/f3d/932/0176-01

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019-07-29

Case and law context

Role: background; posture: Remand after conspiracy conviction; appeal focuses on materiality of excluded analogue evidence; result: remanded; claim:

Annotation blocks, including explicitly excluded context
Case	Element	Holding and scope	Variant	Exact source quotations
/f3d/932/0176-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019	Identified offense in Subchapter I	not_reached Excluded from merits counts background / procedural The source decides access to material analogue evidence and remands; the stored charge description is procedural background, not proof of agreement or knowledge.	Unspecified variant	A federal jury convicted Benjamin Galecki and Charles Burton Ritchie ("Defendants") of charges related to a conspiracy to distribute controlled substance analogues. Source: `docroot/ir/caselaw/f3d_932.jsonl#/f3d/932/0176-01`; Unicode character offsets [21:185] (end exclusive); SHA-256 `0c82c7f094e38f767e715c3747fe78c7143ba5296685729c8ea1b24467828dbe`. Evidence kind: fact; polarity: supports; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged) In any further proceedings, the Government has the option to grant the Touhy request as to Dr. Berrier, dismiss the indictment, or endure a sanction. Source: `docroot/ir/caselaw/f3d_932.jsonl#/f3d/932/0176-01`; Unicode character offsets [52255:52404] (end exclusive); SHA-256 `0c82c7f094e38f767e715c3747fe78c7143ba5296685729c8ea1b24467828dbe`. Evidence kind: held; polarity: not recorded; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)