·
Case and law context
Interpretation-only case: no CASE context or instance blocks recorded in this snapshot.
Instances and excluded annotation blocks
| Case | Element | Holding and scope | Variant | Exact source quotations |
|---|
Court interpretations recorded from this case
interpretation
And faced with all these short- comings in the government’s submission, we cannot say it has carried its conceded burden of showing its prosecution of Mr. Hemani complies with the Second Amendment.
And faced with all these short- comings in the government’s submission, we cannot say it has carried its conceded burden of showing its prosecution of Mr. Hemani complies with the Second Amendment.Source:
docroot/ir/caselaw/clus_cl.jsonl#/cl/10876933; Unicode character offsets [49204:49401] (end exclusive); SHA-256 ddc3c7badaca411744cfb09e0eefa48fc95674d3448c1f5c6032881f91d5e9f2.Hemani (June 18, 2026), majority pp. 18-19, rejects automatically disarming this regular marijuana user based solely on that status under the government's historical-analogy theory. It reserves addicts, present intoxication, individualized dangerousness proof, particular dangerous drugs, and section 922(g)(1). This is an as-applied constitutional limitation, not textual deletion of status.g3 or a universal dangerousness element. It does not defeat liability independently established under a different prohibited status.