Identified offense in Subchapter I

AND · 21usc846:object-offense

Import/export conspiracies under section 963 are not automatically section 846 offenses. Drug type/quantity and defendant-specific penalty findings require the object statute and applicable circuit rules; none is imposed here as a universal element of all section 846 offenses.

Exact element source

to commit any offense defined in this subchapter
Source: docroot/ir/usc/title21.jsonl#title21_sec846; Unicode character offsets [66:114] (end exclusive); SHA-256 2e517c5d16d23f29a12a2ee674170178c593255445eb2bf7e8f112f4236ea1e1.

All variants

Recorded DB variant labels, including zero-count variants
VariantDescriptionMerits instance blocksDistinct casesExample cases (up to 3 per group)
distribution/admitted-recurring-methamphetamine-sales1
Satisfied 1; not satisfied 0; excluded context 0
1/f3d/932/1091-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019 — satisfied
distribution/agreementAgreement to distribute controlled substances; successful distribution is not required.0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 0
0No annotation uses in this snapshot
possession-with-intent/attemptIntent to possess a controlled substance for distribution plus strongly corroborative conduct.0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 0
0No annotation uses in this snapshot
Unspecified variantNo variant assigned in the database.0
Satisfied 0; not satisfied 0; excluded context 2
0No counted merits examples

Excluded context examples: /f3d/932/0176-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019 — background/procedural; /us/513/0010-01 — Supreme Court of the United States · 1994 — rule-announced/merits

How courts decided this element

Annotation blocks, including explicitly excluded context
CaseElementHolding and scopeVariantExact source quotations
/f3d/932/0176-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019Identified offense in Subchapter Inot_reached
Excluded from merits counts
background / procedural

The source decides access to material analogue evidence and remands; the stored charge description is procedural background, not proof of agreement or knowledge.
Unspecified variant
A federal jury convicted Benjamin Galecki and Charles Burton Ritchie ("Defendants") of charges related to a conspiracy to distribute controlled substance analogues.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f3d_932.jsonl#/f3d/932/0176-01; Unicode character offsets [21:185] (end exclusive); SHA-256 0c82c7f094e38f767e715c3747fe78c7143ba5296685729c8ea1b24467828dbe.

Evidence kind: fact; polarity: supports; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

In any further proceedings, the Government has the option to grant the Touhy request as to Dr. Berrier, dismiss the indictment, or endure a sanction.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f3d_932.jsonl#/f3d/932/0176-01; Unicode character offsets [52255:52404] (end exclusive); SHA-256 0c82c7f094e38f767e715c3747fe78c7143ba5296685729c8ea1b24467828dbe.

Evidence kind: held; polarity: not recorded; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

/f3d/932/1091-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019Identified offense in Subchapter Isatisfied
Counted merits instance
applied / merits

basis: proved; count: Count I conspiracy; subject: count=Count I conspiracy

The opinion separately reaches sufficiency after rejecting other trial objections. The object is identified through evidence of methamphetamine distribution, not merely the indictment caption.
distribution/admitted-recurring-methamphetamine-sales
During the interview, Mazzulla admitted that over the past two years he sold up to two ounces of methamphetamine per week to his employees.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f3d_932.jsonl#/f3d/932/1091-01; Unicode character offsets [2040:2179] (end exclusive); SHA-256 134fb3d6293d60034b50e328b2f8bc6338c96fa98b9411a4bc86a8b0b50fded8.

Evidence kind: fact; polarity: supports; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

Viewing the record in the light most favorable to the government, we are satisfied that the evidence supports the verdict on every count.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f3d_932.jsonl#/f3d/932/1091-01; Unicode character offsets [28848:28985] (end exclusive); SHA-256 134fb3d6293d60034b50e328b2f8bc6338c96fa98b9411a4bc86a8b0b50fded8.

Evidence kind: held; polarity: not recorded; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

/us/513/0010-01 — Supreme Court of the United States · 1994Identified offense in Subchapter Inot_reached
Excluded from merits counts
rule-announced / merits

Unspecified variantNo source quotation recorded for this block.

Court interpretations