United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi · 1992-04-30
Case and law context
Role: background; posture: Historical section 10(j) temporary injunction while alleged successor-employer refusal remained pending at the Board.; result: mixed; claim: (a)
Instances and excluded annotation blocks
| Case | Element | Holding and scope | Variant | Exact source quotations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| /f-supp/792/1459-01 — United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi · 1992 | Alternative breaches of applicable collective-bargaining duties | not_reached Excluded from merits counts background / procedural claim: (a); theory: section 10(j) interim bargaining; subject: theory=section 10(j) interim bargaining The court orders temporary bargaining, not a final ULP finding. Its 1992 reasonable-cause approach is historical; no present injunction-standard claim is made. | interim-relief/successor-recognition-dispute | On September 16, Union Staff Representative Rip Williamson responded to this letter with a request that Moeller Rubber recognize and bargain with the union.Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f_supp_792.jsonl#/f-supp/792/1459-01; Unicode character offsets [25252:25408] (end exclusive); SHA-256 ed7d04a7cb28f235026d6d7b085d40d7deca2112fb0461aaa25edb8d0795edeb.This request was refused in a letter from Brock dated October 8, 1991.Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f_supp_792.jsonl#/f-supp/792/1459-01; Unicode character offsets [25409:25479] (end exclusive); SHA-256 ed7d04a7cb28f235026d6d7b085d40d7deca2112fb0461aaa25edb8d0795edeb.In making a Section 10(j) determination, the district court may not decide whether an unfair labor practice has actually occurred, because this ultimate determination is reserved for the board, subject to review by the court of appeals.Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f_supp_792.jsonl#/f-supp/792/1459-01; Unicode character offsets [11246:11482] (end exclusive); SHA-256 ed7d04a7cb28f235026d6d7b085d40d7deca2112fb0461aaa25edb8d0795edeb.While interim bargaining is necessary to preserve the status quo, the latter part of the request reaches too far.Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f_supp_792.jsonl#/f-supp/792/1459-01; Unicode character offsets [23449:23562] (end exclusive); SHA-256 ed7d04a7cb28f235026d6d7b085d40d7deca2112fb0461aaa25edb8d0795edeb. |