Covered employer

Coverage and quality

0 annotation blocks; 0 merits instance blocks; 0 distinct cases with counted merits instances; 0 excluded blocks.

Snapshot af6842b5 built from commit e3efe9e6 on 2026-11-10: 298 of 298 case files in the repository.

0 case–law pairs: 0 independently reviewed at the current content; 0 not currently independently reviewed. Reviewed does not mean PASS.

Small annotation samples do not establish prevalence, confidence or legal correctness.

Current authored case-instance annotations; superseded/rejected records and machine proposals are omitted (302 stored blocks).

Counting rules and source integrity

Counted instances require applied citation role, merits scope, and a reached holding. Procedural, not-reached, comparator, and other context remains visible but is excluded from counts.

Source checks verify quotation integrity only. Review badges identify their reports and freshness; a historical verdict is not approval of changed content.

Source commit: e3efe9e6a405f9a8d816ce67b3c7821d75e4c87b; built: 2026-11-10T20:10:54.760173+00:00. Database snapshot SHA-256: af6842b5b0e134d1b7b341363699a8853b47a22de70515f84038f10a0b59d0da. 5032 source quotations verified across this snapshot.

AND · 29usc158:employer

Coverage is cross-sectional; do not infer employee/employer status or commerce jurisdiction merely from a citation.

Exact element source

It shall be an unfair labor practice for an employer-

Source: docroot/ir/usc/title29.jsonl#title29_sec158; Unicode character offsets [68:121] (end exclusive); SHA-256 caadb20cedf4fd4e200812fc0ec46617cc7978ef7a6b0a30e355bccfeb7e0d06.

Routes and case patterns

No routes recorded for this element.

How courts decided this element

Annotation blocks, including explicitly excluded context
Case	Element	Holding and scope	Pattern	Exact source quotations

Court interpretations