), 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a) (5), to bargain in good faith with Respondent, Local 826, International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO. In addition, the Board de",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.545454545454546,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 10345,
"end": 10352,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Social Security Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "39c9aabd50a155fd",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_990/1259_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Oregon",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "upplemental security income benefits (SSI) may be available to individuals who are age 65 or over, blind, or disabled, but who do not have insured status under the Act. 42 U.S.C. § 1382(a).\nThe burden of proof to establish a disability rests upon the claimant. Gomez v. Chater, 74 F.3d 967, 970 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.",
"linked": false,
"weight": 3.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 5224,
"end": 5231,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Colorado Ski Safety Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "e2bb339c77f79f83",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_23/1327_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Colorado",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": " address the Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 34.)\nII. DISCUSSION\nThe parties agree that the Colorado Ski Safety Act (“the Act”) applies in this case and that under the Act, Mr. Bazarewski is a “skier,” Beaver Creek is a “ski area,” and The Vail Corporation is a “ski area operator.” (ECF NO. 22 at 2.) The Act provides that, “[N]o ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 4.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 10174,
"end": 10181,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Social Security Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "22e1006dc893957f",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_990/1259_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Oregon",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "B) to people who have contributed to the Social Security program and who suffer from a physical or mental disability. 42 U.S.C. § 423(a)(1). In addition, under the Act,, supplemental security income benefits (SSI) may be available to individuals who are age 65 or over, blind, or disabled, but who do not have insured status un",
"linked": false,
"weight": 3.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 19039,
"end": 19046,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Employee Patent Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "f63bc13633cc1503",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/ill-app-3d/volume_287/0957_01/index.html",
"court": "Illinois Appellate Court",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": " Employee Patent Act (Act). Assuming, arguendo, plaintiff had been allowed to amend his complaint, he would not have been able to state a cause of action under the Act, which provides, in part:\n\"A provision in an employment agreement which provides that an employee shall assign or offer to assign any of the employee’s rights ",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.266666666666667,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 13793,
"end": 13800,
"quote": "The Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Premises Liability Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "b8618c4f1b43fe0f",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/ill-app-3d/volume_160/0568_01/index.html",
"court": "Illinois Appellate Court",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": " 1985, ch. 80, par. 302), which abolished the distinction at common law between invitees and licensees as to the duty owed by an occupier or owner of premises. The Act, which imposes a duty of reasonable care under the circumstances, became effective September 12, 1984. The occurrence in question occurred January 10, 1984. We",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.266666666666667,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 1183,
"end": 1190,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Workers’ Compensation Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "2df59a1e1547c5f7",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/ill-app-3d/volume_233/0192_01/index.html",
"court": "Illinois Appellate Court",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": "ission) reversed the arbitrator’s award of medical expenses, holding that claimant’s application for benefits was untimely under the Workers’ Compensation Act (the Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 48, par. 138.1 et seq.). Claimant appealed the Commission’s decision to the circuit court, which confirmed the Commission’s decisio",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.266666666666667,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 13966,
"end": 13973,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Premises Liability Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "d3dc34e373b00366",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/ill-app-3d/volume_160/0568_01/index.html",
"court": "Illinois Appellate Court",
"decade": "1980s",
"context": "h imposes a duty of reasonable care under the circumstances, became effective September 12, 1984. The occurrence in question occurred January 10, 1984. We hold the Act is not to be applied retroactively. O’Donnell v. Electro-Motive Division of the General Motors Corp. (1986), 148 Ill. App. 3d 627, 499 N.E.2d 608; Lorek v. Hol",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.266666666666667,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 5882,
"end": 5889,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Colorado Ski Safety Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "1ce20cc2b7608c0c",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-3d/volume_23/1327_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Colorado",
"decade": "2010s",
"context": "isting between the skier and the ski area operator and between skiers.” Kumar v. Copper Mountain, Inc., 431 Fed.Appx. 736, 737 (10th Cir.2011). Kumar held that the Act “expressly bars ‘any claim’ based on an injury caused by [an inherent risk].” 431 Fed.Appx. at 738 (emphasis in original) (citation omitted).\nThe Act defines t",
"linked": false,
"weight": 4.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 14297,
"end": 14304,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Legal Arizona Workers Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "912eddf8218783ef",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp-2d/volume_526/0968_01/index.html",
"court": "United States District Court for the District of Arizona",
"decade": "2000s",
"context": "more easily identify identity fraud, has been extended to all users. (Facts, Ex. 22B at 3-4.)\nII. The Legal Arizona Workers Act\nThe Legal Arizona Workers Act (“the Act”), A.R.S. § 23-211 through 23-214 (Supp.2007), is a conscious State attempt to impose sanctions by “licensing and similar laws” upon those who employ unauthori",
"linked": false,
"weight": 3.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 9638,
"end": 9645,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Texas Abandoned Motor Vehicle Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "8d61abc83ceadb48",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/sw2d/volume_879/0152_01/index.html",
"court": "Texas Courts of Appeals",
"decade": "1990s",
"context": ".Ann. art. 4477-9a (Vernon Supp.1994). Article V of article 4477-9a is known as the Texas Abandoned Motor Vehicle Act (the Act). The trial court concluded that the Act applied to the case and that appellants, rather than treating the Mazda as an abandoned vehicle subject to the provisions of the Act, improperly tried to forec",
"linked": false,
"weight": 5.2105263157894735,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 212,
"end": 219,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Immigration and Nationality Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "382c1e235109ad1b",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_548/0325_01/index.html",
"court": "United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit",
"decade": "1970s",
"context": " of a final order of deportation entered by the Board of Immigration Appeals (the Board) pursuant to section 241(a)(ll) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. § 1251(a)(11), following his conviction in Australia for importation of marijuana and cocaine. Vissian does not challenge the factual basis for this",
"linked": false,
"weight": 9.0,
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"sample_kind": "main_audit_precision",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 1540,
"end": 1547,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: National Labor Relations Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "d9d456426f56cf08",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_373/0127_01/index.html",
"context": "distribution center employees” at both facilities. Because the company planned to consolidate and transfer its operations to Lebanon, Indiana, it argued that holding an election would not effectuate the purposes of the National Labor Relations Act (“the Act”). The NLRB’s Regional Director found that the intended relocation did not render an immediate election inappropriate and ordered an election.\nThe Board denied the company’s Request for Review of the Regional Director’s Decision and Direction of Ele",
"html_sha256": "fba6e4a650af703a8df91033211e86690eb0f5025c04d835cd6a5c2d2ebc8add",
"opinion_sha256": "63b7872746c11f1d1f231987ec8b8c278b926d37a1d659022b92c208e899e2de",
"sample_kind": "supplemental_precision_only",
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 313,
"end": 320,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Interstate Commerce Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "f3f0c46c4405f80e",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f2d/volume_669/0219_01/index.html",
"context": " for review of an Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) order declaring an ocean terminal facility owned by intervenor Florida East Coast Railway (FEC) to be a “line of railroad” within the meaning of former section la of the Interstate Commerce Act (the Act) (now codified at 49 U.S.C. § 10903 (Supp.1979)) and thus subject to ICC jurisdiction. The City presents three alternative arguments: the ICC had no authority to declare FEC’s ocean terminal a “line of railroad” because a petition for permission to ",
"html_sha256": "f6b37453f3b0bbb3db828274fa7f30ff4a344eaa60303ad9b1a485e9dbd5f7fd",
"opinion_sha256": "9692feec6fb5c31a0c4a839ff8eee9fdfe4bf8955087ad77e28f7cf7ce300112",
"sample_kind": "supplemental_precision_only",
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 3557,
"end": 3564,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "01b59e4a59eeadf4",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/ill-app-3d/volume_214/0156_01/index.html",
"context": "the proof was insufficient to show that the parties lived separate and apart in excess of two years or that the marriage was irretrievably broken down, as required by the “no-fault” provision of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (the Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 40, par. 401(a)(2)). It is respondent’s position that the “living separate and apart” ground for dissolution set forth in section 401(a)(2) of the Act requires that spouses live physically separate and apart for two years",
"html_sha256": "e22ecabb66b047f10c07c3aab8adc6acfa75409032aecc3117c3d9734172c834",
"opinion_sha256": "4a328ed87ffdfae8197b5817431813d09481e49c6c89ac0fd890d644b8fdfcbb",
"sample_kind": "supplemental_precision_only",
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 3736,
"end": 3743,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "644787a3d73a8ad3",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/ill-app-3d/volume_214/0156_01/index.html",
"context": "t” provision of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (the Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 40, par. 401(a)(2)). It is respondent’s position that the “living separate and apart” ground for dissolution set forth in section 401(a)(2) of the Act requires that spouses live physically separate and apart for two years. Respondent urges this court to reject the holding in In re Marriage of Kenik (1989), 181 Ill. App. 3d 266, that the state of “living separate and apart” can be realized without ",
"html_sha256": "e22ecabb66b047f10c07c3aab8adc6acfa75409032aecc3117c3d9734172c834",
"opinion_sha256": "4a328ed87ffdfae8197b5817431813d09481e49c6c89ac0fd890d644b8fdfcbb",
"sample_kind": "supplemental_precision_only",
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 401,
"end": 408,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Workers’ Compensation Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "31a2de1a707e7f01",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/ill-app-3d/volume_221/0457_01/index.html",
"context": "his first amended complaint. The court held that plaintiff’s cause of action was barred by the exclusive remedy provision of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 48, par. 138.1 et seq.). Plaintiff argues in this appeal that the Act does not foreclose a common-law cause of action. We affirm.\nCount I of plaintiff’s first amended complaint alleged that he was employed by defendant Dixon Publishing Company, d/b/a Dixonweb Printing Co. (Dixonweb). On May 15, 1985, plaintiff suffere",
"html_sha256": "4b356acc127823069ee20b16abc697177310d6cc35de8678a4987701682e600c",
"opinion_sha256": "fae9d2a5a82ec65a8162aad7dd7e146aa17ac36f0d8a612c27ccbdd55068df61",
"sample_kind": "supplemental_precision_only",
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 6165,
"end": 6172,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Post-Conviction Hearing Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "1b558968991c2c19",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/ill-2d/volume_205/0247_01/index.html",
"context": "s second death penalty hearing is presented in detail in our opinion on defendant’s direct appeal and will not be recounted here. We will discuss only those facts necessary to the disposition of this appeal.\nANALYSIS\nThe Post-Conviction Hearing Act (the Act) (725 ILCS 5/122 — 1 et seq. (West 2000)) is a statutory vehicle which provides criminal defendants with an opportunity to obtain relief from substantial violations of their federal or state constitutional rights that occurred at trial or sentencing",
"html_sha256": "7c03f824436fc957b37de266d67c46219d4f73aacafc30f67e01cc822d8605a1",
"opinion_sha256": "8e7bf0e9f990aa8cc4e67c0a08caa342ad7d6d6196fa1e838cfbc18ab1d6605b",
"sample_kind": "supplemental_precision_only",
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 6493,
"end": 6500,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Post-Conviction Hearing Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "c673d40f95e9dc40",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/ill-2d/volume_205/0247_01/index.html",
"context": " provides criminal defendants with an opportunity to obtain relief from substantial violations of their federal or state constitutional rights that occurred at trial or sentencing. People v. Towns, 182 Ill. 2d 491, 502 (1998). A petition filed under the Act is not an appeal, but a collateral attack on the judgment of conviction or sentence. People v. Edwards, 195 Ill. 2d 142 (2001); People v. Williams, 186 Ill. 2d 55, 62 (1999). Consequently, the purpose of a post-conviction proceeding is not to determ",
"html_sha256": "7c03f824436fc957b37de266d67c46219d4f73aacafc30f67e01cc822d8605a1",
"opinion_sha256": "8e7bf0e9f990aa8cc4e67c0a08caa342ad7d6d6196fa1e838cfbc18ab1d6605b",
"sample_kind": "supplemental_precision_only",
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 4219,
"end": 4226,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "30e7fa0bfe8edb7d",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/ill-app-3d/volume_108/0083_01/index.html",
"context": "ly, the defendant contends that the trial court erred in that the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (Act) is not applicable to transactions between a mobile home park landlord and tenant. We note, however, that the applicability of the Act was never clearly raised before the trial court; therefore, it may be considered waived. (Kravis v. Smith Marine, Inc. (1975), 60 Ill. 2d 141, 147.) However, because the issue is one of public importance concerning a matter of statutory interpretati",
"html_sha256": "778ab104df51e480e98c20bdba2782dfd9b42f672bc71c5a5619ed3d8ce1ac4d",
"opinion_sha256": "5fbbd985b8b8c9d5fb392a118cff213e44b54f3b3ff9a5b04068cf4582aa3ca4",
"sample_kind": "supplemental_precision_only",
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 184,
"end": 191,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Contribution Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "7a2802bf6ba88525",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/ill-app-3d/volume_308/0348_01/index.html",
"context": "\nJUSTICE CAHILL\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nWe are asked to decide whether the settlement of a property damage lawsuit can pass the good-faith test under the Contribution Act (the Act) (740 ILCS 100/2(c) (West 1996)) when the plaintiff, as a condition of the settlement agreement, assigns his cause of action to the defendant. We conclude that this kind of settlement undermines the policy of the Act and reverse.\nIn an earlier revie",
"html_sha256": "8c1feace4f9d1e17ec3e5055693b79548ee3d44764636cfd0add02c5b4438fe8",
"opinion_sha256": "2e4e406a317a88d7f0cf6ef61b95a338f1c7cf174d5f69a0c8888a244e94c172",
"sample_kind": "supplemental_precision_only",
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 401,
"end": 408,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Contribution Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "0be3c001c43acaf2",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/ill-app-3d/volume_308/0348_01/index.html",
"context": "test under the Contribution Act (the Act) (740 ILCS 100/2(c) (West 1996)) when the plaintiff, as a condition of the settlement agreement, assigns his cause of action to the defendant. We conclude that this kind of settlement undermines the policy of the Act and reverse.\nIn an earlier review of this case, we dismissed the appeal of defendant Litgen Concrete Cutting and Coring Company (Litgen) for lack of jurisdiction. See Dubina v. Mesirow Realty Development, Inc., 283 Ill. App. 3d 36, 669 N.E.2d 694 (1",
"html_sha256": "8c1feace4f9d1e17ec3e5055693b79548ee3d44764636cfd0add02c5b4438fe8",
"opinion_sha256": "2e4e406a317a88d7f0cf6ef61b95a338f1c7cf174d5f69a0c8888a244e94c172",
"sample_kind": "supplemental_precision_only",
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 3970,
"end": 3977,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Post-Conviction Hearing Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "447c0b86b92942cd",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/ill-app-3d/volume_249/0797_01/index.html",
"context": "ering the plea. Since defendant’s post-conviction petition raises issues collateral to the waiver of his right to file a post-conviction petition, we will review defendant’s appeal on the merits.\nSection 122 — 2.1 of the Post-Conviction Hearing Act (the Act), in effect at the time deféndant filed his petition for post-conviction relief, requires the court to examine the petition and enter an order “[wjithin 30 days after the filing and docketing of each petition.” (Emphasis added.) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 199",
"html_sha256": "4bc4a156260c49f488c159903bbd0c5d79ee2c1fc82e45ee55574932bfa1ef3a",
"opinion_sha256": "e1be0d9f6cdb4659a54994654467f618f88a6bd3de70051bfa8cd345c338d53a",
"sample_kind": "supplemental_precision_only",
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 4602,
"end": 4609,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Post-Conviction Hearing Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "9ca91dc0276c6f9c",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/ill-app-3d/volume_249/0797_01/index.html",
"context": "g and docketing of a post-conviction petition, the court may enter an order dismissing a defendant’s petition as frivolous and patently without merit. If the petition is not dismissed, it must be docketed for further consideration in accordance with the Act. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 38, par. 122 — 2.1 (now codified, as amended, at 725 ILCS 5/122 — 2.1(a)(2) (West 1992)).\nOur supreme court has indicated that the 30-day rule set forth in section 122 — 2.1 is mandatory, not directory. (People v. Porter (",
"html_sha256": "4bc4a156260c49f488c159903bbd0c5d79ee2c1fc82e45ee55574932bfa1ef3a",
"opinion_sha256": "e1be0d9f6cdb4659a54994654467f618f88a6bd3de70051bfa8cd345c338d53a",
"sample_kind": "supplemental_precision_only",
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 12013,
"end": 12020,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Social Security Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "1613001f458d2f0f",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f3d/volume_198/0045_01/index.html",
"context": "vron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 842-43, 104 S.Ct. 2778, 81 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984), as are the regulations consistent with that view, since they are neither arbitrary nor capricious, nor manifestly contrary to the Act, see, e.g., Thomas Jefferson University v. Shalala, 512 U.S. 504, 512, 114 S.Ct. 2381, 129 L.Ed.2d 405 (1994); Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. at 844, 104 S.Ct. 2778. We are not persuaded to the contrary vi",
"html_sha256": "a2a665be5e068e5f0fba4de539770ab97ab840f4300d42956f7c79e59a800d2e",
"opinion_sha256": "7075ca0e11aa15a09b13b872af808e6b4ed6b29ed65712e1d18681a90924dde7",
"sample_kind": "supplemental_precision_only",
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 17066,
"end": 17073,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Religious Freedom Restoration Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "dee88efc2d090ca4",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/ill-app-3d/volume_302/0564_01/index.html",
"context": "ordinance does not enjoy presumptive validity (Columbus Park, 25 Ill. 2d at 71-72), and the burden of proof shifts to the city.\nIn its petition for rehearing, the Church brings to our attention House Bill 2370, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (the Act) (Pub. Act 90 — 806, eff. December 2, 1998). This act, signed by the Governor on December 4, 1998, applies retroactively and adopts the compelling interest test set out in Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205, 32 L. Ed. 2d 15, 92 S. Ct. 1526 (1972). The",
"html_sha256": "0ce32d5b123647799d49499ec72e90de0539952e6c9e667b94df2bafe9ba6c7c",
"opinion_sha256": "73bd7a10eb4d1c5aba9865b5e04e2c8c0a25d52c5e88e1c2aa97e115e976987c",
"sample_kind": "supplemental_precision_only",
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 17429,
"end": 17436,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Religious Freedom Restoration Act",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "8e7bd7ce33091226",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/ill-app-3d/volume_302/0564_01/index.html",
"context": "s retroactively and adopts the compelling interest test set out in Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205, 32 L. Ed. 2d 15, 92 S. Ct. 1526 (1972). The Church contends that since the Church’s right to free exercise of religion is burdened by the ordinance, the Act requires that the city meet the Yoder burden of proof: that the city’s interest in adoption of the zoning ordinance is compelling and that the ordinance is the least restrictive means of furthering that interest. We agree, but by applying the compel",
"html_sha256": "0ce32d5b123647799d49499ec72e90de0539952e6c9e667b94df2bafe9ba6c7c",
"opinion_sha256": "73bd7a10eb4d1c5aba9865b5e04e2c8c0a25d52c5e88e1c2aa97e115e976987c",
"sample_kind": "supplemental_precision_only",
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 7733,
"end": 7740,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Speedy Trial Act of 1974",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "b99895ed90be60ce",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_439/0352_01/index.html",
"context": "hatever justice might be found at trial. Under these circumstances it cannot be said that when the government indicated its notice of readiness for trial, it did not intend to immediately proceed.\nAny objection based on the Speedy Trial Act of 1974 (the Act), 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., and implementing post July 1, 1966 Southern District Plan for Prompt Disposition of Criminal Cases must also fail for much the same reasons. Pursuant to the provisions of the Act and the Plan a defendant such as Goldman ",
"html_sha256": "3f639291f496aa7520cf218eaf2a27f7ade46307f5a06a79a82933e95bb40d84",
"opinion_sha256": "69f79b856dda5c419dbbc61e1d9081bb9086371129ee67a4cb9efccf458b3fa8",
"sample_kind": "supplemental_precision_only",
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 7941,
"end": 7948,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Speedy Trial Act of 1974",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "a7255eeb9f2c7c64",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_439/0352_01/index.html",
"context": "on based on the Speedy Trial Act of 1974 (the Act), 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., and implementing post July 1, 1966 Southern District Plan for Prompt Disposition of Criminal Cases must also fail for much the same reasons. Pursuant to the provisions of the Act and the Plan a defendant such as Goldman is required to be tried within 180 days of the indictment, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(g); however, cases pending on July 1, 1976, the effective date of the Act, are to be tried within 180 days of July 1,1976. 18 U.S.C.",
"html_sha256": "3f639291f496aa7520cf218eaf2a27f7ade46307f5a06a79a82933e95bb40d84",
"opinion_sha256": "69f79b856dda5c419dbbc61e1d9081bb9086371129ee67a4cb9efccf458b3fa8",
"sample_kind": "supplemental_precision_only",
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
},
{
"start": 8132,
"end": 8139,
"quote": "the Act",
"pattern": "act_anaphor",
"status": "resolved",
"canonical": "Act: Speedy Trial Act of 1974",
"reason": "explicit parenthetical act binding",
"id": "5f4601ccaeab514c",
"url": "https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/f-supp/volume_439/0352_01/index.html",
"context": "l for much the same reasons. Pursuant to the provisions of the Act and the Plan a defendant such as Goldman is required to be tried within 180 days of the indictment, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(g); however, cases pending on July 1, 1976, the effective date of the Act, are to be tried within 180 days of July 1,1976. 18 U.S.C. § 3163(b)(2); Rule 5(a)(1) of the Statement of Time Limits and Procedures for Achieving Prompt Disposition of Criminal Cases (the local rules).\nNotwithstanding this requirement, certain peri",
"html_sha256": "3f639291f496aa7520cf218eaf2a27f7ade46307f5a06a79a82933e95bb40d84",
"opinion_sha256": "69f79b856dda5c419dbbc61e1d9081bb9086371129ee67a4cb9efccf458b3fa8",
"sample_kind": "supplemental_precision_only",
"correct": true,
"review_note": "Root inspected the explicit parenthetical Act binding in the source paragraph and this use of the alias. Identity is opinion-local; no jurisdiction/version/global-join inference.",
"identity_scope": "opinion"
}
]
}