neochart v2 research

cases/21usc846/us-513-10-shabani.case

Source: cases/21usc846/us-513-10-shabani.case

Case source: https://www.neochart.com/catalog/cases/us/volume_513/0010_01/index.html

Verbatim annotated passages

In order to establish a violation of 21 U. S. C. § 846, the Government need not prove the commission of any overt acts in furtherance of the conspiracy.

Exact source text

casedsl 1

case /us/513/0010-01
  name United States v. Shabani
  cite 513 U.S. 10 (1994)
  court Supreme Court of the United States
  date 1994-11-01
  url catalog/cases/us/volume_513/0010_01/index.html
  source ir/caselaw/us_513.jsonl sha1=31f5a6ef12ff5fbe20dc5efd49875c85a9137ce2 chars=13253

law 21usc846
  role rule-announced
  posture Supreme Court review of whether §846 requires an overt act
  result remanded

element agreement : not-reached
  scope merits
  role rule-announced
  rule @8339..8491 | In order to establish a violation of 21 U. S. C. § 846, the Government need not prove the commission of any overt acts in furtherance of the conspiracy.
  gloss The Court announces the no-overt-act rule; it does not decide a defendant-specific sufficiency finding here.

element knowledge : not-reached
  scope merits

element intentional-joinder : not-reached
  scope merits

element object-offense : not-reached
  scope merits

misfit The Supreme Court announces that conspiracy does not require an overt act and reverses the Ninth Circuit rule; it does not adjudicate defendant-specific sufficiency. Attempt remains separate.
misfit Claimant outcome refers to the prosecuting government, not the defendant-appellant; remanded and mixed retain unresolved or split dispositions.