·
Case and law context
Interpretation-only case: no CASE context or instance blocks recorded in this snapshot.
Instances and excluded annotation blocks
| Case | Element | Holding and scope | Variant | Exact source quotations |
|---|
Court interpretations recorded from this case
interpretation
Consequently, we vacate the district court’s derivative judgment in favor of defendants on Codrington’s claims under Monell v.
Consequently, we vacate the district court’s derivative judgment in favor of defendants on Codrington’s claims under Monell v.Source:
docroot/ir/caselaw/f4th_142.jsonl#/f4th/142/884; Unicode character offsets [2309:2435] (end exclusive); SHA-256 997b387c2c89f1d2c34461257739053b3dcd8941cb6ef00e0ce9f261c8d7c09a.Satisfied by (1) an express municipal policy, (2) a widespread practice/custom so permanent and well settled as to have the force of law, (3) an act of an official with final policymaking authority (Pembaur; Praprotnik), or (4) deliberate indifference in failure to train/supervise (`policy.failure-to-train`).