Covered employer

Coverage and quality

0 annotation blocks; 0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases with counted merits instances; 0 excluded blocks.

Frozen DB: 165 case–law contexts. Source tree: 300 CASE files. This snapshot does not imply full current repository coverage.

Legal review status: unavailable to this view.

Counting rules and source integrity

Counted instances require applied citation role, merits scope, and a reached holding. Procedural, not-reached, comparator, and other context remains visible but is excluded from counts.

Source hash and exact-offset checks verify quotation integrity only; they do not establish legal correctness, model confidence, exhaustive coverage, or approval. Zero means no counted annotation in this snapshot.

Database snapshot SHA-256: b8882353247abdd6e20d4e22922c166d68ccb8e2da50e13e0162a35c316318f8. 3301 source quotations verified across this snapshot.

AND · 29usc158:employer

Coverage is cross-sectional; do not infer employee/employer status or commerce jurisdiction merely from a citation.

Exact element source

It shall be an unfair labor practice for an employer-

Source: docroot/ir/usc/title29.jsonl#title29_sec158; Unicode character offsets [68:121] (end exclusive); SHA-256 caadb20cedf4fd4e200812fc0ec46617cc7978ef7a6b0a30e355bccfeb7e0d06.

All variants

No variants recorded in this snapshot.

How courts decided this element

Annotation blocks, including explicitly excluded context
Case	Element	Holding and scope	Variant	Exact source quotations

Court interpretations