/f2d/841/0141-01

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988-03-02

Original case on neochart.com

Case and law context

29 U.S.C. § 158(a)

Role: applied; posture: Board enforcement proceeding over requested identities of union officers seeking supervisory posts; disclosure/privacy and relevance objections resolved.; result: claimant-won; claim: (a)

Instances and excluded annotation blocks

Annotation blocks, including explicitly excluded context
CaseElementHolding and scopeVariantExact source quotations
/f2d/841/0141-01 — United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988Alternative breaches of applicable collective-bargaining dutiessatisfied
Counted merits instance
applied / merits

basis: law; claim: (a); theory: information disclosure; subject: theory=information disclosure

The duty is applied to specific relevant information; relevance and the employer’s privacy interests are balanced, not assumed from every union request.
information/refusal-to-identify-potentially-conflicted-representatives
Gene Cole, the Detroit MSC’s Postmaster, responded by letter and refused to provide the union with the information until its relevance to the collective bargaining process was explained.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f2d_841.jsonl#/f2d/841/0141-01; Unicode character offsets [6651:6837] (end exclusive); SHA-256 cdb9c687b3fe037ff5d885f593b297e4e0d36e897a91fa18b5affd0d1b33cf70.

Evidence kind: fact; polarity: supports; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

Generally, an employer’s duty to bargain collectively established in § 8(a)(5) of the National Labor Relations Act , obligates it to provide a labor union with relevant information necessary for the proper performance of the union’s duties as the employees’ bargaining representative.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f2d_841.jsonl#/f2d/841/0141-01; Unicode character offsets [8875:9159] (end exclusive); SHA-256 cdb9c687b3fe037ff5d885f593b297e4e0d36e897a91fa18b5affd0d1b33cf70.

Evidence kind: rule; polarity: not recorded; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

Therefore, we find that the union’s interest in the disclosure of the information is relevant to its duty to provide loyal representation and is not outweighed by the Postal Service's interest.
Source: docroot/ir/caselaw/f2d_841.jsonl#/f2d/841/0141-01; Unicode character offsets [17562:17755] (end exclusive); SHA-256 cdb9c687b3fe037ff5d885f593b297e4e0d36e897a91fa18b5affd0d1b33cf70.

Evidence kind: held; polarity: not recorded; absent flag: 0; quoted-rule flag: 0 (1 = tagged; 0 = not tagged)

Court interpretations recorded from this case