Fraud in the sale of securities predicate (§ 1961(1)(D))

OR · 18usc1962:racketeering.securities-fraud

Criminal RICO and pre-PSLRA civil RICO include fraud in the sale of securities under § 1961(1)(D); note 18 U.S.C. § 1964(c) (added 1995) bars civil RICO claims relying on conduct actionable as securities fraud absent a criminal conviction.

Exact element source

racketeering activity
Source: docroot/ir/usc/title18.jsonl#title18_sec1962; Unicode character offsets [148:169] (end exclusive); SHA-256 6caae47f43b5ab0899b660616e298363bd36f9f540d915c2be11eb7126f5e27d.

All variants

Recorded DB variant labels, including zero-count variants
VariantDescriptionMerits instance blocksDistinct casesExample cases (up to 3 per group)
securities-fraud/false-prospectus-and-secret-purchase-arrangements0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 1
0No counted merits examples

Excluded context examples: /f2d/624/1118-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980 — applied/lower-court

How courts decided this element

Annotation blocks, including explicitly excluded context
CaseElementHolding and scopeVariantExact source quotations
/f2d/624/1118-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980Fraud in the sale of securities predicate (§ 1961(1)(D))satisfied
Excluded from merits counts
applied / lower-court

basis: proved; claim: (c); party: Weisman; count: 1973 public offering (nine securities counts); subject: party=Weisman; count=1973 public offering (nine securities counts)

Nine securities counts from one offering = ONE predicate act (district court's charge, not disturbed). Sufficiency not contested by Weisman. Jury verdict and district-court counting ruling, reported but not reviewed by the panel.
securities-fraud/false-prospectus-and-secret-purchase-arrangements
Weisman and his co-defendants filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a prospectus that contained false and misleading statements and that failed to disclose material facts, including DePalma’s and Fusco’s role in the project and their beneficial ownership of a large portion of the Theatre’s stock.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f2d_624.jsonl#/f2d/624/1118-01; Unicode character offsets [2258:2567] (end exclusive); SHA-256 9f02652be952ebf06fe5bc7850efdd6237ac4cd8110d7ce9690b75ad54eaa6ed.

Evidence kind: fact; polarity: supports; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

made secret arrangements through which various individuals agreed to purchase stock in the Theatre in return for promises of eventual cash payoffs, transfers of portions of Weis-man’s interest in the Theatre, and other forms of inducement or remuneration
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f2d_624.jsonl#/f2d/624/1118-01; Unicode character offsets [2783:3037] (end exclusive); SHA-256 9f02652be952ebf06fe5bc7850efdd6237ac4cd8110d7ce9690b75ad54eaa6ed.

Evidence kind: fact; polarity: supports; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

The district court concluded that the specific violations of securities laws charged elsewhere in the indictment could only constitute a single predicate act of racketeering because they arose “out of the same episode.”
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f2d_624.jsonl#/f2d/624/1118-01; Unicode character offsets [50990:51209] (end exclusive); SHA-256 9f02652be952ebf06fe5bc7850efdd6237ac4cd8110d7ce9690b75ad54eaa6ed.

Evidence kind: held; polarity: not recorded; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

Court interpretations

interpretation

This language is certainly broad enough on its face to include conspiracies involving securities and bankruptcy fraud and drug related offenses.

/f2d/624/1118-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980

This language is certainly broad enough on its face to include conspiracies involving securities and bankruptcy fraud and drug related offenses.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f2d_624.jsonl#/f2d/624/1118-01; Unicode character offsets [14879:15023] (end exclusive); SHA-256 9f02652be952ebf06fe5bc7850efdd6237ac4cd8110d7ce9690b75ad54eaa6ed.

Criminal RICO and pre-PSLRA civil RICO include fraud in the sale of securities under § 1961(1)(D); note 18 U.S.C. § 1964(c) (added 1995) bars civil RICO claims relying on conduct actionable as securities fraud absent a criminal conviction.