·
Case and law context
Interpretation-only case: no CASE context or instance blocks recorded in this snapshot.
Instances and excluded annotation blocks
| Case | Element | Holding and scope | Variant | Exact source quotations |
|---|
Court interpretations recorded from this case
interpretation
§ 1964(c) (creating a private right of action, in federal district court, for "[a]ny person injured in his business or property by reason of a violation of section 1962 of this chapter").
§ 1964(c) (creating a private right of action, in federal district court, for "[a]ny person injured in his business or property by reason of a violation of section 1962 of this chapter").Source:
docroot/ir/caselaw/f_supp_3d_380.jsonl#/f-supp-3d/380/1031-01; Unicode character offsets [30068:30255] (end exclusive); SHA-256 88790a7a2b5207a13a0f41f4c5ea2fabac24d184e2e85a099b48bcb84714b89c.Unlike `pattern`, collection of an unlawful debt requires only a single collection of a debt arising from illegal gambling or usurious lending at >= 2x the enforceable rate (e.g. tribal payday lending cases such as Gibbs v. Haynes Invs.).
interpretation
§ 1964(c) (creating a private right of action, in federal district court, for "[a]ny person injured in his business or property by reason of a violation of section 1962 of this chapter").
§ 1964(c) (creating a private right of action, in federal district court, for "[a]ny person injured in his business or property by reason of a violation of section 1962 of this chapter").Source:
docroot/ir/caselaw/f_supp_3d_380.jsonl#/f-supp-3d/380/1031-01; Unicode character offsets [30068:30255] (end exclusive); SHA-256 88790a7a2b5207a13a0f41f4c5ea2fabac24d184e2e85a099b48bcb84714b89c.Damages must be concrete, clear, and definite (not speculative or unripe pending exhaustion of contractual/collateral remedies), and must be domestic under RJR Nabisco v. European Community (579 U.S. 325 (2016)).